{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"jax","slug":"jax","name":"JAX","type":"framework","url":"https://github.com/google/jax","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/jax","categories":["frameworks-sdks"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"jax__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.automatic.differentiation.with.function.composition","name":"automatic-differentiation-with-function-composition","description":"Computes gradients of arbitrary Python functions through reverse-mode automatic differentiation (grad) that decomposes composite functions into primitive operations with known derivatives. JAX traces function execution to build a computational graph, then applies the chain rule in reverse to compute gradients with respect to any input. Supports higher-order derivatives (hessian, jacobian) by composing grad with itself, enabling second-order optimization and sensitivity analysis without manual derivative specification.","intents":["compute gradients of loss functions for neural network training without writing backpropagation code","compute jacobians and hessians for optimization algorithms that require second-order information","differentiate through custom numerical algorithms to enable gradient-based hyperparameter tuning","verify gradient implementations by comparing against finite differences"],"best_for":["ML researchers implementing custom optimization algorithms","scientists building differentiable physics simulations","teams requiring automatic differentiation across arbitrary Python code"],"limitations":["grad only works on scalar outputs — must reduce multi-output functions with a loss aggregation function","cannot differentiate through Python control flow (if/while) that depends on traced values — requires jax.lax.cond/while_loop","in-place mutations are not supported; all operations must be functional","reverse-mode AD has memory overhead proportional to computation depth"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed via pip or conda","functions must be pure (no side effects) and use JAX-compatible operations"],"input_types":["Python functions","NumPy-compatible arrays","PyTree structures (nested dicts/lists of arrays)"],"output_types":["gradient arrays matching input shape","jacobian matrices","hessian matrices"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automatic-differentiation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.jit.compilation.to.xla","name":"jit-compilation-to-xla","description":"Traces a Python function once to extract its computational graph, then compiles it to XLA (Accelerated Linear Algebra) bytecode for execution on CPUs, GPUs, or TPUs with near-native performance. The jit decorator intercepts all primitive operations during a symbolic trace, builds a static computation graph, and uses XLA's compiler to fuse operations, eliminate dead code, and generate device-specific machine code. Subsequent calls with the same input shapes execute the compiled code directly, bypassing Python interpretation.","intents":["accelerate numerical computations by 10-100x through compilation and device-specific optimization","deploy ML models to production with predictable latency and no Python runtime overhead","compile complex numerical algorithms once and reuse across different input shapes","enable automatic kernel fusion and memory layout optimization without manual tuning"],"best_for":["production ML systems requiring sub-millisecond latency","researchers running large-scale simulations that benefit from compilation overhead amortization","teams deploying to heterogeneous hardware (CPU/GPU/TPU) with a single codebase"],"limitations":["compilation adds overhead (100ms-1s) on first call with new input shapes — amortized over many calls","cannot JIT functions with Python control flow that depends on traced values; must use jax.lax.cond/while_loop","compiled functions cannot have side effects (print, file I/O) — these are eliminated during tracing","XLA compilation may fail on very complex graphs or unsupported operations; fallback to eager execution required"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX with XLA backend (included in standard installation)","GPU/TPU drivers if targeting accelerators","functions must be traceable (no data-dependent control flow)"],"input_types":["Python functions","NumPy-compatible arrays","PyTree structures"],"output_types":["compiled XLA functions","arrays with same structure as original function output"],"categories":["automation-workflow","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.scan.based.sequential.computation","name":"scan-based-sequential-computation","description":"Provides jax.lax.scan for efficient sequential computation (e.g., RNNs, sequential processing) that applies a function repeatedly over a sequence while maintaining state. scan traces the function once and generates XLA code that loops over the sequence, updating state at each step. Unlike explicit loops, scan enables compiler optimizations (kernel fusion, memory layout optimization) and works correctly within jit, vmap, and pmap, making it the preferred way to implement sequential algorithms in JAX.","intents":["implement RNNs and sequential models efficiently within JIT compilation","process variable-length sequences without explicit loops or padding","accumulate state across sequence steps (e.g., running statistics, cumulative sums)","parallelize sequential computation across batches via vmap(scan(...))"],"best_for":["ML practitioners implementing RNNs, LSTMs, and other sequential models","researchers building sequential algorithms that require efficient compilation","teams processing variable-length sequences (text, time series) efficiently"],"limitations":["scan requires a fixed function signature across all steps — cannot change types or shapes","scan is less intuitive than explicit loops — requires understanding of functional patterns","scan overhead is noticeable for very short sequences — explicit loops may be faster","debugging scan is difficult — errors may occur in specific sequence steps and be hard to reproduce"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","understanding of functional sequential computation"],"input_types":["initial state (arrays or PyTrees)","sequence (arrays or PyTrees)","function to apply at each step"],"output_types":["final state (arrays or PyTrees)","stacked outputs from each step (arrays or PyTrees)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.device.agnostic.computation.with.automatic.placement","name":"device-agnostic-computation-with-automatic-placement","description":"Automatically places computations on available devices (CPU, GPU, TPU) without explicit device specification, enabling code portability across different hardware. JAX detects available devices at runtime and places arrays on the default device, with automatic data transfer between devices when needed. Users can control placement via jax.device_put and specify device constraints, but the default behavior is transparent device management that enables the same code to run on different hardware.","intents":["write code that runs on CPU, GPU, or TPU without modification","automatically leverage available hardware acceleration without device-specific code","migrate code between different hardware platforms (e.g., development on CPU, production on TPU)","handle heterogeneous hardware setups where different computations run on different devices"],"best_for":["teams developing on CPU but deploying to GPU/TPU","researchers experimenting with different hardware platforms","organizations with heterogeneous hardware setups"],"limitations":["automatic placement may not be optimal for complex multi-device setups — manual placement may be needed","data transfer between devices adds overhead — explicit placement can reduce transfers","device availability is detected at runtime — code may fail if expected devices are unavailable","debugging device placement issues can be difficult — performance problems may be due to unexpected data transfers"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","appropriate device drivers (GPU/TPU) if targeting accelerators"],"input_types":["arrays","PyTree structures"],"output_types":["arrays on specified device","PyTree structures on specified device"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_12","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.shape.polymorphic.tracing.and.compilation","name":"shape-polymorphic-tracing-and-compilation","description":"Enables JIT compilation of functions that work with variable input shapes by using abstract shapes during tracing, generating code that handles multiple concrete shapes without recompilation. When a function is JIT-compiled with abstract_eval, JAX traces it with symbolic shapes (e.g., (batch, 128) where batch is a variable dimension) and generates XLA code that works for any concrete batch size. This avoids recompilation when batch size changes, a common scenario in ML training and inference.","intents":["compile functions once and reuse for different batch sizes without recompilation","handle variable-length sequences without explicit padding or recompilation","build inference systems that accept variable input shapes","optimize compilation time by avoiding recompilation for shape variations"],"best_for":["ML practitioners training with variable batch sizes","teams building inference systems with variable input shapes","researchers implementing algorithms that work with variable-sized inputs"],"limitations":["shape polymorphism requires careful handling of shape-dependent operations (e.g., reshape, transpose)","some operations cannot be shape-polymorphic (e.g., operations that depend on concrete shape values)","debugging shape polymorphism issues can be difficult — errors may occur for specific shapes","shape polymorphic code may be less efficient than shape-specific code due to additional runtime checks"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","understanding of abstract shapes and shape polymorphism"],"input_types":["functions with variable input shapes","abstract shape specifications"],"output_types":["compiled functions that work with multiple shapes","arrays with variable shapes"],"categories":["automation-workflow","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_13","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.serialization.and.checkpoint.management","name":"serialization-and-checkpoint-management","description":"Provides utilities for saving and loading JAX arrays and PyTree structures via jax.experimental.io_callback and third-party libraries (e.g., flax.serialization, orbax), enabling model checkpointing and state persistence. JAX itself does not provide built-in serialization (by design, to keep the core library minimal), but the ecosystem provides robust solutions for saving model parameters, optimizer states, and training metadata. Checkpointing is essential for long-running training and enables resuming from interruptions.","intents":["save model parameters and optimizer state during training for resumption","load pretrained models for fine-tuning or inference","implement distributed checkpointing across multiple devices","manage training artifacts and enable reproducibility"],"best_for":["teams training large models that require checkpointing","researchers implementing long-running experiments","practitioners building production ML systems"],"limitations":["JAX core does not provide built-in serialization — requires external libraries (flax, orbax)","serialization adds I/O overhead — can be a bottleneck for frequent checkpointing","distributed checkpointing is complex — requires careful coordination across devices","compatibility issues may arise when upgrading JAX or dependencies"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","external serialization library (flax, orbax, or custom solution)","storage backend (local filesystem, cloud storage)"],"input_types":["arrays","PyTree structures (model parameters, optimizer states)"],"output_types":["serialized files (HDF5, msgpack, or custom format)","loaded arrays and PyTree structures"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_14","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.debugging.and.error.analysis.with.eager.execution","name":"debugging-and-error-analysis-with-eager-execution","description":"Provides eager execution mode (jax.config.update('jax_disable_jit', True)) that disables JIT compilation and executes functions immediately, enabling step-by-step debugging and error inspection. In eager mode, Python control flow works normally, print statements execute, and errors occur at the line that causes them, making debugging much easier than in compiled mode. Eager execution is essential for development and debugging, though it sacrifices performance.","intents":["debug JAX code by disabling JIT and using Python debuggers","inspect intermediate values during computation without rewriting code","test code correctness before optimizing with JIT compilation","develop and iterate quickly without compilation overhead"],"best_for":["developers debugging JAX code","researchers prototyping new algorithms","teams developing and testing before optimization"],"limitations":["eager execution is much slower than JIT compilation — 10-100x slower for typical workloads","eager mode does not catch all JIT-specific errors — some bugs only appear in compiled mode","debugging distributed code (pmap) is difficult even in eager mode — device synchronization issues may not appear","switching between eager and compiled mode can reveal subtle bugs — code may work in one mode but not the other"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","Python debugger (pdb, IDE debugger)"],"input_types":["JAX functions","arrays"],"output_types":["arrays","debug output (print statements, intermediate values)"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.vectorization.across.batch.dimensions","name":"vectorization-across-batch-dimensions","description":"Automatically transforms a function written for a single input into a batched function via vmap (vectorized map), which adds a batch dimension and applies the function element-wise across that dimension. vmap traces the function once with a single example, then generates code that processes an entire batch in parallel using SIMD instructions or vectorized operations. Unlike explicit loops, vmap enables the compiler to fuse batch operations and optimize memory access patterns, often achieving near-peak hardware throughput.","intents":["process entire batches of data without writing explicit loops or reshaping code","automatically parallelize forward passes across batch dimensions for faster inference","compute gradients for entire batches in a single compiled operation","apply the same function to different axes (e.g., batch, sequence length) through nested vmap calls"],"best_for":["ML practitioners processing large batches of images, sequences, or structured data","researchers implementing custom neural network layers that need efficient batching","teams building inference pipelines where batch size varies but code should remain constant"],"limitations":["vmap only vectorizes over specified axes — cannot automatically infer which dimensions to batch","functions must be written for unbatched inputs; vmap does not reshape inputs automatically","some operations (e.g., global reductions across batch) require explicit handling with vmap's in_axes parameter","nested vmap calls can lead to complex code and reduced compiler optimization effectiveness"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","functions must be pure and compatible with JAX operations"],"input_types":["Python functions","arrays with batch dimension","PyTree structures with batch dimensions"],"output_types":["batched output arrays","PyTree structures with batch dimensions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.device.parallelization.with.pmap","name":"multi-device-parallelization-with-pmap","description":"Distributes a function across multiple devices (GPUs, TPUs) via pmap (parallel map), which replicates the function across devices and automatically handles data distribution and communication. pmap traces the function once per device, generates device-specific code, and inserts collective communication operations (all-reduce, all-gather) at specified points. Unlike vmap which vectorizes within a single device, pmap partitions computation across devices and manages synchronization, enabling near-linear scaling for data-parallel training.","intents":["distribute neural network training across multiple GPUs or TPUs with minimal code changes","implement data-parallel training where each device processes a different batch shard","perform collective operations (all-reduce for gradient averaging) without manual communication code","scale training to hundreds of devices while maintaining a single-device code path"],"best_for":["teams training large models on multi-GPU or multi-TPU clusters","researchers implementing distributed training algorithms","organizations deploying to cloud TPU pods or GPU clusters"],"limitations":["pmap requires all devices to be available and homogeneous — cannot handle device failures gracefully","communication overhead between devices can dominate for small batch sizes or high-latency interconnects","pmap is less flexible than explicit distributed training frameworks (e.g., Horovod) for heterogeneous setups","debugging distributed pmap code is difficult — errors may occur on specific devices and be hard to reproduce"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX with multi-device support (GPU/TPU drivers)","multiple devices (GPUs or TPUs) available and properly configured","functions must be pure and compatible with JAX operations"],"input_types":["Python functions","arrays with device dimension","PyTree structures with device dimensions"],"output_types":["arrays distributed across devices","PyTree structures with device dimensions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.numpy.compatible.array.operations","name":"numpy-compatible-array-operations","description":"Provides a NumPy-compatible API (jax.numpy) that implements standard array operations (matmul, sum, reshape, etc.) as JAX primitives that can be traced, differentiated, and compiled. jax.numpy wraps NumPy functions and maps them to XLA operations, ensuring that code written for NumPy can be executed on JAX with minimal changes. All operations are functional (no in-place mutations) and return immutable arrays, enabling safe composition with transformations like grad and jit.","intents":["write numerical code that works with NumPy syntax but runs on GPUs/TPUs with JAX","migrate existing NumPy code to JAX by changing imports from numpy to jax.numpy","use familiar NumPy operations within JAX transformations (grad, jit, vmap)","ensure code portability across NumPy, JAX, and other array libraries"],"best_for":["scientists and engineers familiar with NumPy transitioning to JAX","teams with existing NumPy codebases that want to leverage GPU acceleration","researchers building algorithms that should work with multiple array backends"],"limitations":["jax.numpy does not support all NumPy functions — some advanced operations are missing or have different semantics","in-place operations (arr[i] = x) are not supported; must use functional updates (arr.at[i].set(x))","random number generation is different from NumPy — requires explicit PRNGKey and functional API","some operations have different performance characteristics than NumPy (e.g., sorting is slower on CPU)"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","familiarity with NumPy API"],"input_types":["arrays","scalars","PyTree structures"],"output_types":["JAX arrays","PyTree structures"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_5","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.custom.primitive.operation.registration","name":"custom-primitive-operation-registration","description":"Enables users to define custom operations (primitives) with specified gradient rules, XLA lowering rules, and batching rules, integrating them seamlessly into JAX's transformation system. Users register a primitive by defining its forward computation, then provide implementations for grad (reverse-mode derivative), jvp (forward-mode derivative), vmap (batching behavior), and xla_lowering (XLA compilation). Once registered, the custom operation can be used within any JAX transformation without modification, enabling extension of JAX with domain-specific operations.","intents":["integrate custom CUDA kernels or specialized operations into JAX computations","define domain-specific operations (e.g., custom convolution, sparse operations) with automatic differentiation support","wrap external libraries (e.g., C++, CUDA) and make them compatible with JAX transformations","implement operations that are more efficient than compositions of JAX primitives"],"best_for":["researchers implementing novel operations that require custom kernels","teams integrating specialized hardware (custom accelerators) with JAX","developers wrapping external numerical libraries for use in JAX"],"limitations":["requires understanding of JAX's primitive system and tracer architecture — steep learning curve","custom primitives must provide gradient and batching implementations; incomplete implementations break transformations","XLA lowering rules are device-specific and complex — may require expertise in XLA IR","custom primitives cannot be JIT-compiled to XLA unless an xla_lowering rule is provided; otherwise they execute eagerly"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed with development headers","understanding of JAX's primitive API and tracer system","C++ compiler if wrapping external code"],"input_types":["Python functions","arrays","PyTree structures"],"output_types":["registered JAX primitives","arrays"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.functional.random.number.generation","name":"functional-random-number-generation","description":"Provides a functional random number API (jax.random) that generates deterministic, reproducible random numbers via explicit PRNG keys, avoiding global state and enabling safe parallelization. Instead of NumPy's stateful RNG, JAX uses a key-based system where each random operation consumes a key and returns a new key, ensuring reproducibility and enabling safe use in transformations. The API supports multiple RNG algorithms (threefry, philox) and enables splitting keys for parallel random number generation across devices.","intents":["generate reproducible random numbers in ML training without global state","parallelize random number generation across devices by splitting keys","ensure deterministic behavior in stochastic algorithms (dropout, data augmentation) for debugging","implement custom sampling algorithms with guaranteed reproducibility"],"best_for":["ML researchers implementing stochastic algorithms that require reproducibility","teams training models on multiple devices where random number generation must be synchronized","scientists building simulations that require deterministic randomness"],"limitations":["functional API is less convenient than NumPy's stateful RNG — requires explicit key management","key splitting adds overhead compared to stateful RNGs — noticeable in tight loops","some advanced RNG features (e.g., Gaussian mixture sampling) are not provided; users must implement custom samplers","debugging key management can be error-prone — incorrect key reuse leads to correlated random numbers"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","understanding of functional RNG concepts"],"input_types":["PRNG keys","shape specifications","dtype specifications"],"output_types":["random arrays","new PRNG keys"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.pytree.based.data.structure.handling","name":"pytree-based-data-structure-handling","description":"Provides a PyTree system that treats nested structures (dicts, lists, tuples, custom classes) as first-class data structures in JAX transformations. PyTrees enable automatic handling of complex data structures in grad, jit, vmap, and pmap without manual flattening/unflattening. Users can register custom classes as PyTree nodes, and JAX automatically applies transformations to all leaves (arrays) while preserving structure, enabling clean code for handling model parameters, optimizer states, and other nested data.","intents":["work with nested parameter dictionaries in neural networks without manual flattening","apply transformations (grad, vmap) to structured data (dicts of arrays) transparently","define custom data structures that integrate seamlessly with JAX transformations","handle complex optimizer states and training metadata without boilerplate code"],"best_for":["ML practitioners building neural networks with complex parameter structures","researchers implementing custom optimizers that manage nested state","teams building frameworks on top of JAX that need clean APIs for structured data"],"limitations":["PyTree flattening/unflattening adds overhead — noticeable for very large nested structures","custom PyTree registration requires understanding of JAX's PyTree API","some operations (e.g., stacking PyTrees) require explicit handling — not all NumPy operations work on PyTrees","debugging PyTree issues can be difficult — errors may occur deep in nested structures"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","understanding of nested data structures"],"input_types":["dicts, lists, tuples of arrays","custom classes registered as PyTree nodes","nested combinations of the above"],"output_types":["PyTree structures with same nesting as input","flattened arrays and tree definitions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.forward.mode.automatic.differentiation","name":"forward-mode-automatic-differentiation","description":"Computes directional derivatives (Jacobian-vector products) via forward-mode AD (jvp), which traces a function while propagating derivative information forward through the computation graph. Unlike reverse-mode grad which is efficient for scalar outputs, forward-mode is efficient for functions with few inputs and many outputs. JAX implements jvp as a tracer that intercepts primitives and applies their forward-mode derivative rules, enabling efficient computation of Jacobians and sensitivity analysis.","intents":["compute jacobians efficiently for functions with few inputs and many outputs","compute directional derivatives for sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification","implement optimization algorithms that require forward-mode derivatives","verify reverse-mode gradients by comparing against forward-mode derivatives"],"best_for":["researchers implementing optimization algorithms that require forward-mode derivatives","scientists performing sensitivity analysis on high-dimensional outputs","teams building uncertainty quantification systems"],"limitations":["forward-mode is less efficient than reverse-mode for scalar outputs — use grad instead","computing full jacobians requires multiple jvp calls (one per input dimension) — expensive for high-dimensional inputs","jvp is less commonly used than grad — fewer examples and less community support","composing jvp with other transformations can lead to complex code and reduced optimization"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","understanding of forward-mode AD concepts"],"input_types":["Python functions","tangent vectors (same shape as inputs)"],"output_types":["jacobian-vector products (same shape as outputs)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.control.flow.primitives.for.dynamic.computation","name":"control-flow-primitives-for-dynamic-computation","description":"Provides functional control flow primitives (jax.lax.cond, jax.lax.while_loop, jax.lax.fori_loop) that enable data-dependent branching and looping within JIT-compiled functions. Unlike Python's if/while which cannot depend on traced values, these primitives accept boolean conditions or loop bounds as inputs and generate XLA code that handles both branches/iterations. This enables dynamic computation (e.g., early stopping, adaptive algorithms) within compiled functions without breaking the compilation boundary.","intents":["implement conditional logic (if/else) that depends on array values within JIT-compiled functions","implement loops with data-dependent termination conditions within JIT compilation","build adaptive algorithms (e.g., early stopping, variable-length processing) that compile to XLA","avoid recompilation when control flow depends on runtime values"],"best_for":["researchers implementing adaptive algorithms that require dynamic control flow","teams building inference systems with variable-length inputs or early stopping","practitioners implementing algorithms that cannot be expressed as static computation graphs"],"limitations":["functional control flow is less intuitive than Python's if/while — requires understanding of functional patterns","both branches of cond must be valid for all inputs — cannot have operations that fail on some inputs","loop bodies in while_loop must have fixed signature — cannot change types or shapes across iterations","debugging control flow primitives is difficult — errors may occur in branches that are not executed"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed","understanding of functional control flow"],"input_types":["boolean conditions (arrays or Python bools)","loop bounds (integers)","loop state (arrays or PyTrees)"],"output_types":["arrays or PyTrees (same structure as input)"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"jax__headline","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.high.performance.numerical.computing.framework","name":"high-performance numerical computing framework","description":"JAX is a high-performance numerical computing framework that offers automatic differentiation, JIT compilation, and is compatible with NumPy, making it ideal for machine learning research.","intents":["best high-performance computing framework","high-performance framework for machine learning","JAX vs TensorFlow for numerical computing","best library for automatic differentiation","JAX for research in ML","high-performance numerical computing tools"],"best_for":["machine learning research","numerical computing tasks"],"limitations":[],"requires":[],"input_types":[],"output_types":[],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":57,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.9+","JAX installed via pip or conda","functions must be pure (no side effects) and use JAX-compatible operations","JAX with XLA backend (included in standard installation)","GPU/TPU drivers if targeting accelerators","functions must be traceable (no data-dependent control flow)","JAX installed","understanding of functional sequential computation","appropriate device drivers (GPU/TPU) if targeting accelerators","understanding of abstract shapes and shape polymorphism"],"failure_modes":["grad only works on scalar outputs — must reduce multi-output functions with a loss aggregation function","cannot differentiate through Python control flow (if/while) that depends on traced values — requires jax.lax.cond/while_loop","in-place mutations are not supported; all operations must be functional","reverse-mode AD has memory overhead proportional to computation depth","compilation adds overhead (100ms-1s) on first call with new input shapes — amortized over many calls","cannot JIT functions with Python control flow that depends on traced values; must use jax.lax.cond/while_loop","compiled functions cannot have side effects (print, file I/O) — these are eliminated during tracing","XLA compilation may fail on very complex graphs or unsupported operations; fallback to eager execution required","scan requires a fixed function signature across all steps — cannot change types or shapes","scan is less intuitive than explicit loops — requires understanding of functional patterns","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7,"quality":0.9,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.692Z","last_scraped_at":null,"last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=jax","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=jax"}},"signature":"IQuse/uWixUw1V0Wsjz0D5bLOPKhVpOukV2fpZS17BWUggW25C1gylAl+jNbENjpV4cGb7qw98QJf68LScBeCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T12:55:50.617Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/jax","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/jax","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=jax","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}