{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_lintrule","slug":"lintrule","name":"Lintrule","type":"product","url":"https://www.lintrule.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/lintrule","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.declarative.policy.rule.definition.without.code","name":"declarative policy rule definition without code","description":"Enables non-technical stakeholders to define custom linting rules using a declarative, code-free interface that translates policy intent into executable lint rules. The system abstracts away plugin development complexity by providing a rule builder that generates enforcement logic without requiring users to write custom linter extensions or modify build configurations.","intents":["Define company-wide coding standards without hiring specialized linter plugin developers","Allow product managers and architects to enforce architectural decisions as automated checks","Create compliance rules that non-engineers can maintain and iterate on independently"],"best_for":["Engineering teams with non-technical stakeholders who need to enforce policies","Organizations lacking dedicated DevTools/infrastructure teams","Companies with rapidly evolving compliance or architectural requirements"],"limitations":["Rule expressiveness limited to platform's built-in rule types — complex custom logic may require fallback to traditional linters","No programmatic API for rule generation, limiting integration with external policy management systems","Rule versioning and rollback capabilities unknown — may require manual management of rule changes across teams"],"requires":["Git repository with CI/CD pipeline integration capability","Access to Lintrule platform (SaaS or self-hosted deployment)","Basic understanding of code patterns to express as policies"],"input_types":["policy intent (natural language or structured form)","code patterns (regex, AST patterns, or visual rule builder selections)"],"output_types":["executable lint rule definitions","rule configuration files (format unknown)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","policy-as-code"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ci.cd.pipeline.integrated.policy.enforcement","name":"ci/cd pipeline-integrated policy enforcement","description":"Integrates directly into CI/CD workflows as a pre-merge gate that evaluates code against defined policies before pull requests are merged. The system hooks into Git events and CI platforms to run policy checks in parallel with existing linting and testing, blocking merges when violations are detected without requiring code modifications or build configuration changes.","intents":["Catch policy violations early in the development cycle before code review","Prevent non-compliant code from reaching main branches automatically","Enforce policies consistently across all developers without manual review overhead"],"best_for":["Teams using GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket with existing CI/CD pipelines","Organizations needing compliance enforcement at scale across multiple repositories","Development teams wanting to reduce code review burden by automating policy checks"],"limitations":["Integration limited to supported Git platforms and CI systems — custom CI solutions may require webhook-based integration","No built-in rollback mechanism if a policy rule causes false positives in production","Policy enforcement timing and ordering relative to other CI steps not configurable — may cause pipeline delays if policy checks are slow"],"requires":["Git repository hosted on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or similar platform","CI/CD pipeline with webhook or native integration support","Lintrule account with repository access permissions"],"input_types":["code commits","pull request diffs","repository metadata"],"output_types":["policy violation reports","CI/CD status checks (pass/fail)","merge blocking decisions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.code.pattern.matching.and.violation.detection","name":"multi-language code pattern matching and violation detection","description":"Analyzes code across multiple programming languages using pattern matching (likely AST-based or regex-based) to detect violations of defined policies. The system scans code submissions and identifies instances where code structure, naming conventions, API usage, or architectural patterns violate organizational rules, generating detailed violation reports with line numbers and context.","intents":["Detect architectural violations like forbidden imports or disallowed API calls across codebases","Enforce naming conventions and code structure standards automatically","Identify compliance violations like hardcoded secrets, unlogged operations, or missing error handling patterns"],"best_for":["Polyglot organizations with multiple programming languages in production","Teams enforcing architectural boundaries (e.g., preventing frontend code from importing backend modules)","Compliance-heavy industries needing consistent policy enforcement across language boundaries"],"limitations":["Pattern matching accuracy depends on rule definition quality — complex semantic violations may require manual review","Language support coverage unknown — may not support all languages or may have varying detection accuracy across languages","False positive rate not disclosed — teams may need to tune rules iteratively, causing enforcement delays"],"requires":["Supported programming language (specific list unknown)","Code accessible to Lintrule platform (cloud or self-hosted)","Defined policy rules with language-specific patterns"],"input_types":["source code files","code diffs","repository snapshots"],"output_types":["violation locations (file, line number, column)","violation severity levels","violation context and explanation"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.policy.violation.reporting.and.remediation.guidance","name":"policy violation reporting and remediation guidance","description":"Generates detailed violation reports that identify policy breaches, provide context about why violations occurred, and suggest remediation steps. Reports include file locations, violation severity, policy references, and actionable guidance for developers to fix violations, integrating into code review workflows and developer notifications.","intents":["Provide developers with clear, actionable feedback on policy violations in their code","Document policy violations for compliance auditing and team metrics","Enable developers to self-remediate violations without waiting for code review feedback"],"best_for":["Teams wanting to shift left by catching violations before code review","Organizations needing audit trails of policy violations and remediation","Development teams with distributed or asynchronous code review processes"],"limitations":["Remediation guidance quality depends on rule definition — generic rules may produce unhelpful suggestions","No automated code fixing capability — developers must manually remediate violations","Report formatting and integration with code review tools not specified — may require manual copying of violation details into PR comments"],"requires":["Lintrule policy rules defined with violation context and remediation guidance","Integration with code review platform (GitHub, GitLab, etc.) for report delivery"],"input_types":["policy violation data","code context around violations"],"output_types":["violation reports (format unknown)","remediation guidance","severity classifications","policy references"],"categories":["text-generation-language","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.organizational.policy.versioning.and.rollout.management","name":"organizational policy versioning and rollout management","description":"Manages policy rule versions and enables controlled rollout of new or updated policies across teams and repositories. The system tracks policy changes, allows gradual enforcement (e.g., warning-only mode before blocking), and provides mechanisms to test policy changes before organization-wide deployment.","intents":["Roll out new policies gradually to avoid disrupting development workflows","Test policy rules on a subset of repositories before enforcing organization-wide","Track policy changes and maintain audit history of enforcement decisions"],"best_for":["Large organizations with multiple teams and repositories","Teams needing to coordinate policy changes across distributed development groups","Compliance-heavy organizations requiring audit trails of policy enforcement decisions"],"limitations":["Rollout granularity unknown — may only support repository-level or team-level rollout, not fine-grained targeting","No built-in A/B testing framework for comparing policy enforcement outcomes","Policy rollback mechanism not specified — may require manual reversion of policy versions"],"requires":["Lintrule platform with policy management interface","Multiple repositories or teams to coordinate across"],"input_types":["policy rule definitions","rollout configuration (target repositories, enforcement mode)"],"output_types":["policy version history","rollout status and metrics","enforcement mode settings (warning vs blocking)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.repository.wide.policy.compliance.scanning","name":"repository-wide policy compliance scanning","description":"Performs batch scanning of entire repositories or code snapshots to identify all policy violations across the codebase, generating compliance reports that show violation density, distribution, and trends over time. The system can scan historical commits to establish baseline compliance and track improvement metrics.","intents":["Assess current compliance status of existing codebases before enforcing new policies","Generate compliance metrics and dashboards for stakeholder reporting","Identify high-violation areas for targeted remediation efforts"],"best_for":["Organizations onboarding new policies to existing large codebases","Teams needing compliance metrics for executive reporting or audits","Development teams wanting to prioritize remediation efforts based on violation density"],"limitations":["Scanning large repositories may be slow — performance characteristics not disclosed","Historical scanning limited to available Git history — may not detect violations in deleted code","Compliance metrics and trend analysis capabilities not specified — may require manual analysis of scan results"],"requires":["Full repository access for scanning","Lintrule platform with batch scanning capability","Defined policy rules to scan against"],"input_types":["repository snapshots","Git commit history","policy rule definitions"],"output_types":["compliance reports","violation summaries by file/module","compliance metrics and trends","violation distribution visualizations"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.policy.rule.templating.and.reusability","name":"policy rule templating and reusability","description":"Provides pre-built policy rule templates for common compliance and architectural patterns (e.g., forbidden imports, naming conventions, security checks) that teams can customize and reuse across repositories. Templates abstract common rule patterns and allow organizations to build rule libraries that enforce consistent standards.","intents":["Quickly implement common policies without defining rules from scratch","Share policy definitions across teams and repositories for consistency","Build organizational rule libraries that encode architectural and compliance standards"],"best_for":["Organizations implementing common compliance standards (e.g., OWASP, PCI-DSS)","Teams wanting to standardize policies across multiple repositories","Companies lacking expertise to define complex policy rules from scratch"],"limitations":["Template library size and coverage unknown — may not include templates for specialized compliance requirements","Template customization capabilities not specified — may require forking templates rather than parameterizing them","Community template sharing not mentioned — teams may need to recreate common rules independently"],"requires":["Lintrule platform with template library access","Basic understanding of policy intent to customize templates"],"input_types":["template selections","customization parameters"],"output_types":["instantiated policy rules","rule libraries"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_lintrule__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.developer.notification.and.workflow.integration","name":"developer notification and workflow integration","description":"Integrates policy violation notifications into developer workflows through Git platforms, IDE plugins, or email notifications, alerting developers immediately when violations are detected. The system can suppress notifications for acknowledged violations or provide snooze capabilities to reduce notification fatigue.","intents":["Alert developers immediately when their code violates policies","Integrate policy feedback into existing development tools and workflows","Reduce notification fatigue by allowing developers to acknowledge or snooze violations"],"best_for":["Teams using GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket with native notification support","Organizations wanting to shift left by notifying developers before code review","Development teams with distributed or asynchronous workflows"],"limitations":["Notification channels limited to supported platforms — custom notification systems may require webhook integration","IDE plugin support not specified — may only support web-based notifications","Notification customization and filtering capabilities unknown — may result in notification fatigue"],"requires":["Git platform integration (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.)","Developer accounts on Lintrule platform","Notification preferences configured"],"input_types":["policy violations","developer notification preferences"],"output_types":["notifications (format and channel dependent)","violation acknowledgment status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":41,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Git repository with CI/CD pipeline integration capability","Access to Lintrule platform (SaaS or self-hosted deployment)","Basic understanding of code patterns to express as policies","Git repository hosted on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, or similar platform","CI/CD pipeline with webhook or native integration support","Lintrule account with repository access permissions","Supported programming language (specific list unknown)","Code accessible to Lintrule platform (cloud or self-hosted)","Defined policy rules with language-specific patterns","Lintrule policy rules defined with violation context and remediation guidance"],"failure_modes":["Rule expressiveness limited to platform's built-in rule types — complex custom logic may require fallback to traditional linters","No programmatic API for rule generation, limiting integration with external policy management systems","Rule versioning and rollback capabilities unknown — may require manual management of rule changes across teams","Integration limited to supported Git platforms and CI systems — custom CI solutions may require webhook-based integration","No built-in rollback mechanism if a policy rule causes false positives in production","Policy enforcement timing and ordering relative to other CI steps not configurable — may cause pipeline delays if policy checks are slow","Pattern matching accuracy depends on rule definition quality — complex semantic violations may require manual review","Language support coverage unknown — may not support all languages or may have varying detection accuracy across languages","False positive rate not disclosed — teams may need to tune rules iteratively, causing enforcement delays","Remediation guidance quality depends on rule definition — generic rules may produce unhelpful suggestions","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.36666666666666664,"quality":0.7300000000000001,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.447Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.551Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=lintrule","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=lintrule"}},"signature":"Zj/O/Ir3NeS0kIcWtWmzPdPrNBh0gxR/SMj2kKQshi8lxYfy3BfjUNLq0ORyKm0aGvsrh6OxWkugoEkFD5ORAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T06:52:53.049Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/lintrule","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/lintrule","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=lintrule","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}