{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_deci","slug":"deci","name":"Deci","type":"product","url":"https://deci.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/deci","categories":["model-training"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_deci__cap_0","uri":"capability://machine.learning.automated.neural.architecture.search.and.optimization","name":"automated neural architecture search and optimization","description":"Automatically discovers and generates optimized neural network architectures tailored to specific hardware constraints and performance targets. Uses proprietary AutoNAC technology to reduce manual architecture design effort while maintaining or improving model accuracy.","intents":["I need to find a more efficient model architecture without spending weeks on manual experimentation","I want to optimize my model for specific hardware constraints like edge devices or GPUs","I need to reduce my model size and latency while keeping accuracy high"],"best_for":["ML engineers at enterprises","AI infrastructure teams","companies deploying models at scale"],"limitations":["Requires significant computational resources to run search process","Results depend on quality of training data and initial model specifications","May require retraining on custom datasets for domain-specific optimization"],"requires":["PyTorch or TensorFlow model","labeled training data","hardware specifications and performance targets","enterprise account"],"input_types":["neural network model (PyTorch/TensorFlow)","hardware specifications","performance constraints (latency/memory targets)"],"output_types":["optimized model architecture","performance metrics","deployment recommendations"],"categories":["machine learning","model optimization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_1","uri":"capability://machine.learning.model.quantization.and.compression","name":"model quantization and compression","description":"Converts full-precision models to lower-precision representations (INT8, FP16, etc.) to reduce model size and inference latency while maintaining accuracy. Handles quantization-aware training and post-training quantization for various model types.","intents":["I need to reduce my model size to fit on edge devices or mobile phones","I want to speed up inference without buying more expensive hardware","I need to lower memory bandwidth requirements for my inference servers"],"best_for":["teams deploying models on resource-constrained devices","companies with high inference volume seeking cost reduction","edge AI and mobile ML practitioners"],"limitations":["Aggressive quantization may impact model accuracy on certain tasks","Some model architectures are more amenable to quantization than others","Requires validation on target hardware to ensure compatibility"],"requires":["trained neural network model","representative validation dataset","target hardware specifications","acceptable accuracy threshold"],"input_types":["trained model (PyTorch/TensorFlow/ONNX)","validation dataset","quantization parameters (bit-width, method)"],"output_types":["quantized model","accuracy degradation metrics","latency/memory reduction estimates"],"categories":["machine learning","model optimization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_10","uri":"capability://machine.learning.batch.inference.optimization","name":"batch inference optimization","description":"Optimizes models specifically for batch processing scenarios where multiple inputs are processed together. Tunes batch sizes and memory allocation for maximum throughput.","intents":["I need to process large batches of data efficiently","I want to maximize GPU/hardware utilization for batch inference","I need to optimize for throughput rather than latency"],"best_for":["teams with batch processing workloads","companies processing large datasets","data science teams with offline inference needs"],"limitations":["Batch optimization may not help with real-time single-request inference","Optimal batch size depends on hardware and model architecture","Memory requirements scale with batch size"],"requires":["model","batch processing workload characteristics","hardware specifications"],"input_types":["model","batch size parameters","hardware memory specifications"],"output_types":["optimized batch configuration","throughput metrics","memory utilization reports"],"categories":["machine learning","data processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_11","uri":"capability://machine.learning.model.performance.benchmarking.across.hardware","name":"model performance benchmarking across hardware","description":"Runs standardized benchmarks to compare model performance across different hardware platforms (GPUs, CPUs, TPUs, edge devices). Provides consistent metrics for cross-platform comparison.","intents":["I want to compare how my model performs on different hardware","I need to decide between different hardware options for deployment","I want to understand hardware-specific performance characteristics"],"best_for":["infrastructure teams","hardware evaluation teams","companies with multi-hardware deployments"],"limitations":["Benchmarks may not reflect real-world performance with production workloads","Hardware availability for testing may be limited","Results are specific to tested configurations"],"requires":["model","access to multiple hardware platforms","standardized benchmark datasets"],"input_types":["model","hardware configurations","benchmark parameters"],"output_types":["cross-platform performance comparison","benchmark reports","hardware ranking"],"categories":["machine learning","performance analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_2","uri":"capability://machine.learning.inference.latency.profiling.and.analysis","name":"inference latency profiling and analysis","description":"Analyzes model inference performance across different hardware configurations to identify bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Provides detailed breakdowns of where computation time is spent within the model.","intents":["I need to understand which parts of my model are slowest","I want to benchmark my model performance across different hardware","I need data to justify infrastructure upgrades or model optimization investments"],"best_for":["ML engineers optimizing inference pipelines","DevOps teams managing model deployments","companies evaluating hardware purchases"],"limitations":["Profiling overhead may affect real-world latency measurements","Results are hardware-specific and may not transfer across different devices","Requires representative input data for accurate profiling"],"requires":["deployed or deployable model","target hardware access","representative input samples"],"input_types":["model file","hardware configuration","input data samples"],"output_types":["latency breakdown report","bottleneck identification","hardware utilization metrics"],"categories":["machine learning","performance analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_3","uri":"capability://machine.learning.large.language.model.optimization","name":"large language model optimization","description":"Specialized optimization pipeline for LLMs including token prediction optimization, attention mechanism acceleration, and KV-cache optimization. Tailored for transformer-based language models of various sizes.","intents":["I need to reduce the cost of running my LLM inference at scale","I want to speed up token generation for real-time LLM applications","I need to deploy large language models on hardware with limited memory"],"best_for":["companies deploying LLMs in production","AI teams building LLM applications","enterprises with high LLM inference volume"],"limitations":["Optimization techniques may vary based on model architecture and size","Some optimizations may require model retraining or fine-tuning","Results depend on specific LLM architecture and tokenizer"],"requires":["LLM model (PyTorch/TensorFlow/ONNX)","inference workload characteristics","target latency/throughput requirements"],"input_types":["language model","inference patterns","hardware specifications"],"output_types":["optimized model","latency reduction metrics","cost savings estimates"],"categories":["machine learning","generative AI"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_4","uri":"capability://machine.learning.computer.vision.model.optimization","name":"computer vision model optimization","description":"Specialized optimization for vision models including CNNs, vision transformers, and multimodal architectures. Handles optimization for image classification, object detection, segmentation, and other vision tasks.","intents":["I need to deploy computer vision models on edge devices or cameras","I want to reduce inference latency for real-time video processing","I need to optimize vision models for specific hardware like mobile or embedded systems"],"best_for":["computer vision teams","edge AI practitioners","companies deploying vision models at scale"],"limitations":["Optimization effectiveness varies by model architecture and task","Some vision tasks are more amenable to optimization than others","Real-time video processing requires additional pipeline optimization"],"requires":["vision model (PyTorch/TensorFlow)","representative image/video data","target hardware specifications"],"input_types":["vision model","sample images or video","hardware constraints"],"output_types":["optimized model","inference speed metrics","accuracy preservation report"],"categories":["machine learning","computer vision"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_5","uri":"capability://machine.learning.multimodal.model.optimization","name":"multimodal model optimization","description":"Optimizes models that process multiple input modalities (text, image, audio, video) simultaneously. Handles cross-modal attention mechanisms and fusion layers specific to multimodal architectures.","intents":["I need to optimize my vision-language model for faster inference","I want to reduce latency for multimodal AI applications","I need to deploy multimodal models on resource-constrained hardware"],"best_for":["teams building multimodal AI applications","companies deploying vision-language models","enterprises with complex AI pipelines"],"limitations":["Multimodal optimization is more complex than single-modality optimization","Results depend on how modalities are fused in the architecture","May require careful tuning to maintain cross-modal alignment"],"requires":["multimodal model","training data with multiple modalities","target hardware specifications"],"input_types":["multimodal model","multimodal training data","hardware constraints"],"output_types":["optimized model","per-modality latency breakdown","accuracy metrics"],"categories":["machine learning","generative AI"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_6","uri":"capability://machine.learning.mlops.pipeline.integration","name":"mlops pipeline integration","description":"Integrates Deci's optimization capabilities into existing MLOps workflows and CI/CD pipelines. Supports popular frameworks and model formats for seamless deployment.","intents":["I want to add model optimization to my existing ML pipeline without major refactoring","I need to automate optimization as part of my model deployment process","I want to version and track optimized models alongside my original models"],"best_for":["MLOps engineers","ML platform teams","enterprises with established ML workflows"],"limitations":["Integration complexity depends on existing pipeline architecture","Requires familiarity with target frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, ONNX)","May need custom adapters for proprietary model formats"],"requires":["existing MLOps infrastructure","PyTorch/TensorFlow/ONNX models","enterprise account"],"input_types":["model files in standard formats","pipeline configuration","deployment specifications"],"output_types":["integrated optimization step","optimized model artifacts","performance reports"],"categories":["machine learning","DevOps"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_7","uri":"capability://machine.learning.hardware.aware.model.deployment.recommendations","name":"hardware-aware model deployment recommendations","description":"Analyzes model characteristics and hardware capabilities to recommend optimal deployment configurations. Suggests hardware choices, batch sizes, and optimization strategies based on inference requirements.","intents":["I need to decide what hardware to buy for my model deployment","I want to know the best way to deploy my model on existing hardware","I need to estimate infrastructure costs for different deployment scenarios"],"best_for":["infrastructure teams planning deployments","companies evaluating hardware purchases","teams optimizing deployment costs"],"limitations":["Recommendations are based on model characteristics and may not account for all operational constraints","Hardware availability and pricing vary by region and time","Actual performance may differ from estimates due to system-level factors"],"requires":["model specifications","inference workload characteristics","budget constraints"],"input_types":["model file","expected inference volume","latency requirements","budget parameters"],"output_types":["hardware recommendations","cost estimates","deployment configuration suggestions"],"categories":["machine learning","infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_8","uri":"capability://machine.learning.model.accuracy.preservation.validation","name":"model accuracy preservation validation","description":"Validates that optimized models maintain acceptable accuracy levels compared to original models. Runs comprehensive testing across different input distributions and edge cases.","intents":["I need to ensure my optimized model doesn't lose accuracy on real-world data","I want to understand the accuracy-latency tradeoff for different optimization levels","I need to prove to stakeholders that optimization doesn't compromise model quality"],"best_for":["ML teams with strict accuracy requirements","regulated industries requiring model validation","companies deploying critical AI systems"],"limitations":["Validation is only as good as the test dataset provided","Edge cases not in test data may still cause accuracy degradation","Requires representative validation data for reliable results"],"requires":["original and optimized models","comprehensive validation dataset","accuracy metrics and thresholds"],"input_types":["original model","optimized model","validation dataset","accuracy requirements"],"output_types":["accuracy comparison report","degradation metrics","validation pass/fail status"],"categories":["machine learning","quality assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_deci__cap_9","uri":"capability://business.cost.benefit.analysis.and.roi.estimation","name":"cost-benefit analysis and roi estimation","description":"Calculates infrastructure cost savings and ROI from model optimization. Compares hardware costs, energy consumption, and operational expenses before and after optimization.","intents":["I need to justify the cost of optimization tools to my management","I want to estimate how much money optimization will save us","I need to understand the payback period for optimization investments"],"best_for":["finance-conscious teams","enterprises evaluating optimization ROI","companies with high inference volume"],"limitations":["ROI estimates depend on accurate cost assumptions and inference volume projections","Actual savings may vary based on implementation details and operational factors","Does not account for indirect benefits like improved user experience"],"requires":["current infrastructure costs","expected inference volume","model optimization metrics"],"input_types":["current hardware costs","inference volume","energy costs","optimization metrics"],"output_types":["cost savings estimates","ROI calculations","payback period analysis"],"categories":["business","machine learning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":47,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["PyTorch or TensorFlow model","labeled training data","hardware specifications and performance targets","enterprise account","trained neural network model","representative validation dataset","target hardware specifications","acceptable accuracy threshold","model","batch processing workload characteristics"],"failure_modes":["Requires significant computational resources to run search process","Results depend on quality of training data and initial model specifications","May require retraining on custom datasets for domain-specific optimization","Aggressive quantization may impact model accuracy on certain tasks","Some model architectures are more amenable to quantization than others","Requires validation on target hardware to ensure compatibility","Batch optimization may not help with real-time single-request inference","Optimal batch size depends on hardware and model architecture","Memory requirements scale with batch size","Benchmarks may not reflect real-world performance with production workloads","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.45,"quality":0.88,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.283Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.534Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=deci","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=deci"}},"signature":"WU9Pj+9WNVH8Avm/KVNApXYfc3sx29fVfX5xmee7WSjcbBOxQjB3gNKwQYmlUOm5wTq3jmUWYqjYHf/S9YiwBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T11:48:48.224Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/deci","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/deci","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=deci","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}