{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-manifest","slug":"manifest","name":"Manifest","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/mnfst/manifest","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/manifest","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ai.native.backend.infrastructure.provisioning","name":"ai-native backend infrastructure provisioning","description":"Provides a managed backend platform specifically architected for AI code editors and generative tools, replacing traditional BaaS solutions like Supabase. Uses a declarative configuration model to automatically provision compute, storage, and API layers optimized for LLM-driven workflows, with built-in support for streaming responses, token management, and context window optimization.","intents":["Deploy an AI code editor without managing infrastructure or databases","Quickly scaffold a backend that handles LLM API calls, caching, and rate limiting","Build a 'vibe coding' tool that needs real-time collaboration and AI suggestions"],"best_for":["AI-first SaaS founders building code editors or generative tools","Teams migrating from Supabase who need LLM-optimized infrastructure","Solo developers prototyping AI coding assistants without DevOps expertise"],"limitations":["Unclear if it supports multi-region deployment or edge computing","No documented SLA or uptime guarantees visible in public repos","Maturity level unknown — may lack production-grade monitoring/observability"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ (assumed based on typical framework requirements)","Git repository for version control of infrastructure definitions","API credentials for underlying LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["YAML/JSON configuration files","TypeScript/Python code for custom handlers","LLM prompts and context windows"],"output_types":["REST/GraphQL API endpoints","WebSocket streams for real-time updates","Structured JSON responses from LLM inference"],"categories":["automation-workflow","backend-infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.collaborative.editing.backend","name":"real-time collaborative editing backend","description":"Provides a managed operational transformation (OT) or CRDT-based synchronization layer for multi-user code editing sessions. Handles conflict resolution, presence awareness, and cursor tracking across distributed clients without requiring developers to implement complex sync logic, with automatic persistence to underlying storage.","intents":["Enable multiple users to edit code simultaneously without conflicts","Show real-time cursor positions and selections from other collaborators","Persist collaborative edits automatically without manual save logic"],"best_for":["Teams building collaborative AI code editors (e.g., pair programming tools)","Platforms offering shared coding environments or AI-assisted pair sessions","Developers who want CRDT/OT without implementing Yjs or Automerge themselves"],"limitations":["Unknown if it supports offline-first workflows or eventual consistency models","Unclear how it handles large files (>10MB) or high-frequency edit rates","No visible documentation on conflict resolution strategies or merge semantics"],"requires":["WebSocket or similar real-time transport protocol","Client library for the target editor (VS Code, Monaco, CodeMirror, etc.)","Network connectivity for synchronization"],"input_types":["Text edits (insertions, deletions, replacements)","Cursor/selection positions","User presence metadata"],"output_types":["Synchronized document state across clients","Presence updates (cursor positions, user info)","Conflict-resolved merged edits"],"categories":["automation-workflow","collaboration-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.api.gateway.with.request.response.optimization","name":"llm api gateway with request/response optimization","description":"Acts as a managed proxy layer between client applications and multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.), handling request routing, response streaming, token counting, rate limiting, and cost tracking. Abstracts provider-specific API differences behind a unified interface, enabling seamless provider switching and multi-provider fallback strategies.","intents":["Route LLM requests to different providers based on cost, latency, or model availability","Count tokens accurately before sending requests to avoid quota overages","Stream LLM responses to clients in real-time without buffering entire outputs","Track LLM API costs and usage per user or project"],"best_for":["AI code editor builders who want to support multiple LLM backends","Cost-conscious teams needing per-request billing and provider optimization","Developers building LLM-powered tools who want to avoid vendor lock-in"],"limitations":["Adds network latency (proxy hop) compared to direct client-to-LLM calls","Unknown if it supports custom model fine-tuning or local model inference","No visible documentation on rate limiting strategies or quota management"],"requires":["API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Network access to external LLM APIs or local model servers","Configuration for provider routing rules and fallback strategies"],"input_types":["LLM prompts (text)","System messages and context","Model parameters (temperature, max_tokens, etc.)"],"output_types":["Streamed text tokens","Structured completions (JSON mode)","Token usage metadata and cost estimates"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","api-gateway"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.context.window.and.prompt.management","name":"context window and prompt management","description":"Provides utilities for managing LLM context windows, including automatic prompt compression, sliding window strategies, and semantic chunking of code files. Handles the complexity of fitting large codebases into token limits by intelligently selecting relevant context based on the current editing location or query, with support for custom ranking and filtering strategies.","intents":["Automatically select the most relevant code snippets to include in LLM prompts","Compress prompts when approaching token limits without losing semantic meaning","Manage context for multi-file code editing scenarios where full codebase context is infeasible"],"best_for":["AI code editors handling large codebases (>100k LOC)","Teams building code completion or refactoring tools with context constraints","Developers who want intelligent context selection without manual prompt engineering"],"limitations":["Compression strategies may lose important context for certain code patterns","Unknown if it supports language-specific AST-aware chunking or only text-based","No visible documentation on ranking algorithms for context relevance"],"requires":["Code files or text documents to analyze","Token counting library (built-in or external)","Configuration for context window size and compression thresholds"],"input_types":["Source code files (multiple languages)","User queries or prompts","Current editing context (cursor position, selected text)"],"output_types":["Optimized prompts with selected context","Compression metadata (removed sections, compression ratio)","Relevance scores for included context"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","prompt-engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.ai.suggestion.and.code.completion.integration","name":"ai suggestion and code completion integration","description":"Provides a managed service for delivering AI-powered code suggestions, completions, and refactoring recommendations directly within code editors. Integrates with the LLM gateway and context management to generate contextually relevant suggestions, with support for inline display, acceptance/rejection tracking, and learning from user feedback to improve suggestion quality.","intents":["Show AI code completions inline as the user types","Generate refactoring suggestions for selected code blocks","Track which suggestions users accept or reject to improve future recommendations"],"best_for":["AI code editor builders (VS Code extensions, web-based editors, etc.)","Teams building 'vibe coding' tools with AI-assisted workflows","Developers who want suggestion infrastructure without building from scratch"],"limitations":["Suggestion latency depends on LLM provider response time (typically 100-500ms)","Unknown if it supports local model inference for lower latency","No visible documentation on suggestion ranking or filtering strategies"],"requires":["Integration with editor API (VS Code LSP, Monaco Editor API, etc.)","LLM provider configured in the gateway","Context management system for code awareness"],"input_types":["Current code buffer and cursor position","User typing events or explicit completion requests","File metadata (language, path, project context)"],"output_types":["Inline code suggestions (single or multiple options)","Refactoring recommendations with diffs","Acceptance/rejection feedback for training"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","ai-assistance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.authentication.and.user.management.for.ai.tools","name":"authentication and user management for ai tools","description":"Provides managed authentication, authorization, and user management specifically designed for AI-powered applications. Supports multiple auth methods (OAuth, API keys, JWT), role-based access control (RBAC), and usage quotas per user or team. Integrates with the LLM gateway to enforce per-user rate limits and track usage for billing.","intents":["Authenticate users in an AI code editor without building auth from scratch","Enforce per-user LLM usage quotas to control costs","Manage team-based access control for collaborative editing"],"best_for":["SaaS AI tool builders who need managed authentication","Teams building multi-tenant AI code editors","Developers who want RBAC and quota management without custom implementation"],"limitations":["Unknown if it supports SAML/LDAP for enterprise SSO","No visible documentation on session management or token refresh strategies","Quota enforcement may have latency (eventual consistency)"],"requires":["OAuth provider configuration (GitHub, Google, etc.) or API key setup","User database or identity provider integration","Configuration for RBAC roles and quota limits"],"input_types":["User credentials (OAuth tokens, API keys, passwords)","User metadata (email, name, team affiliation)","Usage events (LLM requests, API calls)"],"output_types":["JWT or session tokens for authenticated requests","User profiles with roles and quotas","Usage reports and quota status"],"categories":["safety-moderation","authentication"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.data.extraction.from.code.and.documents","name":"structured data extraction from code and documents","description":"Provides utilities for extracting structured information from source code and documents using LLM-powered analysis. Supports schema-based extraction (e.g., function signatures, dependencies, documentation) with validation and type safety. Uses the LLM gateway to perform extraction and caches results to avoid redundant API calls.","intents":["Extract function signatures and documentation from code files automatically","Identify code dependencies and build a project dependency graph","Parse and structure unstructured documentation or comments"],"best_for":["AI code editors that need to understand codebase structure","Teams building code analysis or refactoring tools","Developers who want LLM-powered extraction without manual parsing"],"limitations":["LLM extraction may be less accurate than AST-based parsing for code structure","Extraction latency depends on LLM provider (typically 200-1000ms per file)","Unknown if it supports caching or incremental updates"],"requires":["Source code files or documents to analyze","JSON Schema or similar format for extraction structure","LLM provider configured in the gateway"],"input_types":["Source code files (multiple languages)","Documentation or text documents","Extraction schema (JSON Schema, TypeScript types, etc.)"],"output_types":["Structured JSON data matching the schema","Validation errors if extraction fails schema validation","Confidence scores or metadata about extraction quality"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","code-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.project.and.workspace.management","name":"project and workspace management","description":"Provides a managed workspace abstraction for organizing code projects, managing file hierarchies, and tracking project metadata. Supports multi-project workspaces with shared configuration, environment variables, and build/run settings. Integrates with the backend to enable project-scoped authentication, quotas, and AI context management.","intents":["Organize multiple code projects within a single workspace","Share configuration and environment variables across projects","Manage project-specific LLM quotas and AI settings"],"best_for":["AI code editors supporting multiple open projects","Teams managing monorepos or multi-project workspaces","Developers who want project-scoped configuration without manual setup"],"limitations":["Unknown if it supports nested workspaces or project hierarchies","No visible documentation on file system abstraction or virtual file systems","Unclear how it handles large projects (>1M files)"],"requires":["File system access or virtual file system implementation","Project configuration files (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.)","Authentication for project-scoped access control"],"input_types":["Project metadata (name, description, language, framework)","File paths and directory structures","Configuration files and environment variables"],"output_types":["Project index and file hierarchy","Project-scoped settings and quotas","Workspace configuration merged from all projects"],"categories":["automation-workflow","project-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.feedback.and.telemetry.collection.for.ai.improvements","name":"feedback and telemetry collection for ai improvements","description":"Provides a managed system for collecting user feedback on AI suggestions, tracking suggestion acceptance rates, and gathering telemetry on AI tool usage. Data is aggregated and analyzed to identify patterns, improve suggestion quality, and optimize LLM prompts. Supports privacy-preserving collection with optional data anonymization.","intents":["Track which AI suggestions users accept or reject","Identify patterns in suggestion quality across different code contexts","Measure the impact of AI features on user productivity and satisfaction"],"best_for":["AI tool builders who want to improve suggestion quality over time","Teams conducting A/B testing on different LLM models or prompts","Developers who want usage analytics without building custom telemetry"],"limitations":["Privacy concerns with collecting code snippets or user feedback","Unknown if it supports differential privacy or data anonymization","Telemetry collection may impact performance if not asynchronous"],"requires":["Client-side integration to capture feedback events","User consent for data collection (GDPR, CCPA compliance)","Backend storage for telemetry data"],"input_types":["Suggestion acceptance/rejection events","User feedback (ratings, comments)","Usage metrics (latency, error rates, feature adoption)"],"output_types":["Aggregated analytics dashboards","Suggestion quality metrics (acceptance rate, user satisfaction)","Recommendations for prompt or model improvements"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-manifest__cap_9","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.version.control.and.change.tracking.integration","name":"version control and change tracking integration","description":"Provides integration with Git and other version control systems to track code changes, manage branches, and enable AI-powered code review and diff analysis. Supports automatic commit generation, branch suggestions, and conflict resolution assistance. Integrates with the LLM gateway to analyze diffs and provide intelligent merge suggestions.","intents":["Generate meaningful commit messages automatically from code changes","Analyze diffs with AI to identify potential issues or improvements","Suggest branch names or strategies based on code changes","Assist with merge conflict resolution using AI analysis"],"best_for":["AI code editors with built-in Git integration","Teams using AI-assisted code review workflows","Developers who want intelligent version control assistance"],"limitations":["Commit message generation may not capture intent if diff is ambiguous","Unknown if it supports multiple VCS (Git, Mercurial, Perforce, etc.)","No visible documentation on merge conflict resolution strategies"],"requires":["Git repository or other VCS integration","Access to commit history and diff information","LLM provider configured in the gateway"],"input_types":["Code diffs (unified diff format)","Commit history and branch information","User context (branch name, issue tracker links)"],"output_types":["Generated commit messages","Code review suggestions and issue identification","Merge conflict resolution recommendations"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","version-control"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ (assumed based on typical framework requirements)","Git repository for version control of infrastructure definitions","API credentials for underlying LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","WebSocket or similar real-time transport protocol","Client library for the target editor (VS Code, Monaco, CodeMirror, etc.)","Network connectivity for synchronization","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Network access to external LLM APIs or local model servers","Configuration for provider routing rules and fallback strategies","Code files or text documents to analyze"],"failure_modes":["Unclear if it supports multi-region deployment or edge computing","No documented SLA or uptime guarantees visible in public repos","Maturity level unknown — may lack production-grade monitoring/observability","Unknown if it supports offline-first workflows or eventual consistency models","Unclear how it handles large files (>10MB) or high-frequency edit rates","No visible documentation on conflict resolution strategies or merge semantics","Adds network latency (proxy hop) compared to direct client-to-LLM calls","Unknown if it supports custom model fine-tuning or local model inference","No visible documentation on rate limiting strategies or quota management","Compression strategies may lose important context for certain code patterns","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.578Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:23.056Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=manifest","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=manifest"}},"signature":"jVj1RN5lNxprVdKx3hRjx6Vbssn52It5KOgbMm7nZfet5rE22/nuHcS6bR8wO05Nhl2U7PszBc3IPtQp9mexBg==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T22:12:15.258Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/manifest","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/manifest","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=manifest","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}