{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-llm-zoo","slug":"llm-zoo","name":"llm-zoo","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/texra-ai/llm-zoo","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/llm-zoo","categories":["model-training"],"tags":["llm","gpt","claude","gemini","openai","anthropic","google","deepseek","grok","qwen","minimax","glm","moonshot","dashscope","copilot","openrouter","ai","chatgpt","gpt-4","gpt-5"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.provider.llm.model.registry.with.real.time.pricing","name":"multi-provider llm model registry with real-time pricing","description":"Maintains a curated, always-current registry of 100+ LLM models across 15+ providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen, MiniMax, GLM, Moonshot, DashScope, OpenRouter, etc.) with dynamically updated pricing, context window specifications, and capability matrices. The registry is structured as queryable metadata that enables developers to programmatically discover and compare models without manual research or API calls to each provider.","intents":["I need to find the cheapest LLM model that supports a 128K context window for my use case","I want to compare pricing and capabilities across all major LLM providers in one place","I need to programmatically select the best model for a task based on cost, latency, and context requirements","I'm building a multi-model application and need current pricing to estimate costs"],"best_for":["LLM application developers evaluating model trade-offs","teams building cost-optimized AI systems with provider flexibility","startups prototyping with multiple LLM backends","researchers comparing model capabilities across vendors"],"limitations":["Pricing data is point-in-time and may lag actual provider updates by hours to days","Does not include real-time availability or rate-limit information per provider","Context window and capability data is manually curated, subject to human error","No historical pricing trends or cost prediction modeling","Limited to models the maintainers have explicitly added; emerging models may have delays"],"requires":["Node.js 14+ or browser JavaScript runtime","npm or yarn package manager","No API keys required for registry access (data is static/bundled)"],"input_types":["query parameters (model name, provider, min context window, max price)","filter criteria (capability flags, pricing tier)"],"output_types":["structured JSON model metadata","filtered arrays of model objects","comparison matrices (pricing, context, capabilities)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.context.window.and.capability.filtering.for.model.selection","name":"context window and capability filtering for model selection","description":"Provides structured filtering and querying across model metadata dimensions including context window size, supported modalities (text, vision, audio), function calling support, fine-tuning availability, and cost per token. Enables developers to programmatically narrow model choices based on technical requirements rather than manually reviewing provider documentation.","intents":["I need to find all models with at least 200K context windows under $0.01 per 1K tokens","Which models support vision input and function calling simultaneously?","I want to filter for models that support fine-tuning within my budget","Show me all open-source or self-hosted alternatives to GPT-4"],"best_for":["developers building constraint-aware model selection logic","teams with specific technical requirements (vision, function calling, context size)","cost-conscious teams optimizing for price-per-capability","researchers comparing model feature matrices"],"limitations":["Filtering is based on static metadata; does not reflect real-time model availability or performance","Capability data is binary (supported/not supported) without nuance on quality or performance differences","No filtering by latency, throughput, or availability SLAs","Does not account for provider-specific rate limits or quota restrictions","Pricing filters are approximate; actual costs may vary by region or volume discounts"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installation","Basic JavaScript knowledge for query construction"],"input_types":["filter objects with properties like minContextWindow, maxPricePerToken, supportsVision, supportsFunctionCalling","comparison operators (>, <, ===, includes)"],"output_types":["filtered arrays of model objects","boolean match results","aggregated statistics (min/max price, average context window)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.npm.package.distribution.of.model.metadata","name":"npm package distribution of model metadata","description":"Distributes the LLM model registry as a lightweight npm package (1442 downloads) that can be installed as a dependency and imported directly into Node.js or browser applications. The package bundles model metadata as static JSON or JavaScript objects, enabling zero-latency local queries without external API calls or network dependencies.","intents":["I want to include LLM model metadata in my application without adding external API dependencies","I need to query available models offline or in environments with restricted network access","I want to bundle model information with my application for reproducible deployments","I need to version-lock model metadata to a specific point in time for consistency"],"best_for":["Node.js application developers","teams building offline-capable AI tools","developers prioritizing minimal external dependencies","applications requiring deterministic model metadata across deployments"],"limitations":["Requires manual package updates to get latest pricing and model additions","No automatic sync with provider changes; pricing may become stale between releases","Package size grows with each new model addition; may impact bundle size for browser applications","No built-in update notifications when new models or pricing changes occur","Requires npm/yarn; not directly usable in pure Python or other language ecosystems"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm 6+ or yarn 1.22+","package.json in project root"],"input_types":["import statements","require() calls"],"output_types":["JavaScript objects or JSON","arrays of model metadata","exported functions for filtering/querying"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.cross.provider.model.comparison.and.cost.analysis","name":"cross-provider model comparison and cost analysis","description":"Enables side-by-side comparison of models across multiple providers by normalizing pricing (cost per 1K tokens for input/output), context windows, and capabilities into a unified schema. Developers can programmatically calculate total cost of ownership for different model choices or generate comparison matrices for decision-making.","intents":["I want to calculate the cost difference between using GPT-4 vs Claude 3 Opus for my workload","Show me a comparison table of all vision-capable models ranked by price per 1K tokens","I need to estimate total monthly costs for different model selection strategies","Which provider offers the best value for long-context applications?"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multi-provider strategies","cost-conscious developers optimizing LLM spend","product managers comparing vendor options","researchers analyzing LLM economics"],"limitations":["Pricing comparison is static and does not account for volume discounts or enterprise pricing","Does not include inference latency or throughput in cost calculations","Comparison is based on published pricing; actual costs may vary by region or account tier","No historical cost trends or price change predictions","Does not factor in provider-specific features (e.g., fine-tuning costs, batch processing discounts)"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed","Basic understanding of token economics"],"input_types":["model names or provider names","token counts for workload estimation","filter criteria (capability requirements)"],"output_types":["cost comparison objects","ranked arrays by cost metric","total cost of ownership estimates","comparison matrices (CSV, JSON, or formatted text)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.model.capability.matrix.querying","name":"model capability matrix querying","description":"Exposes a structured capability matrix for each model including supported modalities (text, vision, audio), function calling support, fine-tuning availability, tool use, streaming, and other technical features. Developers can query this matrix to find models matching specific capability requirements without reading provider documentation.","intents":["I need a model that supports both vision input and function calling for my agent","Which models support streaming responses for real-time applications?","I want to find all models that can be fine-tuned within my budget","Show me models that support tool use and have at least 100K context windows"],"best_for":["developers building multi-modal AI applications","teams implementing function-calling agents","researchers comparing model feature sets","teams planning fine-tuning strategies"],"limitations":["Capability data is binary (supported/not supported) without quality or performance metrics","Does not include implementation details (e.g., vision quality, function calling latency)","Capabilities may change with provider updates; registry may lag actual provider changes","No performance benchmarks for capabilities (e.g., vision accuracy, function calling reliability)","Does not account for capability limitations (e.g., some models have vision-only for certain image types)"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed"],"input_types":["capability names (vision, functionCalling, streaming, fineTuning, toolUse)","boolean filters","arrays of required capabilities"],"output_types":["filtered model arrays","capability matrices (2D arrays or objects)","boolean match results","capability intersection/union results"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.provider.agnostic.model.abstraction.layer","name":"provider-agnostic model abstraction layer","description":"Provides a unified metadata schema that abstracts away provider-specific naming conventions, pricing structures, and capability representations. Developers can write model-selection logic once and apply it across providers without conditional logic for each vendor's API or documentation format.","intents":["I want to build an application that can switch between OpenAI and Anthropic models without code changes","I need to abstract model selection logic from provider-specific implementation details","I want to support multiple providers in my application without duplicating model metadata","I need a vendor-neutral way to represent model capabilities in my codebase"],"best_for":["teams building multi-provider LLM applications","developers avoiding vendor lock-in","teams with provider flexibility requirements","applications needing fallback model strategies"],"limitations":["Abstraction layer does not include provider-specific features or optimizations","Does not handle provider-specific authentication or API differences","Unified schema may lose nuance in provider-specific capabilities","Requires manual mapping when new providers or models are added","Does not provide actual API client functionality; only metadata abstraction"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed","Understanding of provider-specific API differences for actual integration"],"input_types":["provider names","model identifiers","capability queries"],"output_types":["normalized model metadata objects","provider-agnostic capability representations","unified pricing structures"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.real.time.pricing.data.aggregation.and.curation","name":"real-time pricing data aggregation and curation","description":"Continuously monitors and aggregates pricing information from 15+ LLM providers, normalizing different pricing models (per-token, per-1K-tokens, per-request) into a unified cost structure. The registry is manually curated and updated to reflect provider pricing changes, ensuring developers have current cost information for budgeting and model selection.","intents":["I need current pricing for all major LLM models to estimate my monthly costs","I want to be alerted when a model's pricing changes significantly","I need to track pricing trends to optimize my model selection over time","I want to include current pricing in my application's model selection logic"],"best_for":["cost-conscious development teams","teams with tight LLM budgets","applications requiring accurate cost estimation","teams evaluating provider economics"],"limitations":["Pricing updates are manual and may lag actual provider changes by hours to days","No automatic alerts for pricing changes; requires manual package updates","Does not include volume discounts, enterprise pricing, or regional variations","Pricing is normalized to per-token cost; actual costs may vary by usage pattern","No historical pricing data or trend analysis","Does not account for provider-specific pricing models (e.g., batch processing discounts)"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed","Regular package updates to stay current with pricing changes"],"input_types":["model names","provider names","token counts for cost estimation"],"output_types":["pricing objects (input/output token costs)","total cost estimates","cost per model comparisons","pricing matrices"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.context.window.specification.and.comparison","name":"context window specification and comparison","description":"Maintains detailed context window specifications for each model including input context limit, output token limit, and any special considerations (e.g., sliding window, context compression). Enables developers to filter models by context requirements and estimate token usage for their workloads.","intents":["I need a model with at least 200K context window for processing long documents","Which models support the longest context windows for my use case?","I want to estimate how many documents I can fit in a model's context window","I need to find models with sufficient context for my RAG application"],"best_for":["developers building long-context applications (RAG, document analysis)","teams processing large documents or multiple files","researchers working with long-form content","applications requiring extended conversation history"],"limitations":["Context window specifications are static; actual available context may vary by provider implementation","Does not include information about context compression or sliding window behavior","No performance metrics for how models handle near-maximum context","Does not account for system prompts or other overhead that reduces effective context","Context window limits may change with provider updates; registry may lag"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed"],"input_types":["minimum context window requirement","model names or provider names","token count estimates"],"output_types":["context window specifications","filtered model arrays by context size","context utilization estimates","comparison matrices"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.model.release.date.and.version.tracking","name":"model release date and version tracking","description":"Tracks release dates and version information for each model, enabling developers to identify the latest versions, understand model lineage (e.g., GPT-4 → GPT-4 Turbo → GPT-4o), and make informed decisions about model stability and feature availability based on release recency.","intents":["I want to use the latest version of a model for my application","I need to understand the difference between GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo","I want to track when new model versions are released","I need to know if a model is stable or recently released"],"best_for":["developers staying current with model releases","teams evaluating model maturity and stability","researchers tracking model evolution","applications requiring latest model features"],"limitations":["Release date data is manually curated and may be incomplete for older models","Does not include detailed changelog information between versions","No automatic notifications for new model releases","Version naming conventions vary by provider; not standardized across vendors","Does not track deprecation timelines or end-of-life dates"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed"],"input_types":["model names","provider names","date ranges for filtering"],"output_types":["release date information","version lineage data","model age/recency metrics","filtered arrays sorted by release date"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-zoo__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.open.source.and.self.hosted.model.identification","name":"open-source and self-hosted model identification","description":"Identifies and catalogs open-source and self-hosted LLM alternatives within the registry, enabling developers to find models they can run locally or deploy on their own infrastructure without vendor dependencies. Includes metadata about model size, quantization options, and deployment requirements.","intents":["I want to find open-source alternatives to GPT-4 for my application","I need a model I can run locally without cloud dependencies","I want to compare self-hosted models with commercial options","I need to find models suitable for on-premises deployment"],"best_for":["teams prioritizing data privacy and on-premises deployment","developers avoiding vendor lock-in","organizations with restricted cloud usage","researchers working with open-source models"],"limitations":["Does not include deployment instructions or infrastructure requirements","No performance benchmarks for self-hosted models","Does not track model size, quantization options, or hardware requirements","Limited to models the maintainers have explicitly cataloged","Does not provide actual model weights or download links"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","npm package installed","Infrastructure for running self-hosted models (not provided by this package)"],"input_types":["filter for open-source/self-hosted models","capability requirements","cost constraints"],"output_types":["filtered arrays of open-source models","comparison matrices (open-source vs commercial)","model metadata with deployment indicators"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":30,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 14+ or browser JavaScript runtime","npm or yarn package manager","No API keys required for registry access (data is static/bundled)","Node.js 14+","npm package installation","Basic JavaScript knowledge for query construction","npm 6+ or yarn 1.22+","package.json in project root","npm package installed","Basic understanding of token economics"],"failure_modes":["Pricing data is point-in-time and may lag actual provider updates by hours to days","Does not include real-time availability or rate-limit information per provider","Context window and capability data is manually curated, subject to human error","No historical pricing trends or cost prediction modeling","Limited to models the maintainers have explicitly added; emerging models may have delays","Filtering is based on static metadata; does not reflect real-time model availability or performance","Capability data is binary (supported/not supported) without nuance on quality or performance differences","No filtering by latency, throughput, or availability SLAs","Does not account for provider-specific rate limits or quota restrictions","Pricing filters are approximate; actual costs may vary by region or volume discounts","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.14599952560473914,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":1442,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=llm-zoo","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=llm-zoo"}},"signature":"9CtYb2Nn58cPRcTeNrlL6GARrSXADKo3/dsOWjocqb7swBGG0QMfoe6PW7P7jknJXxnA0qPfwx2pS+UVmWU9BA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T17:26:24.192Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/llm-zoo","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/llm-zoo","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=llm-zoo","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}