{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","slug":"lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","name":"arena-leaderboard","type":"benchmark","url":"https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmarena-ai/arena-leaderboard","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","categories":["automation"],"tags":["static","leaderboard","region:us"],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.crowdsourced.model.evaluation.via.pairwise.comparison","name":"crowdsourced model evaluation via pairwise comparison","description":"Collects human preference judgments by presenting users with side-by-side model outputs for identical prompts, recording which response is preferred. Uses a tournament-style ranking system where pairwise comparison results are aggregated into Elo ratings, enabling continuous benchmarking without fixed test sets. The leaderboard updates dynamically as new human votes accumulate, with statistical confidence intervals computed from vote counts.","intents":["Compare model performance across diverse real-world use cases without predefined benchmarks","Identify which models perform best on user-submitted prompts rather than curated datasets","Track model quality changes over time as new versions are released","Discover emerging models that outperform established baselines on practical tasks"],"best_for":["AI researchers validating model improvements against human preference","Model developers benchmarking against competitors in production-like conditions","Community-driven evaluation initiatives seeking scalable human feedback"],"limitations":["Pairwise comparison voting is slower than single-model rating; requires 2x user interactions per evaluation","Elo rating convergence requires hundreds of votes per model pair; early rankings are statistically unreliable","Voter bias toward longer responses or specific writing styles can skew results if not controlled","No built-in mechanism to detect or weight votes by evaluator expertise; all votes treated equally"],"requires":["HuggingFace Spaces infrastructure for hosting","API access to model endpoints being evaluated","Persistent database to store vote history and compute Elo ratings","Web interface for human voters (browser with JavaScript support)"],"input_types":["text prompts (user-submitted or from predefined categories)","model identifiers (names/versions of models to compare)"],"output_types":["Elo ratings (numeric scores per model)","ranking tables (sorted by rating with confidence intervals)","vote counts and win/loss statistics per model pair","historical trend data showing rating changes over time"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","benchmark-evaluation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.model.inference.orchestration.with.response.caching","name":"multi-model inference orchestration with response caching","description":"Manages parallel inference calls to multiple LLM endpoints (OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source models via HuggingFace) for the same prompt, with response caching to avoid redundant API calls for identical inputs. Implements request batching and timeout handling to ensure responsive UI even when some model endpoints are slow or unavailable. Responses are cached by prompt hash, reducing API costs and latency for repeated evaluations.","intents":["Generate responses from multiple models simultaneously for fair side-by-side comparison","Reduce API costs by caching responses to frequently-evaluated prompts","Handle model endpoint failures gracefully without blocking the entire evaluation","Support adding new models without modifying core evaluation logic"],"best_for":["Leaderboard operators managing costs across dozens of model API calls","Researchers comparing models on identical prompts with minimal latency variance","Systems requiring fault-tolerant multi-provider LLM orchestration"],"limitations":["Cache invalidation requires manual intervention if model behavior changes (no automatic versioning)","Parallel inference increases peak API costs during high-traffic periods despite caching benefits","Response caching by prompt hash doesn't account for system prompt or temperature variations","Timeout handling may return incomplete responses if models exceed configured latency thresholds"],"requires":["API keys for each model provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Persistent cache storage (Redis, database, or file system)","Network connectivity to all model endpoints","Timeout configuration tuned to expected model response latencies"],"input_types":["text prompts (user input or predefined test cases)","model configuration (temperature, max_tokens, system prompt)"],"output_types":["structured responses from each model (text completion)","metadata (latency, token counts, error status per model)","cache hit/miss indicators"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.dynamic.leaderboard.ranking.with.statistical.confidence.intervals","name":"dynamic leaderboard ranking with statistical confidence intervals","description":"Computes Elo ratings from pairwise vote data and displays rankings with confidence intervals derived from vote counts and win/loss ratios. Uses Bayesian posterior estimation to quantify uncertainty in rankings, showing which models are statistically significantly different versus within margin of error. Leaderboard updates incrementally as new votes arrive, with ranking stability metrics to indicate when a model's position is reliable.","intents":["Display model rankings that account for statistical uncertainty in voting data","Identify which ranking differences are statistically significant vs. noise","Communicate confidence in model comparisons to users and researchers","Detect when a model has enough votes to be reliably ranked"],"best_for":["Researchers publishing leaderboard results with statistical rigor","Leaderboard operators communicating ranking reliability to stakeholders","Systems requiring transparent uncertainty quantification in crowdsourced rankings"],"limitations":["Confidence intervals widen significantly for models with few votes, making early rankings appear unreliable","Elo rating system assumes transitivity (if A beats B and B beats C, A should beat C), which may not hold for diverse tasks","Bayesian posterior estimation requires tuning of prior distributions; different priors yield different confidence intervals","Leaderboard updates are delayed relative to vote submission if ranking computation is batched"],"requires":["Vote history database with win/loss records per model pair","Statistical computation library (scipy, numpy, or equivalent)","Configurable Elo rating parameters (K-factor, initial rating)","Bayesian prior distributions for confidence interval estimation"],"input_types":["pairwise vote records (model A vs model B, winner)","vote counts and timestamps"],"output_types":["Elo ratings (numeric scores per model)","confidence intervals (lower/upper bounds)","ranking position with stability indicator","statistical significance tests between model pairs"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.prompt.categorization.and.stratified.evaluation.tracking","name":"prompt categorization and stratified evaluation tracking","description":"Organizes user-submitted prompts into predefined categories (writing, coding, reasoning, etc.) and tracks model performance separately per category. Enables stratified analysis showing which models excel at specific task types versus overall. Category-level statistics reveal performance gaps (e.g., model A dominates writing but underperforms on reasoning) that aggregate rankings would obscure.","intents":["Understand model strengths and weaknesses across different task domains","Identify models optimized for specific use cases rather than general-purpose ranking","Detect category-specific biases in model training or fine-tuning","Filter leaderboard by task type to find best model for a specific application"],"best_for":["Practitioners selecting models for domain-specific applications (coding, writing, math)","Researchers analyzing model capability gaps across task categories","Leaderboard operators providing actionable insights beyond aggregate rankings"],"limitations":["Category assignment is subjective; user-submitted prompts may be miscategorized or ambiguous","Small sample sizes per category lead to unreliable rankings within categories","Category definitions may not align with real-world use case distributions","Stratified analysis increases computational overhead for ranking updates"],"requires":["Predefined category taxonomy (hardcoded or configurable)","Prompt classification logic (rule-based, ML-based, or manual tagging)","Separate ranking computation per category","UI components to display category-level statistics"],"input_types":["text prompts with category labels","pairwise votes tagged with category"],"output_types":["per-category Elo ratings and rankings","category-level performance heatmaps","model strength/weakness profiles by category","category-specific confidence intervals"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.leaderboard.ui.with.interactive.voting.interface","name":"real-time leaderboard ui with interactive voting interface","description":"Provides a web-based interface (built with Gradio or Streamlit on HuggingFace Spaces) for users to submit prompts, view side-by-side model responses, and vote on preferences. Implements real-time leaderboard updates visible to all users, with sorting/filtering by model name, rating, category, or region. Voting interface includes response metadata (latency, token count) to inform user decisions.","intents":["Allow non-technical users to participate in model evaluation via simple voting UI","Display live leaderboard rankings updated as votes accumulate","Enable users to explore model responses interactively before voting","Provide transparency into evaluation methodology and vote counts"],"best_for":["Community-driven benchmarking initiatives seeking broad participation","Model developers wanting public visibility for their models","Researchers collecting human preference data at scale"],"limitations":["HuggingFace Spaces has resource limits; high traffic may cause UI slowdowns or timeouts","Gradio/Streamlit abstractions add latency (~200-500ms per interaction) compared to native web apps","Real-time leaderboard updates require polling or WebSocket connections; polling adds latency","No built-in user authentication; cannot track individual voter behavior or prevent vote manipulation"],"requires":["HuggingFace Spaces account and deployment","Gradio or Streamlit framework","Backend API for vote submission and leaderboard queries","Browser with JavaScript support for interactive UI"],"input_types":["text prompts (user-typed or selected from examples)","user preference votes (click to select preferred response)"],"output_types":["rendered leaderboard table (HTML/CSS)","side-by-side model response display","vote confirmation and feedback","metadata display (latency, token counts, vote counts)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.geographic.and.temporal.leaderboard.filtering","name":"geographic and temporal leaderboard filtering","description":"Tracks leaderboard rankings across geographic regions and time periods, enabling users to filter results by location (US, EU, Asia) and date range. Stores vote timestamps and regional metadata, allowing analysis of how model preferences vary by region or how rankings evolve over time. Temporal filtering reveals model improvement trajectories and seasonal trends in evaluation patterns.","intents":["Compare model performance across geographic regions to detect regional preference biases","Track model ranking changes over time to identify improvement or degradation","Analyze how new model releases impact leaderboard positions","Investigate temporal trends in evaluation patterns (e.g., increased coding evaluations)"],"best_for":["Global model developers understanding regional performance variations","Researchers studying how model preferences differ across cultures/regions","Leaderboard operators tracking long-term model quality trends"],"limitations":["Regional filtering requires geoIP detection; accuracy depends on IP database quality","Temporal filtering with fine granularity (hourly) requires high-volume vote storage","Small sample sizes in specific regions lead to unreliable regional rankings","Temporal analysis assumes consistent evaluation methodology over time; methodology changes invalidate trends"],"requires":["Vote timestamp recording","GeoIP database or user-provided region information","Time-series database or partitioned storage for efficient temporal queries","UI components for date range and region selection"],"input_types":["votes with timestamps and geographic metadata","date range and region filters from UI"],"output_types":["regional leaderboard rankings","temporal ranking trends (line charts)","regional preference heatmaps","time-series statistics per model"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["HuggingFace Spaces infrastructure for hosting","API access to model endpoints being evaluated","Persistent database to store vote history and compute Elo ratings","Web interface for human voters (browser with JavaScript support)","API keys for each model provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Persistent cache storage (Redis, database, or file system)","Network connectivity to all model endpoints","Timeout configuration tuned to expected model response latencies","Vote history database with win/loss records per model pair","Statistical computation library (scipy, numpy, or equivalent)"],"failure_modes":["Pairwise comparison voting is slower than single-model rating; requires 2x user interactions per evaluation","Elo rating convergence requires hundreds of votes per model pair; early rankings are statistically unreliable","Voter bias toward longer responses or specific writing styles can skew results if not controlled","No built-in mechanism to detect or weight votes by evaluator expertise; all votes treated equally","Cache invalidation requires manual intervention if model behavior changes (no automatic versioning)","Parallel inference increases peak API costs during high-traffic periods despite caching benefits","Response caching by prompt hash doesn't account for system prompt or temperature variations","Timeout handling may return incomplete responses if models exceed configured latency thresholds","Confidence intervals widen significantly for models with few votes, making early rankings appear unreliable","Elo rating system assumes transitivity (if A beats B and B beats C, A should beat C), which may not hold for diverse tasks","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.35,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.2,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.766Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.012Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard"}},"signature":"SyQpyBvOPpqlNt7lRlE0JvSYkL3lCA1Uk+59lVpGFTNLwt2nGIq61AZf+hg9FBRHaAF6PZGG+bg2ZFTBrAroBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T20:57:39.686Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=lmarena-ai--arena-leaderboard","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}