{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_debateai","slug":"debateai","name":"DebateAI","type":"product","url":"https://debateai.org","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/debateai","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_0","uri":"capability://productivity.ai.debate.opponent.simulation","name":"ai debate opponent simulation","description":"Generates realistic AI-controlled debate opponents that respond to user arguments with counterarguments on selected topics. The AI maintains a debate position and adapts responses based on the user's argumentation.","intents":["I want to practice debating without needing a human opponent","I need to test my arguments against different perspectives","I want to debate on-demand whenever I have free time"],"best_for":["high school debate students","college debate competitors","professionals preparing for presentations"],"limitations":["AI opponents occasionally generate weak or circular counterarguments","AI reasoning sophistication varies by topic","lacks competitive pressure of human opponents"],"requires":["internet connection","debate topic selection"],"input_types":["text"],"output_types":["text"],"categories":["productivity","education"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_1","uri":"capability://productivity.argument.structure.analysis","name":"argument structure analysis","description":"Evaluates user arguments for logical coherence, identifies structural weaknesses, and provides feedback on how well arguments are constructed. Analyzes premise-conclusion relationships and argument validity.","intents":["I want to know if my argument is logically sound","I need feedback on how to better structure my points","I want to understand what makes my argument weak or strong"],"best_for":["debate students","academic writers","professionals developing persuasive content"],"limitations":["feedback quality depends on topic complexity","may not catch all logical fallacies"],"requires":["user-submitted argument text"],"input_types":["text"],"output_types":["text"],"categories":["productivity","education"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_2","uri":"capability://education.logical.fallacy.detection","name":"logical fallacy detection","description":"Identifies common logical fallacies in user arguments such as ad hominem, straw man, circular reasoning, and false dilemmas. Provides explanations of detected fallacies and their impact on argument validity.","intents":["I want to catch logical errors in my reasoning before presenting","I need to understand what fallacies I'm committing","I want to learn how to avoid common argumentation mistakes"],"best_for":["debate students","critical thinking learners","academic writers"],"limitations":["detection accuracy varies by fallacy type and context","may produce false positives on complex arguments"],"requires":["argument text input"],"input_types":["text"],"output_types":["text"],"categories":["education","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_3","uri":"capability://education.multi.topic.debate.practice","name":"multi-topic debate practice","description":"Provides access to debate scenarios across diverse topics including political, philosophical, practical, and policy domains. Users can select topics of interest to practice argumentation in specific areas.","intents":["I want to practice debating on topics relevant to my interests","I need to prepare for debates on specific subjects","I want to explore different debate domains"],"best_for":["students with varied debate interests","professionals preparing for specific debates","learners exploring multiple perspectives"],"limitations":["topic availability may be limited","AI consistency varies across different topics"],"requires":["topic selection"],"input_types":["topic selection"],"output_types":["debate scenario","text"],"categories":["education","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_4","uri":"capability://education.real.time.counterargument.generation","name":"real-time counterargument generation","description":"Generates contextually relevant counterarguments in response to user positions during active debate sessions. Adapts responses based on the specific arguments presented by the user.","intents":["I want to see how my arguments can be challenged","I need to prepare responses to likely counterarguments","I want to understand different perspectives on my position"],"best_for":["debate practitioners","critical thinkers","argument developers"],"limitations":["counterargument quality inconsistent","may not reflect highest-level competitive debate reasoning","occasionally produces circular or weak responses"],"requires":["user argument input","active debate session"],"input_types":["text"],"output_types":["text"],"categories":["education","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_5","uri":"capability://education.debate.format.selection","name":"debate format selection","description":"Allows users to choose from different debate formats and structures for their practice sessions. Supports various debate styles to accommodate different learning preferences and preparation needs.","intents":["I want to practice a specific debate format","I need to prepare for a particular debate structure","I want to learn different debate methodologies"],"best_for":["competitive debate students","format-specific learners","tournament preparers"],"limitations":["format variety may be limited","not all formats may be equally well-supported"],"requires":["format selection"],"input_types":["format selection"],"output_types":["debate session"],"categories":["education","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_6","uri":"capability://education.skill.progression.tracking","name":"skill progression tracking","description":"Monitors user performance across debate sessions and provides insights into improvement areas. Tracks argumentation quality, fallacy reduction, and overall debate performance over time.","intents":["I want to see how much my debating has improved","I need to identify which skills need more practice","I want to measure my progress toward debate goals"],"best_for":["serious debate students","competitive debaters","self-directed learners"],"limitations":["tracking depth may be limited in free version","metrics may not capture all skill dimensions"],"requires":["multiple debate sessions","user account"],"input_types":["debate session data"],"output_types":["progress report","text"],"categories":["education","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_debateai__cap_7","uri":"capability://education.low.stakes.practice.environment","name":"low-stakes practice environment","description":"Provides a consequence-free space for users to practice debating and make mistakes without judgment or competitive pressure. Enables experimentation with new arguments and techniques safely.","intents":["I want to practice without fear of losing","I need a safe space to try new argumentation techniques","I want to build confidence before real debates"],"best_for":["beginner debaters","anxious learners","skill-builders"],"limitations":["lack of competitive pressure may not fully simulate tournament conditions"],"requires":["user participation"],"input_types":["user arguments"],"output_types":["debate feedback"],"categories":["education","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["internet connection","debate topic selection","user-submitted argument text","argument text input","topic selection","user argument input","active debate session","format selection","multiple debate sessions","user account"],"failure_modes":["AI opponents occasionally generate weak or circular counterarguments","AI reasoning sophistication varies by topic","lacks competitive pressure of human opponents","feedback quality depends on topic complexity","may not catch all logical fallacies","detection accuracy varies by fallacy type and context","may produce false positives on complex arguments","topic availability may be limited","AI consistency varies across different topics","counterargument quality inconsistent","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.283Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.548Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=debateai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=debateai"}},"signature":"FiUk6Q410oQvwWBb/yDB5d+GdTsev7+3f1mpw1xJyI9S3rAjiUyY5nHnhYWuUsuhpa1c3GUH3IOGQ9SSSIP5AA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T15:00:18.069Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/debateai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/debateai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=debateai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}