{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser","slug":"javaparser--javaparser","name":"javaparser","type":"repo","url":"https://javaparser.org","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/javaparser--javaparser","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":["abstract-syntax-tree","ast","code-analysis","code-generation","code-generator","java","javadoc","javaparser","javasymbolsolver","parser","syntax-tree"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.java.source.code.parsing.with.full.ast.generation.java.1.25.support","name":"java source code parsing with full ast generation (java 1-25 support)","description":"Converts Java source code into a complete Abstract Syntax Tree using a recursive descent parser that handles Java language features from version 1.0 through Java 25 including preview features. The parser generates a hierarchical node structure (CompilationUnit → ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration → MethodDeclaration, etc.) that preserves all syntactic information including comments, annotations, and modifiers. The parsing pipeline tokenizes input, applies grammar rules, and constructs typed AST nodes that can be traversed and manipulated programmatically.","intents":["Parse a Java source file and extract its complete syntactic structure","Build tooling that needs to understand Java code at the AST level","Analyze Java code without executing it","Support code transformation and generation pipelines"],"best_for":["Java code analysis tool builders","IDE developers needing AST infrastructure","Static analysis and linting tool creators","Code refactoring and transformation frameworks"],"limitations":["Parser is single-threaded; parsing large codebases requires sequential processing","No built-in caching of parsed ASTs across invocations","Preview features support depends on parser version alignment with Java release cycle","Memory overhead scales with codebase size (full AST retained in memory)"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher runtime","javaparser-core module as Maven/Gradle dependency"],"input_types":["Java source code (String)","Java source files (File/Path)","InputStream with Java source"],"output_types":["CompilationUnit (root AST node)","Typed AST node hierarchy (ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration, MethodDeclaration, etc.)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","parsing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.ast.node.traversal.and.visitor.pattern.implementation","name":"ast node traversal and visitor pattern implementation","description":"Provides visitor pattern implementations (GenericVisitor, ModifierVisitor, VoidVisitor) that enable traversal and transformation of the AST without modifying the node classes themselves. The visitor pattern allows developers to define custom logic that executes on specific node types (e.g., MethodDeclaration, FieldDeclaration) as the tree is walked. ModifierVisitor enables in-place AST transformation by returning modified nodes, while VoidVisitor supports side-effect operations like analysis and reporting.","intents":["Traverse an AST and collect information about specific code elements","Transform AST nodes in place (e.g., rename methods, add annotations)","Implement custom code analysis rules that inspect specific node types","Build code generation logic that walks the AST and produces output"],"best_for":["Developers building custom code analysis tools","Refactoring tool implementers","Code generation framework builders","Teams needing extensible AST processing without modifying core node classes"],"limitations":["Visitor pattern requires explicit method overrides for each node type; no automatic delegation","Deep AST traversal can be memory-intensive for large codebases","Visitor state management is developer responsibility; no built-in context passing","Performance degrades with complex visitor logic on large trees"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher (uses functional interfaces in some visitor variants)","javaparser-core module"],"input_types":["AST node (Node subclass)","CompilationUnit or any subtree"],"output_types":["Modified AST nodes (ModifierVisitor)","Analysis results/reports (VoidVisitor)","Collected data structures"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_10","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.annotation.processing.and.metadata.extraction","name":"annotation processing and metadata extraction","description":"Extracts and analyzes Java annotations from AST nodes, providing access to annotation values, targets, and metadata. Developers can query annotations on classes, methods, fields, and parameters, and extract annotation values (strings, numbers, arrays, nested annotations) for use in code analysis and generation. This enables tools to leverage annotation-driven development patterns and extract configuration from annotated code.","intents":["Extract configuration from annotations (e.g., @Entity, @RestController)","Implement annotation processors that analyze code structure","Generate code based on annotation presence and values","Build tools that understand annotation-driven frameworks"],"best_for":["Framework developers building annotation-driven systems","Code generation tool builders","Static analysis tools analyzing annotated code","Teams building IDE plugins for annotation-heavy frameworks"],"limitations":["Annotation values are AST expressions; evaluating complex expressions requires additional logic","Runtime annotation retention is not available; only source-level annotations are visible","Annotation inheritance and meta-annotations require manual traversal","No built-in support for annotation processors (APT); requires separate integration"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core module"],"input_types":["AST node with annotations (ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration, MethodDeclaration, etc.)"],"output_types":["AnnotationExpr objects","Annotation values (strings, numbers, arrays, nested annotations)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_11","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.method.and.field.resolution.with.overload.resolution","name":"method and field resolution with overload resolution","description":"Resolves method calls and field accesses to their definitions by analyzing method signatures, parameter types, and inheritance hierarchies to determine which overloaded method is being invoked. The resolution system handles method overloading, varargs, type erasure, and inheritance-based method lookup (including interface default methods). It returns ResolvedMethodDeclaration objects that provide access to the method's signature, return type, and declaring class.","intents":["Determine which method definition a method call invokes","Resolve field accesses to their field declarations","Handle method overloading and overriding correctly","Implement IDE features like 'go to definition' for methods"],"best_for":["IDE developers needing method resolution","Refactoring tool builders","Static analysis tools analyzing method calls","Code navigation and documentation tools"],"limitations":["Overload resolution doesn't handle all edge cases (e.g., lambda type inference)","Method resolution fails if parameter types cannot be resolved","Performance degrades with deep inheritance hierarchies and many overloads","Varargs and generic method resolution can be ambiguous"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-symbol-solver-core module","Classpath configuration for dependency resolution"],"input_types":["MethodCallExpr (method call AST node)","FieldAccessExpr (field access AST node)","Context (enclosing method/class)"],"output_types":["ResolvedMethodDeclaration","ResolvedFieldDeclaration"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.lexical.preservation.and.comment.attribution","name":"lexical preservation and comment attribution","description":"Preserves original source formatting, whitespace, and comments during parsing and AST manipulation through a lexical preservation system that tracks token positions and associates comments with AST nodes. When the AST is modified and pretty-printed, the original formatting is maintained where possible, and comments are reattached to their corresponding code elements. This is critical for tools that need to preserve developer intent and code style during transformations.","intents":["Modify Java code while preserving original formatting and comments","Implement refactoring tools that don't destroy code style","Generate diffs that show only semantic changes, not formatting changes","Build IDE features that maintain code aesthetics during transformations"],"best_for":["IDE plugin developers","Code refactoring tool builders","Linting tools that need to preserve formatting","Code generation tools that must integrate with existing codebases"],"limitations":["Lexical preservation adds ~15-20% memory overhead per parsed file","Comment attribution uses heuristics; edge cases with ambiguous comment placement may require manual resolution","Preserving formatting during complex AST transformations requires careful node manipulation","Performance impact on large-scale transformations due to position tracking"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core module with lexical preservation enabled (ParserConfiguration.setLexicalPreservationEnabled(true))"],"input_types":["Java source code with comments and formatting"],"output_types":["AST with attached comment nodes","Pretty-printed Java code with original formatting preserved"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_3","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.symbol.resolution.and.type.inference.across.compilation.units","name":"symbol resolution and type inference across compilation units","description":"Resolves Java symbols (types, methods, fields, variables) to their definitions across multiple compilation units using a context-based resolution system (javaparser-symbol-solver-core). The symbol solver uses type resolvers (ReflectionTypeSolver, JavaParserTypeSolver, CombinedTypeSolver) to locate symbol definitions in the classpath, source code, or runtime reflection. It performs type inference on expressions and method calls, handling generics, inheritance hierarchies, and method overloading to determine the exact symbol being referenced.","intents":["Determine what type a variable or expression has in context","Find the definition of a method or field being called/accessed","Resolve generic type parameters to their concrete types","Implement IDE features like 'go to definition' and type hints"],"best_for":["IDE developers needing semantic code analysis","Static analysis tool builders requiring type information","Code refactoring tools that must understand type relationships","Teams building code navigation and documentation tools"],"limitations":["Symbol resolution requires classpath configuration; missing dependencies cause resolution failures","Type inference for complex generics and wildcard types is incomplete in edge cases","Performance degrades significantly with large classpath or deep inheritance hierarchies","Reflection-based resolution doesn't work for code not on the classpath","No built-in support for Java modules (JPMS) in older versions"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-symbol-solver-core module","Classpath configuration pointing to dependencies (JAR files or source directories)","Optional: javaparser-core for source-based resolution"],"input_types":["AST node (Expression, MethodCallExpr, etc.)","Context (enclosing method/class for scope resolution)"],"output_types":["ResolvedType (concrete type information)","ResolvedMethodDeclaration (method definition)","ResolvedFieldDeclaration (field definition)","ResolvedReferenceType (class/interface type)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.from.ast.templates.and.builders","name":"code generation from ast templates and builders","description":"Generates Java source code from AST structures using a builder pattern API (CompilationUnitBuilder, ClassOrInterfaceBuilder, MethodBuilder, etc.) that constructs AST nodes programmatically without parsing. Developers can fluently build AST hierarchies by chaining builder methods, then pretty-print the resulting AST to Java source code. This enables code generation tools to create Java code dynamically based on templates, configurations, or runtime decisions.","intents":["Generate Java classes, methods, and fields programmatically","Build code generation tools that create boilerplate code","Implement template-based code generation (e.g., from annotations or configuration)","Create AST structures for code transformation pipelines"],"best_for":["Code generation framework builders","Annotation processor implementers","Developers building DSLs that generate Java code","Teams automating boilerplate code creation"],"limitations":["Builder API requires knowledge of Java AST structure; steep learning curve for complex code","No validation of generated code semantics (e.g., type correctness, method signatures)","Generated code requires manual formatting configuration for style compliance","Builder chains can become verbose for large code structures"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core module"],"input_types":["Builder method calls (fluent API)","AST node objects"],"output_types":["CompilationUnit (root AST)","Pretty-printed Java source code (String)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.ast.serialization.and.deserialization.to.json","name":"ast serialization and deserialization to json","description":"Serializes parsed AST structures to JSON format and deserializes JSON back into AST objects through the javaparser-core-serialization module. This enables AST persistence, transmission over networks, and integration with tools that work with JSON representations of code structure. The serialization preserves all AST node information including types, positions, and metadata.","intents":["Store parsed AST structures for later analysis without re-parsing","Transmit AST data between services or tools","Integrate JavaParser with JSON-based analysis pipelines","Cache AST representations for performance optimization"],"best_for":["Distributed code analysis systems","AST caching and persistence layers","Microservices that need to share code structure data","Integration with JSON-based toolchains"],"limitations":["JSON serialization adds significant overhead compared to binary formats","Deserialized AST loses some runtime context (e.g., symbol resolution state)","Large codebases produce very large JSON files (10-50x source code size)","No built-in compression; network transmission of large ASTs is bandwidth-intensive"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core-serialization module","JSON processing library (Jackson or similar)"],"input_types":["AST node (CompilationUnit or subtree)","JSON string or stream"],"output_types":["JSON representation of AST","Deserialized AST node"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.pretty.printing.with.customizable.formatting.rules","name":"pretty printing with customizable formatting rules","description":"Converts AST structures back to formatted Java source code using a configurable pretty printer that supports custom indentation, line breaks, and spacing rules. The pretty printer traverses the AST and generates source code that respects the original formatting when lexical preservation is enabled, or applies default formatting rules otherwise. Developers can customize output through PrettyPrinterConfiguration to enforce code style standards.","intents":["Convert modified AST back to readable Java source code","Enforce consistent code formatting across generated or transformed code","Generate code that matches project style guidelines","Create diffs that show only semantic changes by normalizing formatting"],"best_for":["Code generation and transformation tools","IDE developers needing code formatting","Teams enforcing code style standards","Refactoring tools that preserve readability"],"limitations":["Pretty printer doesn't validate semantic correctness of generated code","Custom formatting rules require understanding PrettyPrinterConfiguration API","Performance overhead for large ASTs due to string concatenation","Some complex formatting preferences (e.g., alignment) require manual post-processing"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core module"],"input_types":["AST node (CompilationUnit or subtree)"],"output_types":["Formatted Java source code (String)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_7","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.metamodel.driven.ast.node.generation.and.evolution","name":"metamodel-driven ast node generation and evolution","description":"Uses a metamodel specification (javaparser-core-metamodel-generator) to automatically generate AST node classes, visitor implementations, and serialization code, enabling rapid adaptation to new Java language features without manual coding. The metamodel describes the structure of each AST node type (fields, relationships, constraints), and code generators produce the corresponding Java classes, ensuring consistency and reducing maintenance burden.","intents":["Add support for new Java language features without manually coding AST node classes","Maintain consistency across generated AST node implementations","Reduce boilerplate code for visitor and serialization implementations","Enable rapid evolution of the parser as Java language evolves"],"best_for":["JavaParser maintainers and contributors","Teams extending JavaParser with custom node types","Organizations building domain-specific AST systems","Projects needing rapid AST evolution"],"limitations":["Metamodel changes require regenerating all dependent code; build complexity increases","Custom node types require metamodel definition and generator updates","Generated code is not human-editable; modifications must be made to generators","Debugging generated code is more difficult than hand-written code"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core-metamodel-generator module","Maven build system (metamodel generation integrated into build)"],"input_types":["Metamodel specification (XML or DSL)"],"output_types":["Generated AST node classes","Generated visitor implementations","Generated serialization code"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_8","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.file.codebase.analysis.with.project.wide.symbol.resolution","name":"multi-file codebase analysis with project-wide symbol resolution","description":"Analyzes entire Java projects by parsing multiple compilation units and resolving symbols across file boundaries using a project-aware symbol solver. The JavaParserTypeSolver indexes source directories and enables symbol resolution that spans the entire codebase, allowing tools to understand cross-file dependencies, inheritance hierarchies, and method call chains. This enables project-wide refactoring and analysis without processing files in isolation.","intents":["Analyze dependencies and relationships across an entire Java project","Implement project-wide refactoring (e.g., rename a method used across multiple files)","Build code navigation tools that work across file boundaries","Detect unused code or dead imports across the entire codebase"],"best_for":["Large-scale refactoring tool builders","IDE developers needing project-wide analysis","Static analysis tool creators","Teams building codebase intelligence platforms"],"limitations":["Memory usage scales with project size; very large codebases (>100k files) may exhaust heap","Symbol resolution performance degrades with project complexity and deep inheritance","Requires source code to be available; doesn't work with binary-only dependencies","Circular dependencies and complex generics can cause resolution failures","No built-in incremental analysis; changes require re-parsing affected files"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-core and javaparser-symbol-solver-core modules","Source code directory configuration","Sufficient heap memory (typically 2-4GB for large projects)"],"input_types":["Source directory paths","List of Java files to analyze"],"output_types":["Project-wide symbol table","Cross-file dependency graph","Type and method resolution results"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-javaparser--javaparser__cap_9","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.generic.type.parameter.resolution.and.constraint.solving","name":"generic type parameter resolution and constraint solving","description":"Resolves Java generic type parameters to their concrete types through a constraint-solving system that handles type bounds, wildcards, and inheritance hierarchies. When analyzing code like `List<String>` or method calls with generic parameters, the symbol solver infers the concrete type arguments by analyzing type constraints from assignments, method signatures, and inheritance relationships. This enables accurate type information for generic code.","intents":["Determine the concrete type of a generic variable or expression","Resolve method overloads involving generic parameters","Analyze code that uses complex generic patterns (wildcards, bounds)","Implement IDE features that show accurate types for generic code"],"best_for":["IDE developers needing accurate type information","Static analysis tools analyzing generic code","Code refactoring tools working with generics","Teams building type-aware code generation"],"limitations":["Type inference for complex wildcard patterns is incomplete","Recursive type bounds and self-referential generics cause resolution failures","Performance degrades with deeply nested generic types","Some edge cases with multiple type parameter bounds are unresolved","Type erasure in runtime reflection limits some resolution strategies"],"requires":["Java 8 or higher","javaparser-symbol-solver-core module"],"input_types":["Generic type expression (e.g., ParameterizedType AST node)","Context (enclosing method/class for scope)"],"output_types":["ResolvedType with concrete type arguments","Type parameter mappings"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":46,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Java 8 or higher runtime","javaparser-core module as Maven/Gradle dependency","Java 8 or higher (uses functional interfaces in some visitor variants)","javaparser-core module","Java 8 or higher","javaparser-symbol-solver-core module","Classpath configuration for dependency resolution","javaparser-core module with lexical preservation enabled (ParserConfiguration.setLexicalPreservationEnabled(true))","Classpath configuration pointing to dependencies (JAR files or source directories)","Optional: javaparser-core for source-based resolution"],"failure_modes":["Parser is single-threaded; parsing large codebases requires sequential processing","No built-in caching of parsed ASTs across invocations","Preview features support depends on parser version alignment with Java release cycle","Memory overhead scales with codebase size (full AST retained in memory)","Visitor pattern requires explicit method overrides for each node type; no automatic delegation","Deep AST traversal can be memory-intensive for large codebases","Visitor state management is developer responsibility; no built-in context passing","Performance degrades with complex visitor logic on large trees","Annotation values are AST expressions; evaluating complex expressions requires additional logic","Runtime annotation retention is not available; only source-level annotations are visible","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.6322924188527775,"quality":0.34,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.550Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:58:37.059Z","last_commit":"2026-05-03T13:10:34Z"},"community":{"stars":6084,"forks":1224,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=javaparser--javaparser","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=javaparser--javaparser"}},"signature":"k4xaPPRwlC25IkuxL3IKcBDYL9JQ4wwagT+G295qQ0A2nm/wMxxZbsbtEZ4ssC1wKWN4CPB68LeDnWBXU1W8Aw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T07:55:47.836Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/javaparser--javaparser","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/javaparser--javaparser","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=javaparser--javaparser","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}