{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-keploy","slug":"keploy","name":"Keploy","type":"repo","url":"https://keploy.io/","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/keploy","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.http.traffic.interception.and.recording","name":"http traffic interception and recording","description":"Keploy intercepts live HTTP/HTTPS traffic at the network layer using eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) on Linux or syscall hooking on other platforms, capturing request/response pairs with full headers, bodies, and timing metadata without requiring code instrumentation. This approach enables zero-modification traffic capture directly from running applications, recording both inbound client requests and outbound service calls in real-time.","intents":["Capture all API calls my application makes without modifying source code","Record realistic user traffic patterns for test case generation","Monitor what external services my application calls during normal operation"],"best_for":["Backend teams testing microservices without access to source code","DevOps engineers building test infrastructure for legacy applications","Integration testing teams needing realistic traffic replay"],"limitations":["eBPF-based capture requires Linux kernel 4.4+ with BPF support; macOS and Windows use less efficient syscall hooking with higher overhead","Encrypted TLS traffic requires certificate pinning bypass or MITM proxy setup, adding complexity","High-volume traffic (>10k req/s) may experience packet loss or buffering delays depending on system resources"],"requires":["Linux kernel 4.4+ for eBPF support (or macOS/Windows with reduced performance)","Network interface with packet capture capabilities","Root or CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileges for packet interception","Keploy CLI installed and running as daemon"],"input_types":["live HTTP/HTTPS traffic","TCP/UDP network packets"],"output_types":["structured request/response objects (JSON)","YAML test case format","mock data stubs"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","network-monitoring"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.automatic.test.case.generation.from.traffic","name":"automatic test case generation from traffic","description":"Keploy analyzes captured HTTP traffic and automatically generates executable test cases by extracting request parameters, response assertions, and dependency chains. It uses pattern matching and heuristics to identify test boundaries (request start/end), deduplicate similar requests, and create parameterized test templates that can be executed against different versions of the application.","intents":["Generate test cases automatically from production traffic without manual test writing","Create regression test suites that reflect actual user behavior","Reduce test case creation time from hours to minutes"],"best_for":["Teams with high API churn looking to maintain test coverage automatically","QA engineers building regression test suites from production data","Startups needing rapid test coverage without dedicated QA resources"],"limitations":["Generated tests may include environment-specific values (timestamps, UUIDs, API keys) requiring manual sanitization or regex-based parameterization","Cannot infer business logic assertions — generates only response matching, not semantic correctness checks","Deduplication heuristics may miss subtle variations in requests, creating redundant test cases","No automatic detection of flaky tests or race conditions in captured traffic"],"requires":["Captured HTTP traffic from Keploy's interception layer","Test runner compatible with generated test format (Go, Java, Python, Node.js)","Application under test with stable API contracts"],"input_types":["captured HTTP request/response pairs","traffic metadata (timing, headers, body)"],"output_types":["executable test code (Go, Java, Python, Node.js)","YAML test case definitions","parameterized test templates"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.dependency.mocking.and.stub.generation","name":"dependency mocking and stub generation","description":"Keploy extracts outbound API calls from captured traffic and automatically generates mock stubs (recorded responses) that can be replayed during test execution. These stubs are stored as YAML or JSON files and injected into the application via a local mock server, allowing tests to run in isolation without hitting real external services. The system maintains request-response mappings with fuzzy matching to handle minor variations in requests.","intents":["Mock external API dependencies so tests run fast and don't depend on third-party services","Eliminate flakiness caused by external service downtime or rate limiting","Run tests offline without network access to production services"],"best_for":["Teams with heavy external service dependencies (payment gateways, analytics, third-party APIs)","CI/CD pipelines that need deterministic, fast test execution","Development teams working offline or in restricted network environments"],"limitations":["Stubs capture only the responses observed during recording — edge cases and error scenarios not exercised during capture won't be mocked","Fuzzy matching for request variations uses simple heuristics (header/body field matching) and may incorrectly match unrelated requests","No automatic detection of stub staleness — mocks may become outdated if external APIs change their response format","Stub injection requires application to route requests through Keploy's mock server, adding a network hop (~5-10ms latency)"],"requires":["Captured outbound HTTP traffic from the interception layer","Application configured to use Keploy's mock server as a proxy or via SDK integration","YAML/JSON storage for stub definitions"],"input_types":["captured outbound HTTP requests and responses","request-response metadata"],"output_types":["YAML/JSON stub definitions","mock server configuration","request matching rules"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.test.replay.and.assertion.validation","name":"test replay and assertion validation","description":"Keploy executes generated test cases by replaying recorded requests against the application and comparing actual responses against captured baseline responses. It uses byte-level or semantic comparison (depending on content type) to validate that responses match, with configurable assertion strategies for handling non-deterministic fields like timestamps or request IDs. Test results are reported with detailed diffs showing where responses diverged.","intents":["Run regression tests to ensure application behavior hasn't changed","Validate that code changes don't break existing API contracts","Detect unintended side effects from refactoring or dependency updates"],"best_for":["Backend teams running continuous regression testing in CI/CD","Teams validating API compatibility across versions","Development teams catching regressions before code review"],"limitations":["Assertion validation is response-based only — cannot verify internal state, database changes, or side effects outside the HTTP response","Non-deterministic fields (timestamps, UUIDs, random values) require manual regex-based filtering or custom assertion logic","Large response payloads (>10MB) may cause memory overhead or slow comparison","No built-in support for async operations or eventual consistency patterns — only validates immediate HTTP responses"],"requires":["Generated test cases from Keploy's test generation layer","Application running and accessible at a known endpoint","Baseline responses captured during initial traffic recording"],"input_types":["executable test cases (YAML or code)","baseline response data","application endpoint URL"],"output_types":["test execution results (pass/fail)","response diff reports (JSON or HTML)","assertion failure details"],"categories":["automation-workflow","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.test.code.generation","name":"multi-language test code generation","description":"Keploy generates executable test code in multiple programming languages (Go, Java, Python, Node.js) from captured traffic, using language-specific idioms and testing frameworks (Go's testing package, JUnit, pytest, Jest). The code generator maintains a template system for each language, inserting captured request/response data into framework-appropriate structures, and produces code that can be immediately run without additional configuration.","intents":["Generate tests in the same language as the application under test","Create tests that integrate with existing CI/CD pipelines using native test runners","Avoid polyglot test infrastructure by using language-native testing frameworks"],"best_for":["Polyglot teams with services in multiple languages","Teams wanting tests to live in the same repository as application code","Organizations with existing test infrastructure in specific languages"],"limitations":["Code generation quality varies by language — some languages produce more idiomatic code than others","Generated code may not follow team-specific style guides or linting rules, requiring post-generation cleanup","No support for languages outside the core set (Go, Java, Python, Node.js) — custom languages require manual test writing","Generated tests inherit limitations of the underlying test framework (e.g., no async/await support in older Go versions)"],"requires":["Captured traffic data","Target language runtime installed (Go 1.16+, Java 8+, Python 3.7+, Node.js 14+)","Language-specific test runner (go test, Maven/Gradle, pytest, Jest)"],"input_types":["captured HTTP traffic","target language specification"],"output_types":["executable test code in Go, Java, Python, or Node.js","language-specific test configuration files"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.application.state.and.database.mocking","name":"application state and database mocking","description":"Keploy captures database queries and state changes that occur during traffic recording, then replays those state changes during test execution to ensure the application operates with the same data context. It intercepts database calls (SQL, NoSQL) and records the queries and results, allowing tests to run against a consistent, reproducible data state without requiring manual database setup or teardown scripts.","intents":["Ensure tests run with the same database state as production traffic","Eliminate database setup/teardown complexity in test suites","Make tests reproducible across different environments and machines"],"best_for":["Teams with complex database schemas and interdependent data","Applications with stateful behavior that depends on database contents","CI/CD pipelines that need fast, isolated test execution without database provisioning"],"limitations":["Database mocking captures only queries executed during recording — unexercised code paths won't have mocked data","Concurrent database operations may be recorded out of order, causing race conditions in replayed tests","Large datasets (>100MB) require significant storage and memory to replay during test execution","No automatic detection of database schema changes — mocks may fail if schema evolves after recording","Supports only databases with Keploy drivers (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB); custom databases require manual integration"],"requires":["Captured database queries and results from traffic recording","Database driver compatible with Keploy (MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, etc.)","Application configured to use Keploy's database proxy or SDK"],"input_types":["captured database queries","query results and response data","transaction logs"],"output_types":["database mock definitions (YAML/JSON)","query-response mappings","state snapshots"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.bidirectional.test.synchronization.and.versioning","name":"bidirectional test synchronization and versioning","description":"Keploy maintains version control for captured traffic, test cases, and stubs, allowing teams to track changes over time and synchronize test definitions across environments. When traffic is re-recorded, Keploy diffs new traffic against previous recordings and updates test cases incrementally, preserving manual edits while incorporating new observations. This enables collaborative test maintenance where multiple team members can contribute to test suites without conflicts.","intents":["Track changes to test cases and stubs in version control","Update tests when APIs change without losing manual customizations","Collaborate on test maintenance across distributed teams"],"best_for":["Teams using Git for test case management","Organizations with frequent API changes requiring test updates","Distributed teams needing to merge test changes from multiple sources"],"limitations":["Merge conflicts may occur if the same test case is modified manually and updated from traffic simultaneously","Versioning adds storage overhead — maintaining multiple versions of large test suites can consume significant disk space","No built-in conflict resolution strategy — teams must manually resolve conflicts between traffic-based updates and manual edits","Synchronization across environments requires manual Git operations or CI/CD integration"],"requires":["Git repository for storing test cases and stubs","Keploy CLI with version control integration","Git credentials for pushing/pulling test definitions"],"input_types":["test case definitions (YAML/JSON)","stub definitions","captured traffic data"],"output_types":["Git commits with test changes","diff reports showing test modifications","merged test definitions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-keploy__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ci.cd.pipeline.integration.and.reporting","name":"ci/cd pipeline integration and reporting","description":"Keploy integrates with CI/CD systems (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI) via CLI commands and webhooks, executing test suites automatically on code changes and reporting results back to the pipeline. It generates structured test reports (JSON, HTML, JUnit XML) that integrate with standard CI/CD dashboards, and can block deployments if tests fail or coverage thresholds aren't met.","intents":["Run Keploy tests automatically on every code commit","Block deployments if regression tests fail","Report test results in CI/CD dashboards alongside other test suites"],"best_for":["Teams with existing CI/CD pipelines wanting to add regression testing","Organizations requiring automated quality gates before deployment","DevOps teams integrating testing into deployment workflows"],"limitations":["CI/CD integration requires manual pipeline configuration — no auto-detection of pipeline type","Report generation adds 10-30 seconds overhead per test run","Large test suites (>1000 tests) may exceed CI/CD timeout limits or resource constraints","No built-in support for distributed test execution — all tests run on a single CI/CD runner"],"requires":["CI/CD system with support for custom commands (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, etc.)","Keploy CLI installed in CI/CD environment","Test cases and stubs committed to Git repository"],"input_types":["test case definitions","application code","CI/CD environment variables"],"output_types":["JUnit XML reports","JSON test results","HTML test reports","CI/CD status updates"],"categories":["automation-workflow","testing-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":22,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Linux kernel 4.4+ for eBPF support (or macOS/Windows with reduced performance)","Network interface with packet capture capabilities","Root or CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileges for packet interception","Keploy CLI installed and running as daemon","Captured HTTP traffic from Keploy's interception layer","Test runner compatible with generated test format (Go, Java, Python, Node.js)","Application under test with stable API contracts","Captured outbound HTTP traffic from the interception layer","Application configured to use Keploy's mock server as a proxy or via SDK integration","YAML/JSON storage for stub definitions"],"failure_modes":["eBPF-based capture requires Linux kernel 4.4+ with BPF support; macOS and Windows use less efficient syscall hooking with higher overhead","Encrypted TLS traffic requires certificate pinning bypass or MITM proxy setup, adding complexity","High-volume traffic (>10k req/s) may experience packet loss or buffering delays depending on system resources","Generated tests may include environment-specific values (timestamps, UUIDs, API keys) requiring manual sanitization or regex-based parameterization","Cannot infer business logic assertions — generates only response matching, not semantic correctness checks","Deduplication heuristics may miss subtle variations in requests, creating redundant test cases","No automatic detection of flaky tests or race conditions in captured traffic","Stubs capture only the responses observed during recording — edge cases and error scenarios not exercised during capture won't be mocked","Fuzzy matching for request variations uses simple heuristics (header/body field matching) and may incorrectly match unrelated requests","No automatic detection of stub staleness — mocks may become outdated if external APIs change their response format","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.577Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:23.056Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=keploy","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=keploy"}},"signature":"oLy/gNdb0+Se6EWP7JWI02rwYrltdajrOiiIu1upmU1q4dVUK888duen2dh6PZUCWknEP1lsNBOVfHT/VOZYDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T03:03:25.047Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/keploy","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/keploy","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=keploy","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}