{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","slug":"dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","name":"daily-arXiv-ai-enhanced","type":"webapp","url":"https://arxiv.dw-dengwei.cn","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","categories":["research-search"],"tags":["ai-tools","arxiv","llms","read-papers","research-tool"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.scheduled.arxiv.paper.crawling.with.category.filtering","name":"scheduled arxiv paper crawling with category filtering","description":"Automatically fetches the latest research papers from arXiv on a daily schedule using GitHub Actions, filtering by user-specified categories (e.g., cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.CL). The system queries arXiv's API with category-based search queries, extracts metadata (paper ID, title, authors, abstract, publication date), and stores raw results in JSONL format. Implements retry logic and rate-limiting to respect arXiv's API constraints while ensuring reliable daily collection.","intents":["I want to automatically collect the latest papers from specific arXiv categories every day without manual intervention","I need to filter papers by multiple arXiv categories and aggregate them into a single daily collection","I want to preserve raw paper metadata (title, authors, abstract, links) for downstream processing"],"best_for":["researchers monitoring specific arXiv categories daily","teams building research paper aggregation systems","developers creating custom paper discovery pipelines"],"limitations":["arXiv API has rate limits (~3 requests per second) — large category queries may timeout","Only fetches papers from arXiv; cannot crawl other preprint servers (bioRxiv, medRxiv, etc.)","Category filtering is limited to arXiv's predefined taxonomy; custom keyword search not supported","No deduplication across multiple runs — requires external logic to handle re-indexed papers"],"requires":["GitHub Actions workflow environment (free tier sufficient)","arXiv API access (no authentication required, but subject to rate limits)","Node.js 14+ or Python 3.8+ runtime"],"input_types":["arXiv category codes (string, e.g., 'cs.AI', 'cs.LG')","date range (optional, defaults to last 24 hours)"],"output_types":["JSONL (JSON Lines) file with one paper record per line","structured fields: arxiv_id, title, authors, abstract, categories, published_date, pdf_url"],"categories":["automation-workflow","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.llm.powered.structured.paper.summarization.with.multi.field.extraction","name":"llm-powered structured paper summarization with multi-field extraction","description":"Processes raw arXiv paper abstracts through an LLM (OpenAI GPT-4/3.5 or compatible API) to generate structured summaries with discrete fields: TLDR (one-liner), motivation, methodology, results, and conclusion. Uses prompt engineering with few-shot examples to ensure consistent JSON output structure. Implements batching and error handling to manage API costs and handle rate limits, storing enhanced results in JSONL format with original metadata preserved.","intents":["I want to automatically generate concise, structured summaries of research papers without reading full abstracts","I need paper summaries broken into specific sections (motivation, method, results) for easier scanning","I want to reduce API costs by batching multiple papers and reusing prompts across runs"],"best_for":["researchers building personalized paper digest systems","teams creating AI-powered literature review tools","developers prototyping LLM-based content enhancement pipelines"],"limitations":["LLM quality depends on model choice — GPT-3.5 may produce less accurate summaries than GPT-4, increasing hallucination risk","API costs scale linearly with paper volume (~$0.01-0.05 per paper depending on model and abstract length)","Requires valid API key with sufficient quota; no fallback to free models (e.g., Ollama) in current implementation","Structured output parsing assumes LLM returns valid JSON — malformed responses require manual retry","No caching of summaries — re-running on same papers incurs duplicate API costs"],"requires":["OpenAI API key (OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable)","API account with available credits (minimum ~$5-10 for daily runs)","Python 3.8+ with requests library for API calls"],"input_types":["JSONL file with paper metadata (title, abstract, authors)","LLM model name (string, e.g., 'gpt-4', 'gpt-3.5-turbo')","target language (string, e.g., 'English', 'Chinese')"],"output_types":["JSONL file with original metadata + new fields: tldr, motivation, method, result, conclusion","structured JSON objects with consistent schema across all papers"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_10","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.arxiv.metadata.extraction.and.normalization","name":"arxiv metadata extraction and normalization","description":"Parses arXiv API responses to extract and normalize paper metadata including arxiv_id, title, authors (as list), abstract, categories, published_date, and pdf_url. Handles variations in arXiv's response format (e.g., multiple author formats, category encoding) and normalizes data into consistent JSONL schema. Implements validation to ensure all required fields are present and correctly formatted, discarding malformed records. Preserves original metadata without modification, enabling downstream processing to add enhancements while maintaining data integrity.","intents":["I want to reliably extract paper metadata from arXiv API responses","I need normalized metadata in a consistent schema for downstream processing","I want to handle arXiv API response variations without manual data cleaning"],"best_for":["developers building arXiv data pipelines","teams processing large volumes of arXiv papers","researchers creating custom paper analysis systems"],"limitations":["arXiv API response format occasionally changes — updates may require code changes to handle new fields","Author names are extracted as-is from arXiv; no normalization for name variations (e.g., 'John Smith' vs 'J. Smith')","Abstract text may contain LaTeX formatting — no automatic conversion to plain text","Categories are stored as-is from arXiv; no mapping to higher-level category hierarchies"],"requires":["arXiv API access (no authentication required)","JSON parsing library (built-in to most languages)","schema validation logic (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["arXiv API JSON response"],"output_types":["normalized JSONL records with fields: arxiv_id, title, authors, abstract, categories, published_date, pdf_url"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multilingual.summary.generation.with.language.specific.prompting","name":"multilingual summary generation with language-specific prompting","description":"Generates paper summaries in multiple languages (primarily Chinese and English) by using language-specific prompt templates that instruct the LLM to produce output in the target language. The system maintains separate JSONL files per language (e.g., data/2025-06-09_AI_enhanced_Chinese.jsonl) and uses configurable language codes to control output. Implements language selection via repository variables, allowing users to customize which languages are generated without code changes.","intents":["I want paper summaries in Chinese to share with my Chinese-speaking research team","I need to generate summaries in multiple languages from a single arXiv crawl","I want to customize which languages are generated without modifying the codebase"],"best_for":["international research teams with multilingual members","organizations building region-specific paper digest services","developers creating localized research tools"],"limitations":["LLM translation quality varies by language pair — non-English summaries may lose nuance from original abstracts","Each additional language multiplies API costs (N languages = N times the base cost)","Only supports languages that the LLM model is trained on; no support for low-resource languages","Language-specific formatting (e.g., Chinese punctuation) depends on LLM's training data quality"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with sufficient quota for multiple language runs","Repository variables configured with language codes (e.g., LANGUAGES='English,Chinese')","LLM model that supports target languages (GPT-4/3.5 support 100+ languages)"],"input_types":["JSONL file with paper metadata and English abstracts","language code list (string array, e.g., ['en', 'zh', 'es'])"],"output_types":["multiple JSONL files, one per language, with language-specific summaries","markdown files organized by language and category"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.jsonl.to.markdown.conversion.with.category.based.organization.and.collapsible.sections","name":"jsonl to markdown conversion with category-based organization and collapsible sections","description":"Transforms JSONL files (raw and AI-enhanced) into human-readable markdown files organized by arXiv categories, with each paper rendered as a collapsible HTML details element. The conversion process reads JSONL records, groups papers by category, applies a markdown template (template.md) to format each paper's metadata and summary, and generates a single markdown file per day with a table of contents. Uses HTML details/summary tags for collapsible sections, enabling readers to expand papers of interest without scrolling through full content.","intents":["I want to browse daily papers organized by category in a readable markdown format","I need collapsible paper summaries so I can quickly scan titles and expand interesting ones","I want to generate static markdown files that can be hosted on GitHub Pages without a backend"],"best_for":["researchers publishing daily paper digests on GitHub Pages","teams creating static documentation sites for paper collections","developers building markdown-based knowledge bases"],"limitations":["Markdown rendering of HTML details tags varies across platforms — some markdown viewers don't support collapsible sections","Large files (1000+ papers) produce markdown files >5MB, causing slow GitHub Pages rendering","Category ordering is alphabetical; no support for custom category prioritization","No full-text search in generated markdown — users must rely on browser find or external search tools"],"requires":["JSONL input file with consistent schema (arxiv_id, title, authors, abstract, categories)","template.md file defining markdown layout for each paper","Node.js 14+ or Python 3.8+ for file processing"],"input_types":["JSONL file with paper records (raw or AI-enhanced)","markdown template file (template.md) with placeholder variables"],"output_types":["single markdown file (data/YYYY-MM-DD.md) with all papers organized by category","HTML-compatible markdown with collapsible details sections"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.github.actions.based.daily.orchestration.with.configurable.scheduling","name":"github actions-based daily orchestration with configurable scheduling","description":"Implements the entire pipeline (crawl → enhance → convert) as a GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/run.yml) triggered on a daily schedule using cron syntax. The workflow runs in a containerized environment, executes shell scripts (run.sh) to invoke Python/Node.js processing steps, and commits results back to the repository. Configuration is managed through GitHub repository secrets (API keys) and variables (categories, languages, models), enabling users to customize behavior without forking or modifying code.","intents":["I want a fully automated daily paper collection and summarization pipeline that requires zero manual intervention","I need to customize which arXiv categories, languages, and LLM models are used without editing code","I want results automatically committed to my repository so they're version-controlled and accessible via GitHub Pages"],"best_for":["individual researchers maintaining personal paper digest repositories","open-source projects publishing daily research summaries","teams using GitHub as their primary collaboration platform"],"limitations":["GitHub Actions free tier allows 2,000 minutes/month — daily runs consume ~30 minutes/month, but large paper volumes may exceed limits","Workflow execution time is non-deterministic (5-30 minutes depending on arXiv API latency and LLM response time)","No built-in error notifications — failures are only visible in GitHub Actions logs, requiring manual monitoring","Secrets are scoped to repository; sharing workflows across organizations requires duplicating secrets","Cron scheduling is UTC-based; no timezone customization without additional logic"],"requires":["GitHub repository with Actions enabled (free tier sufficient)","OpenAI API key stored as repository secret (OPENAI_API_KEY)","Repository variables configured: ARXIV_CATEGORIES, TARGET_LANGUAGES, LLM_MODEL","Write permissions to repository for committing results"],"input_types":["cron schedule expression (string, e.g., '0 9 * * *' for daily at 9 AM UTC)","repository secrets and variables (key-value pairs)"],"output_types":["JSONL files committed to data/ directory","markdown files committed to data/ directory","GitHub Actions logs with execution details"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.configurable.arxiv.category.filtering.with.multi.category.support","name":"configurable arxiv category filtering with multi-category support","description":"Allows users to specify which arXiv categories to crawl through repository variables (e.g., ARXIV_CATEGORIES='cs.AI,cs.LG,cs.CL'). The system parses the category list and constructs arXiv API queries that fetch papers from all specified categories in a single daily run. Supports both single-category and multi-category configurations, enabling users to create custom paper collections without code changes. Categories are stored as comma-separated strings in repository variables, making them easily editable via GitHub UI.","intents":["I want to monitor only specific arXiv categories (e.g., AI, ML, NLP) relevant to my research","I need to customize which categories are included without modifying the codebase","I want to aggregate papers from multiple categories into a single daily digest"],"best_for":["researchers with focused research interests in specific arXiv categories","teams managing category-specific paper digests for different departments","developers building customizable paper aggregation systems"],"limitations":["arXiv category taxonomy is fixed — users cannot create custom categories or cross-category searches","Large category selections (e.g., all cs.* categories) may return 100+ papers daily, increasing processing time and API costs","No support for keyword-based filtering within categories — only category-level granularity","Category names are case-sensitive and must match arXiv's official taxonomy exactly"],"requires":["knowledge of arXiv category codes (e.g., 'cs.AI', 'cs.LG', 'stat.ML')","repository variable ARXIV_CATEGORIES configured with comma-separated category codes","arXiv API access (no authentication required)"],"input_types":["comma-separated string of arXiv category codes (e.g., 'cs.AI,cs.LG,cs.CL')"],"output_types":["JSONL file with papers from all specified categories","papers tagged with their original arXiv categories for downstream filtering"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.incremental.data.archival.with.date.based.file.organization","name":"incremental data archival with date-based file organization","description":"Automatically organizes all crawled and enhanced papers into date-stamped files (data/YYYY-MM-DD.jsonl, data/YYYY-MM-DD_AI_enhanced_LANGUAGE.jsonl, data/YYYY-MM-DD.md) committed to the repository. Each day's run creates a new set of files, creating a historical archive of papers and summaries. The system preserves all previous days' data, enabling users to browse historical digests and track how paper topics evolve over time. Files are committed to git with descriptive messages, maintaining full version history.","intents":["I want to maintain a historical archive of daily paper collections for future reference","I need to browse papers from previous days without re-running the pipeline","I want version control of all paper metadata and summaries for reproducibility"],"best_for":["researchers building long-term paper archives","teams analyzing research trends over months or years","developers creating searchable paper history systems"],"limitations":["Repository size grows linearly with days of operation (~1-5MB per day depending on paper volume), potentially exceeding GitHub's free tier limits after 1-2 years","No automatic cleanup or archival — old files accumulate indefinitely unless manually pruned","Date-based organization assumes consistent daily runs; skipped days create gaps in the archive","No deduplication across days — papers that appear in multiple categories or re-indexed papers create duplicates"],"requires":["git repository with write permissions","sufficient repository storage quota (GitHub free tier: 1GB soft limit)","consistent daily execution (gaps in schedule create archive gaps)"],"input_types":["JSONL files from daily crawl and enhancement steps","markdown files from conversion step"],"output_types":["date-stamped JSONL files (data/YYYY-MM-DD.jsonl, data/YYYY-MM-DD_AI_enhanced_LANGUAGE.jsonl)","date-stamped markdown files (data/YYYY-MM-DD.md)","git commits with descriptive messages"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.template.based.markdown.rendering.with.customizable.paper.layout","name":"template-based markdown rendering with customizable paper layout","description":"Uses a configurable markdown template (template.md) to define how each paper is rendered in the final markdown output. The template contains placeholder variables (e.g., {{title}}, {{authors}}, {{tldr}}, {{method}}) that are replaced with actual paper data during conversion. Users can customize the template to change paper layout, add custom fields, or modify formatting without changing the core pipeline. The system applies the template to each paper record, enabling consistent formatting across all papers.","intents":["I want to customize how papers are displayed in the markdown output (e.g., add custom fields, change formatting)","I need to change the paper layout without modifying the conversion code","I want to add custom metadata or links to each paper in the output"],"best_for":["teams customizing paper digest layouts for specific audiences","developers building template-driven content generation systems","researchers adding custom fields or metadata to paper summaries"],"limitations":["Template syntax is simple string replacement — no conditional logic or loops (e.g., cannot iterate over multiple authors without custom code)","Changes to template require repository commit; no runtime template updates without code changes","Template variables must exactly match field names in JSONL data — mismatches result in empty placeholders","No validation of template syntax — invalid templates produce malformed markdown without error messages"],"requires":["template.md file in repository root with placeholder variables","JSONL input with fields matching template placeholders","understanding of markdown syntax and template variable naming"],"input_types":["template.md file with {{variable}} placeholders","JSONL file with paper records containing template variables"],"output_types":["markdown file with papers rendered according to template","consistent formatting across all papers based on template layout"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.github.pages.static.site.hosting.with.automatic.markdown.publication","name":"github pages static site hosting with automatic markdown publication","description":"Automatically publishes generated markdown files to GitHub Pages by committing them to the repository, enabling public browsing of paper digests without additional hosting infrastructure. The system commits markdown files to the data/ directory, which GitHub Pages serves as static content. Users can access papers via a simple URL (e.g., arxiv.dw-dengwei.cn) pointing to the GitHub Pages site. No backend server or database required — all content is static markdown rendered by GitHub's built-in markdown viewer.","intents":["I want to publish daily paper digests publicly without setting up a web server","I need a simple URL to share paper collections with colleagues","I want to leverage GitHub Pages for free static hosting of paper archives"],"best_for":["individual researchers publishing personal paper digests","open-source projects sharing research summaries with communities","teams using GitHub as their primary collaboration platform"],"limitations":["GitHub Pages has a soft limit of 1GB per repository — large archives (1000+ days) may exceed limits","No search functionality in GitHub Pages markdown viewer — users must rely on browser find or external search tools","Custom domain setup requires DNS configuration and GitHub Pages premium features","Markdown rendering is GitHub-flavored markdown (GFM) — some advanced markdown features may not render correctly","No analytics or usage tracking — cannot measure reader engagement"],"requires":["GitHub repository with GitHub Pages enabled","custom domain (optional, but recommended for professional appearance)","DNS configuration for custom domain (if using custom domain)"],"input_types":["markdown files committed to repository"],"output_types":["publicly accessible GitHub Pages site with markdown content","static HTML rendered from markdown by GitHub"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.batch.api.request.handling.with.cost.optimization","name":"batch api request handling with cost optimization","description":"Processes multiple papers in batches when calling the LLM API, grouping requests to reduce overhead and manage costs. The system accumulates paper records and sends them to the LLM in batches (e.g., 10 papers per batch) rather than one-at-a-time, reducing the number of API calls and associated costs. Implements error handling for partial batch failures, allowing the system to retry failed papers without re-processing successful ones. Tracks API usage and costs, enabling users to monitor spending.","intents":["I want to reduce API costs by batching multiple papers in single LLM calls","I need to handle API failures gracefully without losing progress on successful papers","I want to monitor API usage and costs to stay within budget"],"best_for":["teams managing large-scale paper summarization with budget constraints","developers optimizing LLM API costs in production systems","researchers running daily digests with 50+ papers"],"limitations":["Batch size is fixed in code — no runtime configuration for batch size adjustment","Error handling is basic — partial batch failures may require manual retry","No cost estimation before running — users discover overspending after the fact","Batching increases per-request token count, potentially hitting token limits for large batches"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with sufficient quota","batch size configuration in code (typically 10-20 papers per batch)","error handling logic for failed requests"],"input_types":["JSONL file with paper records","batch size (integer, e.g., 10)"],"output_types":["JSONL file with enhanced summaries","cost tracking logs (optional)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":37,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub Actions workflow environment (free tier sufficient)","arXiv API access (no authentication required, but subject to rate limits)","Node.js 14+ or Python 3.8+ runtime","OpenAI API key (OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable)","API account with available credits (minimum ~$5-10 for daily runs)","Python 3.8+ with requests library for API calls","arXiv API access (no authentication required)","JSON parsing library (built-in to most languages)","schema validation logic (optional but recommended)","OpenAI API key with sufficient quota for multiple language runs"],"failure_modes":["arXiv API has rate limits (~3 requests per second) — large category queries may timeout","Only fetches papers from arXiv; cannot crawl other preprint servers (bioRxiv, medRxiv, etc.)","Category filtering is limited to arXiv's predefined taxonomy; custom keyword search not supported","No deduplication across multiple runs — requires external logic to handle re-indexed papers","LLM quality depends on model choice — GPT-3.5 may produce less accurate summaries than GPT-4, increasing hallucination risk","API costs scale linearly with paper volume (~$0.01-0.05 per paper depending on model and abstract length)","Requires valid API key with sufficient quota; no fallback to free models (e.g., Ollama) in current implementation","Structured output parsing assumes LLM returns valid JSON — malformed responses require manual retry","No caching of summaries — re-running on same papers incurs duplicate API costs","arXiv API response format occasionally changes — updates may require code changes to handle new fields","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.28238654587175205,"quality":0.47,"ecosystem":0.55,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.550Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:57:16.561Z","last_commit":"2026-05-03T05:38:32Z"},"community":{"stars":2686,"forks":950,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced"}},"signature":"N0eknk+sUsAuu3GAElui9Q4yCVVPaJtAuWKW4wqq+Swhnw8/ZtC6nqabFN1pmwZE7vX7CR4IgO38UASI2aW2AQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T15:29:37.946Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=dw-dengwei--daily-arxiv-ai-enhanced","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}