{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_datprof","slug":"datprof","name":"DATPROF","type":"product","url":"https://www.datprof.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/datprof","categories":["data-pipelines"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.governance.sensitive.data.discovery.and.classification","name":"sensitive-data-discovery-and-classification","description":"Automatically scans databases and data stores to identify, locate, and classify sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) across the organization. Uses pattern matching and machine learning to detect sensitive data elements without manual inventory.","intents":["I need to find all instances of customer PII in our databases for compliance audits","I want to understand what sensitive data we have and where it's stored","I need to map data lineage to identify compliance risks across systems"],"best_for":["Enterprise compliance officers","Data governance teams","Organizations in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, pharma)"],"limitations":["Requires database connectivity and appropriate access permissions","Accuracy depends on data quality and pattern completeness","Discovery at scale can be resource-intensive"],"requires":["Database connectivity","Network access to data sources","Appropriate user permissions"],"input_types":["database schemas","data repositories","file systems"],"output_types":["data classification reports","sensitive data inventory","compliance audit documentation"],"categories":["data-governance","compliance","security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.security.dynamic.data.masking","name":"dynamic-data-masking","description":"Masks sensitive data elements in real-time or batch mode using configurable masking rules and algorithms (redaction, tokenization, encryption, shuffling). Applies masking policies consistently across databases while maintaining data utility for testing.","intents":["I need to remove customer names and SSNs from production data before sharing with developers","I want to mask sensitive data while keeping it realistic enough for testing","I need to apply consistent masking rules across multiple databases"],"best_for":["Data engineers","QA teams","Compliance teams managing data access","Organizations handling regulated data"],"limitations":["Masking can reduce data utility if not configured carefully","Performance impact on large datasets during batch masking","Requires careful rule configuration to avoid over-masking or under-masking"],"requires":["Database write access","Masking rule configuration","Understanding of data sensitivity levels"],"input_types":["database tables","structured data","data fields with PII/PHI"],"output_types":["masked datasets","anonymized databases","test data with masked sensitive fields"],"categories":["data-security","compliance","data-privacy"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_10","uri":"capability://security.role.based.access.control.for.test.data","name":"role-based-access-control-for-test-data","description":"Implements granular access controls that determine which users and teams can access which masked or subset datasets. Enforces data access policies based on roles, projects, and compliance requirements.","intents":["I need to ensure developers only access masked data, not real customer information","I want to restrict access to sensitive test data to authorized team members only","I need to enforce different access levels for different user roles"],"best_for":["Security teams","Enterprise data governance teams","Organizations with strict data access requirements","Regulated industry organizations"],"limitations":["Requires careful role definition and maintenance","Access control overhead can impact performance","Role creep can occur without regular audits"],"requires":["User and role definitions","Access policy configuration","Integration with identity management systems"],"input_types":["user roles","access policies","dataset classifications"],"output_types":["access control configurations","access logs","policy enforcement"],"categories":["security","access-control","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.management.database.subsetting","name":"database-subsetting","description":"Creates smaller, representative subsets of production databases that maintain referential integrity and data relationships while reducing volume. Enables faster provisioning of test environments with production-like data without copying entire datasets.","intents":["I need a smaller copy of production data for testing without the full dataset size","I want to maintain data relationships while reducing database volume","I need to provision test environments faster with smaller data footprints"],"best_for":["QA teams","Development teams","Database administrators","Organizations with large production databases"],"limitations":["Subsetting logic must be carefully designed to maintain statistical validity","Complex foreign key relationships can complicate subsetting","May not capture edge cases present only in full dataset"],"requires":["Understanding of database schema and relationships","Subsetting criteria definition","Database read access"],"input_types":["production databases","database schemas","subsetting rules"],"output_types":["subset databases","reduced-volume test datasets","representative data samples"],"categories":["data-management","testing","performance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_3","uri":"capability://devops.test.data.provisioning.and.deployment","name":"test-data-provisioning-and-deployment","description":"Automates the provisioning and deployment of masked and subset test data to development, QA, and staging environments. Orchestrates the entire workflow from source selection through environment refresh with version control and audit trails.","intents":["I need to automatically refresh test environments with fresh masked data","I want to provision multiple environments with consistent test data","I need to track which version of test data is deployed where"],"best_for":["DevOps teams","QA teams","Database administrators","Enterprise organizations with multiple test environments"],"limitations":["Requires careful orchestration to avoid data inconsistencies","Provisioning time scales with data volume","Dependent on network connectivity and target environment availability"],"requires":["Access to source and target databases","Provisioning workflow configuration","Environment definitions"],"input_types":["masked datasets","subset data","environment configurations","provisioning schedules"],"output_types":["provisioned test environments","deployment logs","audit trails","version tracking"],"categories":["devops","data-management","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_4","uri":"capability://compliance.compliance.template.application","name":"compliance-template-application","description":"Provides pre-built, industry-specific compliance templates for GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and other regulatory frameworks. Automatically applies appropriate masking rules, retention policies, and data handling procedures based on selected compliance standards.","intents":["I need to ensure our test data handling meets GDPR requirements","I want to apply HIPAA-compliant data masking without building rules from scratch","I need to demonstrate compliance with PCI-DSS for payment card data"],"best_for":["Compliance officers","Enterprise organizations in regulated industries","Organizations new to compliance requirements","Finance, healthcare, and pharmaceutical companies"],"limitations":["Templates may require customization for specific organizational needs","Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry","Templates don't replace legal compliance review"],"requires":["Selection of applicable compliance frameworks","Understanding of organizational compliance scope"],"input_types":["compliance framework selection","data classification"],"output_types":["compliance-configured masking rules","retention policies","audit documentation","compliance reports"],"categories":["compliance","governance","security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.governance.data.lineage.and.impact.analysis","name":"data-lineage-and-impact-analysis","description":"Maps data flows and dependencies across systems to show where sensitive data originates, how it moves through the organization, and what systems depend on it. Enables impact analysis when applying masking or retention policies.","intents":["I need to understand how customer data flows through our systems","I want to know what will break if I mask a particular field","I need to identify all systems that depend on a specific data element"],"best_for":["Data architects","Enterprise data governance teams","Organizations with complex data ecosystems","Compliance teams planning data handling changes"],"limitations":["Requires comprehensive metadata and system documentation","Complex systems may have incomplete or outdated lineage information","Real-time lineage tracking can be resource-intensive"],"requires":["System metadata and schema information","Data flow documentation","Integration with source systems"],"input_types":["database schemas","system metadata","data flow definitions"],"output_types":["data lineage diagrams","impact analysis reports","dependency maps","compliance documentation"],"categories":["data-governance","compliance","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.security.masking.rule.configuration.and.management","name":"masking-rule-configuration-and-management","description":"Provides a centralized interface for creating, configuring, testing, and managing data masking rules. Supports multiple masking algorithms (redaction, tokenization, encryption, shuffling, format-preserving encryption) with rule versioning and reusability.","intents":["I need to create custom masking rules for our specific data types","I want to test masking rules before applying them to production data","I need to maintain consistent masking rules across teams and projects"],"best_for":["Data engineers","Database administrators","Compliance teams","Organizations with complex masking requirements"],"limitations":["Requires technical expertise to configure complex rules","Testing masking rules requires sample data","Rule maintenance overhead increases with number of rules"],"requires":["Understanding of masking algorithms","Sample data for testing","Access to rule configuration interface"],"input_types":["data field specifications","masking algorithm selection","test data samples"],"output_types":["masking rule definitions","rule test results","rule documentation","rule version history"],"categories":["data-security","configuration","data-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_7","uri":"capability://compliance.audit.logging.and.compliance.reporting","name":"audit-logging-and-compliance-reporting","description":"Records all data access, masking operations, and provisioning activities with detailed audit trails. Generates compliance reports demonstrating adherence to regulatory requirements and data handling policies.","intents":["I need to prove that we masked sensitive data before sharing it with developers","I want to track who accessed what data and when for compliance audits","I need to generate reports showing our compliance with data protection regulations"],"best_for":["Compliance officers","Internal audit teams","Enterprise security teams","Organizations undergoing regulatory audits"],"limitations":["Audit logs can grow very large and require storage management","Report generation can be time-consuming for large datasets","Audit trail completeness depends on system configuration"],"requires":["Audit logging enabled","Sufficient storage for audit logs","Access to reporting interface"],"input_types":["system activity logs","data access records","masking operation logs"],"output_types":["audit reports","compliance documentation","access logs","activity summaries"],"categories":["compliance","security","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.management.multi.database.orchestration","name":"multi-database-orchestration","description":"Coordinates masking, subsetting, and provisioning operations across multiple heterogeneous databases and data sources simultaneously. Maintains consistency and referential integrity across distributed data environments.","intents":["I need to mask data consistently across our Oracle, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL databases","I want to provision test environments that span multiple database systems","I need to maintain data relationships across different database platforms"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations with heterogeneous database environments","Database administrators managing multiple platforms","Large organizations with distributed data architecture"],"limitations":["Complexity increases significantly with number of databases","Cross-database referential integrity can be difficult to maintain","Performance depends on network connectivity between systems"],"requires":["Connectivity to all target databases","Understanding of cross-database relationships","Appropriate permissions across all systems"],"input_types":["multiple database connections","cross-database relationship definitions","orchestration workflows"],"output_types":["consistently masked multi-database environments","provisioned test environments","orchestration logs"],"categories":["data-management","devops","enterprise"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_datprof__cap_9","uri":"capability://compliance.data.retention.and.purge.policy.management","name":"data-retention-and-purge-policy-management","description":"Defines and enforces data retention policies based on regulatory requirements and business rules. Automatically identifies and purges data that exceeds retention periods while maintaining audit trails of deletion.","intents":["I need to automatically delete customer data after 7 years per GDPR requirements","I want to enforce retention policies consistently across all databases","I need to prove that we deleted data as required by regulations"],"best_for":["Compliance officers","Data governance teams","Organizations in regulated industries","Enterprise data management teams"],"limitations":["Purging data is irreversible and requires careful planning","Complex retention rules can be difficult to implement correctly","Performance impact of purge operations on production systems"],"requires":["Clear retention policy definitions","Database write access","Backup and recovery procedures"],"input_types":["retention policy definitions","regulatory requirements","data age criteria"],"output_types":["purged datasets","deletion audit logs","retention compliance reports"],"categories":["compliance","data-governance","security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Database connectivity","Network access to data sources","Appropriate user permissions","Database write access","Masking rule configuration","Understanding of data sensitivity levels","User and role definitions","Access policy configuration","Integration with identity management systems","Understanding of database schema and relationships"],"failure_modes":["Requires database connectivity and appropriate access permissions","Accuracy depends on data quality and pattern completeness","Discovery at scale can be resource-intensive","Masking can reduce data utility if not configured carefully","Performance impact on large datasets during batch masking","Requires careful rule configuration to avoid over-masking or under-masking","Requires careful role definition and maintenance","Access control overhead can impact performance","Role creep can occur without regular audits","Subsetting logic must be carefully designed to maintain statistical validity","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.282Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.548Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=datprof","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=datprof"}},"signature":"0infO359gviUEjU2Dk4MoZCjBd9ctK33dCnkR4qjRnI7BGC/51IsXSlw0sUSmQcXWRUyvlIcEV0esmgeNKFWCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T11:01:23.464Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/datprof","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/datprof","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=datprof","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}