{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_good-ai","slug":"good-ai","name":"Good AI","type":"product","url":"https://www.the-good-ai.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/good-ai","categories":["text-writing"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_good-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.real.time.grammar.and.syntax.correction","name":"real-time grammar and syntax correction","description":"Analyzes text as users write to identify and suggest corrections for grammatical errors, punctuation mistakes, and syntax issues. The system likely employs rule-based grammar engines combined with neural language models to detect errors across multiple dimensions (subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, comma placement, etc.) and provides inline suggestions with explanations. Corrections are surfaced in real-time within the editor interface, allowing writers to accept or reject suggestions without breaking their writing flow.","intents":["I want immediate feedback on grammar mistakes as I write my essay","I need to understand why a grammatical correction is being suggested","I want to improve my writing mechanics without manual proofreading"],"best_for":["High school and college students learning English writing conventions","Non-native English speakers seeking grammar guidance","Writers who want real-time feedback without external proofreaders"],"limitations":["Real-time processing may struggle with context-dependent grammar (e.g., intentional fragments for stylistic effect)","Likely cannot distinguish between formal and informal writing contexts without explicit user configuration","Performance may degrade on very long documents (10,000+ words) due to computational overhead"],"requires":["Active internet connection for cloud-based grammar engine","Modern browser with JavaScript support or native application","Text input in supported languages (likely English primary, others unknown)"],"input_types":["plain text","formatted text (if editor supports rich text)"],"output_types":["annotated text with inline suggestions","structured error list with severity levels"],"categories":["text-generation-language","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_good-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.plagiarism.detection.and.originality.scoring","name":"plagiarism detection and originality scoring","description":"Compares submitted essays against a database of academic sources, web content, and previously submitted papers to identify textual overlap and flag potential plagiarism. The system likely uses fingerprinting or hashing techniques (similar to Turnitin's approach) to detect exact and near-duplicate matches, combined with semantic similarity algorithms to catch paraphrased content. Results are presented as an originality score (percentage of unique content) with detailed reports showing matched sources and overlap regions highlighted in the document.","intents":["I need to verify my essay is original before submitting to my teacher","I want to see which sources my essay text matches against","I need a plagiarism report to include with my submission"],"best_for":["Students preparing essays for academic submission","Teachers/instructors verifying student work authenticity","Institutions requiring plagiarism screening before acceptance"],"limitations":["Plagiarism detection accuracy depends on database coverage — may miss plagiarism from paywalled academic journals or very recent publications","Semantic similarity detection (paraphrasing) is less reliable than exact-match detection and may produce false positives on common phrasing","Free tier likely has limited database access or delayed reporting compared to premium tier","Cannot detect plagiarism from sources not indexed in the system's database"],"requires":["Essay submission in supported formats (likely PDF, DOCX, TXT)","Active internet connection to query plagiarism database","Account creation (free or premium tier)"],"input_types":["plain text","PDF documents","Microsoft Word documents (.docx)","Google Docs (if integration exists)"],"output_types":["originality percentage score","detailed plagiarism report with source citations","highlighted text regions showing matched content"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_good-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.essay.structure.and.composition.guidance","name":"essay structure and composition guidance","description":"Provides AI-driven suggestions for essay organization, thesis development, argument flow, and content structure. The system analyzes the essay's current structure and offers recommendations for improving logical progression, paragraph coherence, and alignment with essay conventions (e.g., introduction-body-conclusion). This likely involves analyzing document sections, detecting thesis statements, evaluating argument strength, and suggesting reorganization or expansion of weak sections. Guidance is surfaced as contextual suggestions or a separate outline/structure view.","intents":["I need help organizing my essay into a logical structure","I want feedback on whether my thesis is clear and well-supported","I need suggestions for improving the flow between paragraphs","I want to understand if my essay follows standard academic structure"],"best_for":["High school and early college students learning essay writing conventions","Non-native English speakers unfamiliar with English academic essay structure","Writers seeking structural feedback without human tutoring"],"limitations":["Structure guidance is likely generic and may not account for discipline-specific essay conventions (e.g., scientific papers vs. humanities essays)","AI suggestions for argument strength are subjective and may not align with instructor expectations","Cannot evaluate factual accuracy or evidence quality — only structural coherence","Premium features likely required for in-depth structural analysis; free tier may offer only basic outline suggestions"],"requires":["Essay text of sufficient length (likely 200+ words for meaningful analysis)","Active internet connection for cloud-based analysis","Account creation (free or premium tier)"],"input_types":["plain text","formatted text with section breaks"],"output_types":["structural recommendations as inline comments","essay outline view showing detected sections","suggestions for thesis refinement","paragraph-level feedback on coherence and flow"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_good-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.freemium.access.to.core.writing.tools","name":"freemium access to core writing tools","description":"Provides free tier access to basic grammar checking, plagiarism detection, and essay guidance features with usage limits or reduced functionality, while premium tier unlocks advanced features and higher quotas. The freemium model is implemented via account-based access control, with feature flags or API rate limiting determining which capabilities are available to free vs. paid users. Free tier users likely experience delays in plagiarism report generation, limited plagiarism database access, or reduced frequency of structural suggestions.","intents":["I want to try the tool before committing to a paid subscription","I need basic writing assistance without paying for premium features","I want to upgrade to premium only if I find the free tier valuable"],"best_for":["Budget-conscious students and casual writers","Users evaluating the tool before purchasing","High school students with limited disposable income"],"limitations":["Free tier likely has significant feature restrictions (e.g., limited plagiarism checks per month, basic grammar only, no advanced essay analysis)","Free tier may have longer processing times or delayed report generation","Conversion friction: premium features may be gated behind paywalls, creating friction when users hit free tier limits","Free tier may include ads or promotional content"],"requires":["Email address for account creation","No payment method required for free tier"],"input_types":["user account creation data"],"output_types":["account tier status","feature availability matrix","usage quota tracking"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_good-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.tool.integration.within.unified.editor.interface","name":"multi-tool integration within unified editor interface","description":"Consolidates grammar checking, plagiarism detection, and essay guidance into a single editor interface, eliminating the need for users to switch between separate tools. The architecture likely uses a modular backend where each capability (grammar, plagiarism, structure) is a separate service or module, with a unified frontend that coordinates requests and displays results from all services in a cohesive UI. Results from each tool are surfaced as overlays, sidebars, or inline annotations within the same document view.","intents":["I want to check grammar, plagiarism, and structure without switching between multiple tools","I want to see all feedback (grammar, plagiarism, structure) in one place while editing","I want to reduce the number of subscriptions I need to maintain"],"best_for":["Students and writers who value convenience and reduced tool fragmentation","Users with limited technical expertise who prefer all-in-one solutions","Budget-conscious users seeking to consolidate multiple subscriptions"],"limitations":["Unified interface may sacrifice specialized UX optimizations that dedicated tools provide (e.g., Turnitin's detailed plagiarism reports)","Performance may degrade if multiple analysis engines run simultaneously on large documents","Integration complexity may limit extensibility — adding new tools or integrations is harder than with modular architectures","No clear evidence of integration with external tools (Google Docs, Microsoft Word, LMS platforms) that students already use"],"requires":["Modern web browser or native application","Active internet connection","Account creation"],"input_types":["plain text","formatted text"],"output_types":["unified feedback view with grammar, plagiarism, and structure suggestions","consolidated report combining all analysis results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":39,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active internet connection for cloud-based grammar engine","Modern browser with JavaScript support or native application","Text input in supported languages (likely English primary, others unknown)","Essay submission in supported formats (likely PDF, DOCX, TXT)","Active internet connection to query plagiarism database","Account creation (free or premium tier)","Essay text of sufficient length (likely 200+ words for meaningful analysis)","Active internet connection for cloud-based analysis","Email address for account creation","No payment method required for free tier"],"failure_modes":["Real-time processing may struggle with context-dependent grammar (e.g., intentional fragments for stylistic effect)","Likely cannot distinguish between formal and informal writing contexts without explicit user configuration","Performance may degrade on very long documents (10,000+ words) due to computational overhead","Plagiarism detection accuracy depends on database coverage — may miss plagiarism from paywalled academic journals or very recent publications","Semantic similarity detection (paraphrasing) is less reliable than exact-match detection and may produce false positives on common phrasing","Free tier likely has limited database access or delayed reporting compared to premium tier","Cannot detect plagiarism from sources not indexed in the system's database","Structure guidance is likely generic and may not account for discipline-specific essay conventions (e.g., scientific papers vs. humanities essays)","AI suggestions for argument strength are subjective and may not align with instructor expectations","Cannot evaluate factual accuracy or evidence quality — only structural coherence","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.892Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=good-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=good-ai"}},"signature":"+Qoku1jJVxBC4DO34Hng3QlqXzdBO+oVUOMsw7vecwUUUJyNEZfh2JMsiWrSZ5WkdhwaBF3Qy/pRAiACb657Ag==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T12:01:22.506Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/good-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/good-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=good-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}