{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server","slug":"filesystem-mcp-server","name":"Filesystem MCP Server","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/tree/main/src/filesystem","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/filesystem-mcp-server","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["filesystem","official","reference"],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.sandboxed.filesystem.read.operations.with.path.validation","name":"sandboxed filesystem read operations with path validation","description":"Implements configurable access control for file reading through a path allowlist/blocklist security model that validates all requested paths against configured boundaries before exposing file contents. Uses TypeScript SDK's tool registration pattern to expose read_file and list_directory tools with automatic path normalization and symbolic link resolution, preventing directory traversal attacks while maintaining transparent access semantics for LLM clients.","intents":["I need to let an AI agent read specific files and directories without exposing my entire filesystem","I want to prevent path traversal attacks when an LLM requests file contents","I need to audit which files an AI system has accessed during a session"],"best_for":["Teams building AI agents that need controlled filesystem access","Developers integrating LLMs into existing applications with security requirements","Organizations deploying MCP servers in multi-tenant or sandboxed environments"],"limitations":["Path validation adds ~5-10ms per operation due to normalization and allowlist checking","Symbolic links are resolved before validation, which may expose paths outside intended boundaries if symlinks point outward","No built-in support for dynamic permission changes during runtime — requires server restart to update access rules","File size limits not enforced at the MCP layer — large file reads can consume unbounded memory"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom client, etc.)","Configuration file specifying allowed_directories or denied_paths"],"input_types":["file path (string)","directory path (string)"],"output_types":["file contents (string or binary)","directory listing (JSON array of file metadata)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.atomic.file.writing.with.overwrite.protection","name":"atomic file writing with overwrite protection","description":"Provides write_file tool that creates or overwrites files with optional safety checks for preventing accidental data loss. Implements atomic write semantics by writing to a temporary file first, then renaming to target path, ensuring partial writes don't corrupt existing files. Respects the same path validation layer as read operations, preventing writes outside configured boundaries.","intents":["I want an AI agent to create or modify files but prevent it from overwriting critical files","I need atomic writes so incomplete operations don't corrupt my data","I want to allow file creation only in specific directories"],"best_for":["Code generation workflows where LLMs produce files that need safe persistence","Configuration management systems where AI agents modify settings","Development environments where agents generate boilerplate or scaffolding"],"limitations":["Atomic writes require temporary file creation, which doubles disk I/O and may fail if temp directory is full","No built-in version control or backup — overwritten files are permanently lost unless external snapshots exist","File permissions are not preserved during atomic write (uses default umask)","Large file writes may timeout if network latency is high (no streaming support)"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Write permissions on target directory","Sufficient disk space for temporary file during atomic write operation"],"input_types":["file path (string)","file contents (string or binary)","optional: overwrite flag (boolean)"],"output_types":["success confirmation (JSON with path and size)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.recursive.directory.traversal.with.filtering.and.metadata.extraction","name":"recursive directory traversal with filtering and metadata extraction","description":"Implements list_directory tool that recursively enumerates directory trees with configurable depth limits and file type filtering. Returns structured metadata (size, modification time, permissions) for each entry without loading file contents, enabling efficient directory analysis. Uses TypeScript's fs.promises API with concurrent operations to traverse large directory structures while respecting path validation boundaries.","intents":["I need an AI agent to understand my project structure without reading every file","I want to find all files matching a pattern (e.g., all .ts files) in a directory tree","I need to get file metadata to help an LLM decide which files to read next"],"best_for":["Code analysis workflows where LLMs need to understand project structure first","File discovery tasks where agents search for specific file types or patterns","Project scaffolding tools that need to enumerate existing files before generating new ones"],"limitations":["Recursive traversal on very large directories (>100k files) may timeout or consume excessive memory","Symlink loops can cause infinite recursion if not detected — requires cycle detection logic","Metadata may become stale if files are modified during traversal (no atomic snapshot)","No built-in filtering by file content — only name-based and type-based filtering available"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Read permissions on all directories in traversal path","Sufficient memory for metadata of all files in result set"],"input_types":["directory path (string)","optional: max depth (integer)","optional: file type filter (string array, e.g., ['.ts', '.js'])"],"output_types":["directory tree (JSON with nested structure containing file metadata)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.file.and.directory.move.rename.operations.with.conflict.handling","name":"file and directory move/rename operations with conflict handling","description":"Provides move_file tool that relocates files or directories within the sandboxed filesystem with configurable behavior for handling destination conflicts (fail, overwrite, or rename). Validates both source and destination paths against the same security boundaries, ensuring moves cannot escape the allowed directory tree. Implements atomic move semantics using OS-level rename operations when possible.","intents":["I want an AI agent to reorganize my project files (e.g., move generated code to correct directories)","I need to rename files as part of a refactoring workflow","I want to prevent moves that would overwrite existing files unless explicitly allowed"],"best_for":["Code generation and refactoring workflows where LLMs reorganize generated artifacts","Project scaffolding tools that need to move files into final locations","Automated cleanup tasks where agents consolidate or archive files"],"limitations":["Cross-filesystem moves fall back to copy-then-delete, which is not atomic and may leave partial data if interrupted","No built-in support for moving directories with thousands of files — may timeout on large trees","Conflict handling (overwrite/rename) requires additional logic and may not match user expectations","File permissions and ownership are not preserved during move on some systems"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Write permissions on both source and destination directories","Source and destination must be within configured allowed paths"],"input_types":["source path (string)","destination path (string)","optional: conflict strategy (string: 'fail' | 'overwrite' | 'rename')"],"output_types":["success confirmation (JSON with source, destination, and final path)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.semantic.file.search.with.regex.and.glob.pattern.matching","name":"semantic file search with regex and glob pattern matching","description":"Implements search_files tool that finds files matching patterns (regex, glob, or literal strings) across the allowed filesystem tree. Returns matching file paths with optional context snippets showing where matches occur. Uses efficient pattern matching libraries (e.g., minimatch for globs) to avoid loading entire files into memory, supporting large codebases with thousands of files.","intents":["I need an AI agent to find all files containing a specific string or pattern","I want to search for files matching a glob pattern (e.g., all test files)","I need to locate files by regex to support complex search queries"],"best_for":["Code search and refactoring workflows where LLMs need to find files to modify","Codebase analysis tasks where agents search for specific patterns or imports","Migration tools where agents find all files using deprecated APIs"],"limitations":["Regex searches on large codebases may be slow — no built-in indexing or caching","Binary files are not handled gracefully — may return false positives or crash on non-UTF8 content","Context snippets require loading file contents, which negates efficiency gains for large matches","No support for semantic search (e.g., find all functions that call a specific function) — only text-based matching"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Read permissions on all files in search path","Valid regex or glob pattern syntax"],"input_types":["search pattern (string: regex, glob, or literal)","pattern type (string: 'regex' | 'glob' | 'literal')","optional: directory to search (string)","optional: file type filter (string array)"],"output_types":["array of matching file paths (JSON with optional context snippets)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.registration.with.json.rpc.transport.abstraction","name":"mcp tool registration with json-rpc transport abstraction","description":"Implements the MCP server-side tool registration pattern using TypeScript SDK, exposing filesystem operations as callable tools through JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol. Handles tool schema definition (input parameters, return types), request routing, and error serialization automatically. Supports multiple transport mechanisms (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket) through MCP's transport abstraction layer, allowing the same server to work with different client configurations without code changes.","intents":["I want to expose filesystem operations to an LLM client using the MCP protocol","I need a standardized way to define tool schemas and handle requests","I want my server to work with multiple transport mechanisms (stdio, HTTP, etc.)"],"best_for":["Developers building MCP servers that expose filesystem capabilities","Teams integrating MCP into existing LLM applications","Organizations deploying MCP servers across multiple transport layers"],"limitations":["Tool schema validation is performed at registration time, not at request time — invalid inputs may not be caught until execution","Error serialization may lose stack traces or context information when converting exceptions to JSON-RPC errors","Transport abstraction adds ~5-10ms latency per request due to serialization/deserialization overhead","No built-in rate limiting or request queuing — high-volume clients can overwhelm the server"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP TypeScript SDK (@modelcontextprotocol/sdk)","MCP client implementation that supports the same transport mechanism"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request (JSON)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response (JSON)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.configuration.driven.access.control.with.allowlist.blocklist.semantics","name":"configuration-driven access control with allowlist/blocklist semantics","description":"Implements a declarative security model where filesystem access is controlled through configuration files specifying allowed_directories (allowlist) or denied_paths (blocklist). Configuration is loaded at server startup and applied to all subsequent requests without requiring code changes. Supports glob patterns and environment variable expansion in configuration paths, enabling flexible deployment across different environments (dev, staging, production).","intents":["I want to configure which directories an AI agent can access without modifying code","I need different access rules for different deployment environments","I want to use glob patterns to specify allowed paths (e.g., /home/*/projects)"],"best_for":["DevOps teams deploying MCP servers across multiple environments","Organizations with strict security policies requiring configuration-driven access control","Teams that need to change access rules frequently without redeploying code"],"limitations":["Configuration is loaded only at server startup — changes require server restart to take effect","Glob pattern matching may be ambiguous or unexpected (e.g., ** can match across multiple directory levels)","No support for time-based or user-based access control — all clients see the same rules","Configuration file format is not standardized — different servers may use different formats"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Configuration file in supported format (JSON, YAML, or environment variables)","Read permissions on configuration file"],"input_types":["configuration file (JSON or YAML)"],"output_types":["access control rules (internal representation)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.error.handling.and.validation.with.detailed.diagnostic.messages","name":"error handling and validation with detailed diagnostic messages","description":"Implements comprehensive error handling for filesystem operations with detailed diagnostic messages that help LLM clients understand why operations failed (e.g., 'Path /etc/passwd is outside allowed directories' vs generic 'Access denied'). Validates all inputs (paths, patterns, parameters) before execution and returns structured error responses through JSON-RPC error protocol, enabling clients to implement retry logic or fallback strategies.","intents":["I want clear error messages when an AI agent tries to access files outside allowed boundaries","I need to distinguish between permission errors, path validation errors, and filesystem errors","I want my LLM client to understand why an operation failed and potentially retry"],"best_for":["Teams building LLM agents that need to handle filesystem errors gracefully","Developers debugging MCP server configurations and access control rules","Organizations that need detailed audit logs of failed filesystem operations"],"limitations":["Detailed error messages may leak information about filesystem structure to untrusted clients","Error handling adds ~2-5ms overhead per operation due to validation and message formatting","Stack traces are not included in error responses (security best practice), making debugging harder","No built-in error recovery — clients must implement retry logic themselves"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP client that can parse and handle JSON-RPC error responses"],"input_types":["any filesystem operation request"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC error response with error code and message"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_8","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.concurrent.request.handling.with.isolation.and.state.management","name":"concurrent request handling with isolation and state management","description":"Handles multiple concurrent MCP requests from clients through Node.js event loop and async/await patterns, ensuring each request is isolated and doesn't interfere with others. Uses TypeScript's Promise-based APIs to manage concurrent filesystem operations without blocking, enabling the server to handle multiple clients simultaneously. Maintains per-request state (e.g., current working directory context) without cross-request contamination.","intents":["I want my MCP server to handle multiple LLM clients accessing the filesystem simultaneously","I need to ensure that concurrent requests don't interfere with each other","I want my server to remain responsive even when processing slow filesystem operations"],"best_for":["Multi-client deployments where multiple LLM agents access the same filesystem server","High-concurrency environments where many requests arrive simultaneously","Long-running operations where the server must remain responsive to new requests"],"limitations":["Node.js single-threaded event loop means CPU-intensive operations (e.g., large regex searches) will block other requests","No built-in request queuing or priority management — all requests are processed in arrival order","Memory usage grows with concurrent requests — many simultaneous large file operations can exhaust memory","No distributed locking — concurrent writes to the same file from different clients may corrupt data"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Sufficient memory for concurrent request state"],"input_types":["multiple concurrent JSON-RPC requests"],"output_types":["multiple concurrent JSON-RPC responses"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.symbolic.link.resolution.and.cycle.detection","name":"symbolic link resolution and cycle detection","description":"Resolves symbolic links during path validation and directory traversal operations while detecting and preventing infinite loops caused by circular symlink chains. Uses path normalization and visited-set tracking to identify cycles before they cause stack overflow or infinite loops. Provides configuration options to either follow symlinks, reject them, or treat them as regular files depending on security requirements.","intents":["I want my MCP server to safely handle symbolic links without getting stuck in loops","I need to decide whether to follow symlinks or treat them as boundaries","I want to prevent symlinks from exposing files outside the allowed directory tree"],"best_for":["Deployments on Unix-like systems where symlinks are common","Security-sensitive environments where symlinks could be used to escape sandboxes","Large codebases with complex symlink structures (e.g., monorepos with linked packages)"],"limitations":["Symlink resolution adds ~5-10ms per operation due to path normalization and cycle detection","Cycle detection requires tracking visited paths in memory — large directory trees with many symlinks consume significant memory","Symlinks pointing outside allowed directories may be resolved before validation, exposing unintended paths","No support for relative symlinks that escape the sandbox through .. traversal"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Unix-like filesystem with symlink support (or Windows with symlink-aware configuration)"],"input_types":["file path (string, may contain symlinks)"],"output_types":["resolved path (string, with symlinks followed or rejected)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"filesystem-mcp-server__headline","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.for.local.filesystem.operations","name":"mcp server for local filesystem operations","description":"An official reference server for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that facilitates local filesystem operations, including reading, writing, moving, and searching files with configurable access controls.","intents":["best MCP server for filesystem operations","MCP server for managing files","how to implement filesystem operations in MCP","MCP reference server for file handling","educational MCP server examples"],"best_for":["developers looking to understand MCP","educational purposes"],"limitations":["not production-ready"],"requires":["basic knowledge of MCP"],"input_types":["file paths","commands"],"output_types":["file contents","operation results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":77,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom client, etc.)","Configuration file specifying allowed_directories or denied_paths","Write permissions on target directory","Sufficient disk space for temporary file during atomic write operation","Read permissions on all directories in traversal path","Sufficient memory for metadata of all files in result set","Write permissions on both source and destination directories","Source and destination must be within configured allowed paths","Read permissions on all files in search path"],"failure_modes":["Path validation adds ~5-10ms per operation due to normalization and allowlist checking","Symbolic links are resolved before validation, which may expose paths outside intended boundaries if symlinks point outward","No built-in support for dynamic permission changes during runtime — requires server restart to update access rules","File size limits not enforced at the MCP layer — large file reads can consume unbounded memory","Atomic writes require temporary file creation, which doubles disk I/O and may fail if temp directory is full","No built-in version control or backup — overwritten files are permanently lost unless external snapshots exist","File permissions are not preserved during atomic write (uses default umask)","Large file writes may timeout if network latency is high (no streaming support)","Recursive traversal on very large directories (>100k files) may timeout or consume excessive memory","Symlink loops can cause infinite recursion if not detected — requires cycle detection logic","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7,"quality":0.9,"ecosystem":0.48999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.691Z","last_scraped_at":null,"last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=filesystem-mcp-server","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=filesystem-mcp-server"}},"signature":"vzJMoS2fib+ApW4Tq9/k7xPPC29wd0sjTZk30xeFLVRh0qWBG+msomBgIdEEFO/2wMX22Yhn2c1CMpvNhqy3BA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T15:21:07.013Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/filesystem-mcp-server","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/filesystem-mcp-server","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=filesystem-mcp-server","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}