{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-forge-llm","slug":"forge-llm","name":"@forge/llm","type":"framework","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@forge/llm","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/forge-llm","categories":["frameworks-sdks"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.llm.abstraction.layer","name":"multi-provider llm abstraction layer","description":"Provides a unified TypeScript/JavaScript interface for interacting with multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) through a standardized SDK. Routes requests to different providers via a pluggable adapter pattern, normalizing request/response formats across incompatible APIs so developers write once and switch providers without code changes.","intents":["I want to build an LLM application that can swap between OpenAI and Anthropic without rewriting my integration code","I need a consistent API surface across different LLM providers to avoid vendor lock-in","I want to test my application against multiple LLM backends to compare quality and cost"],"best_for":["Node.js/TypeScript developers building LLM applications","teams evaluating multiple LLM providers before committing to one","startups prototyping multi-model strategies"],"limitations":["Abstraction layer may not expose provider-specific advanced features (e.g., OpenAI's vision_detail parameter)","Response normalization adds latency overhead for format translation","Limited to providers with existing adapter implementations"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","TypeScript 4.5+ (or JavaScript with type definitions)","API keys for at least one supported LLM provider"],"input_types":["text prompts","structured message arrays","system instructions"],"output_types":["text completions","structured JSON responses","streaming token sequences"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","api-abstraction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.streaming.response.handling.with.token.level.control","name":"streaming response handling with token-level control","description":"Manages real-time token streaming from LLM providers with granular control over chunk processing, buffering, and backpressure. Implements stream event listeners that fire on token arrival, allowing developers to process partial responses incrementally without waiting for full completion, critical for low-latency user-facing applications.","intents":["I want to display LLM responses token-by-token in my UI as they arrive","I need to process streaming responses and apply custom filtering or transformation to each token","I want to implement cancellation/early stopping when a user interrupts a long-running LLM request"],"best_for":["frontend developers building chat interfaces with real-time response display","backend engineers implementing streaming APIs for LLM applications","teams building interactive AI agents that need responsive feedback"],"limitations":["Streaming adds complexity to error handling — partial responses may be incomplete if stream fails mid-transmission","Token-level processing requires careful memory management to avoid buffering entire responses","Provider stream APIs have different timeout behaviors; normalization may mask underlying issues"],"requires":["Node.js 14+ with native async/await support","Provider API supporting streaming (OpenAI streaming, Anthropic streaming, etc.)","HTTP client with streaming support (fetch, axios, or provider SDK)"],"input_types":["text prompts","message arrays"],"output_types":["event-emitted token streams","async iterables","callback-based token sequences"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.templating.with.variable.interpolation.and.validation","name":"prompt templating with variable interpolation and validation","description":"Provides a templating system for constructing LLM prompts with variable substitution, conditional sections, and optional schema validation. Developers define prompt templates with placeholders that are filled at runtime, reducing prompt engineering boilerplate and enabling reusable, testable prompt patterns across applications.","intents":["I want to define reusable prompt templates with variables that change per request","I need to validate that all required variables are provided before sending a prompt to the LLM","I want to version and test different prompt variations without duplicating code"],"best_for":["teams managing multiple prompt variations for different use cases","developers building prompt-driven applications with complex variable requirements","organizations standardizing prompt engineering practices across teams"],"limitations":["Template syntax may not support complex conditional logic — advanced use cases require custom preprocessing","No built-in prompt optimization or cost estimation based on template expansion","Validation is static — cannot validate semantic correctness of interpolated values"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","TypeScript 4.5+ for type-safe template definitions (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["template strings","variable objects","schema definitions"],"output_types":["interpolated prompt strings","validation results","structured prompt objects"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.function.calling.with.schema.based.argument.validation","name":"function calling with schema-based argument validation","description":"Enables LLMs to invoke external functions by defining function schemas (name, description, parameters) that the LLM can understand and call. The SDK validates LLM-generated function calls against schemas, marshals arguments to correct types, and executes registered functions, creating a bridge between LLM reasoning and deterministic code execution.","intents":["I want my LLM to call external APIs or functions based on user requests","I need to ensure function calls from the LLM have valid arguments before execution","I want to build an LLM agent that can take actions in external systems"],"best_for":["developers building LLM agents with external tool access","teams implementing AI assistants that need to interact with APIs or databases","builders creating autonomous workflows triggered by LLM decisions"],"limitations":["Schema validation is syntactic only — cannot validate semantic constraints (e.g., 'user_id must exist in database')","Function execution errors are not automatically retried or recovered; requires explicit error handling","No built-in timeout or resource limits on function execution — long-running functions can block the LLM response loop"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","Provider supporting function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Function definitions with JSON Schema-compatible parameter descriptions"],"input_types":["function schema definitions","LLM-generated function call objects","function arguments"],"output_types":["function execution results","validation errors","structured function call responses"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.message.history.management.with.context.windowing","name":"message history management with context windowing","description":"Manages conversation history by maintaining a rolling window of messages sent to the LLM, automatically truncating or summarizing older messages to stay within token limits. Tracks message roles (user, assistant, system) and implements strategies for context optimization, preventing token budget overruns while preserving conversation coherence.","intents":["I want to maintain a multi-turn conversation without manually managing token counts","I need to automatically drop old messages when approaching the LLM's context limit","I want to preserve important context while removing redundant messages to save tokens"],"best_for":["developers building chatbot applications with long conversations","teams implementing stateful LLM interactions with memory constraints","builders optimizing LLM costs by minimizing context size"],"limitations":["Automatic truncation may lose important context if strategy is too aggressive","No built-in summarization — requires external summarization model for intelligent compression","Token counting is approximate; actual token usage may exceed estimates due to tokenizer differences"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","Token counter for the target LLM (provider-specific or third-party library)","Knowledge of LLM's context window size"],"input_types":["message arrays with role and content","token limit configuration"],"output_types":["windowed message arrays","token count estimates","truncation metadata"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.logic.with.exponential.backoff","name":"error handling and retry logic with exponential backoff","description":"Implements automatic retry mechanisms for transient LLM API failures (rate limits, timeouts, temporary outages) using configurable exponential backoff strategies. Distinguishes between retryable errors (429, 503) and permanent failures (401, 404), preventing wasted retries on unrecoverable errors while maintaining resilience for temporary issues.","intents":["I want my LLM application to automatically retry failed requests without manual intervention","I need to handle rate limiting gracefully without crashing or losing requests","I want to distinguish between temporary API issues and permanent configuration errors"],"best_for":["production LLM applications requiring high availability","teams building resilient agents that operate in unreliable network conditions","developers optimizing for cost by avoiding wasted API calls on permanent failures"],"limitations":["Exponential backoff increases latency for failed requests — not suitable for real-time applications requiring sub-second responses","Retry logic cannot distinguish between rate limits and actual service degradation — may retry unnecessarily","No built-in circuit breaker pattern — repeated failures can still exhaust retry budgets"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","Configuration for retry attempts, backoff multiplier, and max delay"],"input_types":["LLM API requests","error responses from providers"],"output_types":["successful responses after retries","final error after exhausting retries","retry metadata (attempt count, delay)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.request.response.logging.and.observability.hooks","name":"request/response logging and observability hooks","description":"Provides hooks for logging and monitoring LLM requests and responses, enabling developers to track API usage, debug issues, and measure performance. Integrates with observability systems via callback functions that fire before/after API calls, capturing request parameters, response metadata, latency, and token usage without requiring code changes.","intents":["I want to log all LLM API calls for debugging and audit purposes","I need to track token usage and costs across my application","I want to measure LLM response latency and identify performance bottlenecks"],"best_for":["teams operating LLM applications in production requiring observability","developers debugging LLM behavior and prompt effectiveness","organizations tracking LLM costs and usage patterns"],"limitations":["Logging hooks add overhead — may impact latency for high-throughput applications","No built-in integration with observability platforms — requires custom adapters for Datadog, New Relic, etc.","Sensitive data (API keys, user inputs) may be logged if not carefully filtered"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","Custom logging implementation or integration with logging library (Winston, Pino, etc.)"],"input_types":["LLM requests","LLM responses","error objects"],"output_types":["log entries","metrics data","observability events"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-forge-llm__cap_7","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.type.safe.llm.response.parsing.with.typescript.generics","name":"type-safe llm response parsing with typescript generics","description":"Leverages TypeScript generics to provide compile-time type safety for LLM responses, allowing developers to define expected response shapes and automatically validate/parse responses against those types. Uses runtime validation (likely JSON Schema or Zod) to ensure LLM outputs conform to expected structures, preventing runtime errors from malformed responses.","intents":["I want TypeScript to enforce that my LLM responses match a specific structure","I need to parse LLM JSON responses and validate they have required fields before using them","I want to catch response parsing errors at development time, not in production"],"best_for":["TypeScript developers building type-safe LLM applications","teams using LLMs to generate structured data (JSON, objects)","developers prioritizing compile-time safety over runtime flexibility"],"limitations":["LLMs may not always generate valid JSON or conform to schemas — validation failures require fallback handling","Type safety is compile-time only; runtime validation still required for untrusted LLM outputs","Complex nested types may be difficult to express in JSON Schema or validation libraries"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+","Runtime validation library (Zod, JSON Schema, io-ts, etc.)","LLM configured to output JSON format"],"input_types":["TypeScript type definitions","LLM response strings","JSON objects"],"output_types":["typed and validated response objects","validation errors","type-safe data structures"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 14+","TypeScript 4.5+ (or JavaScript with type definitions)","API keys for at least one supported LLM provider","Node.js 14+ with native async/await support","Provider API supporting streaming (OpenAI streaming, Anthropic streaming, etc.)","HTTP client with streaming support (fetch, axios, or provider SDK)","TypeScript 4.5+ for type-safe template definitions (optional but recommended)","Provider supporting function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Function definitions with JSON Schema-compatible parameter descriptions","Token counter for the target LLM (provider-specific or third-party library)"],"failure_modes":["Abstraction layer may not expose provider-specific advanced features (e.g., OpenAI's vision_detail parameter)","Response normalization adds latency overhead for format translation","Limited to providers with existing adapter implementations","Streaming adds complexity to error handling — partial responses may be incomplete if stream fails mid-transmission","Token-level processing requires careful memory management to avoid buffering entire responses","Provider stream APIs have different timeout behaviors; normalization may mask underlying issues","Template syntax may not support complex conditional logic — advanced use cases require custom preprocessing","No built-in prompt optimization or cost estimation based on template expansion","Validation is static — cannot validate semantic correctness of interpolated values","Schema validation is syntactic only — cannot validate semantic constraints (e.g., 'user_id must exist in database')","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.09253120914996495,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:08:13.652Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":421,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=forge-llm","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=forge-llm"}},"signature":"jqpAil5Yi7NjWhWLV7w3fIo4twPrjx3N0G7s3L1xnvVJXCWwjzAqhAD8T/mCvsgLrG9bWrgctS7YBP6Mh1hGDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T01:57:01.852Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/forge-llm","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/forge-llm","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=forge-llm","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}