{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_govdash","slug":"govdash","name":"GovDash","type":"product","url":"https://govdash.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/govdash","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.opportunity.capture.and.sam.gov.integration","name":"opportunity capture and sam.gov integration","description":"Automatically ingests federal contracting opportunities from SAM.gov via API polling or webhook integration, parsing unstructured opportunity data (NAICS codes, contract values, deadlines, requirements) into structured records. The system normalizes heterogeneous opportunity formats and deduplicates entries across multiple searches, storing them in a centralized database indexed by opportunity ID, agency, and deadline for real-time alerting and filtering.","intents":["I need to monitor hundreds of SAM.gov opportunities without manually checking the portal daily","I want to automatically capture opportunities matching our NAICS codes and contract value thresholds","I need to deduplicate opportunities we've already reviewed across multiple team members' searches"],"best_for":["Mid-sized GovCon firms with 5+ active proposal teams","Prime contractors managing multiple subsidiary bids","Federal vendors tracking 50+ concurrent opportunities"],"limitations":["SAM.gov API rate limits may delay real-time ingestion for high-volume searches","Parsing accuracy depends on SAM.gov data quality — malformed opportunity descriptions may require manual correction","No predictive filtering for win probability — relies on manual NAICS/value thresholds"],"requires":["Active SAM.gov account with API credentials","Network access to SAM.gov API endpoints","Configured NAICS code taxonomy matching firm's capabilities"],"input_types":["SAM.gov API responses (JSON)","Opportunity search filters (NAICS, contract value, agency)"],"output_types":["Structured opportunity records (JSON/database)","Filtered opportunity lists (CSV, dashboard views)","Deadline alerts (email, webhook)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.proposal.workflow.orchestration.with.template.management","name":"proposal workflow orchestration with template management","description":"Provides a structured proposal authoring environment with role-based task assignment, version control, and deadline tracking. The system maintains a library of reusable proposal sections (boilerplate, past performance narratives, technical approaches) indexed by opportunity type and NAICS code, enabling rapid assembly of new proposals by mapping opportunity requirements to pre-approved content blocks. Workflow state machines enforce review gates (compliance check → technical review → executive approval) with audit trails.","intents":["I need to assign proposal writing tasks to team members with clear deadlines and dependencies","I want to reuse past proposal sections without manually copying from old Word documents","I need to enforce a consistent review process so proposals don't go out without compliance sign-off"],"best_for":["Teams writing 10+ proposals annually with overlapping requirements","Organizations with distributed proposal teams across multiple offices","Firms needing audit trails for compliance reviews"],"limitations":["Template matching relies on manual tagging — no semantic understanding of proposal requirements vs. available sections","Version control is document-level, not sentence-level, making collaborative editing of shared sections cumbersome","No built-in integration with Microsoft Word or Google Docs — requires copy-paste or API integration by customer"],"requires":["Proposal team with 3+ members for role-based workflow to add value","Pre-built template library (customer-provided or GovDash-provided starter set)","Access to opportunity requirements in structured format (RFP parsing or manual entry)"],"input_types":["Opportunity requirements (text, structured fields)","Proposal section templates (rich text, markdown)","Team member roles and permissions (JSON configuration)"],"output_types":["Assembled proposal drafts (PDF, DOCX, HTML)","Workflow status dashboards (JSON, web UI)","Audit logs (JSON, CSV)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.compliance.requirement.extraction.and.tracking","name":"compliance requirement extraction and tracking","description":"Parses RFP documents and contract statements of work (SOWs) to extract compliance obligations (security certifications, reporting requirements, audit schedules, data handling restrictions) using rule-based extraction and optional LLM-assisted parsing. The system maps extracted requirements to a compliance taxonomy (CMMC levels, ITAR, EAR, FAR clauses, insurance requirements) and creates trackable compliance tasks with evidence collection workflows, linking each requirement to responsible parties and deadline calendars.","intents":["I need to identify all compliance obligations in an RFP without manually reading 200 pages","I want to track which team members are responsible for each compliance requirement and when evidence is due","I need to flag conflicts between compliance requirements across multiple active contracts"],"best_for":["Defense contractors managing CMMC compliance across multiple contracts","Firms with complex compliance requirements (ITAR, EAR, DFARS)","Organizations with 10+ active contracts requiring audit readiness"],"limitations":["Extraction accuracy depends on RFP document quality and formatting — scanned PDFs or non-standard layouts may require manual correction","Compliance taxonomy is static — custom or emerging requirements (e.g., new CMMC controls) require manual addition","No integration with external compliance management systems (e.g., Workiva, AuditBoard) — requires manual export/import"],"requires":["RFP or SOW documents in PDF or text format","Pre-configured compliance taxonomy matching firm's regulatory scope","Access to team member directory for task assignment"],"input_types":["RFP/SOW documents (PDF, DOCX, TXT)","Compliance taxonomy definitions (JSON)","Team member roles (CSV, directory integration)"],"output_types":["Extracted compliance requirements (structured JSON)","Compliance task lists (CSV, dashboard)","Evidence collection checklists (PDF, web forms)","Compliance gap reports (PDF)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.contract.lifecycle.state.machine.with.milestone.tracking","name":"contract lifecycle state machine with milestone tracking","description":"Implements a state machine for contract progression (awarded → signed → active → closeout) with automatic milestone detection and deadline calculation based on contract terms. The system parses contract documents to extract key dates (performance periods, option periods, renewal deadlines) and creates calendar-based alerts for contract renewals, option exercises, and compliance reporting windows. Integration with proposal records enables automatic transition from proposal to contract upon award notification.","intents":["I need to track contract renewal deadlines across 50+ active contracts without missing option exercise windows","I want to automatically flag when a contract is approaching closeout so we can prepare final reports","I need visibility into which contracts are in which lifecycle stage across our organization"],"best_for":["Prime contractors with 20+ active contracts","Organizations with decentralized contract management across multiple business units","Firms managing complex contracts with multiple option periods"],"limitations":["Milestone extraction from contract documents is rule-based — non-standard contract language or unusual option structures may require manual configuration","No integration with accounting systems — requires manual reconciliation of contract values vs. actual spend","Calendar alerts are email-based; no integration with Outlook/Google Calendar for automatic scheduling"],"requires":["Contract documents in PDF or text format with extractable dates","Configured state machine definition matching firm's contract lifecycle","Email or webhook endpoint for alert delivery"],"input_types":["Contract documents (PDF, DOCX)","Award notifications (email, manual entry)","State machine configuration (JSON)"],"output_types":["Contract records with extracted milestones (JSON, database)","Lifecycle state dashboards (web UI, CSV export)","Deadline alerts (email, webhook, calendar events)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.past.performance.narrative.generation.and.management","name":"past performance narrative generation and management","description":"Maintains a searchable repository of past performance narratives (project summaries, client testimonials, performance metrics) indexed by contract type, NAICS code, and performance metrics (on-time delivery, budget performance, customer satisfaction). The system enables rapid assembly of past performance sections for new proposals by matching opportunity requirements to relevant past projects, with optional LLM-assisted narrative generation that synthesizes multiple project records into cohesive proposal text while maintaining compliance with FAR requirements for past performance claims.","intents":["I need to quickly find relevant past performance examples for a new proposal without manually searching through old proposals","I want to generate past performance narratives that highlight our strengths for specific opportunity types","I need to ensure past performance claims are accurate and verifiable for compliance audits"],"best_for":["Firms with 50+ completed contracts to draw from","Organizations writing 10+ proposals annually with overlapping customer bases","Teams needing to demonstrate past performance across multiple NAICS codes"],"limitations":["LLM-assisted narrative generation may overstate performance or make unsupported claims — requires human review before submission","Matching past projects to new opportunities relies on manual tagging — no semantic understanding of project similarity","No integration with customer relationship management (CRM) systems — requires manual entry of past performance data"],"requires":["Historical project data (contract type, customer, performance metrics, dates)","Past performance narrative templates or examples","Team member access to review and approve generated narratives"],"input_types":["Project records (contract type, NAICS, metrics, dates)","Opportunity requirements (text, structured fields)","Narrative templates (rich text, markdown)"],"output_types":["Past performance narrative sections (DOCX, PDF, HTML)","Project matching recommendations (JSON, dashboard)","Compliance verification reports (PDF)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.team.collaboration.and.role.based.access.control","name":"team collaboration and role-based access control","description":"Implements role-based access control (RBAC) with granular permissions for proposal teams, compliance officers, contract managers, and executives. The system enforces approval workflows where lower-privilege users (proposal writers) cannot submit without sign-off from higher-privilege users (compliance, executive), with audit trails recording who accessed, modified, or approved each artifact. Integration with identity providers (LDAP, Azure AD, Okta) enables single sign-on and automatic role provisioning based on organizational directory.","intents":["I need to ensure proposal writers can't submit without compliance and executive approval","I want to audit who accessed sensitive contract information for security compliance","I need to automatically provision team members with appropriate access based on their role in the organization"],"best_for":["Organizations with 20+ team members across multiple roles","Firms with strict compliance requirements (CMMC, ITAR) requiring access audits","Enterprises with existing identity management infrastructure (Azure AD, Okta)"],"limitations":["RBAC is coarse-grained — no field-level or document-level encryption for sensitive data","Audit trails are application-level; no integration with security information and event management (SIEM) systems","Identity provider integration requires customer IT configuration — not automatic"],"requires":["Team member directory with role assignments","Identity provider (LDAP, Azure AD, Okta) or manual user provisioning","Configured role definitions matching organizational structure"],"input_types":["Team member directory (CSV, LDAP, Azure AD)","Role definitions (JSON configuration)","Access request workflows (web forms)"],"output_types":["User access records (JSON, database)","Audit logs (CSV, JSON, SIEM integration)","Access reports (PDF, dashboard)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.automated.compliance.documentation.and.evidence.collection","name":"automated compliance documentation and evidence collection","description":"Creates structured evidence collection workflows for compliance requirements, with templates for common documentation types (security assessments, insurance certificates, certifications, audit reports). The system tracks evidence submission status, expiration dates, and renewal deadlines, with automated reminders for upcoming expirations. Integration with document storage (SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive) enables centralized evidence repository with version control and access logging for audit readiness.","intents":["I need to collect and organize compliance evidence (certifications, assessments, insurance) across multiple contracts","I want to track when compliance evidence expires and automatically remind teams to renew","I need to demonstrate evidence collection for compliance audits without manual file searches"],"best_for":["Organizations with 10+ active compliance requirements across multiple contracts","Firms managing CMMC, ITAR, or other complex compliance regimes","Teams preparing for compliance audits or assessments"],"limitations":["Evidence collection relies on manual submission — no automatic ingestion from external systems (e.g., CMMC assessment platforms)","Document storage integration requires customer configuration and API credentials","No optical character recognition (OCR) for scanned documents — requires manual data entry for expiration dates"],"requires":["Document storage system (SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, or local file system)","Configured evidence collection templates matching compliance requirements","Team member access to submit and review evidence"],"input_types":["Evidence documents (PDF, DOCX, images)","Evidence metadata (expiration dates, certifications, assessments)","Compliance requirement definitions (JSON)"],"output_types":["Evidence collection checklists (web forms, PDF)","Evidence status dashboards (web UI, CSV)","Expiration alerts (email, webhook)","Audit-ready evidence reports (PDF)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.rfp.parsing.and.requirement.extraction","name":"rfp parsing and requirement extraction","description":"Parses RFP documents using rule-based extraction and optional LLM-assisted parsing to identify key requirements (technical specifications, compliance obligations, evaluation criteria, submission deadlines). The system extracts structured data (deadline dates, page limits, required certifications, evaluation scoring) and maps requirements to internal capability statements, highlighting gaps where the firm may lack required certifications or past performance. Extracted requirements are stored in a searchable database indexed by requirement type and opportunity ID.","intents":["I need to quickly identify all requirements in a 100+ page RFP without manually reading every page","I want to flag requirements we can't meet so we can decide whether to bid or pursue waivers","I need to map RFP requirements to our capability statement to identify proposal sections to write"],"best_for":["Organizations evaluating 20+ RFPs annually for bid/no-bid decisions","Proposal teams needing rapid requirement analysis for proposal planning","Firms with complex capability statements requiring detailed requirement mapping"],"limitations":["Extraction accuracy depends on RFP document quality and formatting — scanned PDFs or non-standard layouts may require manual correction","LLM-assisted parsing may miss subtle requirements or misinterpret technical specifications — requires human review","No integration with capability statement systems — requires manual mapping of requirements to internal capabilities"],"requires":["RFP documents in PDF or text format","Configured requirement taxonomy matching firm's evaluation criteria","Capability statement data for requirement mapping"],"input_types":["RFP documents (PDF, DOCX, TXT)","Requirement taxonomy (JSON)","Capability statement (structured data, text)"],"output_types":["Extracted requirements (structured JSON, CSV)","Requirement-to-capability mapping (JSON, dashboard)","Gap analysis reports (PDF)","Bid/no-bid recommendation reports (PDF)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_govdash__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.proposal.win.loss.analysis.and.performance.metrics","name":"proposal win/loss analysis and performance metrics","description":"Tracks proposal outcomes (won, lost, withdrawn) and correlates with proposal characteristics (page count, past performance strength, compliance completeness, submission timing) to identify patterns in winning proposals. The system calculates win rates by opportunity type, customer, and proposal team, with optional feedback integration from customer debriefs. Analytics dashboards visualize trends (e.g., proposals with strong past performance have 15% higher win rates) to inform future proposal strategy and resource allocation.","intents":["I want to understand which proposal characteristics correlate with wins so we can improve future proposals","I need to track win rates by opportunity type and customer to inform bidding strategy","I want to identify which proposal teams are most effective so we can allocate resources accordingly"],"best_for":["Organizations with 50+ annual proposals to generate statistically meaningful data","Proposal teams seeking to optimize win rates through data-driven insights","Firms with multiple proposal teams competing for resources"],"limitations":["Win/loss analysis requires 12+ months of data to identify meaningful patterns — limited value for new organizations","Correlation analysis cannot establish causation — high past performance may correlate with wins but may not cause them","Customer feedback integration requires manual entry or email parsing — no automatic integration with customer systems"],"requires":["Historical proposal data (opportunity type, customer, submission date, outcome)","Proposal characteristics (page count, past performance strength, compliance completeness)","12+ months of proposal history for meaningful analysis"],"input_types":["Proposal records (opportunity type, customer, outcome, characteristics)","Customer feedback (email, manual entry, survey responses)"],"output_types":["Win/loss analysis reports (PDF, dashboard)","Performance metrics (JSON, CSV)","Trend visualizations (charts, dashboards)","Strategic recommendations (text reports)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":42,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active SAM.gov account with API credentials","Network access to SAM.gov API endpoints","Configured NAICS code taxonomy matching firm's capabilities","Proposal team with 3+ members for role-based workflow to add value","Pre-built template library (customer-provided or GovDash-provided starter set)","Access to opportunity requirements in structured format (RFP parsing or manual entry)","RFP or SOW documents in PDF or text format","Pre-configured compliance taxonomy matching firm's regulatory scope","Access to team member directory for task assignment","Contract documents in PDF or text format with extractable dates"],"failure_modes":["SAM.gov API rate limits may delay real-time ingestion for high-volume searches","Parsing accuracy depends on SAM.gov data quality — malformed opportunity descriptions may require manual correction","No predictive filtering for win probability — relies on manual NAICS/value thresholds","Template matching relies on manual tagging — no semantic understanding of proposal requirements vs. available sections","Version control is document-level, not sentence-level, making collaborative editing of shared sections cumbersome","No built-in integration with Microsoft Word or Google Docs — requires copy-paste or API integration by customer","Extraction accuracy depends on RFP document quality and formatting — scanned PDFs or non-standard layouts may require manual correction","Compliance taxonomy is static — custom or emerging requirements (e.g., new CMMC controls) require manual addition","No integration with external compliance management systems (e.g., Workiva, AuditBoard) — requires manual export/import","Milestone extraction from contract documents is rule-based — non-standard contract language or unusual option structures may require manual configuration","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.36666666666666664,"quality":0.7300000000000001,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.893Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.552Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=govdash","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=govdash"}},"signature":"JHdUC+mMl0DwD7W9SZI1hl4mriOulMnqrXsBXSUbRasMt84QMA7BZdAosdJ1wJji2/+OP12TGXcLMauHcIWnAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T04:26:06.671Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/govdash","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/govdash","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=govdash","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}