{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","slug":"madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","name":"spec-kit-command-cursor","type":"skill","url":"https://github.com/madebyaris/spec-kit-command-cursor","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","categories":["code-editors","app-builders"],"tags":["ai-workflow","cursor","cursor-commands","developer-tools","documentation","github-spec-kit","planning","project-management","sdd","spec-driven-development","specifications","tasks","templates"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.specification.generation.via.specify.command","name":"specification generation via /specify command","description":"Converts natural language ideas and requirements into structured specification documents through a Cursor IDE command interface. The toolkit prompts users to articulate project scope, requirements, and constraints, then synthesizes responses into a formatted specification that serves as the single source of truth for development. Works by intercepting the /specify command in Cursor, capturing user input through guided prompts, and formatting output as markdown specifications compatible with spec-driven development workflows.","intents":["I want to turn a vague product idea into a detailed written specification without starting from scratch","I need to document requirements in a structured format that my team can reference during development","I want to ensure all stakeholders agree on scope before writing code"],"best_for":["solo developers practicing spec-driven development","small teams wanting lightweight specification workflows","builders prototyping MVPs who need to clarify requirements first"],"limitations":["Specification quality depends entirely on user input clarity — no validation that requirements are testable or complete","No built-in version control or change tracking for specifications across iterations","Limited to text-based specifications; cannot generate visual diagrams or architecture charts","Requires manual refinement if specifications need to reference external documents or APIs"],"requires":["Cursor IDE installed (version 0.30+)","Shell environment with bash/zsh support","Write permissions to project directory for spec file output"],"input_types":["natural language text (user responses to prompts)","project context (optional existing documentation)"],"output_types":["markdown specification document","structured text file with sections for scope, requirements, constraints"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.development.plan.decomposition.via.plan.command","name":"development plan decomposition via /plan command","description":"Breaks down specifications into hierarchical development plans with phases, milestones, and dependencies. The /plan command accepts a specification document and generates a structured plan that maps requirements to implementation phases, identifies critical path items, and suggests task ordering. Implementation uses prompt-based decomposition where the toolkit guides users through planning decisions (timeline, resource constraints, risk factors) and synthesizes responses into a markdown plan document with clear phase boundaries and success criteria.","intents":["I have a spec and need to break it into phases so I know what to build first","I want to identify dependencies between features so I can parallelize work","I need to estimate effort and create a realistic timeline for stakeholders"],"best_for":["project leads planning sprints or milestones","teams transitioning from ad-hoc development to structured planning","developers who want to think through implementation strategy before coding"],"limitations":["No automatic effort estimation — relies on user judgment for time/complexity assessments","Cannot detect circular dependencies or resource conflicts automatically","Plan quality depends on specification completeness; garbage-in-garbage-out if spec is vague","No integration with project management tools (Jira, Linear, GitHub Projects) for syncing plans"],"requires":["Cursor IDE installed (version 0.30+)","Existing specification document (from /specify or external source)","Shell environment with bash/zsh support"],"input_types":["specification document (markdown or text)","user responses to planning prompts (timeline, constraints, priorities)"],"output_types":["markdown development plan with phases and milestones","structured task hierarchy with dependencies"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.actionable.task.extraction.via.tasks.command","name":"actionable task extraction via /tasks command","description":"Converts development plans into granular, assignable tasks with acceptance criteria and implementation hints. The /tasks command parses a plan document and generates a task list where each item includes a clear description, acceptance criteria, estimated effort, and optional implementation notes. Works by analyzing plan phases and milestones, then prompting users to define task granularity and acceptance criteria, synthesizing responses into a structured task document that can be imported into issue trackers or used as a checklist.","intents":["I need to break my plan into concrete tasks that developers can pick up and work on","I want each task to have clear acceptance criteria so I know when it's done","I need to estimate effort per task so I can track velocity and predict delivery"],"best_for":["engineering leads assigning work to team members","solo developers creating a structured todo list from plans","teams wanting to track progress without external project management tools"],"limitations":["No automatic task prioritization — requires manual ordering or explicit priority assignment","Acceptance criteria are text-based; no integration with automated testing frameworks to validate completion","Cannot track task dependencies or detect blocking relationships automatically","No built-in time tracking or burndown calculations; requires external tools for velocity metrics"],"requires":["Cursor IDE installed (version 0.30+)","Development plan document (from /plan or external source)","Shell environment with bash/zsh support"],"input_types":["development plan (markdown or text)","user responses to task definition prompts (granularity, acceptance criteria)"],"output_types":["markdown task list with descriptions and acceptance criteria","structured task document with effort estimates and implementation notes"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.cursor.ide.command.registration.and.execution","name":"cursor ide command registration and execution","description":"Provides a shell-based command registration system that hooks into Cursor IDE's slash command interface, allowing /specify, /plan, and /tasks commands to be invoked directly from the editor. Implementation uses shell scripts that register commands with Cursor's command palette, capture user input through the editor's prompt system, and execute the toolkit's logic in-process. Commands integrate with Cursor's native UI for prompts and file creation, ensuring seamless editor experience without external windows or context-switching.","intents":["I want to run specification/planning/task commands without leaving my editor","I need commands to be discoverable in Cursor's command palette alongside other IDE features","I want command output to appear as files in my project so I can edit and version control them"],"best_for":["Cursor IDE users who want to stay in-editor for all development workflows","teams standardizing on Cursor as their primary development environment","developers who prefer CLI-like command interfaces over GUI-based tools"],"limitations":["Only works with Cursor IDE; no support for VS Code, JetBrains, or other editors","Command execution is synchronous — long-running operations block the editor UI","No built-in command history or undo functionality; users must manually manage file versions","Shell-based implementation limits cross-platform compatibility (Windows support may be incomplete)"],"requires":["Cursor IDE version 0.30 or later","Shell environment (bash/zsh on macOS/Linux, PowerShell on Windows)","Write permissions to project directory"],"input_types":["user text input via Cursor prompts","existing specification/plan documents (optional)"],"output_types":["markdown files created in project directory","command output displayed in Cursor editor"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.specification.to.plan.traceability.linking","name":"specification-to-plan traceability linking","description":"Maintains explicit references between specification sections and plan phases, enabling bidirectional navigation and impact analysis. When /plan is executed on a specification, the generated plan document includes references back to the spec sections it addresses, and plan phases are tagged with requirement IDs. This allows developers to trace any plan phase back to its originating requirement and identify which spec sections are covered by which plan phases. Implementation uses markdown link syntax and structured headers to create a queryable relationship graph without requiring a database.","intents":["I need to verify that my plan covers all requirements from the specification","I want to know which spec requirements are addressed by each plan phase","I need to track scope creep by identifying new requirements that weren't in the original spec"],"best_for":["teams practicing spec-driven development who need audit trails","projects with regulatory or compliance requirements for requirement traceability","developers managing scope across multiple iterations"],"limitations":["Traceability is manual — no automated detection if plan phases miss spec requirements","Links are markdown-based; no tool support for visualizing traceability matrices or dependency graphs","Requires discipline to maintain links as specs and plans evolve; no enforcement mechanism","No integration with requirements management tools (Doors, Jama, Polarion) for formal traceability"],"requires":["Specification document with clearly labeled sections","Development plan generated from /plan command","Markdown editor or viewer to follow links"],"input_types":["specification document with section headers","development plan with phase descriptions"],"output_types":["markdown documents with bidirectional links between spec and plan","structured headers and reference IDs for traceability"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_5","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.template.based.specification.scaffolding","name":"template-based specification scaffolding","description":"Provides pre-built specification templates that guide users through defining key sections (scope, requirements, constraints, acceptance criteria) without starting from a blank page. Templates are markdown files with section headers and placeholder text that prompt users to fill in project-specific details. The /specify command can optionally use a template as a starting point, pre-populating structure and asking users to customize each section. Implementation stores templates in the toolkit directory and allows users to create custom templates by copying and modifying existing ones.","intents":["I want a starting structure for specifications so I don't have to invent the format each time","I need to ensure all specs include required sections (scope, requirements, constraints, etc.)","I want to standardize specification format across my team"],"best_for":["teams establishing specification standards","developers new to spec-driven development who need guidance on what to include","organizations wanting to enforce consistent documentation practices"],"limitations":["Templates are static markdown files; no dynamic validation that required sections are filled in","No template versioning — changes to templates don't automatically update existing specs","Limited to markdown format; cannot generate specifications in other formats (Confluence, Notion, etc.)","No template inheritance or composition; each template is independent"],"requires":["Cursor IDE version 0.30+","Template files in toolkit directory (included in repo)","Write permissions to create new spec files"],"input_types":["template selection (user chooses which template to use)","user text input to fill template sections"],"output_types":["markdown specification file with template structure and user-provided content"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.markdown.document.generation.and.formatting","name":"markdown document generation and formatting","description":"Generates well-formatted markdown documents for specifications, plans, and tasks with consistent heading hierarchy, section organization, and link syntax. The toolkit uses shell scripts to construct markdown output with proper formatting (headers, lists, code blocks, links) that renders correctly in markdown viewers and GitHub. Implementation uses printf/echo commands to build markdown strings with proper escaping and indentation, ensuring output is both human-readable and machine-parseable. All generated documents follow a consistent structure that makes them easy to navigate and version control.","intents":["I want generated documents to be readable in any markdown viewer without special tools","I need documents to render correctly on GitHub so my team can review them in pull requests","I want to be able to edit generated documents manually without breaking the format"],"best_for":["teams using GitHub or GitLab for documentation","developers who prefer plain text over proprietary formats","projects where documentation must be version controlled alongside code"],"limitations":["Markdown output is text-only; cannot include images, diagrams, or rich formatting","No automatic table of contents generation; users must manually update TOC if document structure changes","Markdown rendering varies across platforms (GitHub, GitLab, Notion); some formatting may not render identically","No built-in support for markdown extensions (tables, footnotes, etc.) beyond basic markdown"],"requires":["Markdown viewer or editor (any text editor works)","Git for version control (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["structured data from specification/plan/task generation","user text input"],"output_types":["markdown files (.md) with proper formatting and structure"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor__cap_7","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.interactive.prompt.based.user.input.collection","name":"interactive prompt-based user input collection","description":"Collects structured user input through a series of interactive prompts in the Cursor editor, guiding users through specification, planning, and task definition workflows. Prompts are displayed via Cursor's native input dialog system, capturing responses as text that are then processed and formatted into documents. Implementation uses shell read commands and Cursor's prompt API to create a conversational workflow where each prompt builds on previous responses, allowing users to refine their thinking as they answer questions about requirements, timeline, and constraints.","intents":["I want a guided workflow that asks me the right questions to create a complete specification","I need to think through planning decisions step-by-step rather than writing a plan from scratch","I want prompts to be contextual based on my previous answers"],"best_for":["developers new to spec-driven development who need guidance","teams wanting to standardize the questions asked during planning","solo developers who benefit from structured thinking prompts"],"limitations":["Prompts are linear; no branching logic based on user answers (e.g., different prompts for different project types)","No validation of user input; users can provide incomplete or nonsensical answers","Prompt responses are captured as plain text; no structured data extraction or parsing","No ability to skip prompts or customize which questions are asked"],"requires":["Cursor IDE version 0.30+","Shell environment with read command support"],"input_types":["user text responses to interactive prompts"],"output_types":["structured text document built from prompt responses"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":34,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Cursor IDE installed (version 0.30+)","Shell environment with bash/zsh support","Write permissions to project directory for spec file output","Existing specification document (from /specify or external source)","Development plan document (from /plan or external source)","Cursor IDE version 0.30 or later","Shell environment (bash/zsh on macOS/Linux, PowerShell on Windows)","Write permissions to project directory","Specification document with clearly labeled sections","Development plan generated from /plan command"],"failure_modes":["Specification quality depends entirely on user input clarity — no validation that requirements are testable or complete","No built-in version control or change tracking for specifications across iterations","Limited to text-based specifications; cannot generate visual diagrams or architecture charts","Requires manual refinement if specifications need to reference external documents or APIs","No automatic effort estimation — relies on user judgment for time/complexity assessments","Cannot detect circular dependencies or resource conflicts automatically","Plan quality depends on specification completeness; garbage-in-garbage-out if spec is vague","No integration with project management tools (Jira, Linear, GitHub Projects) for syncing plans","No automatic task prioritization — requires manual ordering or explicit priority assignment","Acceptance criteria are text-based; no integration with automated testing frameworks to validate completion","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.14507841931118037,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.7000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.15,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.45,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.062Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:59:55.150Z","last_commit":"2026-05-01T13:50:25Z"},"community":{"stars":177,"forks":20,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor"}},"signature":"D7f60DOhfald9wQyYGJhtQv+erV3VV/eSvHGRiyhBBcaVciOfEgQepj34FMNtuXFVIUODumYR4/iGQlrYme+AA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T11:46:35.660Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=madebyaris--spec-kit-command-cursor","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}