{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot","slug":"llm-polyglot","name":"llm-polyglot","type":"framework","url":"https://island.hack.dance","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/llm-polyglot","categories":["llm-apis"],"tags":["llm","openai","gemini","streaming","anthropic","llm client","claude","gpt-4"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.provider.agnostic.llm.client.with.openai.sdk.compatibility","name":"provider-agnostic llm client with openai sdk compatibility","description":"Implements a universal adapter layer that translates multiple LLM provider APIs (Anthropic, Gemini, etc.) into OpenAI SDK-compatible interfaces. Uses a provider registry pattern where each provider has a dedicated adapter class that maps provider-specific request/response schemas to OpenAI's format, enabling drop-in replacement of LLM backends without changing application code. The adapter layer handles authentication token management, endpoint routing, and response normalization transparently.","intents":["Switch between LLM providers without refactoring existing OpenAI SDK code","Use Anthropic Claude or Google Gemini with the same client interface as GPT-4","Avoid vendor lock-in by abstracting provider-specific API differences","Test multiple LLM backends against the same application code"],"best_for":["Teams building LLM applications who want provider flexibility","Developers migrating from one LLM provider to another","Multi-model applications requiring cost optimization across providers","Open-source projects avoiding proprietary SDK dependencies"],"limitations":["Response normalization may lose provider-specific features (e.g., Anthropic's extended thinking, tool_choice strict mode)","Streaming response handling depends on provider's streaming protocol support — some providers may have latency overhead during adaptation","No built-in request/response caching or retry logic — applications must implement their own resilience patterns","Provider-specific parameters not in OpenAI spec are dropped during normalization, limiting advanced feature access"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ or JavaScript runtime with ES2020+ support","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.)","npm or yarn package manager"],"input_types":["text prompts","message arrays with role/content structure","system prompts","tool/function definitions in OpenAI format"],"output_types":["text completions","structured message objects with role/content/tool_calls","streaming token chunks","function call objects with arguments"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","llm-abstraction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.response.normalization.across.heterogeneous.providers","name":"streaming response normalization across heterogeneous providers","description":"Handles real-time streaming from different LLM providers (which use different chunking protocols and event formats) and normalizes them into a unified OpenAI-compatible streaming format. Each provider adapter implements a stream transformer that parses provider-specific delimited chunks (e.g., Anthropic's event-stream format, Gemini's Server-Sent Events) and emits standardized token/delta objects matching OpenAI's streaming schema, enabling consistent client-side streaming handling regardless of backend.","intents":["Stream LLM responses in real-time without provider-specific parsing logic","Build streaming UI components that work with any LLM backend","Reduce latency by consuming tokens as they arrive rather than waiting for full responses","Handle provider-specific streaming errors (timeouts, connection drops) uniformly"],"best_for":["Chat applications requiring real-time token streaming","Interactive AI assistants with progressive UI updates","Developers building streaming abstractions on top of multiple LLM providers"],"limitations":["Streaming latency varies by provider — some providers batch tokens before sending, adding 50-200ms overhead","No built-in backpressure handling — fast consumers may overwhelm slow network connections","Provider-specific streaming metadata (e.g., token probabilities, finish reasons) is normalized away, losing fidelity","Error recovery during streams requires application-level handling — partial responses may be lost on connection failure"],"requires":["HTTP/2 or HTTP/1.1 with keep-alive support","Provider API keys with streaming enabled","Client-side streaming support (async iterators or event listeners)"],"input_types":["streaming HTTP responses from LLM providers","Server-Sent Events (SSE) format","newline-delimited JSON (NDJSON) format"],"output_types":["OpenAI-compatible streaming chunks","token delta objects","finish_reason indicators"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.function.calling.with.unified.schema.registry","name":"multi-provider function calling with unified schema registry","description":"Abstracts function/tool calling across providers with different tool-calling implementations (OpenAI's function_calling, Anthropic's tool_use, Gemini's function_calling) by maintaining a unified tool schema registry. When a tool call is requested, the library translates the unified schema into provider-specific format, sends the request, and normalizes the tool call response back to OpenAI's format, handling differences in argument parsing, tool selection, and error handling transparently.","intents":["Define tools once and use them across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini without format conversion","Implement reliable function calling that works consistently regardless of LLM backend","Handle tool call failures and retries uniformly across providers","Build agent systems that can switch LLM providers without redefining tools"],"best_for":["Agent frameworks requiring multi-provider tool support","Applications with complex tool ecosystems (10+ tools)","Teams building provider-agnostic AI assistants"],"limitations":["Tool schema translation may lose provider-specific features (e.g., Anthropic's tool_choice strict mode, OpenAI's parallel tool calls)","Some providers have tool call limits (e.g., max tools per request) that may require batching or fallback logic","Tool argument validation is provider-dependent — malformed arguments may fail silently or with inconsistent error messages","No built-in tool execution or result injection — applications must implement tool execution and response handling"],"requires":["Tool definitions in JSON Schema format","Provider API keys with tool/function calling enabled","Application-level tool execution layer"],"input_types":["JSON Schema tool definitions","tool_choice parameter (auto, required, or specific tool name)","message history with prior tool calls"],"output_types":["tool_calls array with name and arguments","tool_call_id for result injection","normalized tool use objects"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.authentication.and.credential.management.across.providers","name":"authentication and credential management across providers","description":"Centralizes API key and authentication credential management for multiple LLM providers, supporting environment variables, explicit key passing, and credential chains. The library detects which provider is being used and automatically routes credentials to the correct provider endpoint, handling authentication headers, bearer tokens, and provider-specific auth schemes (e.g., Google's OAuth vs OpenAI's API key) without exposing authentication details to application code.","intents":["Manage API keys for multiple LLM providers in a single configuration","Switch providers without changing authentication code","Support environment-based credential injection for CI/CD pipelines","Rotate credentials without redeploying application code"],"best_for":["Multi-provider applications requiring centralized credential management","Teams deploying to multiple environments (dev, staging, prod) with different API keys","Open-source projects that need to support user-provided credentials"],"limitations":["No built-in credential encryption or secure storage — keys are stored in memory and must be protected by application","Environment variable detection is simple string matching — no support for complex credential chains or IAM roles","No credential rotation or expiration handling — applications must manage token refresh externally","Credentials are passed in plaintext over HTTPS — no additional encryption layer"],"requires":["API keys for target LLM providers","Environment variables or explicit key passing","HTTPS for all API communication"],"input_types":["environment variables (OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, etc.)","explicit API key strings","provider configuration objects"],"output_types":["authenticated HTTP headers","bearer tokens","provider-specific auth schemes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.response.schema.normalization.and.type.coercion","name":"response schema normalization and type coercion","description":"Normalizes response objects from different LLM providers into OpenAI's response schema, handling differences in field names, data types, and nested structures. The library maps provider-specific response fields (e.g., Anthropic's 'content' array vs OpenAI's 'message' object) to a unified schema, coerces types (e.g., converting string finish_reason to enum), and handles missing fields with sensible defaults, ensuring consistent response handling across providers.","intents":["Parse LLM responses without provider-specific conditional logic","Access response metadata (finish_reason, token counts, etc.) uniformly","Handle edge cases (empty responses, error responses) consistently","Build type-safe response handling with TypeScript or similar languages"],"best_for":["TypeScript applications requiring type-safe response handling","Multi-provider applications with complex response processing logic","Teams building abstraction layers on top of multiple LLM providers"],"limitations":["Type coercion may lose precision — e.g., converting provider-specific token counts to OpenAI's format may be inaccurate","Provider-specific response fields not in OpenAI schema are dropped — applications cannot access advanced metadata","Error responses are normalized to OpenAI's error format, potentially losing provider-specific error details","No validation of response schema — malformed responses may pass through without error"],"requires":["HTTP response from LLM provider","JSON parsing capability"],"input_types":["JSON response objects from LLM providers","error responses","streaming response chunks"],"output_types":["OpenAI-compatible response objects","typed message objects","error objects with standardized fields"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.handling.and.retry.logic.with.provider.specific.fallbacks","name":"error handling and retry logic with provider-specific fallbacks","description":"Implements a unified error handling layer that catches provider-specific errors (rate limits, authentication failures, network timeouts) and normalizes them into OpenAI-compatible error objects. Includes configurable retry logic with exponential backoff that handles provider-specific retry semantics (e.g., Anthropic's retry-after headers, OpenAI's rate limit errors), and supports fallback to alternative providers on failure, enabling resilient multi-provider applications.","intents":["Handle rate limiting and quota errors consistently across providers","Implement automatic retries with exponential backoff for transient failures","Fall back to alternative providers when primary provider is unavailable","Log and monitor errors uniformly across multiple LLM backends"],"best_for":["Production applications requiring high availability across multiple LLM providers","Cost-optimized applications that need to switch providers based on quota/rate limits","Teams building resilient agent systems with fallback logic"],"limitations":["Retry logic adds latency — exponential backoff may delay responses by 1-30 seconds on repeated failures","Provider fallback requires multiple API keys and may incur costs for failed requests before fallback","No built-in circuit breaker pattern — applications may continue retrying against a permanently unavailable provider","Retry semantics vary by provider — some providers don't expose retry-after headers, requiring heuristic backoff"],"requires":["API keys for multiple providers (for fallback)","Configuration of retry policy (max retries, backoff strategy)","Network connectivity to LLM provider endpoints"],"input_types":["HTTP error responses","timeout errors","network errors"],"output_types":["normalized error objects","retry decisions","fallback provider selection"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-llm-polyglot__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.token.counting.and.cost.estimation.across.providers","name":"token counting and cost estimation across providers","description":"Provides token counting utilities for different LLM providers with varying tokenization schemes (OpenAI's cl100k_base, Anthropic's Claude tokenizer, Gemini's SentencePiece), enabling accurate cost estimation before making API calls. The library implements provider-specific tokenizers or integrates with provider APIs to count tokens in prompts and responses, supporting cost calculation based on provider-specific pricing models (different rates for input/output tokens, context window pricing, etc.).","intents":["Estimate API costs before sending requests to avoid budget overruns","Compare costs across providers for the same prompt","Implement token-aware prompt optimization to reduce costs","Track token usage and costs per request for billing and monitoring"],"best_for":["Cost-sensitive applications comparing multiple LLM providers","Teams with strict API budgets requiring cost forecasting","Applications implementing token-aware prompt optimization"],"limitations":["Token counting accuracy varies by provider — some providers don't expose exact tokenization, requiring approximation","Cost estimation is based on published pricing and may not reflect actual billing (e.g., volume discounts, enterprise pricing)","Token counts for streaming responses are estimates until response is complete","No built-in cost tracking or billing integration — applications must implement their own cost aggregation"],"requires":["Provider-specific tokenizer libraries or API access","Current pricing information for each provider","Prompt text for token counting"],"input_types":["text prompts","message arrays","system prompts"],"output_types":["token count integers","cost estimates in USD","token breakdown by message/role"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":35,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ or JavaScript runtime with ES2020+ support","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.)","npm or yarn package manager","HTTP/2 or HTTP/1.1 with keep-alive support","Provider API keys with streaming enabled","Client-side streaming support (async iterators or event listeners)","Tool definitions in JSON Schema format","Provider API keys with tool/function calling enabled","Application-level tool execution layer","API keys for target LLM providers"],"failure_modes":["Response normalization may lose provider-specific features (e.g., Anthropic's extended thinking, tool_choice strict mode)","Streaming response handling depends on provider's streaming protocol support — some providers may have latency overhead during adaptation","No built-in request/response caching or retry logic — applications must implement their own resilience patterns","Provider-specific parameters not in OpenAI spec are dropped during normalization, limiting advanced feature access","Streaming latency varies by provider — some providers batch tokens before sending, adding 50-200ms overhead","No built-in backpressure handling — fast consumers may overwhelm slow network connections","Provider-specific streaming metadata (e.g., token probabilities, finish reasons) is normalized away, losing fidelity","Error recovery during streams requires application-level handling — partial responses may be lost on connection failure","Tool schema translation may lose provider-specific features (e.g., Anthropic's tool_choice strict mode, OpenAI's parallel tool calls)","Some providers have tool call limits (e.g., max tools per request) that may require batching or fallback logic","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.1918764031027999,"quality":0.39,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":4147,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=llm-polyglot","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=llm-polyglot"}},"signature":"wUr5DuGj0mNj8TKkjN9+y2TGdrCfcgXgsT2oCVkIeUy0WvTB7Iu+nfVAileR8Rv9FdVmqzk0o0L/u98ZZ12VBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T11:25:32.801Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/llm-polyglot","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/llm-polyglot","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=llm-polyglot","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}