{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt","slug":"dsxiangli--decryptprompt","name":"DecryptPrompt","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/DSXiangLi/DecryptPrompt","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/dsxiangli--decryptprompt","categories":["prompt-engineering"],"tags":["aigc","chain-of-thought","chatgpt","demonstration","few-shot-learning","in-context-learning","instruction-tuning","llm","llm-agent","papers","prompt","prompt-engineering","prompt-tuning","zero-shot-learning"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_0","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.organized.research.paper.aggregation.and.topic.based.indexing","name":"organized research paper aggregation and topic-based indexing","description":"Aggregates peer-reviewed LLM research papers from arXiv, conferences, and preprint servers, organizing them into a hierarchical taxonomy covering 20+ research areas (RLHF, CoT, RAG, agents, alignment, etc.). Uses a curated folder structure with PDF storage and README-based indexing to enable semantic navigation across interconnected topics like chain-of-thought reasoning, instruction tuning, and multi-agent systems without requiring a database backend.","intents":["Find all papers on a specific LLM technique like RLHF or prompt engineering without searching multiple venues","Understand the research landscape across related topics (e.g., how agent planning relates to tool use)","Build a local, offline reference library of LLM research organized by research area"],"best_for":["ML researchers building on LLM foundations","LLM engineers evaluating state-of-the-art techniques","Teams documenting internal knowledge bases on prompt engineering"],"limitations":["Manual curation required — no automated paper discovery or real-time updates from arXiv","Taxonomy is fixed and requires repository maintenance to add new research areas","No full-text search across PDFs — navigation relies on folder structure and README metadata"],"requires":["Git client to clone repository","PDF reader for accessing paper files","Basic familiarity with LLM research terminology"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","topic queries (text-based navigation)"],"output_types":["curated paper lists (markdown)","topic-organized file structure","cross-referenced research summaries"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","research-curation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.engineering.technique.documentation.and.pattern.library","name":"prompt engineering technique documentation and pattern library","description":"Maintains a curated collection of prompting methodologies including chain-of-thought (CoT), few-shot learning, zero-shot learning, in-context learning, and instruction tuning, with associated research papers and implementation patterns. Organizes prompting techniques into discrete categories with explanations of when and how to apply each approach, enabling practitioners to understand the theoretical foundations and empirical trade-offs between techniques.","intents":["Learn the difference between few-shot, zero-shot, and in-context learning and when to use each","Understand chain-of-thought reasoning and how to structure prompts for step-by-step problem solving","Find research papers validating specific prompting techniques for particular task types"],"best_for":["Prompt engineers optimizing LLM outputs for specific tasks","ML practitioners new to LLM-based development","Teams standardizing prompt engineering practices across projects"],"limitations":["Documentation is static — does not include interactive prompt testing or evaluation tools","No empirical benchmarking of techniques across different LLM models or task domains","Techniques are described at a conceptual level without code examples or implementation templates"],"requires":["Understanding of LLM fundamentals (tokens, context windows, temperature)","Familiarity with at least one LLM API (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"],"input_types":["text (technique queries)","research papers (PDF)"],"output_types":["technique descriptions (markdown)","research paper references","conceptual explanations"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_10","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.blog.series.and.educational.content.on.llm.concepts.and.techniques","name":"blog series and educational content on llm concepts and techniques","description":"Maintains a series of 51+ educational blog posts explaining LLM concepts, techniques, and research findings in accessible language. Covers topics from fundamentals (tokenization, attention mechanisms) to advanced techniques (RLHF, multi-agent systems), with explanations designed for practitioners and researchers new to specific areas. Blog posts serve as entry points to deeper research papers and provide conceptual foundations for understanding complex LLM methodologies.","intents":["Learn LLM fundamentals and advanced concepts through accessible explanations","Understand the intuition behind complex techniques before diving into research papers","Find curated learning paths for specific LLM topics or application areas"],"best_for":["Practitioners new to LLM development seeking conceptual foundations","Teams onboarding new members to LLM-based projects","Researchers exploring new areas of LLM research"],"limitations":["Blog content is static — does not include interactive examples or hands-on code tutorials","No assessment or validation of learning outcomes","Limited coverage of implementation details and production considerations"],"requires":["Basic understanding of machine learning concepts","Familiarity with Python or similar programming language","Access to blog posts (typically via GitHub or web)"],"input_types":["text (blog posts)"],"output_types":["educational explanations (markdown)","concept summaries","links to research papers"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_11","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.post.training.methodology.and.inference.time.optimization.research.documentation","name":"post-training methodology and inference-time optimization research documentation","description":"Catalogs research on post-training techniques including SFT vs. RL trade-offs, test-time scaling, reasoning enhancement through inference-time computation, and optimization strategies for improving model performance after pre-training. Documents how different post-training approaches (supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, constitutional AI) affect model capabilities and generalization, with papers on inference-time scaling that show how additional computation at inference time can improve reasoning quality.","intents":["Understand the trade-offs between supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning for post-training","Learn how test-time scaling and inference-time computation can improve model reasoning","Find research on optimizing post-training strategies for specific task types or model sizes"],"best_for":["ML engineers designing post-training pipelines for LLMs","Teams optimizing inference-time computation for reasoning tasks","Researchers studying training methodology and generalization in LLMs"],"limitations":["Documentation is research-focused — lacks practical guidance on post-training infrastructure and scaling","No benchmarks comparing post-training approaches across different model sizes or task types","Limited coverage of post-training cost-benefit analysis and resource requirements"],"requires":["Understanding of LLM training pipelines and fine-tuning","Familiarity with reinforcement learning concepts","Knowledge of inference-time computation and resource constraints"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (post-training methodology queries)"],"output_types":["post-training methodology descriptions (markdown)","inference-time optimization strategies","research paper references"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.llm.agent.paradigm.and.tool.use.pattern.documentation","name":"llm agent paradigm and tool-use pattern documentation","description":"Catalogs research on LLM agents including tool-augmented LLMs, agent planning and reasoning, multi-agent systems, and agent-environment interaction patterns. Documents how agents decompose tasks, select tools, handle failures, and coordinate with other agents, with references to foundational papers on ReAct, chain-of-thought agents, and tool-use frameworks that enable LLMs to interact with external APIs and knowledge sources.","intents":["Understand how to design agents that can use tools and APIs to accomplish complex tasks","Learn patterns for multi-agent coordination and communication","Find research on agent planning strategies and failure recovery mechanisms"],"best_for":["Developers building LLM-powered agents and autonomous systems","Teams designing multi-agent workflows for complex problem solving","Researchers exploring agent architectures and reasoning patterns"],"limitations":["Documentation focuses on research patterns rather than production deployment considerations (scaling, monitoring, cost)","No reference implementations or code templates for agent frameworks","Limited coverage of agent safety, alignment, and failure modes in production environments"],"requires":["Understanding of LLM capabilities and limitations","Familiarity with function calling / tool-use APIs","Knowledge of task decomposition and planning concepts"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (agent pattern queries)"],"output_types":["agent architecture descriptions (markdown)","tool-use pattern explanations","research paper references"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.retrieval.augmented.generation.rag.and.knowledge.integration.research.collection","name":"retrieval-augmented generation (rag) and knowledge integration research collection","description":"Aggregates research on RAG systems, document retrieval methods, knowledge base augmentation, and table/chart understanding, documenting how LLMs can be enhanced with external knowledge sources. Covers retrieval strategies (dense retrieval, sparse retrieval, hybrid), knowledge base construction, and integration patterns that enable LLMs to ground responses in factual information and reduce hallucination through knowledge-augmented inference.","intents":["Understand how to build RAG systems that retrieve and integrate external knowledge into LLM responses","Learn retrieval strategies and their trade-offs (dense vs. sparse, BM25 vs. semantic similarity)","Find research on reducing hallucination through knowledge grounding and fact verification"],"best_for":["Teams building knowledge-grounded LLM applications (QA systems, document analysis)","Developers implementing RAG pipelines with vector databases and retrievers","Researchers optimizing retrieval quality and knowledge integration strategies"],"limitations":["Documentation is research-focused — lacks practical guidance on vector database selection, indexing strategies, or production scaling","No benchmarks comparing retrieval methods across different knowledge domains or document types","Limited coverage of retrieval failure modes (irrelevant results, missing context) and mitigation strategies"],"requires":["Understanding of information retrieval concepts (ranking, relevance, recall)","Familiarity with embedding models and vector similarity","Knowledge of LLM context window limitations and token budgets"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (RAG pattern queries)"],"output_types":["RAG architecture descriptions (markdown)","retrieval strategy explanations","knowledge integration patterns"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.llm.alignment.and.rlhf.technique.research.documentation","name":"llm alignment and rlhf technique research documentation","description":"Catalogs research on alignment techniques including RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback), constitutional AI, preference modeling, self-critique mechanisms, and LLM critics. Documents the alignment pipeline from supervised fine-tuning (SFT) through reward modeling and RL training, with papers on how to make LLMs more helpful, harmless, and honest through preference optimization and principle-driven alignment approaches.","intents":["Understand the RLHF pipeline and how to implement preference-based training for LLMs","Learn about constitutional AI and principle-driven alignment approaches","Find research on self-critique and critic models for improving LLM reliability and reducing harmful outputs"],"best_for":["ML engineers fine-tuning LLMs with preference data","Teams implementing alignment techniques for safety-critical applications","Researchers studying LLM training methodologies and preference optimization"],"limitations":["Documentation covers research approaches but lacks practical implementation guides for RLHF infrastructure","No guidance on collecting and labeling preference data at scale or managing annotation quality","Limited coverage of alignment trade-offs (e.g., how RLHF may reduce model capability on certain tasks)"],"requires":["Understanding of reinforcement learning fundamentals","Familiarity with LLM training pipelines and fine-tuning","Knowledge of reward modeling and preference learning concepts"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (alignment technique queries)"],"output_types":["alignment pipeline descriptions (markdown)","technique explanations","research paper references"],"categories":["safety-moderation","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.chain.of.thought.reasoning.and.step.by.step.inference.research.collection","name":"chain-of-thought reasoning and step-by-step inference research collection","description":"Aggregates research on chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, implicit vs. explicit reasoning, test-time scaling, and reasoning enhancement techniques that enable LLMs to solve complex problems through step-by-step inference. Documents how CoT improves performance on reasoning tasks, the relationship between reasoning depth and accuracy, and techniques for eliciting and verifying intermediate reasoning steps.","intents":["Understand how chain-of-thought prompting improves LLM reasoning on complex tasks","Learn the difference between explicit step-by-step reasoning and implicit reasoning patterns","Find research on test-time scaling and how to optimize inference-time computation for better reasoning"],"best_for":["Developers building reasoning-intensive applications (math, logic, code generation)","Researchers studying LLM reasoning capabilities and limitations","Teams optimizing LLM outputs for tasks requiring multi-step problem solving"],"limitations":["Documentation is research-focused — lacks practical guidance on prompt engineering for specific reasoning tasks","No benchmarks comparing CoT effectiveness across different task types or LLM models","Limited coverage of failure modes (incorrect intermediate steps, reasoning loops) and mitigation strategies"],"requires":["Understanding of LLM capabilities and reasoning limitations","Familiarity with prompt engineering concepts","Knowledge of task-specific reasoning patterns (math, logic, code)"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (reasoning technique queries)"],"output_types":["CoT technique descriptions (markdown)","reasoning pattern explanations","research paper references"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.instruction.tuning.and.supervised.fine.tuning.research.documentation","name":"instruction tuning and supervised fine-tuning research documentation","description":"Catalogs research on instruction tuning, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and how to adapt pre-trained LLMs to follow instructions and perform specific tasks. Documents the relationship between instruction tuning and in-context learning, the role of instruction diversity in generalization, and techniques for constructing high-quality instruction datasets that improve model performance across diverse downstream tasks.","intents":["Understand how instruction tuning improves LLM instruction-following capabilities","Learn how to construct instruction datasets and evaluate instruction-tuned models","Find research on the relationship between instruction diversity and model generalization"],"best_for":["ML engineers fine-tuning LLMs for specific domains or task types","Teams building instruction-following models for specialized applications","Researchers studying transfer learning and generalization in LLMs"],"limitations":["Documentation covers research approaches but lacks practical guidance on dataset construction and quality control","No benchmarks comparing instruction tuning effectiveness across different model sizes or architectures","Limited coverage of instruction tuning trade-offs (e.g., how specialization may reduce general capability)"],"requires":["Understanding of supervised fine-tuning and transfer learning","Familiarity with LLM training pipelines","Knowledge of instruction dataset design and evaluation metrics"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (instruction tuning queries)"],"output_types":["instruction tuning methodology descriptions (markdown)","dataset construction guidelines","research paper references"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_7","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.open.source.llm.model.and.framework.ecosystem.reference","name":"open-source llm model and framework ecosystem reference","description":"Maintains a curated index of open-source LLM models (LLaMA, Mistral, Qwen, etc.), inference frameworks (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, etc.), fine-tuning tools (LoRA, QLoRA, etc.), and evaluation leaderboards (MMLU, HumanEval, etc.). Provides links to model repositories, framework documentation, and evaluation benchmarks, enabling practitioners to navigate the rapidly evolving open-source LLM ecosystem and make informed decisions about model selection and deployment.","intents":["Find and compare open-source LLM models by size, capability, and license","Discover inference frameworks and fine-tuning tools for specific use cases","Access evaluation leaderboards and benchmarks for assessing model quality"],"best_for":["Teams building LLM applications with open-source models","Developers evaluating inference frameworks and deployment options","Researchers comparing model capabilities across benchmarks"],"limitations":["Index is manually curated — may lag behind rapid releases of new models and frameworks","No automated benchmarking or performance comparison across frameworks","Limited guidance on model selection criteria or deployment trade-offs (latency, throughput, cost)"],"requires":["Familiarity with LLM model architectures and capabilities","Understanding of inference framework trade-offs (speed, memory, compatibility)","Knowledge of evaluation metrics and benchmark interpretation"],"input_types":["text (model/framework queries)","structured data (model metadata)"],"output_types":["curated model lists (markdown)","framework comparisons","leaderboard links"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_8","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.domain.specific.llm.adaptation.and.specialization.research.documentation","name":"domain-specific llm adaptation and specialization research documentation","description":"Catalogs research on domain-specific LLM variants (biomedical, legal, code, etc.), domain adaptation techniques, and how to specialize pre-trained models for specific industries or knowledge domains. Documents approaches for incorporating domain knowledge through continued pre-training, instruction tuning on domain data, and retrieval-augmented generation with domain-specific knowledge bases.","intents":["Understand how to adapt LLMs for specialized domains (medicine, law, finance, code)","Learn techniques for incorporating domain knowledge into LLM training and inference","Find research on domain-specific evaluation metrics and benchmarks"],"best_for":["Teams building LLM applications for regulated industries (healthcare, finance, legal)","Developers specializing LLMs for technical domains (code, mathematics, science)","Researchers studying domain adaptation and transfer learning in LLMs"],"limitations":["Documentation is research-focused — lacks practical guidance on domain data collection and quality control","No benchmarks comparing domain adaptation techniques across different domains","Limited coverage of domain-specific safety and compliance considerations"],"requires":["Understanding of domain-specific knowledge and terminology","Familiarity with LLM fine-tuning and adaptation techniques","Knowledge of domain-specific evaluation metrics and benchmarks"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (domain adaptation queries)"],"output_types":["domain adaptation methodology descriptions (markdown)","domain-specific model references","research paper references"],"categories":["text-generation-language","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-dsxiangli--decryptprompt__cap_9","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.llm.reliability.hallucination.reduction.and.interpretability.research.collection","name":"llm reliability, hallucination reduction, and interpretability research collection","description":"Aggregates research on improving LLM reliability through hallucination reduction, fact verification, interpretable reasoning, refusal capabilities, and evaluation frameworks. Documents techniques for detecting and mitigating hallucinations (knowledge grounding, self-verification), making LLM reasoning more interpretable, and building guardrails that enable models to refuse unsafe or out-of-scope requests.","intents":["Understand techniques for reducing hallucination and improving factual accuracy in LLM outputs","Learn how to make LLM reasoning more interpretable and verifiable","Find research on building guardrails and refusal capabilities for safety-critical applications"],"best_for":["Teams building production LLM applications requiring high reliability","Developers implementing fact-checking and verification systems","Researchers studying LLM trustworthiness and interpretability"],"limitations":["Documentation is research-focused — lacks practical guidance on implementing hallucination detection in production","No benchmarks comparing hallucination reduction techniques across different task types","Limited coverage of trade-offs between refusal capabilities and model utility"],"requires":["Understanding of LLM limitations and failure modes","Familiarity with fact verification and knowledge grounding techniques","Knowledge of interpretability and explainability concepts"],"input_types":["research papers (PDF)","text (reliability/hallucination queries)"],"output_types":["reliability technique descriptions (markdown)","hallucination mitigation strategies","research paper references"],"categories":["safety-moderation","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Git client to clone repository","PDF reader for accessing paper files","Basic familiarity with LLM research terminology","Understanding of LLM fundamentals (tokens, context windows, temperature)","Familiarity with at least one LLM API (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Basic understanding of machine learning concepts","Familiarity with Python or similar programming language","Access to blog posts (typically via GitHub or web)","Understanding of LLM training pipelines and fine-tuning","Familiarity with reinforcement learning concepts"],"failure_modes":["Manual curation required — no automated paper discovery or real-time updates from arXiv","Taxonomy is fixed and requires repository maintenance to add new research areas","No full-text search across PDFs — navigation relies on folder structure and README metadata","Documentation is static — does not include interactive prompt testing or evaluation tools","No empirical benchmarking of techniques across different LLM models or task domains","Techniques are described at a conceptual level without code examples or implementation templates","Blog content is static — does not include interactive examples or hands-on code tutorials","No assessment or validation of learning outcomes","Limited coverage of implementation details and production considerations","Documentation is research-focused — lacks practical guidance on post-training infrastructure and scaling","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.5476922809091594,"quality":0.34,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.550Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:57:11.504Z","last_commit":"2026-04-10T01:00:15Z"},"community":{"stars":3406,"forks":321,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=dsxiangli--decryptprompt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=dsxiangli--decryptprompt"}},"signature":"v/0k4xdJkgjKRLWrGhr3Wb0MzcEg6VR1KbzPC5CgKWIf3ZxuMYyLHqIzITpoH8IrAPElWRAf0awefztIWQY1Aw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T06:25:02.739Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/dsxiangli--decryptprompt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/dsxiangli--decryptprompt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=dsxiangli--decryptprompt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}