{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-langbase","slug":"langbase","name":"langbase","type":"framework","url":"https://langbase.com/docs","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/langbase","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":["ai","llm","langbase core","langbase sdk","baseai","base ai","langbase","langbase.com","generative AI"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.declarative.llm.pipeline.composition.with.type.safe.schema.binding","name":"declarative llm pipeline composition with type-safe schema binding","description":"Langbase enables developers to define AI workflows declaratively using a schema-based composition model where LLM calls, tool integrations, and data transformations are composed as reusable, type-safe pipeline steps. The SDK provides a fluent API that maps TypeScript/JavaScript types directly to function schemas, eliminating manual schema duplication and enabling compile-time validation of LLM input/output contracts.","intents":["I want to define multi-step LLM workflows without writing boilerplate schema definitions","I need type safety across my LLM pipeline so TypeScript catches schema mismatches at compile time","I want to compose reusable LLM components that can be chained together declaratively"],"best_for":["TypeScript/JavaScript developers building production LLM applications","teams migrating from imperative LLM code to declarative pipeline patterns","developers who value type safety and want to avoid runtime schema validation errors"],"limitations":["TypeScript/JavaScript only — no Python SDK available","Requires understanding of schema-based function calling patterns","Pipeline composition is linear/sequential — complex branching logic requires custom orchestration"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.7+ (for full type inference benefits)","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["TypeScript type definitions","JSON schema objects","LLM provider API credentials"],"output_types":["typed JavaScript objects","structured LLM responses","pipeline execution logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.llm.abstraction.with.unified.interface","name":"multi-provider llm abstraction with unified interface","description":"Langbase abstracts over multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, etc.) through a unified SDK interface, allowing developers to swap providers or run multi-provider inference without changing application code. The SDK handles provider-specific API differences, authentication, and response normalization internally, exposing a consistent method signature across all providers.","intents":["I want to switch between OpenAI and Anthropic without refactoring my code","I need to run inference across multiple LLM providers for cost optimization or fallback","I want to support local LLMs (Ollama) alongside cloud providers in the same codebase"],"best_for":["developers building LLM applications that need provider flexibility","teams evaluating multiple LLM providers and want to avoid vendor lock-in","cost-conscious teams wanting to route requests to cheaper providers dynamically"],"limitations":["Provider-specific features (vision, function calling variants) may not be fully abstracted","Response normalization adds ~50-100ms overhead per request","Some advanced provider features may require provider-specific code paths"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","API credentials for at least one supported LLM provider","network connectivity to LLM provider endpoints"],"input_types":["provider configuration objects","API keys/credentials","LLM request parameters (model, temperature, max_tokens, etc.)"],"output_types":["normalized LLM responses","token usage metadata","provider-agnostic completion objects"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.logging.and.observability.with.structured.event.tracking","name":"logging and observability with structured event tracking","description":"Langbase provides built-in logging and observability features that track LLM calls, function invocations, and pipeline execution with structured event logging. The SDK emits events for request/response pairs, errors, and performance metrics, which can be consumed by external observability platforms (e.g., Langsmith, custom logging backends) for debugging and monitoring.","intents":["I want to log all LLM calls for debugging and auditing purposes","I need to monitor LLM application performance and identify bottlenecks","I want to integrate with external observability platforms for centralized monitoring"],"best_for":["developers building production LLM applications requiring observability","teams debugging complex LLM pipelines and workflows","applications with compliance requirements for LLM call auditing"],"limitations":["Logging adds overhead (~20-50ms per LLM call) that may impact latency-sensitive applications","Structured logging requires integration with external platforms for useful analysis","Sensitive data (API keys, user inputs) must be manually redacted before logging","No built-in analytics or visualization — requires external tools"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","optional: external observability platform (Langsmith, Datadog, etc.)"],"input_types":["logging configuration (level, format, destination)","event filters (which events to log)"],"output_types":["structured event logs (JSON format)","performance metrics (latency, token usage)","error traces with context"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.rate.limiting.and.quota.management.for.api.calls","name":"rate limiting and quota management for api calls","description":"Langbase provides rate limiting and quota management utilities that enforce per-user, per-application, or per-provider rate limits on LLM API calls. The SDK supports token bucket algorithms, sliding window rate limiting, and quota tracking, with configurable limits and automatic request throttling or rejection when limits are exceeded.","intents":["I want to prevent individual users from overwhelming my LLM API with excessive requests","I need to enforce per-provider rate limits to avoid hitting provider quotas","I want to fairly distribute limited LLM API quota across multiple users or applications"],"best_for":["developers building multi-tenant LLM applications with usage limits","teams with limited LLM API budgets and need to enforce quotas","applications requiring fair resource allocation across users"],"limitations":["In-memory rate limiting does not work across distributed instances — requires external state store (Redis)","Rate limit enforcement adds ~5-10ms overhead per request","No built-in analytics for quota usage — requires external tracking","Rate limit configuration is static — dynamic limits require code changes"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","optional: Redis for distributed rate limiting"],"input_types":["rate limit configuration (requests per second, tokens per day, etc.)","user/application identifiers for quota tracking"],"output_types":["rate limit status (remaining quota, reset time)","throttled requests (queued or rejected)","quota usage metrics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.function.calling.with.automatic.schema.generation.and.validation","name":"function calling with automatic schema generation and validation","description":"Langbase provides a function calling system where developers define TypeScript functions that are automatically converted to LLM-compatible schemas (OpenAI function calling, Anthropic tool use, etc.), with built-in validation of function arguments before execution. The SDK handles schema generation, argument parsing, and type coercion, allowing LLMs to invoke functions with guaranteed type safety.","intents":["I want my LLM to call functions without manually writing JSON schemas for each function","I need to validate that function arguments match expected types before the LLM invokes them","I want to support function calling across different LLM providers with a single function definition"],"best_for":["developers building LLM agents that need reliable tool use","teams building multi-step workflows where LLMs must invoke typed functions","applications requiring strict argument validation before function execution"],"limitations":["Complex function signatures (union types, generics) may not translate cleanly to LLM schemas","Recursive or self-referential types are not supported","Function execution is synchronous only — async functions require wrapper patterns"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.7+ for full type inference","LLM provider that supports function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["TypeScript function definitions","function parameter types","JSDoc comments for schema descriptions"],"output_types":["JSON schema objects","validated function arguments","function execution results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.memory.and.context.management.with.configurable.persistence","name":"memory and context management with configurable persistence","description":"Langbase provides a memory abstraction layer that manages conversation history, context windows, and state across multiple LLM calls. The SDK supports multiple memory backends (in-memory, Redis, custom implementations) and handles context truncation, summarization, and retrieval strategies to keep LLM context within token limits while preserving relevant conversation history.","intents":["I want to maintain conversation history across multiple LLM calls without manual state management","I need to persist conversation state across application restarts or distributed instances","I want to automatically summarize old conversation history to stay within LLM token limits"],"best_for":["developers building multi-turn conversational AI applications","teams building stateful LLM agents that need persistent memory","applications requiring distributed memory across multiple server instances"],"limitations":["In-memory backend does not persist across application restarts","Context summarization may lose nuanced information from earlier conversation turns","Custom memory backends require implementing a specific interface","No built-in semantic memory or vector-based retrieval — requires external RAG integration"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","optional: Redis for distributed memory backend","optional: external vector database for semantic memory"],"input_types":["conversation messages (role, content)","memory backend configuration","context window size limits"],"output_types":["conversation history arrays","truncated/summarized context","memory metadata (tokens used, etc.)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.response.handling.with.token.level.granularity","name":"streaming response handling with token-level granularity","description":"Langbase provides native streaming support for LLM responses, allowing developers to consume tokens as they arrive from the LLM provider rather than waiting for complete responses. The SDK handles stream parsing, error recovery, and provides both callback-based and async iterator interfaces for consuming streamed tokens, with built-in support for streaming function calls and structured outputs.","intents":["I want to display LLM responses to users in real-time as tokens arrive","I need to process streaming function calls where the LLM invokes tools mid-stream","I want to cancel or interrupt streaming responses based on user input"],"best_for":["developers building real-time chat interfaces or streaming AI applications","teams building interactive LLM agents that need responsive UX","applications with strict latency requirements where token-level streaming is critical"],"limitations":["Streaming function calls are not supported by all LLM providers","Stream interruption/cancellation behavior varies by provider","Structured output streaming (JSON) may require buffering until complete","Error recovery during streams may lose partial tokens"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","LLM provider with streaming support (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","client-side code to consume streaming responses (fetch API, WebSocket, etc.)"],"input_types":["LLM request parameters with streaming enabled","stream event handlers or async iterators"],"output_types":["token-level stream events","accumulated response text","streaming function call objects"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.output.extraction.with.json.schema.validation","name":"structured output extraction with json schema validation","description":"Langbase enables developers to request structured outputs from LLMs by providing JSON schemas that define expected response formats. The SDK validates LLM responses against the schema, performs type coercion, and returns typed objects, with fallback parsing strategies for LLMs that don't support native structured output modes.","intents":["I want the LLM to return structured data (JSON) that I can use directly in my application","I need to validate that LLM responses conform to a specific schema before processing","I want to extract specific fields from LLM responses without manual parsing"],"best_for":["developers building data extraction pipelines powered by LLMs","teams building LLM-powered APIs that need to return structured responses","applications requiring strict response validation before downstream processing"],"limitations":["LLMs may hallucinate or produce invalid JSON even with schema constraints","Fallback parsing for non-native-structured-output providers may be unreliable","Complex nested schemas may confuse LLMs or exceed token budgets","Schema validation failures require retry logic or manual error handling"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","JSON schema definition for expected output format","LLM provider (native structured output support optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["JSON schema objects","LLM request parameters","response validation rules"],"output_types":["typed JavaScript objects matching schema","validation error details","raw LLM response for debugging"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.templating.with.variable.interpolation.and.conditional.logic","name":"prompt templating with variable interpolation and conditional logic","description":"Langbase provides a prompt templating system that allows developers to define reusable prompt templates with variable placeholders, conditional sections, and formatting helpers. Templates are compiled at runtime and support dynamic variable injection, enabling parameterized prompts that adapt to different contexts without code changes.","intents":["I want to define reusable prompt templates that I can parameterize with different inputs","I need to conditionally include/exclude prompt sections based on runtime variables","I want to manage prompt versions and A/B test different prompt variations"],"best_for":["teams managing multiple LLM prompts and wanting centralized prompt management","developers building prompt-driven applications where prompts change frequently","applications requiring prompt versioning and experimentation"],"limitations":["Template syntax is custom — not compatible with standard template languages (Handlebars, Jinja2)","Complex conditional logic in templates can become hard to maintain","No built-in prompt optimization or evaluation framework","Template compilation adds ~10-20ms overhead per prompt"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","prompt template definitions (inline or from files)"],"input_types":["template strings with variable placeholders","variable values (strings, objects, arrays)","conditional logic expressions"],"output_types":["rendered prompt strings","template metadata (variables used, etc.)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.logic.with.exponential.backoff","name":"error handling and retry logic with exponential backoff","description":"Langbase provides built-in error handling and retry mechanisms for LLM API calls, with configurable exponential backoff, jitter, and provider-specific error classification. The SDK distinguishes between retryable errors (rate limits, transient failures) and non-retryable errors (authentication, invalid requests), automatically retrying appropriate errors without developer intervention.","intents":["I want LLM API calls to automatically retry on transient failures without my code handling it","I need to handle rate limiting gracefully without losing requests","I want to distinguish between errors I should retry vs errors that indicate a problem with my request"],"best_for":["developers building production LLM applications that need reliability","teams with strict SLA requirements and need automatic failure recovery","applications making high-volume LLM API calls that may hit rate limits"],"limitations":["Retry logic is automatic — limited customization of retry strategies per request","Exponential backoff may cause long delays for frequently rate-limited providers","No built-in circuit breaker pattern for cascading failures","Retries consume additional API quota and may increase costs"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","LLM provider API key with sufficient quota"],"input_types":["retry configuration (max attempts, backoff strategy)","error classification rules"],"output_types":["successful LLM response after retries","error details with retry metadata","retry attempt logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.token.counting.and.cost.estimation.for.llm.calls","name":"token counting and cost estimation for llm calls","description":"Langbase provides token counting utilities that estimate the number of tokens consumed by LLM requests and responses, enabling developers to predict costs and stay within token budgets. The SDK supports token counting for multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) with provider-specific tokenization models, and can estimate costs based on current pricing.","intents":["I want to estimate the cost of an LLM call before making it","I need to track token usage across my application to monitor costs","I want to optimize prompts by seeing how many tokens they consume"],"best_for":["developers building cost-conscious LLM applications","teams with strict budgets and need to monitor LLM spending","applications requiring token budget enforcement before making API calls"],"limitations":["Token counting is approximate — actual tokens used may differ slightly from estimates","Pricing data must be manually updated as providers change rates","Token counting for function calls and structured outputs may be inaccurate","No built-in cost tracking or analytics — requires external logging"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","provider-specific tokenizer (e.g., tiktoken for OpenAI)"],"input_types":["prompt text","LLM model name","function schemas (optional)"],"output_types":["token count estimates","cost estimates (in USD or other currency)","token usage breakdown (prompt vs completion)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-langbase__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.batch.processing.for.high.volume.llm.requests","name":"batch processing for high-volume llm requests","description":"Langbase provides batch processing capabilities that allow developers to submit multiple LLM requests as a batch job, which are processed asynchronously by the LLM provider. The SDK handles batch submission, polling for completion, and result retrieval, with support for cost savings through batch pricing (where available) and automatic retry of failed items.","intents":["I want to process thousands of LLM requests cost-effectively using batch pricing","I need to submit a large number of requests without waiting for individual responses","I want to retry failed requests automatically without manual intervention"],"best_for":["developers processing large datasets through LLMs (data labeling, classification, etc.)","teams with non-real-time processing needs and cost constraints","applications requiring high-throughput LLM processing"],"limitations":["Batch processing introduces significant latency (hours to days) compared to real-time API calls","Not all LLM providers support batch processing (OpenAI does, Anthropic does not)","Batch pricing discounts vary by provider and may not justify the latency trade-off","Failed batch items require manual inspection and resubmission"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","LLM provider with batch API support (OpenAI Batch API, etc.)","sufficient API quota for batch submissions"],"input_types":["array of LLM requests","batch configuration (timeout, retry policy)"],"output_types":["batch job ID","batch status (pending, processing, completed)","batch results (array of LLM responses)","error details for failed items"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":37,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.7+ (for full type inference benefits)","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","API credentials for at least one supported LLM provider","network connectivity to LLM provider endpoints","optional: external observability platform (Langsmith, Datadog, etc.)","optional: Redis for distributed rate limiting","TypeScript 4.7+ for full type inference","LLM provider that supports function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","optional: Redis for distributed memory backend"],"failure_modes":["TypeScript/JavaScript only — no Python SDK available","Requires understanding of schema-based function calling patterns","Pipeline composition is linear/sequential — complex branching logic requires custom orchestration","Provider-specific features (vision, function calling variants) may not be fully abstracted","Response normalization adds ~50-100ms overhead per request","Some advanced provider features may require provider-specific code paths","Logging adds overhead (~20-50ms per LLM call) that may impact latency-sensitive applications","Structured logging requires integration with external platforms for useful analysis","Sensitive data (API keys, user inputs) must be manually redacted before logging","No built-in analytics or visualization — requires external tools","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.3233077374270747,"quality":0.34,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":85516,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=langbase","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=langbase"}},"signature":"XKzBiZZfmKG79YeplCONz009Ku3RWtjDRRqPDgJU75rVK0jB+xqOwg+zL6OHfzttZk7hhXXkJvq+ElRmC385Bg==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T02:23:27.024Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/langbase","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/langbase","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=langbase","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}