{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-llm-splitter","slug":"llm-splitter","name":"llm-splitter","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/nearform/llm-splitter#readme","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/llm-splitter","categories":["rag-knowledge"],"tags":["llm","splitter","chunking","text","vectorization"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-llm-splitter__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.semantic.aware.text.chunking.with.configurable.boundaries","name":"semantic-aware text chunking with configurable boundaries","description":"Splits text into semantically coherent chunks by respecting natural language boundaries (sentences, paragraphs, sections) rather than naive character/token limits. Implements configurable splitting strategies that preserve context integrity across chunk boundaries, enabling downstream LLM vectorization to capture meaningful semantic units. The chunker analyzes text structure and applies rule-based or learned boundary detection to minimize context fragmentation.","intents":["I need to split large documents into chunks that preserve semantic meaning for RAG embeddings","I want to configure chunk size and overlap behavior without losing sentence-level coherence","I need to ensure chunks respect document structure (paragraphs, sections) rather than arbitrary token boundaries"],"best_for":["teams building RAG systems with LLM vectorization pipelines","developers optimizing embedding quality by preserving semantic boundaries","applications processing long-form documents (research papers, books, legal contracts)"],"limitations":["No language-specific NLP models included — relies on basic punctuation/whitespace heuristics for boundary detection","Performance degrades on unstructured or malformed text without clear sentence boundaries","Does not handle code blocks, tables, or structured data formats with specialized logic"],"requires":["Node.js 12+ or JavaScript runtime","Text input with clear delimiters (newlines, punctuation) for optimal boundary detection"],"input_types":["plain text","markdown","HTML (with preprocessing)"],"output_types":["structured chunk objects with metadata","JSON array of chunks with position/offset information"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-splitter__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.chunk.metadata.enrichment.with.positional.tracking","name":"chunk metadata enrichment with positional tracking","description":"Automatically generates and attaches rich metadata to each chunk including byte/character offsets, chunk indices, original document position, and boundary type information. This metadata enables downstream systems to reconstruct document context, trace embeddings back to source locations, and implement overlap-aware retrieval strategies. The implementation tracks position state throughout the splitting process to ensure accurate offset calculation.","intents":["I need to track where each chunk came from in the original document for citation/attribution","I want to implement overlap-aware retrieval that knows chunk boundaries and positions","I need to reconstruct document context from retrieved chunks using position metadata"],"best_for":["RAG systems requiring source attribution and chunk traceability","applications implementing sliding-window or overlap-based retrieval strategies","document processing pipelines needing precise position tracking for reconstruction"],"limitations":["Metadata overhead increases output size by 15-25% depending on chunk count","No automatic deduplication of overlapping chunks — requires post-processing for overlap handling","Offset tracking assumes UTF-8 encoding; behavior undefined for other character encodings"],"requires":["Text input with consistent encoding (UTF-8 recommended)","Downstream system capable of consuming and utilizing metadata objects"],"input_types":["plain text with position tracking enabled"],"output_types":["chunk objects with metadata fields: {text, startOffset, endOffset, chunkIndex, metadata}"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-splitter__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.configurable.chunk.size.and.overlap.control","name":"configurable chunk size and overlap control","description":"Exposes configuration parameters for chunk size (in characters or tokens), overlap amount, and splitting strategy selection, allowing users to tune chunking behavior for specific use cases without code changes. Implements parameter validation and applies configurations consistently across the splitting pipeline. Supports both fixed-size and adaptive sizing strategies based on document structure.","intents":["I need to adjust chunk size based on my embedding model's context window and retrieval requirements","I want to configure overlap between chunks to preserve context continuity in retrieval","I need different chunking strategies for different document types (code vs prose)"],"best_for":["teams experimenting with chunking hyperparameters for embedding quality optimization","applications with heterogeneous document types requiring per-type configuration","RAG systems tuning chunk size for specific embedding models and context windows"],"limitations":["No automatic parameter tuning — requires manual experimentation to find optimal values","Configuration is global per splitter instance; no per-document dynamic adjustment","Overlap implementation may create redundant chunks without deduplication logic"],"requires":["Configuration object with valid parameters: {chunkSize, overlap, strategy}","Understanding of embedding model context windows and retrieval requirements"],"input_types":["configuration objects","text input"],"output_types":["chunked text with applied configuration"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-splitter__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.strategy.text.splitting.with.boundary.detection","name":"multi-strategy text splitting with boundary detection","description":"Implements multiple splitting strategies (recursive character splitting, sentence-aware splitting, paragraph-aware splitting) that can be selected or composed based on document type and requirements. Each strategy applies different boundary detection heuristics (punctuation, whitespace, structural markers) to identify natural break points. The implementation allows strategy composition to handle mixed-format documents.","intents":["I need different splitting behavior for code vs natural language documents","I want to split on sentences first, then paragraphs, then characters as fallback","I need to handle documents with mixed content types (prose + code blocks)"],"best_for":["applications processing heterogeneous document collections","RAG systems requiring adaptive chunking based on content type","teams implementing document-type-specific preprocessing pipelines"],"limitations":["Strategy selection is manual — no automatic content-type detection","Boundary detection relies on heuristics; may fail on non-standard formatting","No built-in support for domain-specific boundaries (code blocks, tables, structured data)"],"requires":["Text input with clear structural markers (punctuation, whitespace, newlines)","Strategy selection logic in calling code"],"input_types":["plain text","markdown","mixed-format documents"],"output_types":["chunks split according to selected strategy"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-splitter__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.efficient.batch.text.processing.for.vectorization.pipelines","name":"efficient batch text processing for vectorization pipelines","description":"Optimizes chunking performance for large-scale document processing by implementing efficient batch operations and minimal memory overhead. The implementation processes text sequentially with streaming-friendly patterns, avoiding full document loading into memory. Designed specifically for integration into vectorization pipelines where throughput and memory efficiency are critical.","intents":["I need to process thousands of documents efficiently without memory exhaustion","I want to integrate chunking into a streaming vectorization pipeline","I need predictable performance characteristics for large-scale document processing"],"best_for":["large-scale RAG systems processing millions of documents","streaming vectorization pipelines with memory constraints","batch processing jobs requiring predictable performance"],"limitations":["No built-in parallelization — single-threaded processing only","Memory efficiency assumes streaming input; loading entire documents into memory negates benefits","No progress tracking or cancellation support for long-running batch jobs"],"requires":["Streaming or sequential text input","Sufficient memory for single document + chunk buffer"],"input_types":["text streams","large documents"],"output_types":["chunk streams","batched chunk arrays"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-splitter__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.language.agnostic.text.boundary.detection","name":"language-agnostic text boundary detection","description":"Detects natural text boundaries (sentence ends, paragraph breaks, section headers) using language-agnostic heuristics based on punctuation, whitespace, and structural patterns rather than language-specific NLP models. Applies rule-based detection across multiple languages without requiring language identification or language-specific models. Boundary detection is configurable to handle domain-specific patterns.","intents":["I need to chunk documents in multiple languages without loading language-specific models","I want to detect paragraph and sentence boundaries without external NLP dependencies","I need to handle domain-specific text patterns (code, markdown, structured formats)"],"best_for":["multilingual RAG systems with memory/latency constraints","applications avoiding external NLP dependencies","systems processing domain-specific text formats"],"limitations":["Heuristic-based detection may fail on languages with non-standard punctuation (CJK, Arabic)","No semantic understanding of sentence boundaries — relies on punctuation patterns","Requires manual configuration for domain-specific boundary patterns"],"requires":["Text with clear punctuation and whitespace markers","Optional custom boundary patterns for domain-specific content"],"input_types":["text in any language with standard punctuation"],"output_types":["chunks with detected boundaries"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":27,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Node.js 12+ or JavaScript runtime","Text input with clear delimiters (newlines, punctuation) for optimal boundary detection","Text input with consistent encoding (UTF-8 recommended)","Downstream system capable of consuming and utilizing metadata objects","Configuration object with valid parameters: {chunkSize, overlap, strategy}","Understanding of embedding model context windows and retrieval requirements","Text input with clear structural markers (punctuation, whitespace, newlines)","Strategy selection logic in calling code","Streaming or sequential text input","Sufficient memory for single document + chunk buffer"],"failure_modes":["No language-specific NLP models included — relies on basic punctuation/whitespace heuristics for boundary detection","Performance degrades on unstructured or malformed text without clear sentence boundaries","Does not handle code blocks, tables, or structured data formats with specialized logic","Metadata overhead increases output size by 15-25% depending on chunk count","No automatic deduplication of overlapping chunks — requires post-processing for overlap handling","Offset tracking assumes UTF-8 encoding; behavior undefined for other character encodings","No automatic parameter tuning — requires manual experimentation to find optimal values","Configuration is global per splitter instance; no per-document dynamic adjustment","Overlap implementation may create redundant chunks without deduplication logic","Strategy selection is manual — no automatic content-type detection","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.1333245698961963,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.55,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":1077,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=llm-splitter","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=llm-splitter"}},"signature":"KqPNl6aJXCjGkdcV+M505srUazgkHgCtmdYrM1yCav3QY+XFxRz/j4VvBC3DIAV8qS5e21lzFz51dsRxnlLQAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T19:58:50.916Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/llm-splitter","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/llm-splitter","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=llm-splitter","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}