{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","slug":"homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","name":"Smithery Scaffold","type":"mcp","url":"https://smithery.ai/servers/Homelab-Thor/roocode-general-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","smithery:Homelab-Thor/roocode-general-mcp"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.scaffolding.with.type.safe.tool.registration","name":"mcp server scaffolding with type-safe tool registration","description":"Provides a declarative framework for defining MCP tools with TypeScript/Python type annotations that automatically validate tool schemas against the Model Context Protocol specification. The scaffold generates boilerplate server code, handles protocol handshakes, and enforces type safety at definition time rather than runtime, reducing integration errors when connecting tools to LLM applications.","intents":["I need to quickly create an MCP server without manually implementing protocol compliance boilerplate","I want type safety guarantees when defining tools so TypeScript/Python catches schema mismatches before deployment","I need to expose existing functions as MCP tools with minimal code changes"],"best_for":["teams building internal MCP servers for Claude/LLM integration","developers migrating from REST APIs to MCP for LLM tool access","rapid prototyping of AI agent tool ecosystems"],"limitations":["Requires understanding of Model Context Protocol specification and transport layer (stdio, SSE, or HTTP)","Type safety only as strong as the underlying language's type system — runtime validation still needed for untrusted inputs","No built-in persistence or state management — tools must handle their own data storage","Limited to languages with first-class type annotation support (TypeScript, Python 3.9+)"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ (for TypeScript) or Python 3.9+ (for Python implementation)","Understanding of MCP protocol basics (tools, resources, prompts)","Package manager (npm, yarn, or pip)"],"input_types":["TypeScript/Python function definitions with type annotations","JSON schema descriptions for tool parameters","Configuration objects for server transport setup"],"output_types":["MCP-compliant server code (JavaScript/Python)","Generated protocol handlers and serialization logic","Type definitions for tool inputs/outputs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.automatic.mcp.resource.definition.and.exposure","name":"automatic mcp resource definition and exposure","description":"Enables developers to define MCP resources (files, documents, APIs) through a simple declarative interface that automatically handles resource listing, reading, and template rendering. The framework manages resource URIs, MIME type detection, and content streaming without requiring manual protocol message handling, abstracting away the complexity of the MCP resource subsystem.","intents":["I want to expose files or documents from my system as MCP resources without writing protocol handlers","I need to provide dynamic resource templates that LLMs can query and render","I want to manage resource access control and caching transparently"],"best_for":["developers building knowledge base or document retrieval MCP servers","teams exposing internal APIs as LLM-accessible resources","builders creating context providers for Claude or other MCP-compatible LLMs"],"limitations":["Resource streaming performance depends on underlying file system or API latency — no built-in caching layer","Template rendering limited to simple variable substitution — complex logic requires custom handlers","No built-in authentication — resource access control must be implemented separately","Large resource sets (>10k items) may require custom pagination implementation"],"requires":["MCP server instance created via scaffolding capability","File system access or API endpoint for resource content","Understanding of MCP resource URI format and MIME types"],"input_types":["Resource definitions (path, URI template, content type)","File paths or API endpoints","Template strings with variable placeholders"],"output_types":["MCP resource listings (URI, name, MIME type)","Resource content (text, binary, or streamed)","Rendered templates with substituted variables"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.prompt.template.definition.and.llm.accessible.prompt.registry","name":"prompt template definition and llm-accessible prompt registry","description":"Allows developers to define reusable prompt templates with parameter slots that are automatically registered as MCP prompts, making them discoverable and executable by LLM applications. The framework handles parameter validation, template rendering, and prompt versioning without requiring developers to manually implement the MCP prompt subsystem or manage prompt lifecycle.","intents":["I want to create reusable prompts that Claude or other LLMs can discover and use dynamically","I need to version and manage prompt templates centrally without hardcoding them in LLM applications","I want to expose domain-specific prompt patterns (e.g., code review, documentation generation) as discoverable tools"],"best_for":["teams building prompt engineering platforms or LLM orchestration layers","developers creating specialized prompt libraries for specific domains","organizations standardizing on prompt templates across multiple LLM applications"],"limitations":["Template syntax limited to simple variable substitution — no conditional logic or loops","No built-in prompt versioning or rollback — requires external version control","Parameter validation only at registration time — runtime validation of LLM-provided parameters is minimal","No analytics or usage tracking for prompt discovery and execution"],"requires":["MCP server instance with prompt support","Template definitions with named parameter slots","Understanding of MCP prompt argument types and validation"],"input_types":["Prompt template strings with parameter placeholders","Parameter definitions (name, type, description, optional/required)","Prompt metadata (name, description, tags)"],"output_types":["MCP prompt registry (discoverable prompts with metadata)","Rendered prompt text with substituted parameters","Prompt execution results from LLM applications"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.transport.mcp.server.deployment.stdio.sse.http","name":"multi-transport mcp server deployment (stdio, sse, http)","description":"Provides transport abstraction that allows a single MCP server implementation to be deployed over multiple protocols (stdio for local integration, SSE for server-sent events, HTTP for REST-like access) without code duplication. The framework handles protocol-specific serialization, connection management, and message routing transparently, enabling developers to write transport-agnostic server code.","intents":["I want to deploy the same MCP server for both local CLI tools and remote LLM applications","I need my MCP server to work with Claude Desktop (stdio) and web-based LLM clients (HTTP/SSE)","I want to avoid rewriting server logic for different deployment contexts"],"best_for":["developers building MCP servers for multiple deployment environments","teams integrating MCP with both desktop and cloud LLM applications","organizations standardizing on MCP across heterogeneous infrastructure"],"limitations":["Transport abstraction adds ~50-100ms latency per request due to serialization overhead","HTTP transport requires additional security considerations (CORS, authentication) not handled by framework","SSE transport has connection limits and timeout handling that may require tuning for long-running operations","Stdio transport limited to local machine communication — not suitable for distributed deployments"],"requires":["MCP server implementation using scaffold framework","Node.js or Python runtime with networking capabilities","Understanding of transport-specific configuration (ports, endpoints, authentication)"],"input_types":["Transport configuration (protocol, port, endpoint, authentication settings)","MCP server implementation code","Client connection requests (protocol-specific format)"],"output_types":["MCP protocol messages (serialized per transport)","HTTP responses or SSE event streams","Stdio message streams"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.schema.validation.and.error.handling.for.tool.arguments","name":"schema validation and error handling for tool arguments","description":"Implements automatic JSON schema validation for tool arguments at the MCP protocol boundary, catching malformed inputs before they reach tool handlers. The framework generates validation schemas from type annotations, provides detailed error messages for validation failures, and supports custom validation rules, preventing runtime errors and improving LLM application reliability.","intents":["I want validation errors from LLMs calling my tools to be caught and reported clearly","I need to ensure tool arguments match expected types before executing business logic","I want to provide helpful error messages when LLMs pass invalid arguments"],"best_for":["developers building production MCP servers with strict input validation requirements","teams integrating with LLMs that may generate malformed tool calls","builders creating safety-critical tools that require argument validation"],"limitations":["Validation overhead adds ~10-20ms per tool call for complex schemas","Custom validation rules require manual implementation — no declarative constraint language","Error messages generated from schema validation may not be user-friendly without customization","No support for cross-field validation or conditional schema constraints"],"requires":["Type annotations on tool function parameters","JSON schema generation library (typically included in scaffold)","Understanding of JSON schema format for custom validation rules"],"input_types":["Tool argument objects (JSON)","Type annotations or JSON schemas","Custom validation rule definitions"],"output_types":["Validation success/failure status","Detailed error messages with field-level validation failures","Coerced or normalized argument values"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.and.resource.discovery.with.metadata.filtering","name":"tool and resource discovery with metadata filtering","description":"Provides a discovery mechanism that allows LLM applications to query available tools and resources with filtering by tags, categories, or capabilities. The framework maintains a registry of all registered tools and resources with metadata, supports semantic search or tag-based filtering, and enables LLMs to discover relevant tools dynamically without hardcoding tool lists in applications.","intents":["I want LLMs to discover which tools are available without hardcoding a tool list","I need to filter tools by category or capability so LLMs can find relevant ones","I want to add new tools to my MCP server and have them automatically discoverable"],"best_for":["developers building extensible MCP servers with dynamic tool registration","teams managing large tool ecosystems where manual discovery is impractical","builders creating LLM applications that need to adapt to available tools at runtime"],"limitations":["Discovery queries have no built-in caching — repeated queries may be slow with large tool sets (>1000 tools)","Filtering is limited to exact tag/category matching — no semantic similarity search","No built-in tool usage analytics or popularity ranking for discovery ordering","Tool descriptions are static — no dynamic capability inference based on tool behavior"],"requires":["Tool and resource definitions with metadata (tags, categories, descriptions)","MCP server with discovery endpoint implementation","Client support for MCP discovery protocol"],"input_types":["Tool/resource metadata (name, description, tags, category)","Discovery query filters (tag, category, capability)","Search terms for semantic matching"],"output_types":["Filtered list of tools/resources with metadata","Tool schemas and parameter descriptions","Resource URIs and content types"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.middleware.and.hook.system.for.request.response.interception","name":"middleware and hook system for request/response interception","description":"Implements a middleware pipeline that intercepts MCP protocol messages before tool execution and after response generation, enabling cross-cutting concerns like logging, authentication, rate limiting, and response transformation. Developers can register hooks at various lifecycle points (before tool call, after tool call, on error) without modifying tool implementations, following a standard middleware pattern similar to Express.js or FastAPI.","intents":["I want to log all tool calls and responses for debugging and auditing","I need to implement rate limiting or authentication checks before tools execute","I want to transform or filter tool responses before sending them to LLMs"],"best_for":["developers building production MCP servers with logging and monitoring requirements","teams implementing security policies (authentication, rate limiting) across tools","builders creating observability layers for MCP tool usage"],"limitations":["Middleware execution adds latency (~5-10ms per middleware per request) that compounds with multiple hooks","No built-in middleware for common concerns — developers must implement custom middleware for logging, auth, etc.","Middleware order matters but is implicit — misconfiguration can cause unexpected behavior","Error handling in middleware can mask underlying tool errors if not carefully implemented"],"requires":["MCP server instance with middleware support","Understanding of middleware execution order and lifecycle hooks","Ability to write async middleware functions"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (tool calls, resource requests)","Tool execution context (arguments, metadata)","Tool responses or error objects"],"output_types":["Modified or logged messages","Transformed responses","Authentication/authorization decisions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.testing.utilities.and.mock.mcp.client.for.server.validation","name":"testing utilities and mock mcp client for server validation","description":"Provides testing helpers that simulate MCP client behavior, allowing developers to test tool execution, resource access, and prompt rendering without deploying a full MCP server. Includes mock client implementations, assertion helpers for validating tool schemas and responses, and fixtures for common test scenarios, enabling unit and integration testing of MCP servers in isolation.","intents":["I want to test my MCP tools without setting up a full server and client","I need to validate that my tool schemas match MCP specification before deployment","I want to write integration tests that verify tool behavior with different inputs"],"best_for":["developers building MCP servers with test-driven development practices","teams requiring automated validation of MCP server implementations","builders creating CI/CD pipelines for MCP server deployment"],"limitations":["Mock client may not perfectly simulate real LLM behavior or edge cases in protocol handling","Testing utilities limited to in-process testing — no support for testing actual network transports (HTTP, SSE)","No built-in performance testing or load simulation tools","Fixtures cover common scenarios but may not match specific use cases"],"requires":["Testing framework (Jest, pytest, etc.)","MCP server implementation using scaffold framework","Basic understanding of MCP protocol for writing custom test cases"],"input_types":["Tool definitions and implementations","Test cases with expected inputs/outputs","Mock client configuration"],"output_types":["Test results (pass/fail)","Assertion errors with detailed failure information","Coverage reports for tool execution paths"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"smithery_homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp__cap_8","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.type.safe.tool.handler.implementation.with.ide.autocomplete","name":"type-safe tool handler implementation with ide autocomplete","description":"Generates TypeScript/Python type definitions for tool parameters and return types from MCP schemas, enabling IDE autocomplete and compile-time type checking in tool handler implementations. Developers write tool handlers with full type safety, and the framework ensures that handler signatures match the registered tool schemas, catching type mismatches at development time rather than runtime.","intents":["I want IDE autocomplete when writing tool handler functions","I need compile-time type checking to ensure my tool implementations match their schemas","I want to refactor tools safely knowing that type changes are caught by the compiler"],"best_for":["developers using TypeScript or Python with strong IDE support","teams prioritizing type safety and developer experience","builders creating large MCP server codebases with many tools"],"limitations":["Type safety only as strong as the underlying language's type system — runtime validation still needed","Generated types may become stale if schemas are updated without regenerating types","IDE autocomplete quality depends on IDE support for the language","Complex nested types may result in verbose type definitions"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+ or Python 3.9+ with type annotations","IDE with language server support (VS Code, PyCharm, etc.)","Type generation tool (included in scaffold)"],"input_types":["MCP tool schemas (JSON or type annotations)","Tool handler function signatures"],"output_types":["Generated TypeScript interfaces or Python dataclasses","Type-checked tool handler implementations","Compilation errors for type mismatches"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":30,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ (for TypeScript) or Python 3.9+ (for Python implementation)","Understanding of MCP protocol basics (tools, resources, prompts)","Package manager (npm, yarn, or pip)","MCP server instance created via scaffolding capability","File system access or API endpoint for resource content","Understanding of MCP resource URI format and MIME types","MCP server instance with prompt support","Template definitions with named parameter slots","Understanding of MCP prompt argument types and validation","MCP server implementation using scaffold framework"],"failure_modes":["Requires understanding of Model Context Protocol specification and transport layer (stdio, SSE, or HTTP)","Type safety only as strong as the underlying language's type system — runtime validation still needed for untrusted inputs","No built-in persistence or state management — tools must handle their own data storage","Limited to languages with first-class type annotation support (TypeScript, Python 3.9+)","Resource streaming performance depends on underlying file system or API latency — no built-in caching layer","Template rendering limited to simple variable substitution — complex logic requires custom handlers","No built-in authentication — resource access control must be implemented separately","Large resource sets (>10k items) may require custom pagination implementation","Template syntax limited to simple variable substitution — no conditional logic or loops","No built-in prompt versioning or rollback — requires external version control","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.43,"ecosystem":0.38999999999999996,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:26.913Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:19:48.006Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp"}},"signature":"/Sraql8grburDsoEROk1/IdnvQrs8sWXDOW9D11b6diGyNRjmJx/fovJQXt68Qeos5yjRpwXR1Kmmy/6YNGYDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T04:27:50.780Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=homelab-thor-roocode-general-mcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}