{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-everart","slug":"everart","name":"EverArt","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers-archived/tree/main/src/everart","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/everart","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_0","uri":"capability://image.visual.multi.model.image.generation.via.mcp.protocol","name":"multi-model image generation via mcp protocol","description":"Exposes image generation capabilities through the Model Context Protocol by implementing a standardized MCP server that routes generation requests to multiple underlying AI image models (e.g., DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney). The server translates MCP tool calls into model-specific API requests, handles authentication per model, and returns generated images through the MCP response protocol, enabling LLM clients to invoke image generation as a native tool without direct API knowledge.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to generate images on-demand without managing multiple API integrations","I need to abstract away model-specific image generation APIs behind a unified interface","I want to let Claude or other MCP clients trigger image generation as a tool call","I need to support switching between different image generation models without client code changes"],"best_for":["AI application developers building multi-tool agent systems","teams standardizing on MCP for tool orchestration","builders prototyping LLM workflows that require image synthesis"],"limitations":["Archived and unmaintained — no security updates or bug fixes since archival","No built-in rate limiting or quota management per model","Synchronous request handling only — long-running image generation may timeout","No caching layer for identical prompts across requests","Requires separate API credentials for each underlying image model"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom MCP client, or compatible tool)","Node.js runtime (TypeScript-based server)","API keys for at least one supported image generation service","Network connectivity to external image generation APIs"],"input_types":["text prompts (natural language descriptions)","structured parameters (size, style, model selection)"],"output_types":["image files (PNG, JPEG, WebP depending on model)","image URLs (if model returns remote URLs)","metadata (generation timestamp, model used, seed if applicable)"],"categories":["image-visual","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.schema.registration.for.image.generation","name":"mcp tool schema registration for image generation","description":"Registers image generation as a discoverable MCP tool by defining a JSON schema that describes input parameters (prompt, model, size, style options) and output structure. The server exposes this schema through MCP's tools/list endpoint, allowing MCP clients to dynamically discover available image generation parameters and constraints without hardcoding knowledge of the API. This enables clients to build dynamic UIs or validate requests before sending them to the server.","intents":["I want my MCP client to discover what image generation parameters are available without reading documentation","I need to validate user input against the server's image generation schema before making requests","I want to build a dynamic UI that adapts to the server's supported models and options","I need to understand the constraints (max prompt length, supported sizes) before sending a request"],"best_for":["MCP client developers building dynamic tool interfaces","teams implementing agent systems that need to discover tool capabilities at runtime","builders creating multi-model image generation frontends"],"limitations":["Schema is static and must be manually updated when underlying models change","No runtime capability detection — cannot query which models are currently available","Schema validation is client-side responsibility; server does not enforce schema at request time","No versioning mechanism for schema evolution"],"requires":["MCP protocol implementation (server-side)","JSON Schema knowledge for defining tool parameters","MCP client that supports tools/list endpoint"],"input_types":["JSON Schema definitions (parameter types, constraints, enums)"],"output_types":["MCP tools/list response with tool schema","JSON Schema object describing image generation parameters"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.model.agnostic.prompt.translation.and.routing","name":"model-agnostic prompt translation and routing","description":"Translates normalized image generation requests (generic prompt, size, style parameters) into model-specific API calls by maintaining adapter logic for each supported image generation service. When a client sends a request, the server maps generic parameters to the target model's API format (e.g., converting 'style: cinematic' to Stable Diffusion's LoRA syntax or DALL-E's style parameter), handles model-specific constraints (e.g., size restrictions), and routes the request to the appropriate API endpoint with correct authentication headers.","intents":["I want to send the same image generation request to multiple models without rewriting the prompt for each","I need to abstract model-specific parameter names and constraints behind a unified interface","I want to switch models without changing client code or prompt format","I need to handle model-specific limitations (e.g., max prompt length) transparently"],"best_for":["multi-model image generation platforms","teams evaluating different image generation services","builders creating model-agnostic image synthesis workflows"],"limitations":["Adapter logic must be manually maintained for each new model","Prompt translation is lossy — some model-specific features may not map cleanly","No automatic fallback if primary model fails; requires explicit client-side retry logic","Parameter normalization may not capture all model-specific capabilities","No cost optimization — cannot automatically route to cheapest model based on request"],"requires":["Adapter implementations for each target image generation model","API credentials for each supported model","Knowledge of each model's parameter names and constraints"],"input_types":["normalized image generation request (prompt, size, style, model selection)"],"output_types":["model-specific API request","generated image from target model"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.lifecycle.and.request.handling","name":"mcp server lifecycle and request handling","description":"Implements the MCP server lifecycle by initializing the protocol transport (stdio or HTTP), registering available tools, handling incoming tool calls from MCP clients, executing image generation requests, and returning results through the MCP response protocol. The server follows MCP's request-response pattern where clients send tool calls with parameters, the server processes them asynchronously (or synchronously depending on implementation), and returns structured responses with results or errors.","intents":["I want to run an image generation server that MCP clients can connect to and invoke","I need to handle multiple concurrent image generation requests from different MCP clients","I want to properly manage server startup, tool registration, and graceful shutdown","I need to return structured error responses when image generation fails"],"best_for":["developers deploying MCP servers for image generation","teams building multi-client agent systems","builders integrating image generation into larger MCP ecosystems"],"limitations":["Archived implementation may not follow current MCP specification versions","No built-in concurrency control — may overwhelm downstream image generation APIs","Error handling is basic; no retry logic or circuit breaker pattern","No request queuing or prioritization mechanism","Synchronous request handling may cause client timeouts for slow models"],"requires":["Node.js runtime","MCP SDK (TypeScript/JavaScript)","Transport configuration (stdio or HTTP endpoint)"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests with image generation parameters"],"output_types":["MCP tool result responses with generated images or error messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.authentication.and.credential.management.for.multiple.image.apis","name":"authentication and credential management for multiple image apis","description":"Manages API credentials for multiple image generation services (e.g., OpenAI, Stability AI, Replicate) by storing them securely (environment variables or config files) and injecting them into requests to the appropriate service. The server maintains a credential registry that maps model names to their required authentication headers or API keys, ensuring that requests to each service include correct credentials without exposing them in client requests or logs.","intents":["I want to use multiple image generation APIs without passing credentials through the MCP client","I need to rotate or update API keys without redeploying the server","I want to ensure credentials are not logged or exposed in error messages","I need to support different authentication schemes (API keys, OAuth tokens, bearer tokens) for different models"],"best_for":["multi-model image generation platforms","teams managing credentials across multiple AI services","builders deploying MCP servers in shared environments"],"limitations":["No built-in credential rotation or expiration handling","Credentials stored in environment variables are visible to all processes on the system","No audit logging of credential usage","No support for dynamic credential fetching from secret managers (e.g., AWS Secrets Manager)","Archived implementation may not follow current security best practices"],"requires":["Environment variables or config files with API credentials","Knowledge of each model's authentication scheme","Secure deployment environment (not shared with untrusted processes)"],"input_types":["API credentials (keys, tokens, bearer tokens)"],"output_types":["authenticated requests to image generation APIs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.image.generation.request.validation.and.constraint.enforcement","name":"image generation request validation and constraint enforcement","description":"Validates incoming image generation requests against model-specific constraints (e.g., prompt length limits, supported image sizes, valid style options) before sending them to the underlying API. The server checks parameters against a constraint registry for each model, returns detailed validation errors if constraints are violated, and may normalize parameters (e.g., rounding image dimensions to supported values) to improve request success rates.","intents":["I want to fail fast with clear error messages when a request violates model constraints","I need to prevent wasting API quota on requests that will fail due to invalid parameters","I want to understand what sizes, styles, and prompt lengths each model supports","I need to normalize parameters to match model requirements without manual client-side logic"],"best_for":["multi-model image generation platforms","teams optimizing API quota usage","builders creating user-friendly image generation interfaces"],"limitations":["Constraint registry must be manually maintained as models update their limits","No dynamic constraint discovery — constraints are hardcoded per model","Validation logic is basic; does not check semantic validity of prompts","No cost estimation based on request parameters","Parameter normalization may silently alter user intent (e.g., rounding dimensions)"],"requires":["Constraint definitions for each supported model","Validation logic for each constraint type"],"input_types":["image generation request with prompt, size, style, and other parameters"],"output_types":["validation result (pass/fail with error details) or normalized request"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.image.result.formatting.and.metadata.extraction","name":"image result formatting and metadata extraction","description":"Processes image generation responses from multiple models (which return images in different formats and structures) into a standardized format for MCP clients. The server extracts image data (URL or base64-encoded bytes), generation metadata (timestamp, model used, seed, prompt used), and error information, then formats them into a consistent MCP response structure. This enables clients to handle images uniformly regardless of which underlying model generated them.","intents":["I want to receive image generation results in a consistent format regardless of which model was used","I need to extract metadata (seed, model, timestamp) from generation responses","I want to handle both URL-based and base64-encoded image responses uniformly","I need to track which model generated each image for cost accounting or quality analysis"],"best_for":["multi-model image generation platforms","teams building image generation analytics or cost tracking","builders creating model-agnostic image generation clients"],"limitations":["Response format is model-specific; no standard image generation response schema across APIs","Metadata extraction is lossy — some models provide more information than others","Base64 encoding adds ~33% overhead for large images","No image optimization or compression — returns raw model output","Archived implementation may not handle newer model response formats"],"requires":["Knowledge of each model's response structure","Formatters for each supported model"],"input_types":["raw image generation API responses (URLs, base64 data, metadata objects)"],"output_types":["standardized MCP response with image data, metadata, and error information"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","image-visual"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-everart__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.handling.and.failure.reporting.through.mcp.protocol","name":"error handling and failure reporting through mcp protocol","description":"Catches errors from image generation APIs (rate limits, authentication failures, invalid parameters, service outages) and translates them into structured MCP error responses that clients can parse and handle programmatically. The server distinguishes between client errors (invalid parameters, authentication issues) and server errors (API outages, rate limits), provides actionable error messages, and may include retry guidance or fallback suggestions.","intents":["I want to understand why an image generation request failed and what to do about it","I need to distinguish between client errors (my fault) and server errors (service issue)","I want to implement retry logic based on error type (rate limit vs permanent failure)","I need to log errors for debugging without exposing sensitive information"],"best_for":["production image generation services","teams building resilient agent systems","builders implementing error recovery and retry logic"],"limitations":["Error messages from underlying APIs may be cryptic or unhelpful","No automatic retry logic — clients must implement their own","No circuit breaker pattern — will continue sending requests to failing services","Error categorization is basic; may not distinguish all error types","No error rate monitoring or alerting"],"requires":["Error handling logic for each supported model's API","Error categorization and mapping logic"],"input_types":["errors from image generation APIs"],"output_types":["structured MCP error responses with error code, message, and retry guidance"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop, custom MCP client, or compatible tool)","Node.js runtime (TypeScript-based server)","API keys for at least one supported image generation service","Network connectivity to external image generation APIs","MCP protocol implementation (server-side)","JSON Schema knowledge for defining tool parameters","MCP client that supports tools/list endpoint","Adapter implementations for each target image generation model","API credentials for each supported model","Knowledge of each model's parameter names and constraints"],"failure_modes":["Archived and unmaintained — no security updates or bug fixes since archival","No built-in rate limiting or quota management per model","Synchronous request handling only — long-running image generation may timeout","No caching layer for identical prompts across requests","Requires separate API credentials for each underlying image model","Schema is static and must be manually updated when underlying models change","No runtime capability detection — cannot query which models are currently available","Schema validation is client-side responsibility; server does not enforce schema at request time","No versioning mechanism for schema evolution","Adapter logic must be manually maintained for each new model","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.039Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:18.053Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=everart","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=everart"}},"signature":"mkgBV8D2ZvC+emmlAKGdZ7iuV5kYahZeRL2scwIJPoeSBJC3igFpj/3VX1l78bC8BmdRikQ0Ud3PsiYL5sDWBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T01:01:38.472Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/everart","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/everart","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=everart","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}