{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-license-mit","slug":"license-mit","name":"License: MIT","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/yeagerai/yeagerai-agent/blob/main/LICENSE/?utm_source=awesome-ai-agents","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/license-mit","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.orchestration.framework.with.modular.task.decomposition","name":"agent orchestration framework with modular task decomposition","description":"Provides a framework for building autonomous agents that decompose complex tasks into subtasks through a planning layer, routing each subtask to specialized worker agents or tools. The architecture uses a hierarchical agent pattern where a coordinator agent manages task dependencies and state transitions, enabling multi-step workflows without explicit programming of control flow.","intents":["Build autonomous agents that break down complex user requests into executable subtasks","Create hierarchical agent systems where parent agents delegate to specialized child agents","Implement agents that can reason about task dependencies and execution order","Design workflows that adapt based on intermediate results and error conditions"],"best_for":["Teams building multi-agent systems for complex automation","Developers creating autonomous workflows that require task planning and decomposition","Organizations implementing agent-based business process automation"],"limitations":["Requires explicit definition of agent capabilities and task types — no automatic capability discovery","State management across agent boundaries requires manual implementation or external persistence layer","Debugging multi-agent interactions can be complex due to asynchronous task execution and distributed state","Performance scales with number of agents and task complexity — no built-in optimization for large agent networks"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible provider)","Message queue or async runtime for inter-agent communication"],"input_types":["natural language task descriptions","structured task specifications","agent capability definitions"],"output_types":["task execution results","structured agent responses","execution logs and traces"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.use.integration.with.schema.based.function.calling","name":"tool-use integration with schema-based function calling","description":"Enables agents to invoke external tools and APIs through a schema registry system where each tool is defined with JSON Schema specifications for inputs and outputs. The framework handles schema validation, parameter binding, and error handling, allowing agents to dynamically select and invoke tools based on task requirements without hardcoded tool references.","intents":["Allow agents to call external APIs and tools with automatic parameter validation","Define reusable tool libraries that multiple agents can access","Implement dynamic tool selection where agents choose appropriate tools based on task context","Create type-safe tool integrations that prevent invalid parameter combinations"],"best_for":["Developers building agents that need access to diverse external tools and APIs","Teams creating tool libraries for multi-agent systems","Organizations implementing agents with strict validation requirements"],"limitations":["Schema definition overhead — each tool requires explicit JSON Schema specification","No automatic schema inference from function signatures — must be manually maintained","Tool execution errors require explicit error handling in agent logic","Limited support for streaming tool outputs or long-running tool executions"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","JSON Schema definitions for each tool","Tool implementation with matching input/output signatures"],"input_types":["JSON Schema tool definitions","tool invocation requests with parameters","tool execution results"],"output_types":["validated tool results","error responses with validation details","execution traces"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.agent.state.management.and.context.persistence","name":"agent state management and context persistence","description":"Manages agent execution state including task history, intermediate results, and context across multiple steps. The system maintains a state store that tracks agent decisions, tool invocations, and their outcomes, enabling agents to reference previous results and maintain coherent context throughout multi-step workflows.","intents":["Maintain conversation history and task context across multiple agent steps","Enable agents to reference previous results and decisions in subsequent steps","Implement agent memory that persists across sessions or distributed executions","Track execution traces for debugging and auditing agent behavior"],"best_for":["Teams building long-running agent workflows that span multiple interactions","Developers implementing agents with complex state dependencies","Organizations requiring audit trails and execution transparency"],"limitations":["In-memory state management by default — requires external persistence for distributed deployments","No built-in state compression or pruning — context can grow unbounded","State serialization/deserialization overhead for complex object types","Limited support for state versioning or rollback capabilities"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Optional: external state store (Redis, PostgreSQL, etc.) for persistence"],"input_types":["agent execution events","task results","context updates"],"output_types":["state snapshots","execution traces","context summaries"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.llm.abstraction.layer","name":"multi-provider llm abstraction layer","description":"Abstracts interactions with multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.) through a unified interface, handling provider-specific API differences, token counting, and response formatting. The layer automatically routes requests to configured providers and manages fallback logic if a provider fails.","intents":["Use multiple LLM providers interchangeably without changing agent code","Implement cost optimization by routing tasks to cheaper models when appropriate","Add fallback providers to ensure agent resilience","Track token usage and costs across different LLM providers"],"best_for":["Teams wanting to avoid vendor lock-in with a single LLM provider","Developers building cost-conscious agents that need provider flexibility","Organizations requiring high availability with fallback LLM options"],"limitations":["Provider-specific features (vision, function calling variants) require conditional logic","Token counting differs between providers — cost estimates may be inaccurate","Response format normalization adds latency (~50-100ms per request)","No automatic model selection based on task complexity or cost"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API keys for at least one LLM provider","Provider-specific SDK or HTTP client"],"input_types":["prompts","messages","model configuration"],"output_types":["normalized LLM responses","token usage metrics","cost estimates"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.composition.and.workflow.definition","name":"agent composition and workflow definition","description":"Enables declarative definition of agent workflows using a composition pattern where complex agents are built by combining simpler agents and tools. Workflows are defined through configuration or code, specifying agent dependencies, execution order, and data flow between agents.","intents":["Define complex multi-agent workflows declaratively without imperative control flow","Compose specialized agents into larger systems with clear data dependencies","Create reusable workflow templates that can be instantiated with different agents","Implement conditional branching and error handling in agent workflows"],"best_for":["Teams building complex multi-agent systems with clear task hierarchies","Developers creating reusable workflow templates","Organizations implementing business process automation with agents"],"limitations":["Workflow definition overhead — requires upfront specification of all possible paths","Limited support for dynamic workflow generation based on runtime conditions","Debugging workflow execution requires understanding the composition graph","No visual workflow editor — workflows must be defined in code or configuration"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agent definitions with compatible input/output types","Workflow configuration in YAML or Python"],"input_types":["workflow definitions","agent specifications","task inputs"],"output_types":["workflow execution results","execution traces","intermediate agent outputs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.recovery.in.agent.workflows","name":"error handling and recovery in agent workflows","description":"Implements comprehensive error handling for agent failures including retry logic, fallback agents, and error recovery strategies. The system can catch exceptions at multiple levels (tool invocation, agent execution, workflow level) and apply configured recovery actions.","intents":["Automatically retry failed tool invocations with exponential backoff","Switch to fallback agents when primary agents fail","Implement graceful degradation in multi-agent workflows","Log and report agent failures with detailed context for debugging"],"best_for":["Teams building production agent systems requiring high reliability","Developers implementing agents that call unreliable external services","Organizations needing detailed error tracking and recovery"],"limitations":["Retry logic can increase latency significantly for flaky services","Fallback agents must be explicitly configured — no automatic selection","Error recovery may consume additional LLM tokens and API calls","Some errors (authentication, rate limiting) require manual intervention"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Configured retry policies and fallback agents","Error handling logic in agent implementations"],"input_types":["error events","retry policies","fallback configurations"],"output_types":["recovery actions","error logs","retry results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.performance.monitoring.and.observability","name":"agent performance monitoring and observability","description":"Provides built-in instrumentation for monitoring agent execution including latency tracking, token usage, cost estimation, and success/failure rates. Metrics are collected at multiple levels (tool invocation, agent step, workflow) and can be exported to observability platforms.","intents":["Track agent execution latency and identify performance bottlenecks","Monitor LLM token usage and estimate costs across agent workflows","Measure agent success rates and identify failure patterns","Export metrics to observability platforms for dashboarding and alerting"],"best_for":["Teams operating agents in production requiring performance visibility","Developers optimizing agent workflows for latency and cost","Organizations tracking agent-related expenses and ROI"],"limitations":["Metric collection adds overhead (~10-50ms per agent step)","Token counting is approximate and may not match actual provider billing","No built-in alerting — requires integration with external monitoring systems","Metrics storage requires external time-series database for long-term retention"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Optional: observability platform (Datadog, New Relic, etc.) for metric export"],"input_types":["agent execution events","LLM responses","tool invocation results"],"output_types":["performance metrics","cost estimates","execution traces"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_7","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.engineering.and.template.management","name":"prompt engineering and template management","description":"Provides a system for managing and versioning prompts used by agents, including prompt templates with variable substitution, prompt optimization, and A/B testing capabilities. Prompts can be versioned and tested to improve agent performance.","intents":["Create reusable prompt templates with variable substitution for different agent tasks","Version and track prompt changes to understand their impact on agent behavior","Test different prompts to optimize agent performance","Manage prompt libraries across multiple agents and workflows"],"best_for":["Teams iterating on agent prompts to improve performance","Developers managing prompts across multiple agents","Organizations conducting prompt optimization experiments"],"limitations":["No automatic prompt optimization — requires manual iteration","A/B testing requires significant traffic to achieve statistical significance","Prompt versioning overhead for managing large prompt libraries","Limited support for dynamic prompt generation based on context"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Prompt template definitions","Optional: experiment tracking system for A/B testing"],"input_types":["prompt templates","variable values","agent context"],"output_types":["rendered prompts","performance metrics","optimization recommendations"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.testing.and.validation.framework","name":"agent testing and validation framework","description":"Provides utilities for testing agent behavior including unit tests for individual agents, integration tests for workflows, and validation of agent outputs against expected schemas. Includes fixtures for mocking LLM responses and tools.","intents":["Write unit tests for individual agents with mocked LLM responses","Test multi-agent workflows end-to-end with controlled inputs","Validate agent outputs against expected schemas and formats","Create regression tests to ensure agent behavior doesn't degrade"],"best_for":["Teams building production agent systems requiring test coverage","Developers implementing agents with strict output requirements","Organizations maintaining agent systems over time"],"limitations":["Testing non-deterministic LLM behavior is inherently difficult","Mock LLM responses may not capture real-world behavior variations","Integration tests require significant setup and may be slow","No built-in support for property-based testing of agent behavior"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Testing framework (pytest, unittest, etc.)","Agent implementations with testable interfaces"],"input_types":["test cases","mock LLM responses","expected outputs"],"output_types":["test results","coverage reports","validation errors"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-license-mit__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.deployment.and.scaling","name":"agent deployment and scaling","description":"Enables deployment of agents to various environments (local, cloud, serverless) with built-in support for scaling, load balancing, and resource management. Agents can be packaged as containers or serverless functions and deployed with configuration management.","intents":["Deploy agents to production environments with minimal configuration","Scale agents horizontally to handle increased load","Manage agent resources (memory, CPU, timeouts) across deployments","Implement blue-green deployments for zero-downtime updates"],"best_for":["Teams deploying agents to production at scale","Developers managing agents across multiple environments","Organizations requiring high availability and fault tolerance"],"limitations":["Deployment configuration is environment-specific — requires customization per target","Scaling agents with stateful workflows requires distributed state management","Cold start latency for serverless deployments can be significant","Resource limits (memory, timeout) may constrain agent capabilities"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Container runtime (Docker) or serverless platform (AWS Lambda, etc.)","Deployment configuration and orchestration tools"],"input_types":["agent code","deployment configuration","environment variables"],"output_types":["deployed agent instances","deployment logs","health status"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible provider)","Message queue or async runtime for inter-agent communication","JSON Schema definitions for each tool","Tool implementation with matching input/output signatures","Optional: external state store (Redis, PostgreSQL, etc.) for persistence","API keys for at least one LLM provider","Provider-specific SDK or HTTP client","Agent definitions with compatible input/output types","Workflow configuration in YAML or Python"],"failure_modes":["Requires explicit definition of agent capabilities and task types — no automatic capability discovery","State management across agent boundaries requires manual implementation or external persistence layer","Debugging multi-agent interactions can be complex due to asynchronous task execution and distributed state","Performance scales with number of agents and task complexity — no built-in optimization for large agent networks","Schema definition overhead — each tool requires explicit JSON Schema specification","No automatic schema inference from function signatures — must be manually maintained","Tool execution errors require explicit error handling in agent logic","Limited support for streaming tool outputs or long-running tool executions","In-memory state management by default — requires external persistence for distributed deployments","No built-in state compression or pruning — context can grow unbounded","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.577Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:10.321Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=license-mit","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=license-mit"}},"signature":"LB+LNu2hsY6CrLHjmrK72NSt0axoH5Iblk0e3nC6XgqjZr3YekLg5etF09m8qJilIpWVKIUUMOMMf9uslmX+DQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T11:44:16.624Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/license-mit","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/license-mit","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=license-mit","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}