{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_mapedu","slug":"mapedu","name":"mapEDU","type":"product","url":"http://mapedu.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/mapedu","categories":["data-analysis"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_mapedu__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.healthcare.standards.aligned.curriculum.mapping","name":"healthcare-standards-aligned curriculum mapping","description":"Automatically maps learning objectives to assessment outcomes using domain-specific medical education frameworks (ACGME, GMC, RCPSC, etc.) embedded in the platform's knowledge base. The system uses structured competency taxonomies and alignment algorithms to validate that curriculum design meets regulatory and accreditation requirements without manual cross-referencing of standards documents. This differs from generic curriculum tools by pre-loading healthcare-specific competency hierarchies and validation rules.","intents":["I need to ensure my medical school curriculum aligns with ACGME competency domains without manually checking each learning objective","I want to map nursing program outcomes to specific regulatory standards and generate compliance documentation automatically","I need to identify gaps between what we're teaching and what accreditation bodies require"],"best_for":["Medical school curriculum coordinators managing ACGME-accredited programs","Nursing program directors aligning with CCNE or ACEN standards","Residency training coordinators ensuring competency-based curriculum design","Healthcare education administrators needing compliance audit trails"],"limitations":["Limited to pre-loaded healthcare standards; custom or emerging frameworks require manual configuration","Alignment rules are fixed to specific standard versions; updates to ACGME or GMC frameworks may require platform updates","No support for non-English healthcare education systems or regional standards outside major accreditation bodies","Requires educators to input curriculum data in platform-specific format; no bulk import from existing LMS systems"],"requires":["Active institutional subscription to mapEDU","Access to current healthcare education standards documentation (ACGME, GMC, etc.)","Curriculum data in structured format (learning objectives, assessment methods, competency domains)"],"input_types":["structured curriculum data (learning objectives, assessment types, competency mappings)","text descriptions of course outcomes","competency framework definitions"],"output_types":["alignment matrices (objectives × standards)","compliance reports with gap analysis","structured curriculum maps in exportable formats","accreditation documentation"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow","healthcare-education"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_mapedu__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.automated.exam.psychometric.analysis.and.item.quality.reporting","name":"automated exam psychometric analysis and item quality reporting","description":"Analyzes exam questions using classical test theory and item response theory metrics (difficulty index, discrimination index, point-biserial correlation, Cronbach's alpha) to identify problematic items and generate psychometric reports. The system processes student response data and question metadata to flag items with poor discrimination, excessive difficulty, or statistical anomalies that suggest flawed wording or answer key errors. This automates what typically requires manual statistical review by assessment specialists.","intents":["I need to identify which exam questions are confusing or poorly written without manually reviewing student performance data","I want to calculate item difficulty and discrimination statistics to improve future exam design","I need to generate psychometric reports for accreditation bodies showing exam quality metrics","I want to flag questions with answer key errors or ambiguous wording based on statistical patterns"],"best_for":["Medical school assessment coordinators reviewing board-style exams","Residency program directors analyzing in-training exam performance","Nursing educators evaluating NCLEX-style practice exams","Healthcare education programs needing psychometric documentation for accreditation"],"limitations":["Requires minimum sample size (typically 30+ test-takers) for reliable psychometric statistics; small cohorts produce unreliable metrics","Classical test theory metrics assume single-correct-answer formats; limited support for constructed-response or performance-based assessments","No built-in item banking or question pool management; requires external system for storing and retrieving exam items","Statistical analysis is descriptive only; does not provide prescriptive recommendations for item revision","Latency of 2-5 minutes for analysis of large exams (500+ items) due to statistical computation overhead"],"requires":["Exam response data (student answers, item IDs, correct answers) in CSV or structured format","Minimum 30 test-takers per exam for statistically valid analysis","Item metadata (question type, content domain, difficulty rating)","Active mapEDU subscription with exam analytics module"],"input_types":["exam response files (student ID, item ID, response, correct answer)","item metadata (question text, options, correct answer, content domain)","student demographic data (optional, for subgroup analysis)"],"output_types":["psychometric reports (difficulty index, discrimination index, point-biserial correlation)","item quality flags (problematic items highlighted)","reliability statistics (Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability estimates)","comparative analysis (item performance across cohorts or time periods)","exportable PDF reports for accreditation submission"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_mapedu__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.competency.outcome.alignment.validation.with.gap.detection","name":"competency-outcome alignment validation with gap detection","description":"Validates bidirectional alignment between learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessment methods using a structured mapping engine. The system checks that each competency is taught, practiced, and assessed; flags competencies with missing instructional coverage or assessment methods; and generates gap reports showing which competency domains lack adequate learning experiences. This uses a relational data model where competencies, learning activities, and assessments are linked and validated for completeness.","intents":["I need to ensure every competency we claim to teach is actually covered by at least one learning activity and one assessment","I want to identify which competencies are over-assessed or under-taught in our curriculum","I need to generate curriculum alignment reports showing coverage of all required competency domains","I want to detect orphaned learning activities that don't map to any competency or assessment"],"best_for":["Curriculum committees designing competency-based medical education programs","Program directors conducting curriculum reviews or accreditation self-studies","Healthcare education administrators managing multiple programs with different competency frameworks","Quality assurance teams auditing curriculum completeness"],"limitations":["Validation is structural only; does not assess quality or depth of learning experiences, only presence/absence","Requires manual input of curriculum data; no automatic extraction from existing course catalogs or LMS systems","Gap detection is binary (competency covered or not); does not quantify adequacy of coverage or suggest optimal number of learning experiences","No support for implicit or informal learning; only detects explicitly mapped activities","Alignment rules are fixed; customization of validation logic requires platform configuration or vendor support"],"requires":["Complete curriculum data including learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessment methods","Competency framework definition (list of competencies and hierarchical relationships)","Mapping between curriculum elements and competencies","Active mapEDU subscription"],"input_types":["competency framework (structured list with hierarchies)","learning objectives and course descriptions","instructional activity catalog (lectures, labs, clinical experiences, etc.)","assessment methods and rubrics","explicit mappings between curriculum elements and competencies"],"output_types":["alignment matrices (competencies × learning activities × assessments)","gap reports (competencies lacking coverage)","coverage statistics (% of competencies with complete teach-practice-assess cycle)","orphaned element reports (activities not mapped to competencies)","curriculum completeness scorecards"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_mapedu__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.exam.question.bank.organization.and.metadata.tagging","name":"exam question bank organization and metadata tagging","description":"Provides a structured repository for storing exam questions with automatic or manual tagging by content domain, competency, difficulty level, and question type. The system indexes questions using healthcare-specific taxonomies (e.g., ACGME competency domains, organ systems, clinical skills) and enables filtering and retrieval by multiple metadata dimensions. Questions can be tagged with learning objectives, assessment methods, and psychometric properties from prior administrations, creating a searchable knowledge base for exam construction.","intents":["I need a central repository for all exam questions with easy search and filtering by competency or content area","I want to tag questions with difficulty and discrimination data so I can build balanced exams","I need to prevent question reuse across different student cohorts while maintaining a question pool","I want to organize questions by ACGME domain or nursing competency for curriculum alignment"],"best_for":["Medical schools and residency programs managing large question banks (1000+ items)","Nursing programs building NCLEX-style question pools","Healthcare education programs with multiple exam writers needing centralized question management","Assessment coordinators tracking question usage and psychometric history"],"limitations":["No built-in question authoring interface; questions must be created externally and imported","Limited support for complex question types (case-based scenarios, image-based questions); primarily supports multiple-choice and short-answer formats","No version control for question revisions; updates overwrite previous versions without audit trail","Search and filtering are metadata-based only; no full-text semantic search across question content","No integration with external question banks or question authoring tools; requires manual import/export"],"requires":["Exam questions in structured format (CSV, XML, or platform-specific format)","Metadata schema definition (competency domains, content areas, difficulty levels)","Active mapEDU subscription with question bank module","User accounts with appropriate permissions for question management"],"input_types":["question text (multiple-choice, short-answer, true-false)","answer options and correct answer key","metadata (competency domain, content area, difficulty rating, question type)","psychometric data (difficulty index, discrimination index from prior administrations)","learning objective mappings"],"output_types":["searchable question database with filtering by multiple dimensions","question export lists for exam construction","question usage reports (frequency of use, cohorts tested)","psychometric summaries per question","question statistics and performance trends"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_mapedu__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.curriculum.to.assessment.traceability.reporting","name":"curriculum-to-assessment traceability reporting","description":"Generates traceability matrices and audit reports showing the chain from curriculum design (learning objectives) through instruction to assessment, with evidence that each competency is addressed. The system produces documentation suitable for accreditation bodies, showing which courses, learning activities, and assessments contribute to each competency domain. Reports include coverage statistics, cross-references, and evidence artifacts (syllabus excerpts, assessment rubrics) linked to competency mappings.","intents":["I need to generate accreditation self-study documentation showing how our curriculum addresses all required competencies","I want to create traceability matrices for accreditation site visitors showing curriculum-to-assessment alignment","I need to produce evidence reports linking specific courses and assessments to ACGME or nursing competency domains","I want to audit curriculum completeness and generate reports for program review committees"],"best_for":["Program directors preparing for accreditation reviews (ACGME, CCNE, GMC, etc.)","Curriculum committees documenting curriculum changes for accreditation bodies","Healthcare education administrators managing accreditation compliance documentation","Quality assurance teams conducting internal curriculum audits"],"limitations":["Reports are generated from platform data only; does not automatically extract evidence from external documents (syllabi, rubrics) unless manually uploaded","Traceability is only as complete as the underlying curriculum mappings; gaps in platform data result in incomplete reports","Report customization is limited; standard templates may not match specific accreditation body requirements","No version control for reports; historical versions are not automatically archived","Accreditation standards change frequently; reports may require manual updates when standards are revised"],"requires":["Complete curriculum data in mapEDU (learning objectives, courses, learning activities, assessments)","Competency framework mappings for all curriculum elements","Evidence artifacts (syllabi, rubrics, assessment tools) uploaded to platform or linked externally","Active mapEDU subscription with reporting module"],"input_types":["curriculum mappings (learning objectives, courses, competencies)","assessment data (assessment methods, rubrics, performance data)","evidence artifacts (syllabi, course descriptions, assessment tools)","competency framework definitions"],"output_types":["traceability matrices (competencies × courses × assessments)","accreditation self-study documentation","curriculum alignment reports with evidence cross-references","coverage statistics and gap analysis","exportable PDF or Word documents for accreditation submission","audit trail reports showing curriculum changes over time"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_mapedu__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.cohort.based.exam.performance.analytics.and.trend.analysis","name":"cohort-based exam performance analytics and trend analysis","description":"Analyzes exam performance across student cohorts and time periods, identifying trends in learning outcomes, identifying at-risk students, and comparing performance across different instructional methods or cohorts. The system processes historical exam data to calculate cohort-level statistics (mean scores, score distributions, pass rates), tracks performance trends across multiple exam administrations, and flags significant performance changes that may indicate curriculum or instruction quality issues. Uses time-series analysis and comparative statistics to surface patterns.","intents":["I need to track whether our curriculum changes improved student exam performance compared to previous cohorts","I want to identify students who are struggling early so I can provide targeted support","I need to compare exam performance across different teaching methods or course sections","I want to generate reports showing whether our program meets performance benchmarks for accreditation"],"best_for":["Medical school and residency program directors monitoring educational outcomes","Curriculum committees evaluating effectiveness of curriculum changes","Healthcare education administrators tracking program performance metrics","Assessment coordinators identifying at-risk students for intervention"],"limitations":["Requires historical exam data across multiple cohorts; new programs with limited data history cannot perform meaningful trend analysis","Comparative analysis assumes comparable cohorts; does not account for differences in student demographics or prior preparation","At-risk student identification is statistical only; does not provide intervention recommendations or learning support resources","Performance benchmarks are institution-defined; platform does not provide external benchmarks for comparison","Latency of 5-10 minutes for analysis of large datasets (10,000+ exam records) due to statistical computation"],"requires":["Historical exam data for multiple cohorts (minimum 2-3 years recommended)","Student identifiers and cohort information (class year, program, section)","Exam scores and item-level response data","Competency or content domain mappings for exams","Active mapEDU subscription with analytics module"],"input_types":["exam scores and performance data across cohorts","student demographic and cohort information","item-level response data for detailed analysis","curriculum or instructional method metadata (for comparative analysis)","historical performance data (multiple years)"],"output_types":["cohort performance summaries (mean scores, distributions, pass rates)","trend analysis reports (performance changes over time)","comparative analysis (performance across cohorts, teaching methods, or sections)","at-risk student lists with performance flags","performance benchmark reports","statistical significance tests for performance differences","visualizations (trend charts, distribution plots, comparative graphs)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active institutional subscription to mapEDU","Access to current healthcare education standards documentation (ACGME, GMC, etc.)","Curriculum data in structured format (learning objectives, assessment methods, competency domains)","Exam response data (student answers, item IDs, correct answers) in CSV or structured format","Minimum 30 test-takers per exam for statistically valid analysis","Item metadata (question type, content domain, difficulty rating)","Active mapEDU subscription with exam analytics module","Complete curriculum data including learning objectives, instructional activities, and assessment methods","Competency framework definition (list of competencies and hierarchical relationships)","Mapping between curriculum elements and competencies"],"failure_modes":["Limited to pre-loaded healthcare standards; custom or emerging frameworks require manual configuration","Alignment rules are fixed to specific standard versions; updates to ACGME or GMC frameworks may require platform updates","No support for non-English healthcare education systems or regional standards outside major accreditation bodies","Requires educators to input curriculum data in platform-specific format; no bulk import from existing LMS systems","Requires minimum sample size (typically 30+ test-takers) for reliable psychometric statistics; small cohorts produce unreliable metrics","Classical test theory metrics assume single-correct-answer formats; limited support for constructed-response or performance-based assessments","No built-in item banking or question pool management; requires external system for storing and retrieving exam items","Statistical analysis is descriptive only; does not provide prescriptive recommendations for item revision","Latency of 2-5 minutes for analysis of large exams (500+ items) due to statistical computation overhead","Validation is structural only; does not assess quality or depth of learning experiences, only presence/absence","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.857Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=mapedu","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=mapedu"}},"signature":"7I3/goxS4VQ2LtCD0u0DsGLAwACj/ZLxgU7eRO+Q/LqkV9ijeoV4fXtc6g1c/PRzfL7ib0AsOLfOjlaRGI6DBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T19:47:16.100Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/mapedu","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/mapedu","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=mapedu","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}