{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-instrukt","slug":"instrukt","name":"Instrukt","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/blob42/Instrukt","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/instrukt","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.terminal.based.agent.interaction.interface","name":"terminal-based agent interaction interface","description":"Provides a native terminal UI for real-time interaction with AI agents, enabling developers to send prompts, view agent reasoning chains, and monitor execution state without leaving the command line. Uses a TUI framework (likely Textual or similar) to render multi-pane layouts with agent output, logs, and input buffers, supporting keyboard navigation and context persistence across sessions.","intents":["I want to run and debug AI agents directly from my terminal without switching to a web UI","I need to see the full reasoning chain and intermediate steps of an agent in real-time","I want to iterate on agent prompts and configurations without restarting the entire application"],"best_for":["DevOps engineers and backend developers who work primarily in terminal environments","AI researchers debugging agent behavior and decision-making processes","Teams building autonomous agents who need low-latency feedback loops"],"limitations":["Terminal rendering performance degrades with very large output streams (>10k lines per session)","No built-in support for rich media rendering (images, videos) in terminal output","Limited to single-terminal interaction — no native multi-user collaboration features"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Terminal emulator with 256-color or true-color support","At least 80x24 character terminal dimensions for basic UI, 120x40 recommended"],"input_types":["text prompts","configuration files (YAML/JSON)","agent state snapshots"],"output_types":["formatted text logs","structured agent reasoning traces","real-time execution status updates"],"categories":["automation-workflow","developer-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.execution.orchestration.with.state.management","name":"agent execution orchestration with state management","description":"Manages the lifecycle of AI agent execution including initialization, step-by-step execution control, state snapshots, and rollback capabilities. Implements an execution engine that tracks agent memory, tool invocations, and decision points, allowing developers to pause, inspect, and resume agent runs with full context preservation across terminal sessions.","intents":["I want to pause an agent mid-execution to inspect its internal state and reasoning","I need to save and restore agent execution state for reproducibility and debugging","I want to step through agent decisions one at a time to understand failure modes"],"best_for":["AI engineers building and testing complex multi-step agent workflows","Teams requiring deterministic agent behavior for compliance and auditing","Researchers studying agent decision-making and failure analysis"],"limitations":["State serialization overhead increases with agent memory size (>100MB may cause latency)","No built-in distributed execution — single-machine only","Rollback functionality limited to checkpoints explicitly created during execution"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Agent framework compatible with Instrukt (LangChain, AutoGPT, or custom agents with standard interface)","Sufficient disk space for state snapshots (varies by agent complexity)"],"input_types":["agent configuration objects","execution parameters","saved state checkpoints"],"output_types":["execution traces with timestamps","state snapshots (serialized)","step-by-step decision logs"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.and.function.calling.integration.layer","name":"tool and function calling integration layer","description":"Provides a unified interface for agents to invoke external tools, APIs, and functions with automatic schema validation and error handling. Supports registration of custom tools with type hints, manages tool discovery and routing, and handles asynchronous execution of tool calls with timeout and retry logic built into the orchestration layer.","intents":["I want my agent to call external APIs and tools without writing boilerplate integration code","I need to add custom tools to my agent and have them automatically discoverable","I want automatic error handling and retries when tool calls fail"],"best_for":["Developers building agents that interact with external services (APIs, databases, file systems)","Teams standardizing tool definitions across multiple agents","Rapid prototypers who need quick tool integration without infrastructure setup"],"limitations":["Tool execution runs in the same process — no sandboxing or isolation from agent code","Timeout handling is process-level only; long-running tools may block the entire agent","No built-in rate limiting or quota management for external API calls"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Tool definitions must follow Instrukt's schema format (likely Pydantic or similar)","For async tools: asyncio event loop support"],"input_types":["tool definitions (Python functions with type hints)","tool parameters (JSON/structured data)","configuration for tool routing and execution"],"output_types":["tool execution results (JSON/structured)","error logs with retry metadata","execution timing and performance metrics"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.agent.conversation.and.message.routing","name":"multi-agent conversation and message routing","description":"Enables multiple AI agents to communicate within a shared conversation context, with automatic message routing, context aggregation, and conversation history management. Implements a message bus pattern where agents can send and receive messages, with the framework handling context window management and conversation state across multiple agent instances.","intents":["I want multiple agents to collaborate on a task by exchanging messages and context","I need to manage conversation history across multiple agents without manual context passing","I want to route messages between agents based on task requirements or agent capabilities"],"best_for":["Teams building multi-agent systems with specialized agent roles","Developers prototyping agent swarms or hierarchical agent architectures","Researchers studying emergent behavior in multi-agent systems"],"limitations":["Message routing is synchronous — no built-in support for concurrent agent execution","Context window management is naive (linear concatenation) and doesn't optimize for token efficiency","No built-in conflict resolution when multiple agents propose contradictory actions"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Multiple agent instances with compatible message interfaces","Sufficient context window in underlying LLM for aggregated conversation history"],"input_types":["agent instances","message objects (text, structured data)","routing rules or policies"],"output_types":["aggregated conversation history","routed messages with metadata","agent interaction logs"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.agent.memory.and.context.persistence","name":"agent memory and context persistence","description":"Manages agent memory across sessions using a pluggable storage backend, supporting both short-term (conversation) and long-term (episodic) memory. Implements memory retrieval and summarization to keep context within LLM token limits, with support for semantic search over historical interactions and automatic memory pruning based on relevance or age.","intents":["I want my agent to remember previous interactions and learn from past experiences","I need to manage agent memory efficiently without exceeding LLM context windows","I want to search through agent history to understand how it arrived at a decision"],"best_for":["Developers building long-running agents that need persistent state across sessions","Teams implementing agents with learning capabilities or continuous improvement","Researchers studying how agent memory affects decision quality over time"],"limitations":["Memory retrieval relies on semantic similarity, which may miss relevant context with different phrasing","No built-in conflict resolution when memory contains contradictory information","Storage backend must be managed separately — no built-in database included"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Storage backend (file system, database, or vector store)","Embedding model for semantic memory search (local or API-based)"],"input_types":["interaction logs","agent decisions and outcomes","memory queries (text or semantic)"],"output_types":["retrieved memory snippets","summarized context for agent","memory statistics and usage metrics"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.performance.monitoring.and.metrics.collection","name":"agent performance monitoring and metrics collection","description":"Collects and visualizes real-time metrics about agent execution including token usage, latency, tool call success rates, and decision quality. Implements a metrics pipeline that aggregates data from each step of agent execution and renders dashboards in the terminal UI, with support for exporting metrics for external analysis.","intents":["I want to understand how much my agent is costing in terms of API calls and tokens","I need to identify bottlenecks in agent execution and optimize performance","I want to track agent reliability metrics like success rates and error patterns over time"],"best_for":["DevOps and platform engineers optimizing agent infrastructure costs","Teams monitoring production agent performance and SLAs","Researchers benchmarking agent implementations and comparing approaches"],"limitations":["Metrics collection adds overhead (~5-10% latency per step depending on metric granularity)","No built-in alerting — metrics are collected but not automatically acted upon","Terminal rendering of complex metrics dashboards may be limited by screen real estate"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Instrukt with metrics collection enabled (may require configuration)","External storage for long-term metrics retention (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["agent execution traces","API call logs","tool execution results"],"output_types":["terminal-rendered dashboards","exportable metrics (CSV, JSON)","performance reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.configuration.management.and.agent.templating","name":"configuration management and agent templating","description":"Provides a configuration system for defining agent behavior, tools, memory backends, and execution parameters using declarative YAML or JSON files. Supports agent templates that can be instantiated with different parameters, enabling rapid prototyping and standardization of agent configurations across teams.","intents":["I want to define my agent configuration in a file rather than code for easier iteration","I need to create reusable agent templates that my team can instantiate with different parameters","I want version control for agent configurations to track how behavior changes over time"],"best_for":["Teams standardizing agent definitions and promoting consistency","Non-technical stakeholders who need to configure agents without writing code","DevOps engineers managing agent deployments across environments"],"limitations":["Configuration validation is schema-based and may not catch logical errors (e.g., incompatible tool combinations)","Complex conditional logic in configurations requires custom extensions","No built-in support for environment-specific overrides — requires external templating"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Configuration files in supported format (YAML/JSON)","Schema definition for configuration validation (likely Pydantic)"],"input_types":["YAML/JSON configuration files","template parameters","environment variables"],"output_types":["instantiated agent objects","configuration validation reports","rendered configuration (for review)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.plugin.and.extension.system","name":"plugin and extension system","description":"Allows developers to extend Instrukt with custom tools, memory backends, and UI components through a plugin architecture. Implements a discovery and loading mechanism for plugins, with standardized interfaces for each extension point, enabling the ecosystem to grow without modifying core code.","intents":["I want to add custom tools specific to my domain without modifying Instrukt core","I need to integrate Instrukt with my existing infrastructure (custom databases, APIs)","I want to create custom UI components for specialized agent monitoring"],"best_for":["Teams building domain-specific agent applications","Organizations with custom infrastructure requiring Instrukt integration","Contributors extending Instrukt with new capabilities"],"limitations":["Plugin API stability not guaranteed across versions — may require updates when Instrukt changes","No sandboxing — plugins run with full access to agent state and system resources","Plugin dependency management is manual — no built-in package management"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Plugin development knowledge (understanding Instrukt's plugin interfaces)","For UI plugins: familiarity with Instrukt's TUI framework"],"input_types":["plugin code (Python modules)","plugin configuration","plugin metadata (name, version, dependencies)"],"output_types":["loaded plugin instances","plugin registry","extension point hooks"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.session.recording.and.replay","name":"session recording and replay","description":"Records all agent interactions, decisions, and outputs to enable deterministic replay of sessions for debugging and analysis. Implements a recording format that captures the full execution trace including LLM inputs/outputs, tool calls, and state changes, allowing developers to step through recorded sessions and inspect behavior at any point.","intents":["I want to replay an agent session to understand what went wrong","I need to share a recorded agent execution with teammates for collaborative debugging","I want to create test cases from recorded agent behavior for regression testing"],"best_for":["QA engineers testing agent behavior and creating test cases","Teams debugging production agent failures with recorded sessions","Researchers analyzing agent behavior patterns from recorded interactions"],"limitations":["Recording overhead increases storage requirements (~10-50MB per hour of agent execution depending on verbosity)","Replay is deterministic only if external APIs return identical results — non-deterministic APIs may produce different behavior","No built-in compression — large recordings may require significant disk space"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Sufficient disk space for recording storage","Recording must be enabled at agent startup (not retroactive)"],"input_types":["agent execution traces","LLM API responses","tool execution results"],"output_types":["recorded session files","replay traces with step-by-step execution","session analysis reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-instrukt__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.provider.abstraction.and.multi.model.support","name":"llm provider abstraction and multi-model support","description":"Abstracts away LLM provider differences through a unified interface, supporting multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models, etc.) with automatic fallback and provider-specific optimization. Handles provider-specific features like function calling schemas, token counting, and rate limiting transparently, allowing agents to switch providers without code changes.","intents":["I want to use different LLM providers without rewriting agent code","I need to switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, and local models for cost optimization","I want automatic fallback to a backup provider if the primary provider is unavailable"],"best_for":["Teams evaluating different LLM providers and comparing performance","Cost-conscious developers optimizing LLM spend across multiple models","Organizations with multi-provider strategies for redundancy and compliance"],"limitations":["Provider abstraction may not expose provider-specific advanced features (e.g., vision capabilities in some models)","Token counting is approximate across providers — actual usage may differ","Fallback logic is simple (round-robin or priority-based) and doesn't account for model capability differences"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API keys for configured providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Provider SDKs or HTTP clients for each provider"],"input_types":["provider configuration","LLM prompts","model selection parameters"],"output_types":["LLM responses (unified format)","provider usage metrics","fallback logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","Terminal emulator with 256-color or true-color support","At least 80x24 character terminal dimensions for basic UI, 120x40 recommended","Agent framework compatible with Instrukt (LangChain, AutoGPT, or custom agents with standard interface)","Sufficient disk space for state snapshots (varies by agent complexity)","Tool definitions must follow Instrukt's schema format (likely Pydantic or similar)","For async tools: asyncio event loop support","Multiple agent instances with compatible message interfaces","Sufficient context window in underlying LLM for aggregated conversation history","Storage backend (file system, database, or vector store)"],"failure_modes":["Terminal rendering performance degrades with very large output streams (>10k lines per session)","No built-in support for rich media rendering (images, videos) in terminal output","Limited to single-terminal interaction — no native multi-user collaboration features","State serialization overhead increases with agent memory size (>100MB may cause latency)","No built-in distributed execution — single-machine only","Rollback functionality limited to checkpoints explicitly created during execution","Tool execution runs in the same process — no sandboxing or isolation from agent code","Timeout handling is process-level only; long-running tools may block the entire agent","No built-in rate limiting or quota management for external API calls","Message routing is synchronous — no built-in support for concurrent agent execution","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.042Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:10.321Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=instrukt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=instrukt"}},"signature":"hGylJK0XzMF8B6Y2rpbXwIbzSZuQCT5pqx7pOYtZ+9Jbn/1168O879YO0yIMtwJ36RrXLvcMfzzvWAgc4AUtBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T21:16:13.151Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/instrukt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/instrukt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=instrukt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}