{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai","slug":"eclipse-ai","name":"Eclipse AI","type":"product","url":"https://eclipse-ai.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/eclipse-ai","categories":["data-analysis"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://customer.support.multi.source.feedback.aggregation","name":"multi-source feedback aggregation","description":"Consolidates customer feedback from multiple channels (surveys, support tickets, reviews, social media) into a unified data store. Eliminates manual data collection and normalization across disparate systems.","intents":["I want to see all customer feedback in one place instead of checking multiple tools","I need to stop manually copying feedback between systems","I want to understand patterns across all customer communication channels"],"best_for":["mid-market B2B SaaS companies","teams with multiple feedback channels","companies with established customer communication practices"],"limitations":["Requires integration setup and engineering time","Limited value if customer feedback volume is sparse","Data quality depends on source system data quality"],"requires":["Access to multiple feedback sources (surveys, support systems, review platforms, social media)","Engineering resources for initial integration and data normalization","Sufficient feedback volume to generate meaningful patterns"],"input_types":["survey responses","support tickets","product reviews","social media mentions","customer interviews"],"output_types":["unified feedback database","consolidated feedback records"],"categories":["customer-support","data-integration","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://customer.support.sentiment.analysis.and.polarity.detection","name":"sentiment analysis and polarity detection","description":"Automatically analyzes customer feedback to determine sentiment (positive, negative, neutral) and emotional tone. Surfaces negative sentiment patterns to identify at-risk customers and retention risks.","intents":["I want to quickly identify unhappy customers before they churn","I need to understand if sentiment is improving or declining over time","I want to flag high-priority negative feedback for immediate action"],"best_for":["customer success teams","retention-focused product managers","support teams managing escalations"],"limitations":["Sentiment analysis may struggle with sarcasm, context-dependent language, or domain-specific terminology","Requires sufficient feedback volume to identify meaningful patterns","May produce false positives/negatives without human review"],"requires":["Aggregated customer feedback text","Sufficient feedback volume for pattern detection","Human review process for validation"],"input_types":["customer feedback text","support tickets","survey responses","review text"],"output_types":["sentiment scores","polarity labels","sentiment trend reports","at-risk customer lists"],"categories":["customer-support","analytics","NLP"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_10","uri":"capability://analytics.competitive.feedback.benchmarking","name":"competitive feedback benchmarking","description":"Compares customer feedback sentiment and themes against industry benchmarks or competitor data (if available). Helps teams understand how their customer satisfaction compares to market standards.","intents":["I want to know how our customer satisfaction compares to competitors","I need to understand if our feedback patterns are typical for our industry","I want to identify areas where we're underperforming relative to peers"],"best_for":["competitive product teams","executive stakeholders","companies in competitive markets"],"limitations":["Requires access to benchmark data or competitor feedback","Competitor data may be limited or outdated","Industry benchmarks may not account for company-specific factors","Benchmarking data may not be available for all industries"],"requires":["Internal feedback analysis","Access to benchmark data or competitor feedback sources","Comparable metrics across sources"],"input_types":["internal sentiment scores","internal theme data","benchmark data","competitor feedback (if available)"],"output_types":["benchmark comparison reports","competitive positioning analysis","gap identification","performance rankings"],"categories":["analytics","competitive-intelligence","business-intelligence"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://analytics.theme.and.topic.extraction","name":"theme and topic extraction","description":"Automatically detects recurring themes, topics, and patterns across customer feedback using NLP. Groups similar feedback together to surface the most common customer concerns and feature requests.","intents":["I want to know what customers are talking about most frequently","I need to identify the top reasons customers are unhappy","I want to find common feature requests without reading every piece of feedback"],"best_for":["product managers","customer success leaders","product strategy teams"],"limitations":["Theme detection quality depends on feedback volume and diversity","May miss niche but important feedback signals","Requires domain knowledge to interpret themes correctly"],"requires":["Aggregated customer feedback","Sufficient feedback volume for statistical significance","Human interpretation and validation"],"input_types":["customer feedback text","support tickets","survey responses","review text"],"output_types":["theme clusters","topic tags","frequency rankings","theme distribution reports"],"categories":["analytics","NLP","customer-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://customer.support.retention.risk.identification","name":"retention risk identification","description":"Combines sentiment analysis, theme detection, and feedback patterns to automatically identify customers at high risk of churn. Flags specific risk indicators and provides context for intervention.","intents":["I want to know which customers are most likely to churn soon","I need to prioritize my customer success efforts on at-risk accounts","I want to understand why specific customers might leave"],"best_for":["customer success teams","account managers","retention-focused leaders"],"limitations":["Predictions are only as good as the feedback data provided","Requires sufficient historical feedback to build reliable patterns","Cannot account for external factors (market changes, competitor actions)"],"requires":["Historical customer feedback data","Sentiment and theme analysis results","Customer metadata (account tenure, usage patterns)","Sufficient feedback volume for pattern training"],"input_types":["analyzed feedback with sentiment scores","theme clusters","customer metadata"],"output_types":["risk scores","at-risk customer lists","risk factor breakdowns","intervention recommendations"],"categories":["customer-support","analytics","retention"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://analytics.cross.channel.pattern.discovery","name":"cross-channel pattern discovery","description":"Identifies patterns and correlations across feedback from different channels (e.g., support tickets mentioning the same issue as social media complaints). Reveals insights that single-channel analysis would miss.","intents":["I want to see how the same issue appears across different customer touchpoints","I need to understand if a problem is widespread or isolated to one channel","I want to connect support tickets to product reviews mentioning the same problem"],"best_for":["product teams","customer success leaders","cross-functional insight teams"],"limitations":["Requires data from multiple channels to be effective","Pattern correlation may be coincidental without proper statistical validation","Requires sufficient volume in each channel"],"requires":["Feedback aggregated from multiple sources","Sufficient volume in each channel","Normalized data across channels"],"input_types":["multi-channel feedback","theme clusters","sentiment data"],"output_types":["cross-channel correlation reports","pattern maps","issue severity rankings","channel-specific insights"],"categories":["analytics","customer-support","insights"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_5","uri":"capability://analytics.actionable.insight.generation","name":"actionable insight generation","description":"Transforms raw feedback analysis (sentiment, themes, patterns) into specific, prioritized recommendations for product, support, and success teams. Surfaces the most impactful actions to improve retention.","intents":["I want specific recommendations on what to fix based on customer feedback","I need to prioritize which issues to address first","I want to know which team should own each insight"],"best_for":["product managers","customer success leaders","executive stakeholders"],"limitations":["Recommendations are only as good as the underlying analysis","May require domain expertise to implement effectively","ROI depends on execution quality"],"requires":["Analyzed feedback with sentiment and themes","Risk identification results","Cross-channel patterns","Business context and constraints"],"input_types":["sentiment analysis results","theme clusters","risk scores","pattern data"],"output_types":["prioritized action lists","insight summaries","team-specific recommendations","impact projections"],"categories":["analytics","insights","business-intelligence"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_6","uri":"capability://analytics.feedback.trend.tracking","name":"feedback trend tracking","description":"Monitors how sentiment, themes, and customer concerns evolve over time. Tracks whether specific issues are improving or worsening and measures the impact of product changes on customer perception.","intents":["I want to see if customer satisfaction is improving over time","I need to measure if our product changes had a positive impact on feedback","I want to track whether a specific issue is getting better or worse"],"best_for":["product managers","customer success leaders","executives tracking retention metrics"],"limitations":["Requires historical feedback data to establish trends","Seasonal variations may obscure true trends","External factors may influence trends independently of product changes"],"requires":["Historical feedback data with timestamps","Consistent feedback volume over time","Analyzed sentiment and theme data"],"input_types":["time-series feedback data","sentiment scores with timestamps","theme frequency over time"],"output_types":["trend charts","sentiment trajectory reports","theme evolution graphs","impact analysis reports"],"categories":["analytics","business-intelligence","customer-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.feedback.to.action.workflow.automation","name":"feedback-to-action workflow automation","description":"Enables teams to create automated workflows that trigger actions based on feedback analysis (e.g., alert customer success when sentiment drops, create product tickets for high-frequency themes). Reduces manual response time.","intents":["I want to automatically alert my team when a customer shows churn risk","I need to create product tickets automatically from common feature requests","I want to trigger customer success outreach based on feedback patterns"],"best_for":["teams with mature feedback processes","companies with multiple tools in their stack","organizations seeking to reduce manual work"],"limitations":["Requires integration with downstream tools (ticketing, CRM, etc.)","Automation rules may need tuning to avoid false positives","Requires clear definition of trigger conditions"],"requires":["Analyzed feedback data","Integrations with downstream systems","Clear workflow rules and triggers","Proper validation to prevent alert fatigue"],"input_types":["sentiment scores","risk scores","theme data","customer metadata"],"output_types":["automated alerts","ticket creation","workflow triggers","action logs"],"categories":["automation","customer-support","workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_8","uri":"capability://analytics.team.specific.insight.dashboards","name":"team-specific insight dashboards","description":"Provides customized views of feedback insights tailored to different teams (product, support, success). Each team sees the metrics and insights most relevant to their role and responsibilities.","intents":["I want to see only the insights relevant to my team's work","I need a dashboard that shows metrics my team cares about","I want to share specific insights with my team without overwhelming them with data"],"best_for":["cross-functional teams","organizations with multiple stakeholders","teams needing role-specific views"],"limitations":["Requires configuration for each team","May fragment insights across teams if not properly coordinated","Customization requires understanding of each team's needs"],"requires":["Analyzed feedback data","Team structure and role definitions","Dashboard customization capabilities","User access controls"],"input_types":["sentiment analysis results","theme data","risk scores","trend data"],"output_types":["customized dashboards","role-specific reports","team-focused metrics","visualization views"],"categories":["analytics","business-intelligence","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_eclipse-ai__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.integration.feedback.data.integration.and.normalization","name":"feedback data integration and normalization","description":"Handles technical integration with multiple feedback sources and normalizes data formats for consistent analysis. Manages data mapping, deduplication, and quality assurance across disparate systems.","intents":["I want to connect my survey tool, support system, and review platform to one system","I need to clean up messy feedback data so analysis is accurate","I want to ensure data from different sources is comparable"],"best_for":["companies with multiple feedback tools","teams with engineering resources","organizations with data quality concerns"],"limitations":["Requires engineering time for initial setup","Integration complexity varies by source system","Ongoing maintenance needed as source systems change","Data normalization may lose some source-specific context"],"requires":["API access to feedback sources","Engineering resources for integration","Data mapping specifications","Ongoing maintenance capability"],"input_types":["API connections to feedback sources","data export files","database connections"],"output_types":["normalized feedback records","unified data schema","integration logs","data quality reports"],"categories":["data-integration","data-engineering","customer-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Access to multiple feedback sources (surveys, support systems, review platforms, social media)","Engineering resources for initial integration and data normalization","Sufficient feedback volume to generate meaningful patterns","Aggregated customer feedback text","Sufficient feedback volume for pattern detection","Human review process for validation","Internal feedback analysis","Access to benchmark data or competitor feedback sources","Comparable metrics across sources","Aggregated customer feedback"],"failure_modes":["Requires integration setup and engineering time","Limited value if customer feedback volume is sparse","Data quality depends on source system data quality","Sentiment analysis may struggle with sarcasm, context-dependent language, or domain-specific terminology","Requires sufficient feedback volume to identify meaningful patterns","May produce false positives/negatives without human review","Requires access to benchmark data or competitor feedback","Competitor data may be limited or outdated","Industry benchmarks may not account for company-specific factors","Benchmarking data may not be available for all industries","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.283Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.548Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=eclipse-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=eclipse-ai"}},"signature":"pVVq/shkZ/nPLVxQHZLwOPLLisGs9dJFDuffFOLPYflE/WrXIUskSYaxH1OJDAOoDgwy/hIVWCU/gGo94TqhCQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T14:20:53.576Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/eclipse-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/eclipse-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=eclipse-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}