{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_leya-law","slug":"leya-law","name":"Leya Law","type":"product","url":"https://www.leya.law","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/leya-law","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_0","uri":"capability://legal.semantic.legal.document.search","name":"semantic-legal-document-search","description":"Searches across legal documents and case law using natural language processing that understands contextual meaning rather than just keyword matching. Returns relevant results based on semantic similarity and legal concepts rather than exact phrase matches.","intents":["Find relevant case law without knowing exact citations or keywords","Discover precedents that apply to my case even when phrased differently","Search across large document repositories quickly without manual review"],"best_for":["litigation teams","legal researchers","contract analysts","mid-to-large law firms"],"limitations":["Results still require attorney review for jurisdiction-specific applicability","May miss highly specialized or niche legal concepts","Dependent on quality and comprehensiveness of indexed legal documents"],"requires":["Access to legal document database or uploaded case files","Natural language query formulation","Attorney expertise to validate results"],"input_types":["natural language query","legal documents","case law database"],"output_types":["ranked document results","relevance scores","excerpt highlights"],"categories":["legal","research","search"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_1","uri":"capability://legal.ai.powered.legal.analysis","name":"ai-powered-legal-analysis","description":"Analyzes legal documents and case materials to extract key insights, identify relevant legal principles, and generate preliminary analysis. Provides AI-generated summaries and interpretations of complex legal content.","intents":["Get a quick overview of what a legal document contains","Identify key legal issues and arguments in case materials","Understand the relevance of documents to my case without reading everything"],"best_for":["attorneys handling high-volume cases","legal departments with large document sets","contract review teams"],"limitations":["Cannot replace professional attorney judgment on complex matters","May miss jurisdiction-specific nuances and local legal requirements","Requires experienced attorney review before relying on analysis","Risk of AI hallucination or misinterpretation of legal concepts"],"requires":["Uploaded or indexed legal documents","Attorney oversight and validation","Understanding of relevant jurisdiction and legal context"],"input_types":["legal documents","contracts","case files","depositions"],"output_types":["analysis summaries","key issue identification","legal principle extraction","preliminary insights"],"categories":["legal","research","analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_2","uri":"capability://collaboration.collaborative.annotation.and.markup","name":"collaborative-annotation-and-markup","description":"Enables multiple team members to annotate, highlight, and mark up legal documents within a shared workspace. Tracks who made which annotations and allows team members to view and respond to each other's notes.","intents":["Have my team review the same documents without emailing versions back and forth","See what my colleagues found important in a document","Build a shared understanding of key evidence and arguments across the team"],"best_for":["litigation teams","large law firms","corporate legal departments","multi-attorney case teams"],"limitations":["Requires all team members to have platform access","Annotation organization depends on team discipline and naming conventions","May become cluttered with many simultaneous annotations"],"requires":["Multiple user accounts with appropriate permissions","Uploaded legal documents","Team coordination and workflow practices"],"input_types":["legal documents","user annotations","comments"],"output_types":["annotated documents","annotation history","team notes","markup layers"],"categories":["collaboration","productivity","legal"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_3","uri":"capability://productivity.unified.case.workspace.organization","name":"unified-case-workspace-organization","description":"Provides a centralized workspace where legal teams can organize, store, and access all case-related documents, research, and findings in one location. Enables structured organization of materials by case, issue, or other custom categories.","intents":["Keep all my case materials in one place instead of scattered across drives and emails","Quickly find documents and research I've already done on a case","Give new team members access to all relevant case information without manual compilation"],"best_for":["law firms managing multiple cases","litigation teams","corporate legal departments","contract management teams"],"limitations":["Requires initial setup and organization discipline","Effectiveness depends on consistent naming and filing practices","May require migration of existing documents from other systems"],"requires":["Document upload or integration with existing systems","Team agreement on organizational structure","User access management and permissions"],"input_types":["legal documents","research materials","case files","metadata"],"output_types":["organized workspace","searchable document repository","case folders","access logs"],"categories":["productivity","collaboration","legal"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_4","uri":"capability://legal.accelerated.document.review.workflow","name":"accelerated-document-review-workflow","description":"Streamlines the document review process by using AI to prioritize and categorize documents, reducing the time attorneys spend on manual review. Helps identify responsive documents and flag potentially important materials.","intents":["Review thousands of documents in discovery without spending weeks on it","Identify the most important documents to focus my limited time on","Reduce the cost of document review by automating initial triage"],"best_for":["litigation teams with large document sets","discovery teams","mid-to-large law firms","corporate legal departments"],"limitations":["AI categorization requires attorney validation","May miss subtle relevance that requires legal expertise","Effectiveness depends on clear document review criteria","Cannot fully replace human review for complex privilege determinations"],"requires":["Large document sets for review","Clear review criteria and responsiveness definitions","Attorney oversight of AI categorization","Sufficient budget for premium platform access"],"input_types":["document collections","review criteria","relevance parameters"],"output_types":["prioritized document lists","categorized documents","relevance flags","review recommendations"],"categories":["legal","productivity","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_5","uri":"capability://legal.contract.analysis.and.extraction","name":"contract-analysis-and-extraction","description":"Analyzes contracts to extract key terms, obligations, dates, parties, and other critical information. Identifies potential issues, missing clauses, or non-standard language that may require attention.","intents":["Quickly understand what a contract commits us to without reading every page","Extract key dates and obligations for tracking and compliance","Identify unusual or risky contract language before signing"],"best_for":["contract management teams","corporate legal departments","law firms handling contract review","procurement teams"],"limitations":["Requires attorney review of extracted terms and identified issues","May miss context-specific risks that require business knowledge","Effectiveness varies with contract complexity and non-standard formatting","Cannot provide business judgment on whether terms are acceptable"],"requires":["Uploaded contracts in readable format","Attorney expertise to validate extractions","Understanding of relevant business context"],"input_types":["contracts","agreements","legal documents"],"output_types":["extracted key terms","obligation lists","date calendars","risk flags","clause analysis"],"categories":["legal","analysis","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_6","uri":"capability://legal.legal.research.acceleration","name":"legal-research-acceleration","description":"Speeds up legal research by providing AI-assisted analysis of statutes, regulations, case law, and legal principles. Helps attorneys find applicable law and precedent more quickly than traditional research methods.","intents":["Find applicable law and precedent faster than manual legal research","Understand how courts have interpreted specific statutes or legal principles","Build a comprehensive legal research foundation for a motion or brief"],"best_for":["attorneys conducting legal research","law firms","corporate legal departments","legal scholars"],"limitations":["Results must be verified against current law and jurisdiction-specific requirements","May not capture very recent legal developments","Requires attorney expertise to properly contextualize findings","Cannot provide legal advice or strategic recommendations"],"requires":["Access to comprehensive legal database","Attorney knowledge to validate and contextualize results","Understanding of relevant jurisdiction and legal area"],"input_types":["legal research queries","statute citations","case law references","legal concepts"],"output_types":["relevant case law","statutory analysis","legal precedent","research summaries"],"categories":["legal","research","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_leya-law__cap_7","uri":"capability://collaboration.team.findings.and.insights.sharing","name":"team-findings-and-insights-sharing","description":"Enables legal teams to share research findings, case insights, and analysis results with colleagues in a structured way. Allows team members to build on each other's work and maintain a shared knowledge base of case-related discoveries.","intents":["Share important findings with my team without losing track of who found what","Build on research that my colleagues have already done","Create a searchable record of all insights discovered during case preparation"],"best_for":["collaborative legal teams","large law firms","litigation teams","corporate legal departments"],"limitations":["Requires active participation from team members","Effectiveness depends on clear communication and documentation practices","May create information overload if not well-organized"],"requires":["Multiple team members with platform access","Structured sharing and documentation practices","Clear roles and responsibilities for knowledge management"],"input_types":["research findings","case insights","annotations","analysis results"],"output_types":["shared findings repository","insight summaries","knowledge base","discovery timeline"],"categories":["collaboration","productivity","legal"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Access to legal document database or uploaded case files","Natural language query formulation","Attorney expertise to validate results","Uploaded or indexed legal documents","Attorney oversight and validation","Understanding of relevant jurisdiction and legal context","Multiple user accounts with appropriate permissions","Uploaded legal documents","Team coordination and workflow practices","Document upload or integration with existing systems"],"failure_modes":["Results still require attorney review for jurisdiction-specific applicability","May miss highly specialized or niche legal concepts","Dependent on quality and comprehensiveness of indexed legal documents","Cannot replace professional attorney judgment on complex matters","May miss jurisdiction-specific nuances and local legal requirements","Requires experienced attorney review before relying on analysis","Risk of AI hallucination or misinterpretation of legal concepts","Requires all team members to have platform access","Annotation organization depends on team discipline and naming conventions","May become cluttered with many simultaneous annotations","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.41666666666666663,"quality":0.79,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.446Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.538Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=leya-law","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=leya-law"}},"signature":"nDLqrNFRHKXhCBnS47PoEoy/GDyno8mbM1PSVS8OQbwUVcX/FqXoeH7o6Tzg6QM3sqhL+TbF1J9uS9dkuupNAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T22:49:40.727Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/leya-law","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/leya-law","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=leya-law","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}