{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_everlaw","slug":"everlaw","name":"Everlaw","type":"product","url":"https://www.everlaw.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/everlaw","categories":["research-search"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_0","uri":"capability://legal.predictive.coding.document.relevance","name":"predictive-coding-document-relevance","description":"Uses machine learning models trained on human-reviewed documents to automatically classify remaining documents as relevant or irrelevant to litigation. The system learns from initial manual review decisions and applies those patterns across large document sets to dramatically reduce review workload.","intents":["I need to quickly identify which documents are relevant to this case without reviewing millions manually","I want to prioritize my document review team's time on the most important materials","I need to reduce the cost and timeline of document review in complex litigation"],"best_for":["Large law firms","Corporate legal departments","Litigation teams with high-volume document sets"],"limitations":["Requires initial seed set of human-reviewed documents to train effectively","Accuracy depends on quality and representativeness of training data","May miss novel or edge-case relevant documents if training set is biased"],"requires":["Minimum viable document corpus (typically thousands of documents)","Initial human review sample for model training","Clear relevance criteria defined upfront"],"input_types":["document collections","human relevance judgments","case parameters"],"output_types":["relevance scores","classified document lists","confidence metrics"],"categories":["legal","productivity","machine-learning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_1","uri":"capability://legal.privilege.detection.and.flagging","name":"privilege-detection-and-flagging","description":"Automatically identifies documents that may contain attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other protected communications using AI pattern recognition. Flags potentially privileged documents for human review before production to prevent inadvertent disclosure.","intents":["I need to ensure we don't accidentally produce privileged documents in discovery","I want to quickly identify communications with counsel that need protection","I need to reduce the risk of waiving privilege through inadvertent disclosure"],"best_for":["Large law firms","Corporate legal departments","In-house counsel managing litigation"],"limitations":["AI detection may have false positives requiring human review","Privilege rules vary by jurisdiction and context","Implicit privilege claims may be harder to detect than explicit ones"],"requires":["Document corpus with metadata","Jurisdiction-specific privilege rules configured","Human review process for flagged documents"],"input_types":["documents","email metadata","communication records"],"output_types":["privilege flags","confidence scores","flagged document lists"],"categories":["legal","compliance","risk-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_10","uri":"capability://legal.litigation.analytics.and.reporting","name":"litigation-analytics-and-reporting","description":"Generates comprehensive analytics and reports on document collections including volume statistics, date distribution, key players, communication patterns, and case metrics. Provides visual dashboards and exportable reports for case analysis.","intents":["I need to understand the scope and characteristics of our document collection","I want to create reports showing key statistics for case strategy","I need to visualize communication patterns and relationships"],"best_for":["Case strategy teams","Litigation counsel","Legal project managers"],"limitations":["Analytics quality depends on data quality and completeness","Visualizations may oversimplify complex relationships","Interpretation requires domain expertise"],"requires":["Processed document collection","Extracted metadata and entities","Analysis parameters"],"input_types":["document collections","metadata","entity data"],"output_types":["analytics dashboards","statistical reports","visualizations","exportable reports"],"categories":["legal","analytics","reporting"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_11","uri":"capability://legal.multi.language.document.support","name":"multi-language-document-support","description":"Handles document collections containing multiple languages with automatic language detection and translation capabilities. Enables search and analysis across multilingual document sets.","intents":["I need to process documents in multiple languages","I want to search across documents in different languages","I need to translate documents for review and analysis"],"best_for":["International litigation teams","Multinational corporations","Cross-border disputes"],"limitations":["Translation quality varies by language pair and document complexity","Some languages may have limited support","Technical or specialized terminology may not translate well"],"requires":["Multilingual document collection","Language detection configuration","Translation service access"],"input_types":["documents in multiple languages","multilingual collections"],"output_types":["translated documents","language-tagged documents","multilingual search results"],"categories":["legal","productivity","internationalization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_12","uri":"capability://legal.collaborative.review.and.annotation","name":"collaborative-review-and-annotation","description":"Enables multiple reviewers to work simultaneously on document review with shared annotations, comments, and tags. Provides version control and audit trails for all review activities.","intents":["I need my team to review documents together with shared notes","I want to track who reviewed what and what they found","I need to maintain an audit trail of all review decisions"],"best_for":["Large review teams","Distributed teams","Complex litigation"],"limitations":["Requires coordination and communication protocols","Simultaneous editing may cause conflicts","Audit trail storage increases data volume"],"requires":["Multiple user accounts","Collaboration infrastructure","Defined review protocols"],"input_types":["documents","reviewer annotations","comments","tags"],"output_types":["annotated documents","shared notes","audit trails","review summaries"],"categories":["legal","productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_13","uri":"capability://legal.data.security.and.compliance.management","name":"data-security-and-compliance-management","description":"Provides enterprise-grade security features including encryption, access controls, data residency options, and compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, etc.). Ensures documents are protected and meets regulatory requirements.","intents":["I need to ensure our sensitive litigation data is secure","I want to control who can access specific documents","I need to meet regulatory and compliance requirements"],"best_for":["Large law firms","Corporate legal departments","Regulated industries"],"limitations":["Security features may impact performance","Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction","Data residency restrictions may limit cloud options"],"requires":["Security infrastructure setup","Access control configuration","Compliance monitoring"],"input_types":["user access requests","security policies","compliance requirements"],"output_types":["access controls","encryption","audit logs","compliance reports"],"categories":["legal","security","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_2","uri":"capability://legal.entity.extraction.and.mapping","name":"entity-extraction-and-mapping","description":"Automatically identifies and extracts key entities (people, organizations, locations, dates, financial amounts) from documents and creates relationship maps showing how entities connect across the document set. Provides multi-dimensional insights beyond keyword searching.","intents":["I need to understand who communicated with whom across thousands of documents","I want to identify key players and their relationships in this litigation","I need to track financial flows or transactions mentioned across documents"],"best_for":["Complex litigation teams","Fraud investigation teams","Corporate legal departments","Antitrust cases"],"limitations":["Accuracy varies with document quality and entity ambiguity","May struggle with misspellings, nicknames, or informal references","Requires post-extraction validation for critical entities"],"requires":["Structured or semi-structured documents","Entity type definitions","Sufficient document volume for pattern recognition"],"input_types":["documents","emails","communications"],"output_types":["entity lists","relationship graphs","entity networks","connection maps"],"categories":["legal","analytics","data-extraction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_3","uri":"capability://legal.communication.pattern.analysis","name":"communication-pattern-analysis","description":"Analyzes email and messaging patterns to identify communication networks, frequency of contact, and information flow patterns across organizations. Surfaces hidden relationships and communication hierarchies that may be relevant to litigation.","intents":["I need to understand the communication structure and information flow in this organization","I want to identify key decision-makers and influencers based on communication patterns","I need to find unusual or suspicious communication patterns that may indicate wrongdoing"],"best_for":["Complex litigation teams","Internal investigation teams","Antitrust and competition cases","Fraud investigation teams"],"limitations":["Requires substantial email/communication data to be meaningful","May miss communications through non-digital channels","Pattern interpretation requires human judgment and context"],"requires":["Email or messaging data with metadata","Sufficient communication volume","Defined analysis parameters"],"input_types":["email collections","messaging data","communication metadata"],"output_types":["communication networks","frequency analysis","pattern reports","visualization graphs"],"categories":["legal","analytics","investigation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_4","uri":"capability://legal.cloud.native.document.storage.and.retrieval","name":"cloud-native-document-storage-and-retrieval","description":"Provides scalable cloud-based storage and rapid retrieval of massive document collections without requiring on-premise infrastructure. Handles petabyte-scale datasets with automatic indexing and search optimization.","intents":["I need to store and manage massive document collections without building data centers","I want fast search and retrieval across millions of documents","I need to scale storage up or down based on case needs without capital investment"],"best_for":["Large law firms","Corporate legal departments","Teams handling high-volume litigation"],"limitations":["Requires reliable internet connectivity","Data residency and compliance requirements may limit cloud options","Ongoing subscription costs scale with data volume"],"requires":["Cloud infrastructure access","Network connectivity","Data security and compliance setup"],"input_types":["document files","document collections","metadata"],"output_types":["indexed documents","search results","retrieved documents"],"categories":["legal","productivity","infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_5","uri":"capability://legal.advanced.search.and.filtering","name":"advanced-search-and-filtering","description":"Enables sophisticated search across document collections using boolean operators, field-specific searches, date ranges, and AI-powered semantic search. Allows filtering by document type, sender, date, privilege status, and extracted entities.","intents":["I need to find specific documents using complex search criteria","I want to search by meaning rather than just keywords","I need to filter documents by multiple attributes simultaneously"],"best_for":["Litigation teams","Legal researchers","Document reviewers"],"limitations":["Search quality depends on document indexing quality","Semantic search may return unexpected results without proper training","Complex queries may require technical expertise"],"requires":["Indexed document collection","Search interface access","Understanding of search syntax"],"input_types":["search queries","filter parameters","date ranges"],"output_types":["search results","filtered document lists","result rankings"],"categories":["legal","productivity","search"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_6","uri":"capability://legal.batch.document.processing.and.ingestion","name":"batch-document-processing-and-ingestion","description":"Automatically processes and ingests large batches of documents in various formats (PDF, email, spreadsheets, etc.) into the platform. Handles format conversion, metadata extraction, and deduplication at scale.","intents":["I need to quickly load millions of documents into the system for analysis","I want to automatically extract metadata from documents during ingestion","I need to identify and remove duplicate documents across large collections"],"best_for":["Large law firms","Corporate legal departments","eDiscovery teams"],"limitations":["Processing time scales with volume and file complexity","Some file formats may require manual conversion","Deduplication accuracy depends on metadata quality"],"requires":["Document files in supported formats","Sufficient processing capacity","Metadata mapping configuration"],"input_types":["document files","email archives","structured data"],"output_types":["ingested documents","extracted metadata","deduplication reports"],"categories":["legal","productivity","data-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_7","uri":"capability://legal.document.review.workflow.management","name":"document-review-workflow-management","description":"Provides structured workflow tools for managing document review processes including task assignment, review queues, quality control, and progress tracking. Enables teams to organize review work and monitor completion status.","intents":["I need to assign documents to reviewers and track their progress","I want to implement quality control checks on reviewed documents","I need to manage review workflows across multiple team members"],"best_for":["Large review teams","Law firms with multiple reviewers","Corporate legal departments"],"limitations":["Workflow customization may require technical configuration","Team coordination still requires human management","Quality control depends on defined review standards"],"requires":["Multiple user accounts","Defined review criteria","Team coordination process"],"input_types":["document collections","reviewer assignments","review criteria"],"output_types":["review queues","progress reports","quality metrics","completion status"],"categories":["legal","productivity","project-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_8","uri":"capability://legal.key.evidence.surfacing.and.prioritization","name":"key-evidence-surfacing-and-prioritization","description":"Uses AI to identify and prioritize documents most likely to contain key evidence, smoking guns, or critical information relevant to case strategy. Surfaces high-impact documents early in the review process.","intents":["I need to find the most important documents quickly without reviewing everything","I want to identify smoking gun evidence early in the discovery process","I need to prioritize review resources on the highest-impact documents"],"best_for":["Litigation teams","Trial counsel","Case strategy teams"],"limitations":["Requires clear definition of what constitutes key evidence","AI prioritization may miss context-dependent significance","Human judgment still required for final evidence assessment"],"requires":["Document corpus","Case parameters and key issues","Training data on important documents"],"input_types":["documents","case facts","key issues"],"output_types":["prioritized document lists","evidence scores","key document summaries"],"categories":["legal","analytics","litigation-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__cap_9","uri":"capability://legal.document.metadata.extraction.and.enrichment","name":"document-metadata-extraction-and-enrichment","description":"Automatically extracts and enriches document metadata including sender, recipient, date, subject, file properties, and derived attributes. Creates standardized metadata across heterogeneous document collections.","intents":["I need to extract metadata from thousands of documents automatically","I want to standardize metadata across documents from different sources","I need to use metadata for filtering, sorting, and analysis"],"best_for":["eDiscovery teams","Document management teams","Litigation support"],"limitations":["Metadata extraction accuracy varies by document type and quality","Some documents may have incomplete or corrupted metadata","Enrichment requires external data sources"],"requires":["Document collection","Metadata schema definition","Processing capacity"],"input_types":["documents","emails","files"],"output_types":["extracted metadata","enriched metadata","metadata reports"],"categories":["legal","data-processing","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_everlaw__headline","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.ai.driven.ediscovery.platform","name":"ai-driven ediscovery platform","description":"Everlaw is a cloud-native eDiscovery platform that utilizes AI to streamline document review and legal analysis, making it essential for legal teams managing complex litigation.","intents":["best eDiscovery platform","AI tools for legal document review","cloud-native eDiscovery solutions for law firms","top legal analysis software","AI-driven tools for litigation support"],"best_for":["large law firms","corporate legal departments"],"limitations":["steep learning curve","cost-prohibitive for smaller firms"],"requires":["technical expertise","dedicated training"],"input_types":["PDFs","emails","Slack messages"],"output_types":["categorized documents","AI-generated summaries"],"categories":["search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":50,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Minimum viable document corpus (typically thousands of documents)","Initial human review sample for model training","Clear relevance criteria defined upfront","Document corpus with metadata","Jurisdiction-specific privilege rules configured","Human review process for flagged documents","Processed document collection","Extracted metadata and entities","Analysis parameters","Multilingual document collection"],"failure_modes":["Requires initial seed set of human-reviewed documents to train effectively","Accuracy depends on quality and representativeness of training data","May miss novel or edge-case relevant documents if training set is biased","AI detection may have false positives requiring human review","Privilege rules vary by jurisdiction and context","Implicit privilege claims may be harder to detect than explicit ones","Analytics quality depends on data quality and completeness","Visualizations may oversimplify complex relationships","Interpretation requires domain expertise","Translation quality varies by language pair and document complexity","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.48333333333333334,"quality":0.9199999999999999,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.284Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.532Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=everlaw","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=everlaw"}},"signature":"HGw13N9wtVwKI0oq2kHTPoD/dObxTz9ytP8xPzriK8rU3sFvp083gURMC5H2sTNMzO/ubiqO2OqoH8lvXRR+DA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T01:13:01.733Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/everlaw","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/everlaw","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=everlaw","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}