{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-json-mcp","slug":"json-mcp","name":"JSON MCP","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/VadimNastoyashchy/json-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/json-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.file.splitting.with.structural.awareness","name":"json file splitting with structural awareness","description":"Splits large JSON files into smaller chunks while maintaining structural integrity and valid JSON syntax. The MCP server parses JSON documents into an AST, identifies logical split points (array elements, object properties), and generates valid sub-documents that preserve schema relationships. Enables LLMs to work with oversized JSON datasets by decomposing them into manageable segments without data loss or corruption.","intents":["I need to break up a 500MB JSON file so an LLM can process it in chunks without hitting token limits","Split a JSON array into smaller batches for parallel processing across multiple LLM calls","Decompose a nested JSON structure into independent sub-documents while keeping references intact"],"best_for":["LLM agents processing large datasets","Teams building data pipelines that feed JSON to language models","Developers working with oversized configuration or data files"],"limitations":["Split points are limited to array boundaries and top-level object properties — cannot split within deeply nested structures without potential data fragmentation","No built-in handling of circular references or self-referential JSON structures","Performance degrades on JSON files >1GB due to full AST parsing in memory"],"requires":["MCP client compatible with JSON MCP protocol","Valid JSON input (malformed JSON will fail parsing)","Sufficient memory to hold parsed AST in RAM"],"input_types":["JSON file path or raw JSON string","Split configuration (chunk size, split strategy)"],"output_types":["Array of valid JSON sub-documents","Metadata about split points and boundaries"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.file.merging.with.conflict.resolution","name":"json file merging with conflict resolution","description":"Merges multiple JSON documents into a single coherent structure using configurable merge strategies (deep merge, array concatenation, property override). The server detects schema conflicts, duplicate keys, and incompatible types, then applies user-specified resolution rules (last-write-wins, array union, nested merge). Enables LLM-driven data consolidation workflows where multiple JSON sources must be unified into a canonical representation.","intents":["Combine results from multiple LLM API calls that each return partial JSON objects into one unified response","Merge configuration files from different sources while handling conflicting property values","Consolidate JSON arrays from separate files into a single deduplicated collection"],"best_for":["Multi-step LLM workflows that aggregate partial results","Data integration pipelines combining heterogeneous JSON sources","Configuration management systems that merge environment-specific overrides"],"limitations":["Merge strategy must be specified upfront — no automatic detection of optimal merge semantics","Cannot resolve conflicts in non-primitive types (objects/arrays) without explicit strategy definition","No built-in schema validation — merging incompatible types may produce unexpected results"],"requires":["MCP client with merge capability support","Valid JSON input for all source documents","Merge strategy configuration (deep/shallow, array handling, conflict resolution)"],"input_types":["Multiple JSON file paths or raw JSON strings","Merge strategy specification (enum or config object)"],"output_types":["Single merged JSON document","Merge report with conflict details and resolution applied"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.schema.validation.and.type.enforcement","name":"json schema validation and type enforcement","description":"Validates JSON documents against schemas (JSON Schema, custom rules) and enforces type constraints before processing. The MCP server performs structural validation, type checking, and constraint verification (required fields, value ranges, pattern matching), returning detailed error reports with violation locations. Prevents malformed data from propagating through LLM workflows by catching schema violations early.","intents":["Validate that JSON returned by an LLM matches an expected schema before using it in downstream systems","Enforce required fields and type constraints on user-provided JSON configuration","Generate detailed error messages about which fields violate schema when LLM output is malformed"],"best_for":["LLM agents that must produce structured output conforming to strict schemas","Data pipelines requiring quality gates before processing","Teams building type-safe integrations between LLMs and databases"],"limitations":["Only supports JSON Schema validation — custom business logic validation requires external implementation","Error messages are schema-centric, not user-friendly — require interpretation for end-user communication","No automatic schema inference — schemas must be provided explicitly"],"requires":["JSON Schema definition or custom validation rules","Valid JSON input to validate","MCP client with validation capability"],"input_types":["JSON document to validate","JSON Schema or validation rule specification"],"output_types":["Boolean validation result","Detailed error report with violation locations and constraint details"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.json.path.querying.and.extraction","name":"json path querying and extraction","description":"Extracts specific values or sub-documents from JSON using JSONPath expressions, enabling LLMs to query nested structures without parsing entire documents. The server evaluates JSONPath queries against the JSON AST, returning matching values with their paths and context. Supports filtering, recursive descent, and complex path expressions, allowing precise data extraction from large or complex JSON structures.","intents":["Extract all email addresses from a deeply nested JSON object without loading the entire structure","Query a JSON document for all objects matching a specific condition (e.g., status='active')","Navigate to a specific nested value using a JSONPath expression provided by an LLM"],"best_for":["LLM agents querying large JSON datasets for specific information","Data extraction pipelines that need surgical precision without full document parsing","Interactive tools where users specify JSONPath queries to explore JSON structure"],"limitations":["JSONPath syntax has multiple dialects — behavior may vary if non-standard expressions are used","Complex recursive queries on very large documents may have performance overhead","No support for XPath-style modifications — query-only, cannot update values in place"],"requires":["Valid JSON document","JSONPath expression (string format)","MCP client with query capability"],"input_types":["JSON document (file path or raw string)","JSONPath query expression"],"output_types":["Array of matching values","Array of matching values with their JSONPath locations","Structured result set with context"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.transformation.with.mapping.rules","name":"json transformation with mapping rules","description":"Transforms JSON documents by applying field mappings, type conversions, and structural reshaping rules. The server accepts transformation specifications (field renames, type coercions, nested restructuring, computed fields) and applies them to JSON documents, producing output conforming to a target schema. Enables LLM-driven data normalization and format conversion without custom scripting.","intents":["Convert JSON from one API's response format to another system's expected input format","Rename fields in a JSON document to match a target schema expected by downstream systems","Flatten nested JSON structures or restructure flat data into nested hierarchies"],"best_for":["Data integration pipelines normalizing heterogeneous JSON sources","LLM workflows that must convert between different data representations","Teams building API adapters that transform vendor-specific JSON formats"],"limitations":["Transformation rules must be defined upfront — no automatic schema inference or mapping suggestion","Complex transformations (conditional logic, aggregations) require custom rule syntax or external implementation","No rollback or transaction semantics — failed transformations may produce partial output"],"requires":["Source JSON document","Transformation rule specification (mapping, type conversions, restructuring)","MCP client with transformation capability"],"input_types":["JSON document","Transformation rule specification (object or DSL format)"],"output_types":["Transformed JSON document","Transformation report with applied changes"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.format.conversion.and.serialization","name":"json format conversion and serialization","description":"Converts JSON between different serialization formats (JSON, JSONL, CSV, YAML) and handles encoding/decoding with configurable options (indentation, sorting, null handling). The server parses JSON and re-serializes to target format, preserving data integrity while adapting structure to format constraints. Enables LLM workflows to work with data in multiple formats without external tools.","intents":["Convert a JSON array to JSONL (newline-delimited JSON) for streaming processing","Export JSON data to CSV format for spreadsheet applications","Convert YAML configuration to JSON for programmatic manipulation"],"best_for":["Data pipeline tools that must support multiple input/output formats","LLM agents working with heterogeneous data sources (APIs, files, databases)","Teams building data export/import functionality"],"limitations":["Format conversions may lose information (e.g., JSON to CSV loses nested structure)","CSV conversion requires flat structure — nested JSON must be flattened first","YAML conversion may not preserve type information (numbers vs strings) depending on YAML dialect"],"requires":["Valid input in source format","Target format specification","MCP client with format conversion capability"],"input_types":["JSON, JSONL, CSV, or YAML document"],"output_types":["JSON, JSONL, CSV, or YAML document","Conversion report with warnings about data loss or transformation"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.diff.and.comparison.analysis","name":"json diff and comparison analysis","description":"Compares two JSON documents and generates detailed diffs showing added, removed, and modified fields with their paths and values. The server performs structural comparison at multiple levels (shallow vs deep), detects type changes, and generates human-readable or machine-parseable diff reports. Enables LLM-driven change detection and data reconciliation workflows.","intents":["Detect what changed between two versions of a JSON configuration file","Compare API responses from different endpoints to identify discrepancies","Generate a summary of differences between expected and actual JSON output from an LLM"],"best_for":["Data reconciliation and audit workflows","LLM agents verifying output correctness by comparing against expected results","Configuration management systems tracking changes over time"],"limitations":["Diff output can be verbose for large documents with many changes","No built-in merge capabilities — diff reports are read-only analysis","Diff semantics may vary for arrays (element-by-element vs set-based comparison)"],"requires":["Two valid JSON documents to compare","MCP client with diff capability"],"input_types":["Two JSON documents (file paths or raw strings)","Comparison options (deep vs shallow, array comparison strategy)"],"output_types":["Structured diff report with added/removed/modified fields","Human-readable diff summary","Machine-parseable diff format (JSON patch, RFC 6902)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-json-mcp__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.json.streaming.and.batch.processing","name":"json streaming and batch processing","description":"Processes JSON documents in streaming mode (JSONL, JSON arrays) without loading entire files into memory, enabling efficient handling of large datasets. The server reads JSON line-by-line or element-by-element, applies operations (filtering, transformation, aggregation) to each chunk, and streams results. Supports batch operations across multiple documents with configurable parallelism.","intents":["Process a 10GB JSONL file by streaming it through an LLM without loading it all into memory","Apply a transformation to each element of a large JSON array in batches","Aggregate statistics across millions of JSON objects without holding all in memory"],"best_for":["Data pipelines processing large-scale JSON datasets","LLM agents working with streaming data sources","Teams building memory-efficient data processing workflows"],"limitations":["Streaming mode cannot perform operations requiring full document context (e.g., global sorting, deduplication)","Batch processing adds latency due to chunking and context switching","No built-in checkpointing — failed batches require manual retry logic"],"requires":["JSONL or JSON array input","Batch size configuration","MCP client with streaming capability"],"input_types":["JSONL file or JSON array","Batch size and processing strategy"],"output_types":["Streamed JSON results","Aggregated statistics or summary"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":29,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client compatible with JSON MCP protocol","Valid JSON input (malformed JSON will fail parsing)","Sufficient memory to hold parsed AST in RAM","MCP client with merge capability support","Valid JSON input for all source documents","Merge strategy configuration (deep/shallow, array handling, conflict resolution)","JSON Schema definition or custom validation rules","Valid JSON input to validate","MCP client with validation capability","Valid JSON document"],"failure_modes":["Split points are limited to array boundaries and top-level object properties — cannot split within deeply nested structures without potential data fragmentation","No built-in handling of circular references or self-referential JSON structures","Performance degrades on JSON files >1GB due to full AST parsing in memory","Merge strategy must be specified upfront — no automatic detection of optimal merge semantics","Cannot resolve conflicts in non-primitive types (objects/arrays) without explicit strategy definition","No built-in schema validation — merging incompatible types may produce unexpected results","Only supports JSON Schema validation — custom business logic validation requires external implementation","Error messages are schema-centric, not user-friendly — require interpretation for end-user communication","No automatic schema inference — schemas must be provided explicitly","JSONPath syntax has multiple dialects — behavior may vary if non-standard expressions are used","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.577Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=json-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=json-mcp"}},"signature":"u5tFsciXyTdnxWEg75mXYrifBcmSWgunsOWzHWeLiRipBNHZjX/9xbq39sZRL36VEzX0ZLzBDgydl6RYQBkoDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T07:19:26.499Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/json-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/json-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=json-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}