{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_intellibase","slug":"intellibase","name":"Intellibase","type":"product","url":"https://intellibase.io","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/intellibase","categories":["data-analysis"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_intellibase__cap_0","uri":"capability://productivity.qualitative.data.pattern.extraction","name":"qualitative-data-pattern-extraction","description":"Automatically analyzes unstructured qualitative data from user interviews, surveys, and open-ended responses to identify recurring patterns and themes without manual coding. Uses AI to surface commonalities across multiple data points that would typically require hours of manual review.","intents":["I want to quickly identify common themes in my user interview transcripts","I need to find patterns across 50+ survey responses without manually reading each one","I want to understand what problems users mention most frequently"],"best_for":["product managers at early-stage startups","UX researchers with limited budgets","indie makers conducting user research","small teams without dedicated research analysts"],"limitations":["May miss nuanced context or cultural subtleties that experienced researchers would catch","Requires validation of AI-generated insights by humans","Effectiveness depends on quality and volume of input data","Limited transparency on how AI weights or prioritizes findings"],"requires":["qualitative research data (interviews, surveys, feedback)","sufficient volume of data for pattern detection","user review and validation of results"],"input_types":["interview transcripts","survey responses","open-ended feedback text","user comments"],"output_types":["identified themes","pattern summaries","frequency counts","theme descriptions"],"categories":["productivity","research","data-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_intellibase__cap_1","uri":"capability://productivity.insight.generation.from.research.data","name":"insight-generation-from-research-data","description":"Transforms raw qualitative data into actionable insights by synthesizing patterns into meaningful findings that inform product decisions. Generates interpretations of what the data means for product strategy and user experience improvements.","intents":["I want to understand what insights my user research data reveals about product gaps","I need to convert research findings into actionable recommendations","I want to identify user pain points from my research data"],"best_for":["product managers making feature prioritization decisions","UX researchers presenting findings to stakeholders","startup founders validating product hypotheses"],"limitations":["AI-generated insights require human validation and interpretation","May lack domain expertise or business context awareness","Cannot replace experienced researcher judgment for complex insights"],"requires":["extracted patterns or themes from research data","sufficient context about product and user base","human review to validate insights"],"input_types":["identified patterns","theme summaries","frequency data"],"output_types":["insight statements","actionable recommendations","user need descriptions","problem statements"],"categories":["productivity","research","decision-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_intellibase__cap_2","uri":"capability://productivity.research.data.organization","name":"research-data-organization","description":"Structures and organizes messy qualitative research data into categorized, searchable formats that make it easy to navigate and reference findings. Automatically tags and groups data by theme for quick retrieval.","intents":["I want to organize my research data so I can easily find specific user feedback later","I need to structure my interview notes in a way my team can search and reference","I want to create a searchable database of user feedback"],"best_for":["research teams managing large volumes of qualitative data","product teams building institutional research knowledge","organizations conducting ongoing user research"],"limitations":["Organization quality depends on AI's ability to correctly categorize data","May require manual cleanup or reorganization","Tagging system may not match researcher's mental model"],"requires":["raw qualitative research data","sufficient volume to benefit from organization"],"input_types":["interview transcripts","survey responses","research notes","user feedback"],"output_types":["organized data structure","tagged categories","searchable database","indexed findings"],"categories":["productivity","research","knowledge-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_intellibase__cap_3","uri":"capability://productivity.rapid.research.iteration.acceleration","name":"rapid-research-iteration-acceleration","description":"Enables faster research-to-insight cycles by automating analysis that traditionally takes days or weeks, allowing teams to conduct multiple research rounds and iterate quickly on product decisions. Reduces time from data collection to actionable findings.","intents":["I want to run user research and get insights within hours instead of weeks","I need to validate multiple product hypotheses quickly in my startup","I want to conduct rapid iteration cycles with user feedback"],"best_for":["fast-moving startups and product teams","agile development environments","teams with limited research resources","founders needing quick validation"],"limitations":["Speed may come at cost of depth in analysis","Rapid iteration requires continuous user research access","Quick insights still need validation before major decisions"],"requires":["access to user research data","ability to conduct multiple research rounds","team capacity to act on insights quickly"],"input_types":["research data","user feedback","interview transcripts"],"output_types":["rapid insights","quick findings","iteration recommendations"],"categories":["productivity","research","agile"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_intellibase__cap_4","uri":"capability://productivity.research.cost.reduction","name":"research-cost-reduction","description":"Eliminates the need for expensive external research consultants or dedicated research analysts by automating the analysis phase of user research. Provides research infrastructure at no cost, making professional-grade analysis accessible to resource-constrained teams.","intents":["I want to conduct user research without hiring an expensive research consultant","I need research analysis but can't afford a dedicated analyst","I want to do professional research as a solo founder or small team"],"best_for":["indie makers and solo founders","early-stage startups with limited budgets","small product teams","bootstrapped companies"],"limitations":["Free tier may have limitations on data volume or features","Requires team to validate and interpret AI findings","Cannot fully replace experienced researcher expertise"],"requires":["access to free tier","ability to conduct own user research","time to validate AI findings"],"input_types":["research data"],"output_types":["analyzed findings","insights","recommendations"],"categories":["productivity","research","cost-reduction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["qualitative research data (interviews, surveys, feedback)","sufficient volume of data for pattern detection","user review and validation of results","extracted patterns or themes from research data","sufficient context about product and user base","human review to validate insights","raw qualitative research data","sufficient volume to benefit from organization","access to user research data","ability to conduct multiple research rounds"],"failure_modes":["May miss nuanced context or cultural subtleties that experienced researchers would catch","Requires validation of AI-generated insights by humans","Effectiveness depends on quality and volume of input data","Limited transparency on how AI weights or prioritizes findings","AI-generated insights require human validation and interpretation","May lack domain expertise or business context awareness","Cannot replace experienced researcher judgment for complex insights","Organization quality depends on AI's ability to correctly categorize data","May require manual cleanup or reorganization","Tagging system may not match researcher's mental model","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.9,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.445Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.547Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=intellibase","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=intellibase"}},"signature":"LA1qVnwJK5p243ZGg+XtYjBnHpJglnyhk6aYNyy8YVt8U2KtjlO+ShaJh+4mF4UZiq7AtjPNcDi8mw7YXxScDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-15T22:47:11.486Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/intellibase","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/intellibase","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=intellibase","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}