{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","slug":"deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","name":"DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/deepseek~deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","categories":["chatbots-assistants"],"tags":["deepseek","api-access","text"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$2.90e-7 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.chain.of.thought.reasoning.with.distilled.inference","name":"chain-of-thought reasoning with distilled inference","description":"Implements DeepSeek R1's chain-of-thought reasoning capability distilled into a 32B parameter model, enabling step-by-step problem decomposition and multi-step logical inference without the computational overhead of the full R1 model. Uses knowledge distillation from R1's reasoning outputs to train Qwen 2.5 32B, allowing the model to produce explicit reasoning traces before final answers while maintaining inference efficiency suitable for production deployments.","intents":["I need a model that can solve complex math and logic problems with transparent reasoning steps","I want to use chain-of-thought reasoning in production without the latency of o1-class models","I need to debug model reasoning by seeing intermediate thought processes"],"best_for":["teams building reasoning-heavy applications (math tutoring, code analysis, logical problem-solving)","developers needing interpretable AI decisions with cost-efficiency","organizations migrating from o1-mini seeking performance parity at lower cost"],"limitations":["Reasoning traces are generated sequentially, adding 2-5x latency compared to direct-answer models","Distilled reasoning may lose some nuance from full R1 model on extremely complex multi-domain problems","Token consumption increases significantly due to explicit reasoning output (typically 3-8x more tokens than direct answers)"],"requires":["API access to OpenRouter or compatible inference endpoint","Support for streaming or non-streaming text generation","Sufficient context window (model supports 128K tokens)"],"input_types":["natural language text","mathematical expressions","code snippets","logical puzzles"],"output_types":["text with reasoning traces","structured reasoning steps","final answer with justification"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multi.domain.knowledge.synthesis.and.problem.solving","name":"multi-domain knowledge synthesis and problem-solving","description":"Leverages Qwen 2.5 32B's broad training corpus combined with R1 distillation to synthesize knowledge across mathematics, coding, science, and humanities domains. The model applies reasoning patterns learned from R1 to diverse problem types, using attention mechanisms trained on multi-domain reasoning examples to identify relevant knowledge and apply appropriate solution strategies.","intents":["I need a single model that can handle math, coding, and domain-specific questions with equal competence","I want to solve problems that require cross-domain knowledge integration","I need a general-purpose reasoning model that doesn't require domain-specific fine-tuning"],"best_for":["educational platforms requiring multi-subject tutoring","research assistants supporting interdisciplinary work","general-purpose AI agents handling diverse user queries"],"limitations":["Performance may degrade on highly specialized domains requiring domain-specific training data","Reasoning quality varies by domain; strongest on math/logic, moderate on open-ended humanities","No fine-tuning capability provided through OpenRouter API (requires local deployment)"],"requires":["API key for OpenRouter or self-hosted inference setup","Support for long-context queries (128K token window)","Sufficient rate limits for multi-turn conversations"],"input_types":["natural language questions","code problems","mathematical proofs","scientific explanations","creative writing prompts"],"output_types":["reasoned explanations","code solutions","mathematical derivations","structured answers"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.and.analysis.with.reasoning","name":"code generation and analysis with reasoning","description":"Generates and analyzes code by applying chain-of-thought reasoning to understand requirements, decompose problems into functions, and verify correctness. The model produces intermediate reasoning steps explaining algorithm choice, edge cases, and implementation strategy before generating final code, enabling developers to understand the reasoning behind generated solutions.","intents":["I need to generate code with explanations of why specific algorithms or patterns were chosen","I want to understand potential bugs or edge cases in code before implementation","I need to refactor code with clear reasoning about performance and maintainability tradeoffs"],"best_for":["developers learning new programming patterns or languages","code review tools requiring explainable suggestions","educational platforms teaching algorithmic thinking"],"limitations":["Generated code may contain logical errors despite reasoning traces; always requires human review","Reasoning overhead adds 2-4 seconds latency for typical code generation tasks","Limited to code understanding and generation; no execution or testing capability"],"requires":["API access to OpenRouter with code model support","Context window sufficient for code + reasoning (128K available)","Support for multiple programming languages in prompts"],"input_types":["natural language requirements","code snippets for analysis","algorithm descriptions","pseudocode"],"output_types":["executable code","code with reasoning traces","algorithm explanations","refactoring suggestions"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.mathematical.problem.solving.with.step.by.step.derivation","name":"mathematical problem-solving with step-by-step derivation","description":"Solves mathematical problems by generating explicit step-by-step derivations, using the distilled reasoning capability to break down complex calculations into intermediate steps. The model applies symbolic reasoning patterns learned from R1 to handle algebra, calculus, probability, and discrete mathematics, with each step justified and verifiable.","intents":["I need to solve math problems with complete derivations for educational purposes","I want to verify mathematical reasoning step-by-step to catch errors","I need to generate homework solutions with full working shown"],"best_for":["educational platforms and tutoring systems","homework assistance tools","mathematical research support"],"limitations":["May struggle with very advanced mathematics (graduate-level topology, abstract algebra) requiring specialized notation","Reasoning traces can be verbose, consuming significant tokens for simple problems","No symbolic math engine integration; purely language-based reasoning without computer algebra system verification"],"requires":["API access to OpenRouter","Support for mathematical notation in prompts (LaTeX, plain text)","Sufficient token budget for multi-step derivations"],"input_types":["mathematical problems in natural language","equations and expressions","word problems"],"output_types":["step-by-step solutions","mathematical derivations","final numerical answers","verification of correctness"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.long.context.reasoning.and.document.analysis","name":"long-context reasoning and document analysis","description":"Processes documents up to 128K tokens while maintaining reasoning capability, enabling analysis of entire codebases, research papers, or legal documents with chain-of-thought reasoning applied to the full context. The model uses efficient attention mechanisms to handle long sequences without losing reasoning quality, allowing comprehensive analysis without context truncation.","intents":["I need to analyze a full codebase and reason about architectural improvements","I want to summarize a research paper with reasoning about key contributions","I need to review legal documents and identify potential issues with explanations"],"best_for":["code review and refactoring at scale","document analysis and summarization","research paper analysis and synthesis"],"limitations":["Long-context processing adds significant latency (5-15 seconds for 100K token documents)","Reasoning quality may degrade on documents exceeding 64K tokens due to attention dilution","Token costs scale linearly with document length, making very large batch processing expensive"],"requires":["API access to OpenRouter with 128K context support","Sufficient rate limits and token quota","Document preprocessing to fit within token limits"],"input_types":["full source code files","research papers and PDFs (as text)","legal documents","technical specifications","conversation histories"],"output_types":["comprehensive analysis with reasoning","summaries with key insights","refactoring recommendations","issue identification with explanations"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_5","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multi.turn.conversational.reasoning.with.context.preservation","name":"multi-turn conversational reasoning with context preservation","description":"Maintains reasoning capability across multi-turn conversations by preserving context and applying chain-of-thought reasoning to each turn while building on previous reasoning steps. The model tracks conversation state and applies reasoning patterns consistently across turns, enabling iterative problem-solving and refinement.","intents":["I want to have a multi-turn conversation where the model reasons about my follow-up questions","I need to iteratively refine a solution with reasoning at each step","I want the model to remember and build on previous reasoning in the conversation"],"best_for":["interactive tutoring and educational assistants","collaborative problem-solving tools","debugging assistants that reason about code iteratively"],"limitations":["Context window fills quickly with reasoning traces; long conversations may require context pruning","Reasoning consistency may degrade after 10+ turns as context becomes diluted","No persistent memory across sessions; each conversation starts fresh"],"requires":["API access to OpenRouter with streaming support","Application-level conversation history management","Token budget sufficient for multi-turn reasoning (typically 2-3x single-turn cost)"],"input_types":["natural language questions","follow-up clarifications","refinement requests","code snippets for iteration"],"output_types":["reasoned responses","iterative solutions","refined explanations","conversation summaries"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_6","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.benchmark.competitive.performance.across.reasoning.tasks","name":"benchmark-competitive performance across reasoning tasks","description":"Achieves performance parity or superiority to OpenAI's o1-mini on standardized benchmarks (AIME, MATH, coding competitions) through knowledge distillation from R1, while operating at 32B parameters instead of o1-mini's larger size. The model is optimized for benchmark tasks through supervised fine-tuning on R1 outputs, enabling strong performance on structured reasoning problems.","intents":["I need a reasoning model that matches o1-mini performance but at lower cost","I want to benchmark my reasoning model against industry standards","I need to verify that my model can handle competitive programming and math competition problems"],"best_for":["organizations evaluating reasoning model performance","teams needing cost-effective alternatives to o1-mini","benchmark-driven development and model selection"],"limitations":["Benchmark performance doesn't guarantee real-world performance on novel, unstructured problems","Performance may vary significantly on problems outside benchmark domains","Benchmarks don't measure reasoning transparency or interpretability"],"requires":["Standardized benchmark datasets (AIME, MATH, etc.)","Evaluation infrastructure for automated scoring","API access to OpenRouter for inference"],"input_types":["structured math problems","coding competition problems","standardized test questions"],"output_types":["numerical answers","code solutions","reasoning traces with answers"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.knowledge.distillation.based.reasoning.transfer","name":"knowledge distillation-based reasoning transfer","description":"Transfers reasoning capability from the larger DeepSeek R1 model to the 32B Qwen 2.5 base through knowledge distillation, where the model learns to mimic R1's reasoning patterns and outputs. This approach preserves R1's reasoning quality while reducing parameter count and inference cost, using supervised fine-tuning on R1-generated reasoning traces as training signal.","intents":["I want to use R1-quality reasoning without the computational cost of the full model","I need to understand how knowledge distillation improves reasoning in smaller models","I want to deploy reasoning capability in resource-constrained environments"],"best_for":["teams deploying reasoning models in cost-sensitive environments","researchers studying knowledge distillation for reasoning","organizations needing reasoning capability with lower latency than full R1"],"limitations":["Distilled reasoning may lose some nuance from full R1 on extremely complex problems","Distillation quality depends on R1 output quality; errors in R1 outputs propagate to distilled model","No visibility into distillation process or training data; black-box improvement mechanism"],"requires":["Understanding of knowledge distillation concepts","Baseline model (Qwen 2.5 32B) for comparison","Benchmark datasets to measure distillation effectiveness"],"input_types":["reasoning problems","benchmark tasks"],"output_types":["reasoning traces","final answers","performance metrics"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["API access to OpenRouter or compatible inference endpoint","Support for streaming or non-streaming text generation","Sufficient context window (model supports 128K tokens)","API key for OpenRouter or self-hosted inference setup","Support for long-context queries (128K token window)","Sufficient rate limits for multi-turn conversations","API access to OpenRouter with code model support","Context window sufficient for code + reasoning (128K available)","Support for multiple programming languages in prompts","API access to OpenRouter"],"failure_modes":["Reasoning traces are generated sequentially, adding 2-5x latency compared to direct-answer models","Distilled reasoning may lose some nuance from full R1 model on extremely complex multi-domain problems","Token consumption increases significantly due to explicit reasoning output (typically 3-8x more tokens than direct answers)","Performance may degrade on highly specialized domains requiring domain-specific training data","Reasoning quality varies by domain; strongest on math/logic, moderate on open-ended humanities","No fine-tuning capability provided through OpenRouter API (requires local deployment)","Generated code may contain logical errors despite reasoning traces; always requires human review","Reasoning overhead adds 2-4 seconds latency for typical code generation tasks","Limited to code understanding and generation; no execution or testing capability","May struggle with very advanced mathematics (graduate-level topology, abstract algebra) requiring specialized notation","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.24,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.484Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.776Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b"}},"signature":"9vZtlIoZFBP1L+j8Jko3D/1UHJxcKnrT26vpLHnyZ8v6USNfwXR8V3uE2xnm+rrTIyO/o8lLVXZgmIZViTbYDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T10:32:49.686Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=deepseek-deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}