{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-kagi","slug":"kagi","name":"Kagi","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/ac3xx/mcp-servers-kagi","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/kagi","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-kagi__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.native.kagi.search.integration","name":"mcp-native kagi search integration","description":"Exposes Kagi search API as a Model Context Protocol server, enabling LLM agents and tools to invoke web search through standardized MCP resource and tool interfaces rather than direct HTTP calls. Implements MCP server lifecycle management, request routing, and response marshaling to translate between Kagi's REST API and MCP's JSON-RPC protocol, allowing any MCP-compatible client (Claude, custom agents) to query Kagi without SDK dependencies.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to perform web searches without managing API clients directly","I need to integrate Kagi search into an MCP-based tool ecosystem","I want to expose Kagi as a standardized capability to multiple LLM clients simultaneously"],"best_for":["LLM application developers building multi-tool agents","Teams standardizing on MCP for tool composition","Developers wanting to avoid vendor lock-in to specific LLM provider search integrations"],"limitations":["Requires running a separate MCP server process — adds deployment complexity vs embedded SDKs","Network latency between MCP client and server adds ~50-200ms overhead per search request","MCP protocol overhead increases message size compared to direct API calls","Limited to Kagi API rate limits and authentication model — no built-in caching or request batching"],"requires":["Kagi API key (paid subscription)","Python 3.8+ (inferred from MCP server patterns)","MCP-compatible client (Claude, LangChain with MCP support, or custom agent)","Network connectivity to Kagi API endpoints"],"input_types":["text (search query)","structured parameters (result count, search type filters)"],"output_types":["structured JSON (search results with title, URL, snippet, metadata)","text (formatted search summaries)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-kagi__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.search.result.filtering.and.ranking","name":"search result filtering and ranking","description":"Processes Kagi API responses to filter, rank, and format search results based on configurable criteria (relevance, freshness, domain authority). Implements result deduplication, snippet extraction, and metadata enrichment to normalize Kagi's response format into a consistent structure consumable by LLM agents, reducing noise and improving context quality for downstream reasoning tasks.","intents":["I want search results ranked by relevance to my specific query context","I need to filter out low-quality or irrelevant results before passing to the LLM","I want consistent result formatting across different search types (web, news, academic)"],"best_for":["Developers building fact-checking or research agents","Teams needing high-signal search results for RAG pipelines","Applications where result quality directly impacts LLM reasoning accuracy"],"limitations":["Filtering logic is static — no learned ranking based on agent feedback","No built-in deduplication across multiple search queries","Metadata enrichment depends on Kagi API response completeness — may be sparse for some sources"],"requires":["Kagi API key with search capability","MCP server running with filtering module enabled"],"input_types":["raw Kagi API response (JSON)","filter configuration (JSON schema)"],"output_types":["filtered/ranked result set (JSON array)","formatted snippets (text)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-kagi__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.search.type.orchestration","name":"multi-search-type orchestration","description":"Coordinates multiple Kagi search API endpoints (web search, news search, academic search, image search) through a unified MCP interface, routing queries to appropriate search type based on user intent or explicit parameters. Implements request multiplexing to execute parallel searches and aggregates results into a single response, enabling agents to gather diverse information sources in a single interaction.","intents":["I want to search across news, academic, and web sources simultaneously for comprehensive research","I need my agent to automatically choose the right search type based on query intent","I want to combine image search results with text results for multimedia research tasks"],"best_for":["Research and fact-checking agents requiring multi-modal information","Applications needing comprehensive coverage across news, academic, and web sources","Developers building knowledge synthesis tools"],"limitations":["Parallel search execution increases total API call cost proportionally","Result aggregation from heterogeneous sources may require custom ranking logic","Image search results require separate processing pipeline (not text-based)","No built-in intent detection — requires explicit search type specification or external classifier"],"requires":["Kagi API key with access to multiple search endpoints","MCP server with multi-endpoint routing logic"],"input_types":["search query (text)","search type specification (enum: web|news|academic|images)","optional: intent classification (for automatic routing)"],"output_types":["aggregated result set (JSON array with source type metadata)","per-type result buckets (JSON object keyed by search type)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-kagi__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.kagi.api.authentication.and.session.management","name":"kagi api authentication and session management","description":"Handles Kagi API key storage, validation, and request signing for all outbound API calls from the MCP server. Implements credential management patterns (environment variables, secure config files) and request interceptors to inject authentication headers, managing token lifecycle and error handling for auth failures without exposing credentials in logs or error messages.","intents":["I want to securely manage my Kagi API key without hardcoding it","I need my MCP server to handle authentication failures gracefully","I want to rotate or update API keys without restarting the server"],"best_for":["Production deployments requiring secure credential management","Teams with multiple environments (dev, staging, prod) needing per-environment keys","Applications subject to security audits or compliance requirements"],"limitations":["No built-in key rotation — requires manual updates or external secret management integration","Credentials stored in environment or config files — vulnerable if host is compromised","No rate-limit tracking or quota management — relies on Kagi API responses for limits","Single API key per server instance — no multi-tenant support"],"requires":["Kagi API key (obtained from Kagi account)","Environment variable or config file support in MCP server runtime"],"input_types":["API key (string)","optional: API endpoint URL (for custom deployments)"],"output_types":["authenticated HTTP requests (with Authorization headers)","auth error responses (401, 403)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-kagi__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.error.handling.and.graceful.degradation","name":"error handling and graceful degradation","description":"Implements comprehensive error handling for Kagi API failures (rate limits, timeouts, invalid queries, service unavailability) with fallback strategies and informative error messages. Translates Kagi API error codes into MCP-compatible error responses, implements exponential backoff for transient failures, and provides agents with actionable error context (retry-after headers, suggested query modifications) without exposing raw API errors.","intents":["I want my agent to handle search failures without crashing","I need to know when Kagi is rate-limited and when to retry","I want helpful error messages that suggest query improvements"],"best_for":["Production agents requiring high availability","Applications with strict uptime requirements","Teams building resilient multi-tool agent systems"],"limitations":["Exponential backoff increases latency for transient failures","No circuit breaker pattern — will continue retrying even during extended outages","Error recovery strategies are fixed — no learning from repeated failure patterns","Rate limit handling depends on Kagi providing accurate rate-limit headers"],"requires":["MCP server with error handling middleware","Kagi API returning standard HTTP error codes and rate-limit headers"],"input_types":["HTTP error responses from Kagi API"],"output_types":["MCP error objects (with code, message, retry metadata)","structured error context (JSON)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Kagi API key (paid subscription)","Python 3.8+ (inferred from MCP server patterns)","MCP-compatible client (Claude, LangChain with MCP support, or custom agent)","Network connectivity to Kagi API endpoints","Kagi API key with search capability","MCP server running with filtering module enabled","Kagi API key with access to multiple search endpoints","MCP server with multi-endpoint routing logic","Kagi API key (obtained from Kagi account)","Environment variable or config file support in MCP server runtime"],"failure_modes":["Requires running a separate MCP server process — adds deployment complexity vs embedded SDKs","Network latency between MCP client and server adds ~50-200ms overhead per search request","MCP protocol overhead increases message size compared to direct API calls","Limited to Kagi API rate limits and authentication model — no built-in caching or request batching","Filtering logic is static — no learned ranking based on agent feedback","No built-in deduplication across multiple search queries","Metadata enrichment depends on Kagi API response completeness — may be sparse for some sources","Parallel search execution increases total API call cost proportionally","Result aggregation from heterogeneous sources may require custom ranking logic","Image search results require separate processing pipeline (not text-based)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.577Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=kagi","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=kagi"}},"signature":"u2bNVuutfsJIxcBdNOuXw1BuaQrdwHIqC+yeuBnhvD5b66eQBMDrfOmB8yU1lckO8xpYvIfyKl1vTQDpNNY1DA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T00:17:44.488Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/kagi","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/kagi","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=kagi","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}