{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_magic-documents","slug":"magic-documents","name":"Magic Documents","type":"product","url":"https://magicdocuments.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/magic-documents","categories":["documentation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.batch.document.summarization.with.multi.format.input.handling","name":"batch document summarization with multi-format input handling","description":"Processes multiple documents simultaneously through a queued batch pipeline, applying abstractive summarization models that extract key points while preserving document context. The system accepts PDFs, Word documents, and plain text, routing each through format-specific parsers before applying language models to generate concise summaries. Batch processing allows teams to summarize 10-100+ documents in a single operation rather than one-by-one, significantly reducing time spent on content review.","intents":["I need to quickly understand the key points from 50 research papers without reading each one in full","Our team receives dozens of contracts daily and needs automated executive summaries for legal review","I want to process an entire folder of meeting notes and extract action items in bulk"],"best_for":["Knowledge workers processing high-volume document streams (10+ documents/day)","Legal and compliance teams reviewing contracts and regulatory documents","Research teams synthesizing findings from multiple sources"],"limitations":["Summarization quality degrades on technical specifications and multi-page contracts where precision is critical — loses domain-specific terminology and numerical accuracy","Batch processing introduces latency; no real-time streaming summaries for time-sensitive workflows","No customizable summary length or abstraction level — fixed output format may not suit all use cases","Context window limitations mean documents over 50+ pages may lose information from earlier sections"],"requires":["Document files in PDF, DOCX, or TXT format","Active internet connection for cloud-based processing","Paid subscription tier for batch operations (free tier limited to single documents)"],"input_types":["PDF documents","Microsoft Word (.docx)","Plain text (.txt)","Multiple files in single batch operation"],"output_types":["Text summaries (plain text or formatted)","Structured metadata (document title, key topics, confidence scores)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.automatic.document.categorization.and.smart.tagging","name":"automatic document categorization and smart tagging","description":"Uses multi-label classification models trained on document content, metadata, and structural patterns to automatically assign category tags and organize documents into a hierarchical taxonomy. The system learns from document text, file names, and content patterns to infer appropriate categories without manual configuration. Tags are applied using zero-shot or few-shot classification, allowing the system to recognize new categories without retraining while maintaining consistency across large document sets.","intents":["I have 1000 unorganized documents and need them sorted into project folders without manual tagging","Our team uses inconsistent naming conventions — I want AI to standardize categorization across all documents","I need to quickly find all documents related to 'Q4 budget' without manually searching through folders"],"best_for":["Teams with large unstructured document repositories (500+ documents)","Organizations transitioning from folder-based to metadata-based organization","Knowledge workers seeking to reduce manual filing overhead (15-20% of office time)"],"limitations":["Categorization accuracy varies by document type — performs well on business documents but struggles with highly technical or domain-specific content","No user feedback loop to improve categorization over time — tags are static once applied","Cannot create custom category hierarchies; limited to predefined taxonomy","Requires sufficient document content for classification — fails on very short documents or images without OCR"],"requires":["Documents with readable text content (minimum ~100 words for reliable classification)","Active subscription to Magic Documents","Documents in supported formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT)"],"input_types":["Document text content","Document metadata (filename, creation date)","Document structure (headings, sections)"],"output_types":["Category tags (single or multi-label)","Hierarchical folder structure recommendations","Confidence scores per category assignment"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.format.preserving.document.export.with.ai.generated.metadata.injection","name":"format-preserving document export with ai-generated metadata injection","description":"Exports documents in their original format (PDF, Word, etc.) while embedding AI-generated summaries, tags, and metadata as document properties, comments, or structured fields without altering the original content layout. The system uses format-specific APIs to inject metadata into PDF XMP fields, Word document properties, or custom fields while maintaining full document fidelity. This approach preserves compliance requirements and document integrity while adding searchable AI-generated context.","intents":["I need to send summarized documents to stakeholders while keeping the original formatting intact for compliance","Our legal team requires original documents unchanged but wants AI summaries embedded as searchable metadata","I want to export documents with tags and summaries for archival without creating separate files"],"best_for":["Compliance-heavy industries (legal, finance, healthcare) requiring document integrity verification","Teams needing to preserve original formatting for client delivery or regulatory audit","Organizations archiving documents with AI-generated context for future retrieval"],"limitations":["Metadata injection may not be readable in all document viewers — older PDF readers or Word versions may not display embedded metadata","Export process adds processing time (5-30 seconds per document depending on size and format)","No support for image-based PDFs or scanned documents without OCR preprocessing","Metadata fields are not standardized across formats — PDF XMP fields differ from Word properties, limiting cross-platform consistency"],"requires":["Original document in PDF or DOCX format","Sufficient file permissions to modify document properties","Modern document viewer to read embedded metadata (Adobe Reader, Microsoft Word 2016+)"],"input_types":["PDF documents","Microsoft Word (.docx) files","AI-generated summaries and tags from Magic Documents"],"output_types":["PDF with embedded XMP metadata","Word document with custom properties and comments","Original file format with preserved layout and new metadata fields"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.document.content.extraction.and.structured.data.transformation","name":"document content extraction and structured data transformation","description":"Parses document content using OCR for scanned PDFs and text extraction for digital documents, then transforms unstructured text into structured data formats (JSON, CSV, tables) using language models trained on document understanding. The system identifies key entities, relationships, and data patterns within documents and maps them to user-defined or inferred schemas. This enables extraction of specific information (invoice amounts, contract dates, meeting action items) without manual data entry.","intents":["I need to extract invoice line items and amounts from 200 PDFs into a CSV for accounting","Our contracts contain key dates and parties — I want to automatically extract these into a structured database","I want to pull action items and owners from meeting notes and create a task list automatically"],"best_for":["Finance and accounting teams processing invoices and receipts at scale","Legal teams extracting contract terms and obligations","Project managers automating action item extraction from meeting notes"],"limitations":["Extraction accuracy varies significantly with document quality — scanned PDFs with poor OCR produce unreliable structured data","No schema definition interface — users cannot specify custom extraction patterns or field mappings","Hallucination risk when documents lack clear structure or contain ambiguous information","Performance degrades on documents with complex layouts, tables, or mixed content types"],"requires":["Documents with readable text (digital PDFs or high-quality scans for OCR)","Clear, consistent document structure for reliable extraction","Paid subscription tier for structured data export"],"input_types":["PDF documents (digital or scanned)","Word documents with tables and structured content","Plain text with identifiable data patterns"],"output_types":["JSON objects with extracted fields","CSV files with tabular data","Structured tables with named columns","Confidence scores per extracted field"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_4","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.document.search.and.semantic.retrieval.across.organized.collections","name":"document search and semantic retrieval across organized collections","description":"Indexes document content and AI-generated summaries using vector embeddings, enabling semantic search that finds documents by meaning rather than keyword matching. Users can search for concepts like 'budget discussions' and retrieve all related documents even if they use different terminology. The system maintains a searchable index of document summaries, tags, and full content, allowing fast retrieval from large collections without requiring manual folder navigation.","intents":["I need to find all documents discussing 'cost reduction' without manually searching each folder","Our team wants to search by topic across 5000+ documents and get relevant results in seconds","I'm looking for documents similar to a reference document without knowing exact keywords"],"best_for":["Teams with large document repositories (1000+ documents) requiring fast retrieval","Knowledge workers seeking concept-based search rather than keyword matching","Organizations building internal knowledge bases with semantic discovery"],"limitations":["Search quality depends on summary quality — poor summaries lead to poor semantic retrieval","No full-text search option; relies entirely on semantic embeddings which may miss exact phrase matches","Indexing latency means newly uploaded documents may not appear in search results for 5-10 minutes","Limited to documents processed through Magic Documents; cannot search external sources or real-time data"],"requires":["Documents previously processed and summarized by Magic Documents","Active subscription with search feature enabled","Minimum 10-20 documents for meaningful semantic search results"],"input_types":["Natural language search queries","Document reference files for similarity search","Tag-based filtering combined with semantic search"],"output_types":["Ranked list of relevant documents with relevance scores","Document summaries and metadata for quick review","Links to original documents for full-text review"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.document.upload.and.processing.pipeline.orchestration","name":"document upload and processing pipeline orchestration","description":"Manages the end-to-end workflow of document ingestion, format validation, content extraction, summarization, categorization, and metadata generation through a queued processing pipeline. The system handles multiple upload methods (web UI, API, bulk folder upload) and routes documents through format-specific processors before applying AI models. Processing state is tracked, allowing users to monitor progress and retrieve results asynchronously without blocking on long-running operations.","intents":["I want to upload 100 documents at once and have them automatically summarized and organized","Our system needs to accept document uploads via API and process them in the background","I need to monitor the status of document processing and get notified when summaries are ready"],"best_for":["Teams with bulk document processing needs (10+ documents per session)","Developers integrating Magic Documents into larger workflows via API","Organizations automating document intake from email, cloud storage, or other sources"],"limitations":["No real-time processing — documents are queued and processed asynchronously, introducing latency of 30 seconds to several minutes","Limited API rate limiting documentation — unclear how many documents can be processed simultaneously","No webhook support for completion notifications; users must poll for status","Batch size limits not publicly documented, potentially causing failures on very large bulk uploads"],"requires":["Documents in supported formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT)","API key for programmatic access (if using API)","Active subscription with processing quota"],"input_types":["Single document upload via web UI","Bulk folder upload","API multipart form submission","Cloud storage integration (if available)"],"output_types":["Processing status (queued, processing, complete)","Summaries, tags, and metadata once processing completes","Error messages and failure reasons for problematic documents"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.document.comparison.and.change.tracking.across.versions","name":"document comparison and change tracking across versions","description":"Analyzes multiple versions of the same document to identify changes, additions, and deletions at the content level, then generates summaries of what changed and why. The system uses diff algorithms combined with language models to explain the significance of changes in natural language. This enables teams to quickly understand document evolution without manually comparing versions.","intents":["I need to understand what changed between contract v1 and v3 without reading both in full","Our team edits documents collaboratively and I want a summary of all changes made today","I want to track how a policy document evolved over multiple revisions"],"best_for":["Legal and compliance teams tracking contract revisions","Product teams managing specification document versions","Collaborative teams needing change summaries without manual diff review"],"limitations":["Requires explicit version uploads — no automatic version tracking from cloud storage integrations","Change detection accuracy depends on document structure; poorly formatted documents produce unreliable diffs","No side-by-side visual comparison; only text-based change summaries","Limited to two-version comparison; cannot track changes across 5+ versions in a single operation"],"requires":["Two or more versions of the same document in supported formats","Documents with sufficient text content for meaningful diff analysis","Paid subscription tier for version comparison"],"input_types":["Two or more document versions in PDF or DOCX format","Document metadata indicating version numbers or dates"],"output_types":["Highlighted diff showing additions, deletions, and modifications","Natural language summary of changes and their significance","Change statistics (lines added/removed, sections modified)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_magic-documents__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.document.compliance.and.risk.flagging","name":"document compliance and risk flagging","description":"Scans documents for compliance risks, missing required sections, and policy violations using pattern matching and language models trained on regulatory requirements. The system identifies potential issues like missing signatures, incomplete contract terms, or non-compliant language, then flags them with severity levels and remediation suggestions. This enables teams to catch compliance issues before documents are finalized or executed.","intents":["I need to ensure all contracts include required legal clauses before they're signed","Our compliance team wants to flag documents that violate company policy automatically","I want to identify missing information in forms or applications before processing them"],"best_for":["Legal and compliance teams reviewing contracts and regulatory documents","Organizations with strict compliance requirements (finance, healthcare, government)","Teams seeking to reduce manual compliance review overhead"],"limitations":["Compliance rules are predefined and not customizable — cannot add organization-specific policies or requirements","False positive rate may be high for documents with non-standard formatting or industry-specific language","No integration with compliance management systems or audit trails","Flagging is advisory only — no enforcement mechanism to prevent non-compliant documents from being used"],"requires":["Documents in PDF or DOCX format with readable text","Paid subscription tier with compliance features enabled","Documents with sufficient content for pattern matching (minimum ~500 words)"],"input_types":["Contract documents","Policy documents","Forms and applications","Regulatory filings"],"output_types":["Compliance risk flags with severity levels (critical, high, medium, low)","Specific sections or clauses identified as problematic","Remediation suggestions and required changes","Compliance score or overall risk assessment"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":39,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Document files in PDF, DOCX, or TXT format","Active internet connection for cloud-based processing","Paid subscription tier for batch operations (free tier limited to single documents)","Documents with readable text content (minimum ~100 words for reliable classification)","Active subscription to Magic Documents","Documents in supported formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT)","Original document in PDF or DOCX format","Sufficient file permissions to modify document properties","Modern document viewer to read embedded metadata (Adobe Reader, Microsoft Word 2016+)","Documents with readable text (digital PDFs or high-quality scans for OCR)"],"failure_modes":["Summarization quality degrades on technical specifications and multi-page contracts where precision is critical — loses domain-specific terminology and numerical accuracy","Batch processing introduces latency; no real-time streaming summaries for time-sensitive workflows","No customizable summary length or abstraction level — fixed output format may not suit all use cases","Context window limitations mean documents over 50+ pages may lose information from earlier sections","Categorization accuracy varies by document type — performs well on business documents but struggles with highly technical or domain-specific content","No user feedback loop to improve categorization over time — tags are static once applied","Cannot create custom category hierarchies; limited to predefined taxonomy","Requires sufficient document content for classification — fails on very short documents or images without OCR","Metadata injection may not be readable in all document viewers — older PDF readers or Word versions may not display embedded metadata","Export process adds processing time (5-30 seconds per document depending on size and format)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.857Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=magic-documents","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=magic-documents"}},"signature":"waP56HFII1SOWDNOPr8YdQ1FV0rut9bHf3M/KEhojUUw5rG3vsaDhlopnHd6tsaEq7FsefTvUqW+mb+C5fBVBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T01:56:09.919Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/magic-documents","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/magic-documents","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=magic-documents","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}