{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_geoscore","slug":"geoscore","name":"GEOScore","type":"product","url":"https://geoscoreai.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/geoscore","categories":["data-analysis"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_geoscore__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.multi.engine.ai.search.visibility.scanning","name":"multi-engine ai search visibility scanning","description":"Crawls and analyzes website content against indexing and retrieval requirements for three distinct AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) using engine-specific crawling patterns and citation detection algorithms. The scanner likely simulates how each engine's retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline would discover, parse, and rank the site's content, then surfaces visibility gaps specific to each platform's indexing behavior and content preference signals.","intents":["understand which of my pages are discoverable by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini's crawlers","identify content optimization opportunities specific to AI search engines rather than traditional Google SEO","benchmark my website's AI search visibility against competitors","determine if AI search traffic is worth optimizing for given my current traffic sources"],"best_for":["content publishers and agencies already tracking measurable referral traffic from AI search engines","SEO professionals building future-proof content strategies ahead of AI search adoption curves","niche content creators (research, news, technical documentation) where AI search engines are primary discovery channels"],"limitations":["AI search traffic remains <5% of total web traffic for 95%+ of websites; optimization ROI unclear for sites without existing AI search referrals","Methodology for the 11 technical checks is not publicly documented—unclear if checks are data-driven correlations or theoretical best practices","No real-time monitoring of changes to AI engine indexing policies; checks may become stale as ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini evolve their crawling and ranking algorithms","Cannot measure actual visibility in AI search results (e.g., citation frequency, answer prominence) without access to engine query logs"],"requires":["website with publicly accessible content (no authentication walls)","valid domain name resolvable via DNS","no aggressive rate-limiting or bot-blocking that would prevent crawler access"],"input_types":["website URL"],"output_types":["structured audit report with pass/fail status per check","visibility score (likely 0-100 scale)","per-engine breakdown of indexability and optimization gaps"],"categories":["search-retrieval","seo-audit"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_geoscore__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.11.point.technical.seo.audit.for.ai.search.engines","name":"11-point technical seo audit for ai search engines","description":"Executes a fixed set of 11 automated technical checks against the scanned website, likely covering content structure (headings, semantic HTML), indexability signals (robots.txt, meta tags, canonical URLs), citation formatting (author/date/source attribution), content freshness, and mobile responsiveness. Each check is scored as pass/fail or partial, aggregated into a composite visibility score that indicates readiness for AI search engine discovery and ranking.","intents":["get a quick technical audit specific to AI search optimization without manual analysis","identify which specific technical issues are blocking AI search engine visibility","prioritize content fixes based on which checks have the highest impact on AI search discoverability","understand how my site's technical SEO compares to AI search engine requirements vs traditional Google SEO"],"best_for":["small businesses and content creators who lack dedicated SEO teams and need actionable, prioritized fixes","agencies building AI search optimization into client audits","technical founders validating that their content infrastructure supports AI search indexing"],"limitations":["Fixed 11-check framework may not capture edge cases or emerging AI search engine requirements; no customization or weighted scoring","No explanation of WHY each check matters or HOW it correlates to actual AI search visibility—users must infer importance","Checks are likely static rules (e.g., 'has meta description') rather than dynamic signals (e.g., 'meta description improves citation likelihood by X%')","No historical tracking; cannot measure improvement over time or A/B test content changes"],"requires":["website must be live and publicly accessible","no JavaScript rendering required for checks to pass (unless GEOScore uses headless browser)"],"input_types":["website URL"],"output_types":["pass/fail status per check","composite score (likely 0-100)","brief explanation of each failed check","remediation suggestions (if provided)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","seo-audit"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_geoscore__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.per.engine.visibility.breakdown.and.recommendations","name":"per-engine visibility breakdown and recommendations","description":"Disaggregates the audit results by AI search engine (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini), surfacing engine-specific optimization gaps and recommendations. This likely involves mapping the 11 technical checks to each engine's known indexing behavior and content preferences (e.g., Perplexity may prioritize fresh content and source attribution differently than ChatGPT), then generating tailored remediation suggestions for each platform.","intents":["understand which AI search engine my content is most/least visible in and why","prioritize optimization efforts for the AI search engines that drive the most traffic to my site","get engine-specific recommendations (e.g., 'Perplexity requires explicit author attribution; ChatGPT prioritizes content freshness')","identify if my content strategy should differ by AI search engine or if a single optimization approach covers all three"],"best_for":["content publishers with traffic analytics showing differentiated referral patterns across AI search engines","agencies managing multi-client portfolios and needing to explain AI search optimization to clients","technical content creators (research, news, documentation) where different AI engines may have different discovery patterns"],"limitations":["Engine-specific recommendations are only as accurate as GEOScore's understanding of each engine's indexing behavior; this knowledge may lag behind actual algorithm changes","No data on actual visibility in each engine (e.g., citation frequency, answer prominence); recommendations are theoretical rather than empirically validated","Assumes all three engines are equally relevant to the user's traffic goals; no weighting or prioritization based on actual referral data"],"requires":["completion of the full 11-point audit","website must be indexed by at least one of the three AI search engines"],"input_types":["audit results from multi-engine scanning"],"output_types":["per-engine visibility score","per-engine list of failed checks","per-engine remediation recommendations","comparative analysis (e.g., 'your site is more visible in Perplexity than ChatGPT')"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_geoscore__cap_3","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.free.tier.scanning.with.limited.depth","name":"free tier scanning with limited depth","description":"Provides a freemium model where users can run one or more full 11-point audits without payment, removing friction for initial discovery and experimentation. The free tier likely includes the core audit and per-engine breakdown but may exclude features like historical tracking, competitive benchmarking, or detailed remediation guidance that are reserved for paid tiers.","intents":["test whether AI search visibility is relevant to my business without committing to a paid tool","get a quick baseline audit of my site's AI search readiness","experiment with content changes and re-scan to measure improvement (if free tier allows multiple scans)","evaluate GEOScore's methodology and accuracy before upgrading to a paid plan"],"best_for":["small businesses and solo content creators with limited SEO budgets","agencies evaluating GEOScore before recommending to clients","anyone skeptical of AI search traffic relevance and wanting low-friction validation"],"limitations":["Free tier likely has rate limits (e.g., 1-5 scans per month) to encourage paid upgrades","No historical data or trend tracking on the free tier; cannot measure improvement over time","Limited or no access to competitive benchmarking or detailed remediation guidance","May require email signup or account creation, creating friction for casual users"],"requires":["valid email address (likely required for account creation)","website URL"],"input_types":["website URL"],"output_types":["full 11-point audit report","per-engine visibility breakdown","composite visibility score"],"categories":["search-retrieval","freemium-model"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_geoscore__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.website.crawling.and.content.parsing.for.ai.search.engines","name":"website crawling and content parsing for ai search engines","description":"Implements a web crawler that fetches and parses website content using patterns optimized for AI search engine indexing behavior. The crawler likely respects robots.txt and crawl-delay directives, extracts semantic content structure (headings, paragraphs, lists, tables), detects citation metadata (author, date, source), and analyzes content freshness and mobile rendering. Results are stored in a structured format for analysis against the 11-point audit checks.","intents":["understand how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini crawlers would discover and parse my website's content","identify content structure issues that might prevent AI search engines from extracting information correctly","validate that my site's technical setup (robots.txt, meta tags, canonical URLs) allows AI search engine indexing"],"best_for":["technical founders and DevOps engineers validating that their content infrastructure supports AI search crawling","SEO professionals who want to understand the technical mechanics of AI search indexing"],"limitations":["Crawler behavior is inferred from public documentation and reverse-engineering; actual AI search engine crawling may differ","No real-time crawling; results are snapshots at scan time and may not reflect dynamic content or JavaScript-rendered pages","Cannot crawl behind authentication walls or rate-limited endpoints; may miss content that AI search engines can access","Crawling depth and breadth are likely limited (e.g., max 100-1000 pages per scan) to control costs"],"requires":["website must be publicly accessible and not behind authentication","website must not aggressively block crawlers via robots.txt or rate-limiting","website should have reasonable crawl depth (not infinitely deep site structures)"],"input_types":["website URL"],"output_types":["parsed content structure (headings, paragraphs, metadata)","detected citation metadata (author, date, source)","crawl statistics (pages crawled, crawl errors, robots.txt compliance)","content freshness analysis"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["website with publicly accessible content (no authentication walls)","valid domain name resolvable via DNS","no aggressive rate-limiting or bot-blocking that would prevent crawler access","website must be live and publicly accessible","no JavaScript rendering required for checks to pass (unless GEOScore uses headless browser)","completion of the full 11-point audit","website must be indexed by at least one of the three AI search engines","valid email address (likely required for account creation)","website URL","website must be publicly accessible and not behind authentication"],"failure_modes":["AI search traffic remains <5% of total web traffic for 95%+ of websites; optimization ROI unclear for sites without existing AI search referrals","Methodology for the 11 technical checks is not publicly documented—unclear if checks are data-driven correlations or theoretical best practices","No real-time monitoring of changes to AI engine indexing policies; checks may become stale as ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini evolve their crawling and ranking algorithms","Cannot measure actual visibility in AI search results (e.g., citation frequency, answer prominence) without access to engine query logs","Fixed 11-check framework may not capture edge cases or emerging AI search engine requirements; no customization or weighted scoring","No explanation of WHY each check matters or HOW it correlates to actual AI search visibility—users must infer importance","Checks are likely static rules (e.g., 'has meta description') rather than dynamic signals (e.g., 'meta description improves citation likelihood by X%')","No historical tracking; cannot measure improvement over time or A/B test content changes","Engine-specific recommendations are only as accurate as GEOScore's understanding of each engine's indexing behavior; this knowledge may lag behind actual algorithm changes","No data on actual visibility in each engine (e.g., citation frequency, answer prominence); recommendations are theoretical rather than empirically validated","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.3333333333333333,"quality":0.6900000000000001,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.892Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.552Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=geoscore","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=geoscore"}},"signature":"/4EjvlobB3BzLDHHdkaHxD4/6ZiSq1QuMZBEv+6j1F/8VVa+sP7p72Zr1LuWyvO3ucckGl8CN3wIDvyDURxqBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T15:05:21.299Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/geoscore","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/geoscore","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=geoscore","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}