{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_everlyn","slug":"everlyn","name":"Everlyn","type":"product","url":"https://www.everlynai.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/everlyn","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.adaptive.learning.path.generation","name":"adaptive-learning-path-generation","description":"Generates personalized learning sequences by analyzing student performance data, learning style indicators, and content mastery levels to dynamically adjust curriculum pacing and content difficulty. The system likely uses a combination of item response theory (IRT) or Bayesian knowledge tracing to model student competency and recommend optimal next-step content, with real-time adjustments based on assessment results and engagement metrics.","intents":["I need to create individualized learning paths that adapt to each student's pace without manual intervention","I want to identify which students are falling behind and automatically adjust their content difficulty","I need to optimize time-to-mastery by recommending the most effective learning sequence for each learner"],"best_for":["K-12 schools with diverse student populations and varying achievement levels","EdTech administrators seeking to reduce achievement gaps through personalized instruction","Districts implementing competency-based education models"],"limitations":["Requires sufficient historical student performance data to build accurate learner models — cold-start problem for new students or institutions","Adaptation quality depends on assessment frequency and data quality; sparse or inaccurate assessments degrade path recommendations","No transparency provided on how learning style detection works or what pedagogical frameworks underpin path generation"],"requires":["Student enrollment and demographic data","Historical assessment or performance data (minimum 5-10 data points per student recommended)","Content library with metadata tags (learning objectives, difficulty levels, prerequisites)"],"input_types":["student performance metrics","assessment scores","engagement data","content metadata"],"output_types":["personalized learning sequences","recommended next content items","mastery probability estimates","pacing adjustments"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","personalized-education"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.automated.assessment.generation.and.grading","name":"automated-assessment-generation-and-grading","description":"Automatically generates quiz, test, and assignment questions from curriculum content using natural language processing and content analysis, then evaluates student responses against rubrics and learning objectives. The system likely parses educational content (textbooks, lesson plans, learning objectives), extracts key concepts, generates question variants at multiple difficulty levels, and applies rule-based or ML-based scoring to provide instant feedback without educator intervention.","intents":["I need to generate assessments aligned to specific learning objectives without manually writing every question","I want to provide instant feedback to students on their performance without spending hours grading","I need to create multiple assessment variants to prevent cheating while maintaining consistent difficulty"],"best_for":["Teachers managing large class sizes (50+ students) where manual grading is time-prohibitive","Schools implementing formative assessment strategies requiring frequent, low-stakes quizzes","Districts needing standardized assessment formats across multiple classrooms or grade levels"],"limitations":["Generated questions may not capture nuanced or higher-order thinking skills — likely biased toward factual recall and lower Bloom's taxonomy levels","Grading accuracy for open-ended responses (essays, short answers) is unknown; system may default to multiple-choice or structured responses","No visibility into question quality assurance or validation against learning standards (Common Core, state standards, etc.)","Rubric customization depth unknown — may not support complex, multi-criteria rubrics for subjective assessment"],"requires":["Curriculum content in digital format (text, PDFs, or structured lesson plans)","Learning objectives or standards alignment metadata","Student response data for grading (text, multiple-choice selections, or structured answers)"],"input_types":["curriculum content","learning objectives","student responses","rubric definitions"],"output_types":["generated assessment questions","graded responses with scores","instant feedback messages","performance analytics"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_10","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.teacher.professional.development.and.guidance","name":"teacher-professional-development-and-guidance","description":"Provides educators with recommendations, resources, and guidance on effective use of the platform and pedagogical best practices based on their teaching patterns and student outcomes. The system likely analyzes teacher behavior (assessment frequency, feedback patterns, content selection) and student outcomes to surface actionable insights and suggest improvements, potentially including curated professional development resources or peer benchmarking.","intents":["I want guidance on how to use Everlyn effectively to improve student outcomes","I need to understand which of my teaching practices are most effective based on student data","I want access to professional development resources aligned to my specific needs"],"best_for":["Teachers new to AI-enhanced instruction seeking guidance and support","Educators seeking to improve instructional effectiveness based on data","Schools implementing professional development programs around EdTech adoption"],"limitations":["Guidance quality depends on system's understanding of effective pedagogy — may reflect platform biases rather than research-based practices","Recommendations may not account for context-specific factors (student demographics, resource constraints, school culture)","Professional development resources may be limited or generic rather than personalized","No transparency on how effectiveness is measured or how recommendations are generated"],"requires":["Teacher interaction and usage data","Student outcome data","Pedagogical knowledge base or best practices library"],"input_types":["teacher behavior and usage patterns","student outcome data","assessment and feedback patterns"],"output_types":["effectiveness insights and recommendations","professional development resources","peer benchmarking data","best practice guidance"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.low.code.ai.tutor.creation","name":"low-code-ai-tutor-creation","description":"Provides a visual or form-based interface for educators to build custom AI tutors without coding, likely using a configuration-driven approach where users define tutor behavior through templates, dialogue flows, content mappings, and interaction rules. The system probably abstracts underlying LLM APIs and knowledge retrieval systems, allowing educators to specify tutor personality, subject domain, interaction style, and assessment triggers through UI components rather than code.","intents":["I want to create a custom AI tutor for my specific subject or student population without hiring a developer","I need to configure how my tutor responds to student questions, provides hints, and assesses understanding","I want to quickly iterate on tutor behavior based on student feedback without technical overhead"],"best_for":["Individual educators and small schools without dedicated EdTech or development teams","Subject matter experts (SMEs) who understand pedagogy but lack programming skills","Institutions piloting AI tutoring before committing to custom development"],"limitations":["Abstraction layer likely limits customization depth — complex pedagogical logic or domain-specific reasoning may not be expressible through UI","No visibility into how tutors handle out-of-domain questions or edge cases; fallback behavior unknown","Tutor quality depends heavily on educator configuration choices; poor configuration design may result in ineffective or misleading tutoring","Scalability and multi-language support unknown — may be limited to English or specific subject domains"],"requires":["Subject matter expertise or curriculum knowledge","Access to Everlyn platform with tutor creation permissions","Content library or learning materials to feed into tutor knowledge base","Basic understanding of dialogue flow and interaction design"],"input_types":["tutor configuration (name, subject, personality)","curriculum content or knowledge base","interaction rules and dialogue templates","assessment criteria"],"output_types":["deployed AI tutor instance","tutor interaction logs","student engagement metrics"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.student.performance.analytics.and.insights","name":"student-performance-analytics-and-insights","description":"Aggregates and visualizes student learning data across assessments, engagement, and learning path progression to surface actionable insights for educators. The system likely tracks metrics such as mastery rates, time-to-mastery, concept confusion patterns, and engagement trends, then uses statistical analysis or anomaly detection to flag at-risk students or learning bottlenecks, enabling data-driven intervention decisions.","intents":["I need to identify which students are struggling and require intervention before they fall too far behind","I want to understand which concepts or topics are causing widespread confusion across my class","I need to track individual and cohort-level progress toward learning objectives to inform instruction"],"best_for":["Teachers and administrators seeking data-driven insights into student learning","Schools implementing response-to-intervention (RTI) or multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS)","Districts tracking progress toward state or district learning standards"],"limitations":["Analytics quality depends on assessment frequency and data completeness — sparse data may produce unreliable insights","No transparency on statistical methods used for anomaly detection or risk flagging; false positive rates unknown","Insights may be correlational rather than causal — system may not explain why students are struggling","Privacy implications of aggregating and analyzing student data are not clearly disclosed"],"requires":["Minimum 2-4 weeks of student interaction and assessment data","Consistent assessment administration across student cohorts","Learning objective or standard definitions for progress tracking"],"input_types":["assessment scores","engagement metrics (time spent, interaction frequency)","learning path progression data","student demographic data"],"output_types":["performance dashboards","at-risk student alerts","concept mastery heatmaps","cohort-level trend reports","intervention recommendations"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.content.alignment.to.learning.standards","name":"content-alignment-to-learning-standards","description":"Maps curriculum content, assessments, and learning objectives to educational standards (Common Core, state standards, IB, etc.) to ensure instructional alignment and standards compliance. The system likely uses semantic matching or manual curation to link content to standard codes, then tracks student mastery against standards to provide standards-based progress reports and identify coverage gaps.","intents":["I need to ensure my curriculum and assessments are aligned to state or national learning standards","I want to track student progress toward specific standards rather than just overall grades","I need to identify which standards my students have mastered and which require additional instruction"],"best_for":["Schools and districts required to demonstrate standards alignment for accreditation or compliance","Teachers implementing standards-based grading or competency-based education","Administrators tracking standards coverage across grade levels and classrooms"],"limitations":["Standards alignment accuracy depends on content metadata quality and curation — automated semantic matching may produce false positives","Limited to standards frameworks supported by the platform; custom or non-standard frameworks may not be supported","No visibility into how standards are weighted or prioritized — all standards may be treated equally regardless of importance","Standards-based reporting may require significant workflow changes for educators accustomed to traditional grading"],"requires":["Content library with learning objectives or standards metadata","Selection of applicable standards framework (Common Core, state standards, etc.)","Assessment data mapped to standards"],"input_types":["curriculum content","learning objectives","standards framework definitions","assessment results"],"output_types":["standards alignment mappings","standards-based progress reports","coverage gap analysis","standards mastery dashboards"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.modal.content.ingestion.and.processing","name":"multi-modal-content-ingestion-and-processing","description":"Accepts and processes educational content in multiple formats (PDFs, images, videos, text, audio) to extract learning objectives, concepts, and assessable content. The system likely uses OCR for scanned documents, video transcription and summarization, and NLP to parse text-based content, converting diverse formats into a unified internal representation for use in learning path generation, assessment creation, and tutor knowledge bases.","intents":["I want to upload existing textbooks, lesson plans, and materials in various formats without manual conversion","I need to extract key concepts and learning objectives from video lectures automatically","I want to use scanned or image-based content without manually retyping or reformatting"],"best_for":["Schools digitizing existing curriculum materials and textbooks","Educators with diverse content sources (videos, PDFs, images, audio recordings)","Institutions migrating from paper-based or legacy digital systems"],"limitations":["OCR accuracy varies by document quality; handwritten or low-resolution content may produce errors","Video processing may be slow or limited to certain formats; real-time processing of long videos unknown","Concept extraction quality depends on content clarity and structure — poorly written or ambiguous content may produce incomplete or inaccurate extractions","Audio processing (transcription, summarization) accuracy and language support unknown","No visibility into how extracted content is validated or corrected before use in learning paths or assessments"],"requires":["Content files in supported formats (PDF, JPG, PNG, MP4, MP3, etc.)","Reasonable content quality (legible text, clear audio, etc.)","Storage capacity for processed content and metadata"],"input_types":["PDF documents","images (JPG, PNG, scanned documents)","video files (MP4, etc.)","audio files (MP3, WAV, etc.)","text documents"],"output_types":["extracted text and concepts","learning objectives","video transcripts and summaries","structured content metadata","concept graphs or knowledge maps"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","image-visual"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.real.time.student.feedback.and.hints","name":"real-time-student-feedback-and-hints","description":"Provides immediate, contextual feedback and hints to students during learning activities based on their responses, misconceptions, and progress. The system likely analyzes student answers against expected responses and common misconceptions, then generates targeted hints or explanations using NLP and domain knowledge to guide students toward correct understanding without directly providing answers.","intents":["I want students to receive immediate feedback on their work without waiting for teacher grading","I need to provide hints that guide students toward correct answers without giving away solutions","I want to address common misconceptions in real-time as students encounter them"],"best_for":["Formative assessment and practice activities where immediate feedback improves learning","Self-paced or asynchronous learning environments where teacher feedback is delayed","Students who benefit from scaffolded support and guided discovery"],"limitations":["Hint quality depends on system's understanding of student misconceptions — may provide generic hints rather than targeted guidance","Open-ended responses (essays, complex problem-solving) may receive less effective feedback than structured responses","No transparency on how misconceptions are detected or how hints are generated — may not align with pedagogical best practices","Feedback may be perceived as impersonal or insufficient compared to teacher-provided guidance"],"requires":["Student response data (answers, work samples)","Expected responses and common misconceptions database","Hint generation rules or templates"],"input_types":["student responses","assessment questions","student work samples"],"output_types":["immediate feedback messages","contextual hints","misconception corrections","encouragement or affirmation"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.collaborative.learning.orchestration","name":"collaborative-learning-orchestration","description":"Facilitates peer collaboration and group learning activities by matching students with complementary skills or learning needs, managing group assignments, and tracking collaborative progress. The system likely uses student profile data (skills, learning styles, performance levels) to form optimal groups, then monitors group interactions and individual contributions to ensure equitable participation and learning outcomes.","intents":["I want to form student groups strategically based on skills and learning needs rather than randomly","I need to track individual contributions within group work to ensure fair assessment","I want to facilitate peer learning by pairing students with different strengths and weaknesses"],"best_for":["Educators implementing collaborative learning or project-based learning","Schools emphasizing social-emotional learning and peer support","Classrooms with diverse skill levels where peer tutoring can benefit struggling students"],"limitations":["Group formation algorithms are not transparent — criteria for optimal grouping unknown","Tracking individual contributions in group work is challenging; system may rely on self-reporting or limited interaction logs","Collaborative learning effectiveness depends on group dynamics and social factors not captured by performance data","No visibility into how conflicts or unequal participation are detected or addressed"],"requires":["Student profile data (skills, learning styles, performance levels)","Group assignment and collaboration tools","Interaction tracking and logging"],"input_types":["student profiles","learning objectives","group size preferences","interaction logs"],"output_types":["group assignments","collaboration dashboards","individual contribution tracking","group progress reports"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_8","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.parent.and.guardian.engagement.portal","name":"parent-and-guardian-engagement-portal","description":"Provides parents and guardians with visibility into student progress, learning objectives, and upcoming assessments through a dedicated portal or notifications system. The system likely aggregates student performance data, learning path progress, and teacher communications into a parent-friendly dashboard, with options for notifications about milestones, concerns, or required actions.","intents":["I want to keep parents informed about their child's progress without requiring manual updates","I need to alert parents to concerns or areas where their child needs additional support","I want to help parents understand learning objectives and how they can support learning at home"],"best_for":["Schools seeking to increase parent engagement and communication","Educators managing communication with multiple families","Institutions implementing home-school partnerships for improved outcomes"],"limitations":["Parent portal adoption depends on accessibility, language support, and user experience — may have low usage rates","Data privacy and security are critical; no transparency on how student data is protected or shared with parents","Notifications may be overwhelming or create anxiety if not carefully calibrated","Limited to asynchronous communication; real-time parent-teacher dialogue may require separate channels"],"requires":["Parent/guardian contact information and account setup","Student performance and progress data","Privacy and consent management for data sharing"],"input_types":["student performance data","learning objectives","teacher communications","milestone events"],"output_types":["parent dashboards","progress reports","notifications and alerts","learning objective explanations"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlyn__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.learning.style.and.preference.detection","name":"learning-style-and-preference-detection","description":"Infers student learning preferences and styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.) based on interaction patterns, engagement data, and performance across different content modalities. The system likely analyzes which content types (videos, text, interactive simulations) correlate with higher engagement and mastery for each student, then uses these insights to personalize content delivery and learning path recommendations.","intents":["I want to understand each student's preferred learning modality without administering surveys","I need to recommend content in formats that match each student's learning style","I want to expose students to diverse learning modalities while respecting their preferences"],"best_for":["Educators seeking to personalize instruction based on learning preferences","Schools implementing multi-modal content delivery","Institutions with diverse student populations and learning needs"],"limitations":["Learning style theory has limited empirical support; system may be based on debunked pedagogical assumptions","Preference detection requires sufficient interaction data across multiple content types — cold-start problem for new students","Preferences may change over time or vary by subject; static preference models may become outdated","No transparency on how preferences are detected or how they influence content recommendations"],"requires":["Student interaction data across multiple content modalities","Engagement and performance metrics for each content type","Content library with diverse modalities (text, video, interactive, etc.)"],"input_types":["interaction logs","engagement metrics","performance data by content type","content modality metadata"],"output_types":["learning style profiles","content modality recommendations","personalized learning paths","preference reports"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Student enrollment and demographic data","Historical assessment or performance data (minimum 5-10 data points per student recommended)","Content library with metadata tags (learning objectives, difficulty levels, prerequisites)","Curriculum content in digital format (text, PDFs, or structured lesson plans)","Learning objectives or standards alignment metadata","Student response data for grading (text, multiple-choice selections, or structured answers)","Teacher interaction and usage data","Student outcome data","Pedagogical knowledge base or best practices library","Subject matter expertise or curriculum knowledge"],"failure_modes":["Requires sufficient historical student performance data to build accurate learner models — cold-start problem for new students or institutions","Adaptation quality depends on assessment frequency and data quality; sparse or inaccurate assessments degrade path recommendations","No transparency provided on how learning style detection works or what pedagogical frameworks underpin path generation","Generated questions may not capture nuanced or higher-order thinking skills — likely biased toward factual recall and lower Bloom's taxonomy levels","Grading accuracy for open-ended responses (essays, short answers) is unknown; system may default to multiple-choice or structured responses","No visibility into question quality assurance or validation against learning standards (Common Core, state standards, etc.)","Rubric customization depth unknown — may not support complex, multi-criteria rubrics for subjective assessment","Guidance quality depends on system's understanding of effective pedagogy — may reflect platform biases rather than research-based practices","Recommendations may not account for context-specific factors (student demographics, resource constraints, school culture)","Professional development resources may be limited or generic rather than personalized","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.36666666666666664,"quality":0.78,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.284Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.552Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=everlyn","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=everlyn"}},"signature":"+d3FFqiM1RDu6AL1fXValdVKcxr13CZGRx/g8cQ0U5xZKU8fr0X3xjae7Hg6UaP3ICfTF9G9yvbz0Qevuxq6BQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T14:10:37.168Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/everlyn","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/everlyn","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=everlyn","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}