{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","slug":"madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","name":"advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","type":"skill","url":"https://github.com/madebyaris/advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","categories":["code-editors","deployment-infra","app-builders"],"tags":["agentic-ai","ai-coding","ai-workflow","code-generation","cursor","cursor-ide","cursor-rules","developer-tools","mcp","minimax","minimax-m2"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.clarify.first.prompt.synthesis.for.code.generation","name":"clarify-first prompt synthesis for code generation","description":"Generates structured clarification prompts before code generation by decomposing user intent into explicit requirements, constraints, and context. Uses a multi-turn prompt engineering pattern that forces the AI to ask disambiguating questions about scope, dependencies, error handling, and testing before writing code, reducing hallucination and scope creep in generated artifacts.","intents":["I want the AI to ask me clarifying questions about my coding task before generating code","I need to ensure generated code matches my exact requirements by making them explicit upfront","I want to reduce back-and-forth iterations by establishing clear specs before generation starts"],"best_for":["solo developers building LLM-powered coding agents","teams using Cursor IDE who want structured code generation workflows","developers building production systems where code quality and spec alignment are critical"],"limitations":["Adds latency overhead (typically 1-2 additional LLM calls per task) before actual code generation begins","Requires user engagement with clarification prompts — cannot fully automate for hands-off workflows","Effectiveness depends on quality of initial user intent description; vague inputs produce vague clarifications"],"requires":["Cursor IDE with MCP support","MiniMax M2 API access or compatible LLM with function calling","JavaScript runtime for MCP server execution"],"input_types":["natural language task description","code context or existing codebase snippets","project constraints or requirements"],"output_types":["structured clarification questions","refined specification document","code generation prompt with explicit requirements"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.interleaved.thinking.based.code.reasoning","name":"interleaved thinking-based code reasoning","description":"Leverages MiniMax M2's native interleaved thinking capability to expose intermediate reasoning steps during code generation and analysis. The system chains thinking tokens with code generation, allowing the AI to reason about architectural decisions, trade-offs, and implementation details before committing to code, with reasoning visible to the developer for transparency and debugging.","intents":["I want to see the AI's reasoning about why it chose a particular implementation approach","I need to understand the architectural trade-offs the AI considered for my code","I want to validate the AI's logic before accepting generated code"],"best_for":["developers reviewing AI-generated code for production systems","teams building complex architectural decisions where reasoning transparency is required","educators and learners wanting to understand AI decision-making in coding tasks"],"limitations":["Interleaved thinking increases token consumption by 30-50% per request, raising API costs","Reasoning output is verbose and may overwhelm developers on simple tasks","Requires MiniMax M2 or compatible models with native thinking support — not available on all LLM providers"],"requires":["MiniMax M2 API with thinking token support","Cursor IDE with MCP integration","JavaScript/Node.js 18+ for MCP server"],"input_types":["code generation request","code review prompt","architectural decision question"],"output_types":["thinking tokens (reasoning chain)","generated code with reasoning annotations","architectural justification document"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.full.tool.orchestration.with.schema.based.function.calling","name":"full tool orchestration with schema-based function calling","description":"Implements a schema-based function registry that maps user intents to executable tools (file operations, API calls, test execution, deployment) with native bindings for MiniMax M2's function-calling API. The system manages tool sequencing, error handling, and state propagation across multi-step workflows, enabling the AI to autonomously orchestrate complex coding tasks like testing, linting, and deployment without manual intervention.","intents":["I want the AI to automatically run tests after generating code","I need the AI to call external APIs or tools as part of code generation workflows","I want to automate multi-step coding tasks (generate → lint → test → deploy) in a single prompt"],"best_for":["teams building production CI/CD pipelines with AI assistance","developers automating end-to-end coding workflows in Cursor","organizations deploying agentic AI for full-stack development tasks"],"limitations":["Tool execution is sandboxed to MCP server context — cannot directly execute arbitrary system commands for security","Tool schema definition requires manual specification; no auto-discovery of available tools","Error handling in tool chains requires explicit fallback definitions; cascading failures can halt workflows"],"requires":["MCP server running with tool registry configured","MiniMax M2 API with function-calling support","Tool implementations (file I/O, API clients, test runners) deployed in MCP context","Cursor IDE 1.80+ with MCP support"],"input_types":["function schema definitions (JSON)","tool invocation requests from LLM","execution context and state"],"output_types":["tool execution results","structured function call responses","workflow state updates"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.context.aware.codebase.indexing.and.retrieval","name":"context-aware codebase indexing and retrieval","description":"Maintains an indexed representation of the developer's codebase within the MCP server, enabling the AI to retrieve relevant code context, dependencies, and patterns without sending the entire codebase to the LLM on each request. Uses semantic understanding of code structure to surface related files, function signatures, and architectural patterns that inform code generation decisions.","intents":["I want the AI to understand my codebase structure and generate code consistent with existing patterns","I need the AI to automatically find and reference relevant dependencies and imports","I want code generation that respects my project's architecture without manually specifying context"],"best_for":["developers working in large codebases where full context is impractical to send per request","teams with established architectural patterns that should be preserved in generated code","projects where consistency with existing code style and structure is critical"],"limitations":["Codebase indexing requires initial scan and periodic updates; large repos (>100k LOC) may have noticeable indexing latency","Semantic understanding is limited to code structure analysis; cannot infer business logic or domain-specific patterns from code alone","Index staleness can occur if files are modified outside Cursor; requires explicit refresh triggers"],"requires":["MCP server with file system access to codebase","JavaScript runtime for indexing operations","Cursor IDE with MCP integration","Codebase size reasonable for local indexing (typically <1GB)"],"input_types":["file paths and codebase structure","code snippets for pattern matching","dependency declarations"],"output_types":["indexed code context","relevant file references","architectural pattern summaries"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.production.ready.code.generation.with.error.handling.and.testing","name":"production-ready code generation with error handling and testing","description":"Generates code with built-in error handling patterns, type safety, and test coverage by composing generation prompts with explicit requirements for exception handling, input validation, and unit test generation. The system uses MiniMax M2's reasoning to consider edge cases and failure modes before generating code, then optionally executes generated tests via tool orchestration to validate correctness.","intents":["I want generated code to include proper error handling and validation, not just happy-path logic","I need the AI to generate unit tests alongside implementation code","I want to ensure generated code is production-ready without manual hardening"],"best_for":["teams building production systems where code quality and reliability are non-negotiable","developers who want to reduce manual testing and code review overhead","organizations adopting agentic AI for critical path development"],"limitations":["Generated error handling may be overly defensive or miss domain-specific edge cases","Test generation quality varies; generated tests may have gaps in coverage or miss subtle bugs","Adds significant token overhead (2-3x) due to error handling and test generation requirements"],"requires":["MiniMax M2 API with function calling and reasoning support","Test runner integration (Jest, pytest, etc.) via MCP tools","Cursor IDE with MCP support","Language-specific linting and type-checking tools available in MCP context"],"input_types":["functional requirements","error scenarios and edge cases","test framework specifications"],"output_types":["implementation code with error handling","unit test suite","test execution results"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.turn.agentic.reasoning.with.state.persistence","name":"multi-turn agentic reasoning with state persistence","description":"Maintains conversation state and reasoning context across multiple turns within a Cursor session, allowing the AI to build on previous decisions, refine code iteratively, and track architectural decisions across a coding session. Uses MCP server-side state management to persist context between requests, enabling the AI to reference earlier reasoning and avoid redundant analysis.","intents":["I want the AI to remember architectural decisions I made earlier in the session","I need the AI to refine code iteratively based on feedback without losing context","I want to have a multi-turn conversation with the AI about my code design"],"best_for":["developers working on complex features requiring iterative refinement","teams using Cursor as an interactive coding partner rather than a one-shot code generator","projects where architectural consistency across multiple code generation requests is critical"],"limitations":["State persistence is session-scoped; context is lost when Cursor is closed unless explicitly saved","Large conversation histories can increase latency and token consumption on subsequent requests","No built-in conflict resolution if user manually edits code that the AI is reasoning about"],"requires":["MCP server with session state management","Cursor IDE with persistent MCP connection","JavaScript runtime for state serialization and retrieval"],"input_types":["user messages and code edits","previous reasoning and decisions","architectural context from earlier turns"],"output_types":["refined code with architectural consistency","updated reasoning and decision log","session state snapshots"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.cursor.rules.templating.and.customization","name":"cursor rules templating and customization","description":"Provides a framework for defining and customizing Cursor Rules (system prompts for Cursor IDE) using template variables, conditional logic, and modular rule composition. Allows developers to create reusable rule sets tailored to specific projects, languages, or coding standards, with MiniMax M2 optimizations baked into the rule templates.","intents":["I want to customize Cursor's behavior for my specific project or coding standards","I need to create reusable rule sets that can be shared across my team","I want to optimize Cursor Rules specifically for MiniMax M2's capabilities"],"best_for":["teams standardizing on Cursor IDE with consistent coding practices","organizations wanting to enforce architectural patterns or coding standards via AI","developers building custom Cursor configurations for specific languages or frameworks"],"limitations":["Cursor Rules are static text; complex conditional logic requires manual rule composition","Rule effectiveness depends on LLM quality; rules cannot override model limitations","No built-in validation that rules are actually followed by the AI; requires manual testing"],"requires":["Cursor IDE 1.80+ with Rules support","MiniMax M2 API (for optimized rule templates)","Text editor for rule file creation and editing"],"input_types":["rule templates with variables","project configuration","coding standards documentation"],"output_types":["customized Cursor Rules file","rule composition documentation","validation reports"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules__cap_7","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.language.and.framework.specific.code.generation.patterns","name":"language and framework-specific code generation patterns","description":"Encodes language and framework-specific best practices, idioms, and patterns into the code generation pipeline, enabling the AI to generate code that follows language conventions, uses idiomatic patterns, and respects framework constraints. Includes specialized handling for type systems, async patterns, dependency management, and framework-specific APIs.","intents":["I want generated code to follow Python/TypeScript/Go idioms, not generic pseudocode","I need the AI to understand my framework (React, Django, Spring) and generate framework-idiomatic code","I want generated code to respect type safety and language-specific constraints"],"best_for":["polyglot teams using multiple languages and frameworks","developers working with strongly-typed languages where type safety is critical","teams with established framework conventions that should be preserved"],"limitations":["Language-specific patterns require explicit configuration; no auto-detection of project language","Framework support is limited to explicitly configured frameworks; emerging or niche frameworks may not be covered","Pattern quality depends on training data; less common languages or frameworks may generate suboptimal code"],"requires":["Language and framework configuration in MCP server","MiniMax M2 API with sufficient training data for target languages","Cursor IDE with MCP support"],"input_types":["language and framework specifications","code generation requests","existing code for pattern matching"],"output_types":["language-idiomatic code","framework-specific implementations","type-safe code with proper annotations"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":35,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Cursor IDE with MCP support","MiniMax M2 API access or compatible LLM with function calling","JavaScript runtime for MCP server execution","MiniMax M2 API with thinking token support","Cursor IDE with MCP integration","JavaScript/Node.js 18+ for MCP server","MCP server running with tool registry configured","MiniMax M2 API with function-calling support","Tool implementations (file I/O, API clients, test runners) deployed in MCP context","Cursor IDE 1.80+ with MCP support"],"failure_modes":["Adds latency overhead (typically 1-2 additional LLM calls per task) before actual code generation begins","Requires user engagement with clarification prompts — cannot fully automate for hands-off workflows","Effectiveness depends on quality of initial user intent description; vague inputs produce vague clarifications","Interleaved thinking increases token consumption by 30-50% per request, raising API costs","Reasoning output is verbose and may overwhelm developers on simple tasks","Requires MiniMax M2 or compatible models with native thinking support — not available on all LLM providers","Tool execution is sandboxed to MCP server context — cannot directly execute arbitrary system commands for security","Tool schema definition requires manual specification; no auto-discovery of available tools","Error handling in tool chains requires explicit fallback definitions; cascading failures can halt workflows","Codebase indexing requires initial scan and periodic updates; large repos (>100k LOC) may have noticeable indexing latency","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.10239565792016916,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.8,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.15,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.45,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.062Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:59:55.151Z","last_commit":"2026-04-03T03:00:39Z"},"community":{"stars":76,"forks":10,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules"}},"signature":"Npa5f7jNSzON1EHxpQAQh/C+AK3qqpXdcKwuMnZRMl6TzN4WKF70HB1QbXeAmTCX8JuIS1LPmHq8LGphWEzyCQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T10:19:24.704Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=madebyaris--advance-minimax-m2-cursor-rules","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}