{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_humans","slug":"humans","name":"Humans","type":"product","url":"https://humans.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/humans","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_humans__cap_0","uri":"capability://compliance.blockchain.backed.model.audit.trail.generation","name":"blockchain-backed model audit trail generation","description":"Creates immutable, verifiable records of AI model decisions, training data sources, and inference logs on blockchain. Provides cryptographic proof of model behavior and data lineage for compliance and transparency purposes.","intents":["I need to prove to regulators exactly what data trained my AI model","I want an auditable record of every decision my AI makes for compliance","I need to demonstrate that my AI system is transparent and not hiding biased decisions"],"best_for":["regulated enterprises (finance, healthcare, legal)","organizations with strict compliance requirements","companies needing third-party verifiable AI governance"],"limitations":["Blockchain overhead may slow real-time inference logging","Immutability means errors cannot be retroactively corrected","Requires blockchain infrastructure knowledge to interpret audit trails"],"requires":["blockchain network access","model deployment infrastructure","compliance/audit team to interpret records"],"input_types":["model inference logs","training dataset metadata","model decision parameters"],"output_types":["blockchain transaction records","immutable audit logs","cryptographic proof certificates"],"categories":["compliance","governance","transparency"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_1","uri":"capability://model.training.custom.domain.specific.model.fine.tuning","name":"custom domain-specific model fine-tuning","description":"Allows organizations to train and fine-tune AI models on proprietary datasets specific to their industry or use case without vendor lock-in. Produces models optimized for domain-specific language, terminology, and business logic.","intents":["I want an AI model trained specifically on my industry's jargon and data","I need to avoid being locked into a vendor's generic models","I want to build AI that understands my company's unique processes and terminology"],"best_for":["enterprises with specialized domains (legal, medical, financial)","organizations with large proprietary datasets","companies wanting model ownership and portability"],"limitations":["Requires significant labeled training data for quality results","Fine-tuning process requires technical expertise and computational resources","No guarantee of performance improvement over base models without proper data"],"requires":["proprietary training dataset","computational infrastructure","data labeling/annotation capability","ML engineering expertise"],"input_types":["text documents","structured datasets","labeled training examples","domain-specific corpora"],"output_types":["fine-tuned model weights","custom model artifacts","performance metrics reports"],"categories":["model training","customization","enterprise AI"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_2","uri":"capability://ethics.bias.detection.and.measurement.in.model.outputs","name":"bias detection and measurement in model outputs","description":"Analyzes AI model outputs across demographic groups and protected characteristics to identify and quantify bias. Generates reports on fairness metrics and disparate impact across different user segments.","intents":["I need to measure whether my AI model treats different demographic groups fairly","I want to identify hidden biases in my model before deploying to production","I need to report on fairness metrics to stakeholders and regulators"],"best_for":["enterprises in regulated industries (hiring, lending, criminal justice)","organizations building customer-facing AI systems","companies with diversity and inclusion commitments"],"limitations":["Bias measurement depends on how protected characteristics are defined","No universal definition of 'fairness' across all contexts","Requires baseline data to compare against for bias detection"],"requires":["model outputs to analyze","demographic or protected characteristic labels","fairness metric definitions","baseline comparison data"],"input_types":["model predictions","demographic labels","outcome data","user segment information"],"output_types":["bias measurement reports","fairness metric dashboards","disparate impact analysis","recommendations for bias mitigation"],"categories":["ethics","compliance","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_3","uri":"capability://conversational.ai.empathetic.conversational.ai.interaction","name":"empathetic conversational ai interaction","description":"Generates AI responses designed to be emotionally aware, personalized, and contextually sensitive. Adapts tone, language, and response style based on user emotional state and interaction history.","intents":["I want my customer service AI to sound empathetic and human-like","I need AI that can detect and respond appropriately to customer emotional states","I want personalized interactions that feel tailored to each user's needs"],"best_for":["customer service and support teams","mental health and wellness applications","organizations prioritizing customer experience","companies in sensitive domains (healthcare, counseling)"],"limitations":["Empathy simulation may feel inauthentic to some users","Cannot replace human judgment in high-stakes emotional situations","Requires careful tuning to avoid patronizing or inappropriate tone"],"requires":["conversation history and context","user emotional state indicators","domain-specific response templates","fine-tuned empathy models"],"input_types":["user messages","conversation history","emotional context signals","user profile data"],"output_types":["conversational responses","tone-adjusted text","personalized recommendations","emotional awareness indicators"],"categories":["conversational AI","customer experience","personalization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_4","uri":"capability://explainability.transparent.model.decision.explanation","name":"transparent model decision explanation","description":"Provides human-readable explanations for why an AI model made specific decisions or predictions. Traces decision paths through model logic and highlights contributing factors with confidence levels.","intents":["I need to explain to users why the AI rejected their loan application","I want to understand which factors influenced a specific model prediction","I need to provide transparent reasoning to regulators for AI decisions"],"best_for":["regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal)","organizations with transparency requirements","customer-facing AI systems requiring explainability"],"limitations":["Complex models may produce explanations that are still difficult to interpret","Explanations may not capture all contributing factors in black-box models","Trade-off between explanation simplicity and accuracy"],"requires":["model architecture access","decision logs and feature importance data","explanation generation algorithms","domain knowledge for contextualizing explanations"],"input_types":["model predictions","input features","decision parameters","model weights/coefficients"],"output_types":["natural language explanations","feature importance rankings","decision path visualizations","confidence/uncertainty metrics"],"categories":["explainability","transparency","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_5","uri":"capability://enterprise.multi.tenant.model.isolation.and.governance","name":"multi-tenant model isolation and governance","description":"Manages separate AI model instances or configurations for different organizations or business units with isolated data, training, and inference environments. Ensures data privacy and prevents cross-contamination between tenants.","intents":["I need to run separate AI models for different clients without data leakage","I want each department to have their own customized AI without affecting others","I need to ensure regulatory compliance by isolating data between different entities"],"best_for":["SaaS platforms serving multiple customers","large enterprises with multiple business units","organizations with strict data isolation requirements","regulated industries requiring data segregation"],"limitations":["Multi-tenancy adds operational complexity and infrastructure overhead","Resource allocation between tenants requires careful management","Debugging issues becomes more complex with isolated environments"],"requires":["multi-tenant infrastructure","data isolation mechanisms","separate model instances or partitioned models","tenant identity and access management"],"input_types":["tenant identifiers","tenant-specific training data","tenant configuration parameters","access control policies"],"output_types":["isolated model instances","tenant-specific predictions","governance audit logs","resource utilization reports"],"categories":["enterprise","governance","infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_6","uri":"capability://portability.vendor.independent.model.export.and.portability","name":"vendor-independent model export and portability","description":"Enables export of trained models in standard formats that can be deployed on alternative platforms or infrastructure. Prevents vendor lock-in by ensuring models remain portable and usable outside the Humans.ai ecosystem.","intents":["I want to move my AI model to a different platform without retraining","I need to ensure I'm not locked into one vendor's infrastructure","I want to deploy my model on-premises or on a different cloud provider"],"best_for":["enterprises with multi-vendor strategies","organizations concerned about vendor lock-in","companies with specific deployment requirements","teams wanting maximum flexibility"],"limitations":["Exported models may lose platform-specific optimizations","Requires compatible infrastructure for deployment","Some proprietary features may not be portable"],"requires":["trained model artifacts","standard model format support (ONNX, SavedModel, etc.)","target deployment infrastructure","model conversion tools"],"input_types":["trained model weights","model architecture definitions","metadata and configuration"],"output_types":["portable model files","standard format models","deployment instructions","compatibility reports"],"categories":["portability","enterprise","infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_7","uri":"capability://governance.training.data.provenance.and.lineage.tracking","name":"training data provenance and lineage tracking","description":"Records and traces the origin, transformations, and usage of all data used in model training. Creates a complete lineage map showing where data came from, how it was processed, and which models used it.","intents":["I need to prove where my training data came from for regulatory audits","I want to understand how data transformations affected model behavior","I need to identify which datasets contributed to specific model predictions"],"best_for":["regulated enterprises (finance, healthcare, government)","organizations with strict data governance requirements","companies managing large, complex data pipelines"],"limitations":["Tracking overhead increases with data volume and pipeline complexity","Requires standardized metadata across all data sources","Historical data may lack complete provenance information"],"requires":["data source documentation","transformation pipeline logs","metadata management system","blockchain or centralized ledger for immutability"],"input_types":["raw data sources","data transformation logs","processing pipeline definitions","metadata annotations"],"output_types":["data lineage diagrams","provenance reports","transformation history logs","data quality assessments"],"categories":["governance","compliance","data-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_8","uri":"capability://analytics.model.performance.benchmarking.and.comparison","name":"model performance benchmarking and comparison","description":"Evaluates and compares AI model performance across multiple metrics, datasets, and baselines. Generates comparative reports showing how custom models perform relative to industry standards and competing solutions.","intents":["I want to know if my custom model performs better than the base model","I need to compare my AI's performance against competitors","I want to benchmark my model against industry standards"],"best_for":["data science teams optimizing models","enterprises evaluating AI solutions","organizations making model selection decisions"],"limitations":["Benchmarks are only as good as the test datasets used","Performance metrics may not capture real-world behavior","Comparisons require access to competitor models for fair evaluation"],"requires":["test datasets","performance metrics definitions","baseline models for comparison","evaluation infrastructure"],"input_types":["model predictions","ground truth labels","test datasets","performance metric specifications"],"output_types":["performance metric reports","comparative analysis dashboards","benchmark rankings","improvement recommendations"],"categories":["analytics","evaluation","optimization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_humans__cap_9","uri":"capability://compliance.regulatory.compliance.documentation.generation","name":"regulatory compliance documentation generation","description":"Automatically generates compliance documentation, audit reports, and regulatory filings based on model behavior, training data, and decision logs. Produces evidence packages for regulatory submissions and audits.","intents":["I need to generate compliance documentation for regulatory submissions","I want to create audit-ready reports showing my AI system is compliant","I need evidence packages for regulators investigating my AI decisions"],"best_for":["regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal)","organizations undergoing regulatory audits","companies with compliance officers and legal teams"],"limitations":["Generated documentation may require legal review before submission","Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry","Documentation is only as accurate as underlying data and logs"],"requires":["complete audit trails and logs","model documentation","training data records","decision logs and explanations","compliance framework specifications"],"input_types":["model metadata","audit logs","training data documentation","decision records","compliance requirements"],"output_types":["compliance reports","audit documentation","regulatory filing templates","evidence packages"],"categories":["compliance","governance","documentation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":35,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["blockchain network access","model deployment infrastructure","compliance/audit team to interpret records","proprietary training dataset","computational infrastructure","data labeling/annotation capability","ML engineering expertise","model outputs to analyze","demographic or protected characteristic labels","fairness metric definitions"],"failure_modes":["Blockchain overhead may slow real-time inference logging","Immutability means errors cannot be retroactively corrected","Requires blockchain infrastructure knowledge to interpret audit trails","Requires significant labeled training data for quality results","Fine-tuning process requires technical expertise and computational resources","No guarantee of performance improvement over base models without proper data","Bias measurement depends on how protected characteristics are defined","No universal definition of 'fairness' across all contexts","Requires baseline data to compare against for bias detection","Empathy simulation may feel inauthentic to some users","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.23333333333333334,"quality":0.62,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.445Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.562Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=humans","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=humans"}},"signature":"mX8NrTXfSvofuaX3XiBhVD76plN7hiudlAipsZMJcfzup81ZKvvEK3wHQjf5U9xB9yI/S6uttG0au/WKqrZiAQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T07:16:25.861Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/humans","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/humans","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=humans","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}