{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_jadbio","slug":"jadbio","name":"JADBio","type":"product","url":"https://jadbio.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/jadbio","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_0","uri":"capability://machine.learning.automated.biomarker.discovery.from.omics.data","name":"automated-biomarker-discovery-from-omics-data","description":"Automatically identifies candidate biomarkers from high-dimensional omics datasets (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics) without requiring manual feature engineering or machine learning expertise. The system applies statistical and machine learning algorithms to rank and select the most predictive biological features.","intents":["I need to find which genes or proteins predict treatment response in my patient cohort","I want to identify disease-associated biomarkers from my omics dataset without hiring a data scientist","I need to narrow down thousands of potential features to the most relevant ones for my study"],"best_for":["wet-lab researchers without machine learning background","academic biomedical researchers","pharmaceutical drug discovery teams","clinical researchers validating biomarkers"],"limitations":["Performance on small sample sizes (n<50) is not well-documented","Requires sufficient data quality and preprocessing before upload","Limited control over algorithm selection and hyperparameter tuning"],"requires":["structured omics dataset with samples and features","clinical outcome or phenotype labels for supervised learning","data in standard formats (CSV, Excel, or similar)"],"input_types":["tabular data (CSV, Excel)","omics datasets (gene expression, protein abundance, metabolite levels)","clinical phenotype labels"],"output_types":["ranked list of biomarker candidates","feature importance scores","predictive model performance metrics"],"categories":["machine-learning","biomedical-research","data-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_1","uri":"capability://machine.learning.automated.feature.selection.with.bias.reduction","name":"automated-feature-selection-with-bias-reduction","description":"Systematically selects the most informative features from high-dimensional datasets while reducing researcher bias and preventing overfitting through automated cross-validation and statistical testing. Handles feature selection without manual intervention or subjective threshold setting.","intents":["I want to reduce my 20,000 gene features down to a manageable set without introducing bias","I need to validate that my selected features generalize to new data","I want to avoid the researcher bias that comes from manually cherry-picking features"],"best_for":["researchers working with high-dimensional datasets","teams concerned about reproducibility and publication standards","studies with limited sample sizes where overfitting is a major risk"],"limitations":["Algorithm selection and rationale not fully transparent to users","May not capture complex feature interactions","Requires balanced or stratified datasets for optimal performance"],"requires":["labeled dataset with outcome variable","sufficient samples relative to feature count","clean, preprocessed data"],"input_types":["tabular data with features and labels","high-dimensional datasets (hundreds to thousands of features)"],"output_types":["subset of selected features","feature ranking/importance scores","cross-validation performance estimates"],"categories":["machine-learning","data-analysis","statistical-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_10","uri":"capability://machine.learning.model.interpretability.and.explanation","name":"model-interpretability-and-explanation","description":"Provides explanations for model predictions and biomarker selections, helping researchers understand which features drive predictions and how models make decisions.","intents":["I want to understand why my model selected these specific biomarkers","I need to explain my model's predictions to clinicians and stakeholders","I want to validate that my model is using biologically meaningful features"],"best_for":["researchers preparing publications","teams developing clinical decision support tools","studies requiring regulatory approval"],"limitations":["Interpretability methods may be limited or generic","Complex models may still be difficult to explain","Biological validation of feature importance not automated"],"requires":["trained model","feature metadata and biological context"],"input_types":["trained predictive models","feature importance data"],"output_types":["feature importance rankings","prediction explanations","interpretability visualizations","biological context annotations"],"categories":["machine-learning","interpretability","explainability"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_11","uri":"capability://collaboration.collaborative.project.management.and.sharing","name":"collaborative-project-management-and-sharing","description":"Enables researchers to organize analyses into projects, share results with collaborators, and maintain version history of analyses and datasets for team-based biomarker discovery research.","intents":["I want to share my analysis with my research team members","I need to track changes to my analysis over time","I want to organize multiple related biomarker discovery projects"],"best_for":["research teams and collaborations","institutions with multiple users","studies requiring audit trails for regulatory compliance"],"limitations":["Collaboration features may be limited on free tier","Permission management may be basic","Version control may not be as sophisticated as code repositories"],"requires":["multiple user accounts","institutional or team subscription"],"input_types":["analysis projects","datasets","results"],"output_types":["shared project access","version history","collaboration notifications","audit logs"],"categories":["collaboration","project-management","team-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_2","uri":"capability://machine.learning.predictive.model.training.and.validation","name":"predictive-model-training-and-validation","description":"Automatically trains machine learning models on biomedical data and validates their performance using cross-validation techniques without requiring users to specify algorithms or tune hyperparameters. Handles model selection and evaluation end-to-end.","intents":["I want to build a predictive model for patient outcomes from my biomarker data","I need to know how well my model will perform on new, unseen patients","I want to compare different model architectures without writing code"],"best_for":["researchers building diagnostic or prognostic models","teams without machine learning expertise","studies requiring rapid model validation"],"limitations":["Limited insight into which algorithms were selected or why","Hyperparameter choices not exposed to users for customization","Performance on imbalanced datasets not well-documented","No ability to implement custom model architectures"],"requires":["labeled training dataset","sufficient sample size for meaningful cross-validation","balanced or properly weighted outcome classes"],"input_types":["tabular biomedical data","clinical outcome labels","feature matrices"],"output_types":["trained predictive model","performance metrics (accuracy, AUC, sensitivity, specificity)","cross-validation results","model predictions on test data"],"categories":["machine-learning","biomedical-research","predictive-modeling"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_3","uri":"capability://user.interface.visual.machine.learning.workflow.builder","name":"visual-machine-learning-workflow-builder","description":"Provides an intuitive graphical interface for designing machine learning pipelines without writing code, allowing researchers to connect data inputs, preprocessing steps, feature selection, and model training through a visual canvas.","intents":["I want to design a machine learning workflow without learning Python or R","I need to document my analysis pipeline visually for my research team","I want to experiment with different pipeline configurations quickly"],"best_for":["non-technical researchers","teams prioritizing ease-of-use over customization","researchers needing to document workflows for collaboration"],"limitations":["Limited flexibility compared to code-based approaches","May not support advanced or custom preprocessing steps","Workflow complexity is constrained by UI design"],"requires":["basic understanding of machine learning concepts","web browser access","prepared input data"],"input_types":["data files","configuration parameters"],"output_types":["visual workflow diagram","executable pipeline","analysis results"],"categories":["user-interface","machine-learning","workflow-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.analysis.dataset.quality.assessment.and.preprocessing","name":"dataset-quality-assessment-and-preprocessing","description":"Analyzes input datasets for quality issues, missing values, outliers, and data type inconsistencies, providing recommendations for preprocessing and data cleaning before model training.","intents":["I want to understand the quality of my dataset before investing time in analysis","I need to identify and handle missing values and outliers in my omics data","I want to ensure my data is properly formatted for machine learning"],"best_for":["researchers new to machine learning","teams with heterogeneous data sources","studies requiring data quality documentation"],"limitations":["Preprocessing recommendations may be generic rather than domain-specific","Limited ability to handle complex data quality issues","May not detect subtle batch effects or technical artifacts"],"requires":["raw or minimally processed dataset","metadata about data collection and handling"],"input_types":["tabular data files","omics datasets"],"output_types":["data quality report","preprocessing recommendations","cleaned dataset","quality metrics and visualizations"],"categories":["data-analysis","data-quality","preprocessing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_5","uri":"capability://biomedical.research.biomarker.performance.benchmarking","name":"biomarker-performance-benchmarking","description":"Evaluates and compares the predictive performance of identified biomarkers across multiple metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC, etc.) and provides statistical significance testing to validate biomarker utility.","intents":["I want to know if my identified biomarkers are statistically significant","I need to compare the performance of different biomarker combinations","I want to report biomarker performance metrics for publication"],"best_for":["researchers preparing manuscripts","teams validating biomarker candidates","clinical researchers assessing diagnostic utility"],"limitations":["Statistical testing may not account for multiple comparisons correction","Limited support for specialized biomarker evaluation metrics","Performance estimates may be optimistic on small datasets"],"requires":["biomarker predictions and actual outcomes","sufficient sample size for meaningful statistics","properly labeled validation data"],"input_types":["predicted values from biomarker models","ground truth outcome labels","biomarker expression or abundance values"],"output_types":["performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC, PPV, NPV)","ROC curves and other performance visualizations","statistical significance tests","comparison tables"],"categories":["biomedical-research","statistical-analysis","validation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.visualization.interactive.data.visualization.and.exploration","name":"interactive-data-visualization-and-exploration","description":"Generates interactive visualizations of datasets, model results, and biomarker distributions, allowing researchers to explore patterns, relationships, and model predictions through charts, plots, and heatmaps.","intents":["I want to visualize how my biomarkers separate disease from healthy samples","I need to explore relationships between features in my dataset","I want to create publication-quality figures from my analysis results"],"best_for":["researchers preparing presentations and manuscripts","teams exploring data patterns interactively","studies requiring visual validation of results"],"limitations":["Visualization options may be limited compared to specialized tools","Customization of plots may be restricted","Large datasets may have performance issues"],"requires":["analysis results or raw data","web browser for interactive exploration"],"input_types":["dataset features and outcomes","model predictions","biomarker expression values"],"output_types":["interactive plots and charts","heatmaps and correlation matrices","ROC curves and performance plots","exportable visualizations (PNG, PDF)"],"categories":["data-visualization","exploratory-analysis","reporting"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_7","uri":"capability://business.model.freemium.model.with.limited.data.testing","name":"freemium-model-with-limited-data-testing","description":"Offers a free tier allowing researchers to test the platform on real data with limited computational resources before committing to a paid subscription, reducing adoption barriers for academic institutions.","intents":["I want to try this tool on my data before asking my institution to buy a license","I need to evaluate whether this platform is suitable for my research","I want to test the tool without upfront financial commitment"],"best_for":["academic researchers with limited budgets","teams evaluating multiple tools","institutions considering platform adoption"],"limitations":["Free tier likely has computational limits or feature restrictions","May not support large-scale analyses on free plan","Limited support or priority on free tier"],"requires":["account creation","sample dataset for testing"],"input_types":["biomedical datasets"],"output_types":["analysis results on free tier","performance demonstration"],"categories":["business-model","accessibility","adoption"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_8","uri":"capability://biomedical.research.multi.omics.data.integration","name":"multi-omics-data-integration","description":"Integrates and analyzes data from multiple omics modalities (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) simultaneously, identifying biomarkers that leverage information across different biological measurement types.","intents":["I have gene expression and protein data and want to find biomarkers using both","I want to identify multi-omics signatures that predict treatment response","I need to integrate heterogeneous biological data types in a single analysis"],"best_for":["researchers with multi-omics datasets","teams studying complex biological systems","studies seeking robust biomarkers across modalities"],"limitations":["Integration approach and algorithm selection not transparent","May struggle with highly imbalanced omics data","Requires careful data normalization across modalities"],"requires":["multiple omics datasets with aligned samples","proper normalization and preprocessing of each modality","sufficient sample overlap across data types"],"input_types":["gene expression data","protein abundance data","metabolite measurements","other omics modalities"],"output_types":["integrated biomarker signatures","multi-omics feature rankings","cross-modality correlation analysis"],"categories":["biomedical-research","data-integration","machine-learning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_jadbio__cap_9","uri":"capability://biomedical.research.clinical.outcome.prediction.modeling","name":"clinical-outcome-prediction-modeling","description":"Builds predictive models for clinical outcomes (treatment response, disease progression, patient survival) from biomarker and clinical data, enabling personalized medicine applications.","intents":["I want to predict which patients will respond to a specific drug treatment","I need to build a model that predicts disease progression in my patient cohort","I want to develop a tool for personalized treatment selection"],"best_for":["pharmaceutical researchers in drug development","clinical researchers studying treatment response","teams developing companion diagnostics"],"limitations":["Model interpretability may be limited for regulatory submissions","Requires well-defined clinical outcomes and follow-up data","Performance on rare outcomes or small subgroups not well-documented"],"requires":["biomarker measurements and clinical data","clearly defined clinical outcomes","adequate follow-up time and outcome documentation","sufficient sample size for outcome prediction"],"input_types":["biomarker data","clinical variables","outcome labels (response/non-response, survival time, etc.)"],"output_types":["predictive model","patient risk scores","outcome probability predictions","model performance metrics"],"categories":["biomedical-research","clinical-research","predictive-modeling"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["structured omics dataset with samples and features","clinical outcome or phenotype labels for supervised learning","data in standard formats (CSV, Excel, or similar)","labeled dataset with outcome variable","sufficient samples relative to feature count","clean, preprocessed data","trained model","feature metadata and biological context","multiple user accounts","institutional or team subscription"],"failure_modes":["Performance on small sample sizes (n<50) is not well-documented","Requires sufficient data quality and preprocessing before upload","Limited control over algorithm selection and hyperparameter tuning","Algorithm selection and rationale not fully transparent to users","May not capture complex feature interactions","Requires balanced or stratified datasets for optimal performance","Interpretability methods may be limited or generic","Complex models may still be difficult to explain","Biological validation of feature importance not automated","Collaboration features may be limited on free tier","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.445Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.547Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=jadbio","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=jadbio"}},"signature":"GSCGJVCQx4nwzhs1X8LU/COveCtQ/VQ3ujQmxttbY2+MCk86UjeUhxLgK7aM9FhvapDcolnGTkId5oPlbIq8Cg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T16:04:14.401Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/jadbio","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/jadbio","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=jadbio","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}