{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"lighthouse","slug":"lighthouse","name":"Lighthouse","type":"extension","url":"https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/lighthouse/blipmdconlkpinefehnmjammfjpmpbjk","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/lighthouse","categories":["browser-extensions"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"lighthouse__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.performance.metrics.auditing.with.core.web.vitals","name":"performance-metrics-auditing-with-core-web-vitals","description":"Lighthouse measures page performance by instrumenting the browser's rendering pipeline to capture Core Web Vitals (Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, Cumulative Layout Shift), load time metrics, and resource waterfall analysis. It simulates network and CPU throttling profiles (4G, 3G, desktop) to generate reproducible performance scores on a 0-100 scale with diagnostic breakdowns for each metric.","intents":["I need to measure my page's real-world performance against Google's Core Web Vitals benchmarks","I want to identify which resources are causing slow load times and get prioritized optimization suggestions","I need to compare my site's performance across different network conditions (mobile vs desktop)"],"best_for":["web developers optimizing site speed","performance engineers debugging load time regressions","QA teams validating performance requirements before release"],"limitations":["Single-page audits only — cannot crawl multi-page sites or measure performance across user journeys","Throttling profiles are simulated, not real-world network conditions — actual user performance may vary","Cannot measure performance of pages behind authentication or paywalls","Audit results vary based on machine hardware and background processes — results are not deterministic across runs"],"requires":["Chrome browser (version not specified in listing)","Page must be fully loadable and navigable in the browser","DevTools access to the page being audited"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["Performance score (0-100)","Core Web Vitals metrics (LCP, FID, CLS)","Load time breakdown by resource","Opportunity list with estimated time savings"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","performance-monitoring"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.accessibility.compliance.scanning.wcag.2.1","name":"accessibility-compliance-scanning-wcag-2-1","description":"Lighthouse performs automated accessibility auditing by analyzing the DOM tree, computing contrast ratios, validating semantic HTML structure, and checking for WCAG 2.1 violations. It generates an accessibility score (0-100) and lists specific issues (missing alt text, insufficient color contrast, improper heading hierarchy, missing ARIA labels) with severity levels and remediation guidance.","intents":["I need to identify accessibility violations on my site to meet WCAG 2.1 compliance requirements","I want to find pages with color contrast issues that fail accessibility standards","I need to validate that my site's semantic HTML and ARIA attributes are correct"],"best_for":["web developers building accessible sites","accessibility auditors performing compliance reviews","teams ensuring WCAG 2.1 Level AA or AAA compliance"],"limitations":["Automated scanning catches only rule-based violations — cannot detect issues requiring manual testing (e.g., keyboard navigation, screen reader usability)","Cannot audit pages with dynamic content that requires user interaction to render","Contrast ratio checks work only on static text — cannot analyze text rendered in images or canvas elements","Does not validate accessibility of third-party embedded content (iframes, widgets)"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable in the browser","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["Accessibility score (0-100)","List of WCAG 2.1 violations with severity","Specific elements with issues (e.g., images missing alt text)","Remediation suggestions"],"categories":["safety-moderation","compliance-checking"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_10","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.rule.based.automated.testing.without.machine.learning","name":"rule-based-automated-testing-without-machine-learning","description":"Lighthouse performs deterministic, rule-based auditing using heuristics and predefined checks rather than machine learning models. Each audit rule is implemented as a specific test (e.g., 'check if HTTPS is enabled', 'measure Largest Contentful Paint', 'validate heading hierarchy') that produces consistent results across runs. This approach ensures transparency, reproducibility, and alignment with web standards.","intents":["I need reliable, reproducible audit results that don't vary based on model training or data","I want to understand exactly why an issue was flagged and what rule triggered it","I need audits that align with official web standards (WCAG, Schema.org, etc.)"],"best_for":["teams requiring deterministic, auditable results","compliance-focused organizations needing standards alignment","developers who want to understand the reasoning behind audit findings"],"limitations":["Rule-based approach cannot detect nuanced or context-dependent issues that require human judgment","Cannot identify emerging best practices or novel patterns not covered by predefined rules","False positives and false negatives are possible when rules don't match real-world scenarios","Rules must be manually updated as web standards evolve — no automatic learning or adaptation"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["Audit results based on predefined rules","Explanation of which rule triggered each issue","Deterministic, reproducible findings"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.seo.audit.with.on.page.factors","name":"seo-audit-with-on-page-factors","description":"Lighthouse scans page metadata, structured data, mobile-friendliness, crawlability, and on-page SEO factors to generate an SEO score (0-100). It validates meta tags (title, description), checks for proper heading structure, verifies mobile viewport configuration, detects crawlability issues (robots.txt, canonical tags), and validates structured data (Schema.org markup) compliance.","intents":["I need to verify my page has proper meta tags and structured data for search engine indexing","I want to check if my site is mobile-friendly and properly configured for mobile search","I need to identify crawlability issues that might prevent search engines from indexing my content"],"best_for":["content creators and marketers optimizing for search visibility","web developers implementing SEO best practices","SEO auditors performing technical SEO reviews"],"limitations":["Checks only on-page SEO factors — does not analyze backlinks, domain authority, or off-page ranking signals","Cannot validate actual search engine indexation or ranking position","Structured data validation is limited to basic Schema.org compliance — does not test rich snippet rendering in search results","Mobile-friendliness check is based on viewport meta tag and responsive design patterns — does not simulate actual mobile rendering"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["SEO score (0-100)","List of SEO issues and recommendations","Metadata validation results","Structured data compliance report"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","compliance-checking"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.best.practices.security.and.code.quality.scanning","name":"best-practices-security-and-code-quality-scanning","description":"Lighthouse audits pages for security headers (HTTPS, CSP, X-Frame-Options), detects outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities, identifies console errors and warnings, and validates modern web standards compliance. It generates a Best Practices score (0-100) with specific recommendations for security hardening and code quality improvements.","intents":["I need to verify my site uses HTTPS and has proper security headers configured","I want to identify outdated or vulnerable JavaScript dependencies on my page","I need to check for console errors and warnings that indicate code quality issues"],"best_for":["web developers implementing security best practices","security engineers auditing site configurations","DevOps teams validating production deployments"],"limitations":["Vulnerability detection is based on known library versions — does not perform dynamic security testing or penetration testing","Cannot detect vulnerabilities in custom code or application-specific logic","Security header validation is basic — does not test actual header effectiveness or bypass scenarios","Console error detection only captures errors logged during page load — does not test runtime behavior or user interactions"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["Best Practices score (0-100)","List of security and code quality issues","Detected outdated libraries with vulnerability information","Console errors and warnings"],"categories":["safety-moderation","compliance-checking"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.progressive.web.app.compliance.validation","name":"progressive-web-app-compliance-validation","description":"Lighthouse validates Progressive Web App (PWA) compliance by checking for service worker registration, manifest.json presence and validity, offline capability, HTTPS requirement, and installability criteria. It generates a PWA score (0-100) and provides specific guidance on implementing missing PWA features like service workers, app manifests, and offline support.","intents":["I need to verify my site meets PWA requirements for installation and offline functionality","I want to check if my service worker is properly registered and configured","I need to validate my web app manifest is correct and meets PWA standards"],"best_for":["web developers building Progressive Web Apps","mobile app developers transitioning to web-based PWAs","teams implementing offline-first web applications"],"limitations":["Validation is static — does not test actual offline functionality or service worker behavior during network failures","Cannot test service worker update mechanisms or cache invalidation strategies","Manifest validation checks only JSON structure and required fields — does not test icon rendering or app installation on actual devices","Does not validate app shell architecture or performance of offline-first patterns"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be served over HTTPS","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["PWA score (0-100)","Service worker registration status","Manifest validation results","Installability checklist","Offline capability assessment"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","compliance-checking"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.scored.audit.categories.with.weighted.metrics","name":"scored-audit-categories-with-weighted-metrics","description":"Lighthouse aggregates audit results across five categories (Performance, Accessibility, Best Practices, SEO, PWA) into individual 0-100 scores using weighted metrics and diagnostic data. Each category score is calculated from multiple underlying audits with configurable weighting, and results are displayed with visual indicators, opportunity prioritization, and diagnostic breakdowns to guide remediation efforts.","intents":["I need a quick overall health score for my website across multiple quality dimensions","I want to prioritize which issues to fix based on impact and effort","I need to track improvements over time by comparing audit scores across runs"],"best_for":["web developers getting a holistic view of site quality","product managers tracking quality metrics over time","teams prioritizing technical debt remediation"],"limitations":["Scores are relative and may not correlate directly with real-world user experience or business metrics","Weighting of individual audits is fixed by Google — cannot customize scoring to match team priorities","Scores can vary significantly between runs due to machine performance and background processes","No historical tracking or trend analysis built into the extension — requires manual comparison or external tools"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["Five category scores (0-100 each)","Overall audit report with visual indicators","Opportunity list with estimated impact","Diagnostic data and metrics"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.actionable.remediation.recommendations.with.severity","name":"actionable-remediation-recommendations-with-severity","description":"For each detected issue, Lighthouse provides specific, actionable remediation guidance including code examples, links to documentation, and estimated impact (time savings, performance improvement, or compliance benefit). Issues are categorized by severity (error, warning, notice) and grouped by opportunity to help developers prioritize fixes based on effort and impact.","intents":["I need specific guidance on how to fix the issues Lighthouse found","I want to understand the impact of each issue and prioritize which ones to fix first","I need links to documentation and code examples to implement improvements"],"best_for":["junior developers learning best practices","teams implementing performance and accessibility improvements","developers unfamiliar with specific web standards"],"limitations":["Recommendations are generic and may not account for site-specific constraints or architecture","Estimated impact (e.g., time savings) is approximate and may not reflect actual improvements","Some recommendations require manual implementation — Lighthouse does not provide automated fixes","Documentation links may become outdated as web standards evolve"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage"],"output_types":["List of issues with severity levels","Specific remediation steps for each issue","Code examples and documentation links","Estimated impact metrics"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.configurable.audit.profiles.with.device.and.network.emulation","name":"configurable-audit-profiles-with-device-and-network-emulation","description":"Lighthouse supports configurable audit profiles that allow developers to select which audit categories to run, choose device emulation (mobile vs desktop), and apply network/CPU throttling profiles (4G, 3G, slow 4G, offline). These configurations are applied during the audit to simulate real-world conditions and generate reproducible results across different scenarios.","intents":["I need to audit my site's performance on mobile devices with realistic network conditions","I want to test how my site performs on slow 3G networks to ensure accessibility","I need to run specific audits (e.g., only performance) to focus on particular issues"],"best_for":["performance engineers testing across device/network scenarios","developers optimizing for mobile and low-bandwidth users","teams validating performance requirements for specific user segments"],"limitations":["Throttling profiles are simulated in software — do not represent actual network conditions or real-world variability","Device emulation is based on Chrome's device profiles — may not match all real devices or screen sizes","Configuration options are limited to predefined profiles — cannot create custom throttling or device configurations","Audit results are still affected by machine hardware and background processes despite throttling"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access"],"input_types":["URL of live webpage","Configuration selections (device, network profile, audit categories)"],"output_types":["Audit report with selected configuration applied","Performance metrics under specified conditions","Scores and recommendations based on configuration"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.report.generation.and.export.with.online.viewer","name":"report-generation-and-export-with-online-viewer","description":"Lighthouse generates detailed audit reports that can be viewed in the DevTools panel or exported and shared via the online Lighthouse Viewer (https://googlechrome.github.io/lighthouse/viewer/). Reports include all audit results, scores, recommendations, and diagnostic data in a shareable format that can be accessed without the extension.","intents":["I need to share audit results with team members who don't have the extension installed","I want to archive audit reports for historical comparison and trend tracking","I need to embed audit results in documentation or reports"],"best_for":["teams collaborating on performance and quality improvements","managers tracking quality metrics over time","developers sharing audit results with stakeholders"],"limitations":["Report export format is not documented — unclear what formats are supported (JSON, HTML, PDF, etc.)","Online Viewer requires sharing via URL — no built-in access control or authentication","No built-in historical tracking or trend analysis — requires manual comparison or external tools","Reports are snapshots in time — do not capture ongoing monitoring or real-world user experience"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable","DevTools access","Internet access to view reports online"],"input_types":["Completed audit report"],"output_types":["Shareable report URL","Exported report file (format unknown)","Online viewer display with interactive results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.devtools.integrated.audit.workflow.with.live.page.context","name":"devtools-integrated-audit-workflow-with-live-page-context","description":"Lighthouse is deeply integrated into Chrome DevTools, allowing developers to run audits directly on the current page without leaving the browser or switching tools. The extension accesses the live page DOM, network activity, and rendering metrics through DevTools APIs, and displays results in a dedicated DevTools panel with real-time feedback and interactive exploration of issues.","intents":["I want to audit the page I'm currently developing without switching tools or reloading","I need to quickly identify issues during development and iterate on fixes","I want to correlate audit results with DevTools network and performance data"],"best_for":["web developers during active development","QA teams testing pages in the browser","performance engineers debugging specific pages"],"limitations":["Audits are triggered manually — no continuous monitoring or automated scheduling","Results are specific to the current page load — do not capture multi-page user journeys","Cannot audit pages with authentication or behind paywalls","DevTools integration adds overhead — audits may be slower than CLI version"],"requires":["Chrome browser","Lighthouse extension installed","Page must be fully loadable in the browser","DevTools open and focused on the page"],"input_types":["Live webpage in Chrome browser"],"output_types":["Audit results in DevTools panel","Interactive report with drill-down capabilities","Links to relevant DevTools tabs (Network, Performance, etc.)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"lighthouse__headline","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.automated.website.auditing.extension","name":"automated website auditing extension","description":"Lighthouse is an automated website auditing extension for Chrome that analyzes performance, accessibility, SEO, and compliance, providing actionable reports and improvement suggestions for web developers.","intents":["best website auditing tool","website performance analysis for SEO","automated accessibility checker for websites","best practices auditing extension","PWA compliance tool for developers"],"best_for":["web developers","SEO specialists","accessibility testers"],"limitations":["Chrome only","may conflict with other extensions"],"requires":["Chrome browser"],"input_types":["web pages"],"output_types":["detailed reports"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":59,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Chrome browser (version not specified in listing)","Page must be fully loadable and navigable in the browser","DevTools access to the page being audited","Chrome browser","Page must be fully loadable in the browser","DevTools access","Page must be fully loadable","Page must be served over HTTPS","Internet access to view reports online","Lighthouse extension installed"],"failure_modes":["Single-page audits only — cannot crawl multi-page sites or measure performance across user journeys","Throttling profiles are simulated, not real-world network conditions — actual user performance may vary","Cannot measure performance of pages behind authentication or paywalls","Audit results vary based on machine hardware and background processes — results are not deterministic across runs","Automated scanning catches only rule-based violations — cannot detect issues requiring manual testing (e.g., keyboard navigation, screen reader usability)","Cannot audit pages with dynamic content that requires user interaction to render","Contrast ratio checks work only on static text — cannot analyze text rendered in images or canvas elements","Does not validate accessibility of third-party embedded content (iframes, widgets)","Rule-based approach cannot detect nuanced or context-dependent issues that require human judgment","Cannot identify emerging best practices or novel patterns not covered by predefined rules","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7,"quality":0.9,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.327Z","last_scraped_at":null,"last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=lighthouse","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=lighthouse"}},"signature":"uq5IOh5ul6ETOUIZBX0gW+X42NFxNLZT8ImMHtT1oC4ZL57X0ox2NqXmhj6KotX097nFERI6NqYpJGYF6YvzAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-23T17:52:15.873Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/lighthouse","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/lighthouse","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=lighthouse","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}