{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_getgc","slug":"getgc","name":"GetGC","type":"product","url":"https://getgc.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/getgc","categories":["text-writing"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_getgc__cap_0","uri":"capability://legal.ai.driven.legal.document.drafting","name":"ai-driven legal document drafting","description":"Automatically generates first-draft legal documents such as NDAs, employment agreements, and standard contracts using LLM-based templates. Produces boilerplate language quickly, reducing the time associates spend on initial document creation.","intents":["I need to create an NDA quickly without starting from scratch","I want to generate multiple employment agreement templates for different roles","I need a first draft of a standard contract to review and customize"],"best_for":["In-house legal teams","Mid-size law firms","Solo practitioners","Corporate legal departments handling high-volume routine work"],"limitations":["Generated documents often require substantial attorney revision","Not suitable for novel or highly complex agreements","Cannot handle multi-jurisdictional complexity without human oversight","Liability exposure unclear if AI-drafted language causes disputes"],"requires":["Basic document parameters (parties, jurisdiction, agreement type)","Attorney review before execution","Understanding that output is a starting point, not final product"],"input_types":["text (agreement type, jurisdiction, party information)"],"output_types":["text (formatted legal document)"],"categories":["legal","productivity","document generation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_getgc__cap_1","uri":"capability://legal.jurisdiction.specific.legal.advice.generation","name":"jurisdiction-specific legal advice generation","description":"Provides AI-generated legal guidance tailored to specific jurisdictions, states, and countries. Adapts advice based on local laws, regulations, and legal precedents to give context-aware recommendations.","intents":["I need to understand employment law requirements for a specific state","I want to know what contract clauses are enforceable in this jurisdiction","I need jurisdiction-specific guidance on compliance requirements"],"best_for":["In-house legal teams","Solo practitioners","Businesses operating across multiple jurisdictions","Legal professionals needing quick jurisdictional reference"],"limitations":["Cannot replace specialized legal judgment on novel disputes","Not suitable for complex multi-jurisdictional matters","Advice should be verified by qualified attorney in that jurisdiction","May not capture recent legislative changes immediately"],"requires":["Specification of jurisdiction (state, country, or region)","Clear legal question or scenario","Attorney verification before relying on advice for critical decisions"],"input_types":["text (legal question, jurisdiction specification)"],"output_types":["text (jurisdiction-specific legal guidance)"],"categories":["legal","advisory","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_getgc__cap_2","uri":"capability://legal.real.time.contract.risk.flagging","name":"real-time contract risk flagging","description":"Analyzes contracts during review and automatically identifies problematic clauses, missing standard provisions, and potential legal risks. Flags issues in real-time to accelerate the review process compared to manual reading.","intents":["I need to quickly identify red flags in a contract before negotiation","I want to catch missing clauses or unfavorable terms automatically","I need to review contracts faster without missing common problem areas"],"best_for":["In-house legal teams","Law firms handling high-volume contract review","Corporate legal departments","Risk and compliance teams"],"limitations":["May miss context-specific risks that require domain expertise","Cannot assess novel or unusual clause combinations","Flags are suggestions only—attorney judgment required for final assessment","Effectiveness depends on contract clarity and standard formatting"],"requires":["Contract document in readable format (text or PDF)","Attorney review to validate flagged issues","Understanding of contract context and business objectives"],"input_types":["text (contract document)"],"output_types":["text (risk flags, problematic clauses, missing provisions)"],"categories":["legal","review","risk management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_getgc__cap_3","uri":"capability://legal.contract.clause.analysis.and.explanation","name":"contract clause analysis and explanation","description":"Breaks down and explains specific contract clauses in plain language, identifying their implications and potential issues. Helps legal professionals and non-lawyers understand what contract language actually means.","intents":["I need to understand what this clause means in plain English","I want to know the implications of this contract language","I need to explain a clause to a non-legal stakeholder"],"best_for":["In-house legal teams","Business stakeholders reviewing contracts","Solo practitioners","Anyone needing clause interpretation"],"limitations":["Explanations are general and may not capture all nuances","Cannot provide definitive legal interpretation—attorney review recommended","May oversimplify complex legal language"],"requires":["Specific clause text to analyze","Context about the agreement type and parties"],"input_types":["text (contract clause)"],"output_types":["text (plain language explanation, implications)"],"categories":["legal","education","document analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_getgc__cap_4","uri":"capability://legal.billable.hour.reduction.through.automation","name":"billable hour reduction through automation","description":"Reduces the time associates and attorneys spend on routine legal tasks like document drafting and initial contract review, directly decreasing billable hours spent on standardized work.","intents":["I want to reduce associate hours spent on routine contract drafting","I need to improve profitability by automating repetitive legal work","I want to free up my team to focus on higher-value legal analysis"],"best_for":["Law firms with high-volume routine work","In-house legal departments","Solo practitioners managing multiple clients","Organizations seeking to improve legal department efficiency"],"limitations":["Time savings are most significant for routine, standardized work","Complex matters still require full attorney time","Generated documents require attorney review, limiting total time savings","ROI depends on volume of routine work handled"],"requires":["High volume of routine, standardized legal tasks","Workflow integration to capture time savings","Attorney review processes to maintain quality"],"input_types":["workflow integration"],"output_types":["time savings metrics, efficiency gains"],"categories":["legal","productivity","business optimization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Basic document parameters (parties, jurisdiction, agreement type)","Attorney review before execution","Understanding that output is a starting point, not final product","Specification of jurisdiction (state, country, or region)","Clear legal question or scenario","Attorney verification before relying on advice for critical decisions","Contract document in readable format (text or PDF)","Attorney review to validate flagged issues","Understanding of contract context and business objectives","Specific clause text to analyze"],"failure_modes":["Generated documents often require substantial attorney revision","Not suitable for novel or highly complex agreements","Cannot handle multi-jurisdictional complexity without human oversight","Liability exposure unclear if AI-drafted language causes disputes","Cannot replace specialized legal judgment on novel disputes","Not suitable for complex multi-jurisdictional matters","Advice should be verified by qualified attorney in that jurisdiction","May not capture recent legislative changes immediately","May miss context-specific risks that require domain expertise","Cannot assess novel or unusual clause combinations","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.892Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.548Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=getgc","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=getgc"}},"signature":"o49ydyDtpWYu8cxcnADOtFH5OuFvgXmfXMDEgH5Q7ccZj3/gx64hEz1pMJGa72hKMD1OiHBMoP2l3TjblKYCDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T06:38:08.684Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/getgc","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/getgc","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=getgc","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}