{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_cyclops-security","slug":"cyclops-security","name":"Cyclops Security","type":"product","url":"https://www.cyclops.security","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/cyclops-security","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.multi.tool.security.alert.aggregation","name":"multi-tool security alert aggregation","description":"Automatically collects and consolidates security alerts and vulnerability data from multiple disparate sources including SIEMs, vulnerability scanners, and cloud security platforms into a unified data stream. Normalizes alert formats and metadata across different tool vendors and data schemas.","intents":["I need to see all my security alerts in one place instead of jumping between tools","I want to stop missing critical alerts buried in different security platforms","I need a single source of truth for all vulnerability and threat data across my infrastructure"],"best_for":["enterprises with 3+ security tools in their stack","security operations teams managing multiple platforms","organizations with hybrid or multi-cloud environments"],"limitations":["requires API access and authentication credentials for each connected tool","integration setup is technically demanding and requires security team involvement","effectiveness depends on depth of integration with existing toolstack"],"requires":["API credentials for SIEM, vulnerability scanners, and cloud platforms","network connectivity to all source security tools","security team technical expertise for integration configuration"],"input_types":["API connections to security tools","vulnerability scan results","SIEM alert feeds","cloud security platform data"],"output_types":["unified alert stream","normalized vulnerability records","consolidated threat data"],"categories":["security","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.ml.driven.vulnerability.prioritization","name":"ml-driven vulnerability prioritization","description":"Applies machine learning algorithms to rank and prioritize security alerts and vulnerabilities based on actual risk rather than treating all alerts equally. Reduces alert fatigue by surfacing the most critical threats first.","intents":["I'm overwhelmed by thousands of alerts and need to know which ones actually matter","I want to focus my limited security team on the highest-impact vulnerabilities","I need to cut through false positives and noise to find real threats"],"best_for":["under-resourced security operations teams","organizations with high alert volume and alert fatigue","enterprises needing to optimize triage workflow efficiency"],"limitations":["prioritization accuracy depends on quality and completeness of input data","ML model effectiveness improves over time with more data","may require tuning and customization for specific organizational context"],"requires":["sufficient historical alert and vulnerability data for ML training","normalized and aggregated alert data from multiple sources","ongoing data feed to continuously improve model accuracy"],"input_types":["aggregated security alerts","vulnerability metadata","historical alert data","threat intelligence"],"output_types":["prioritized alert ranking","risk scores","recommended action queue"],"categories":["security","machine-learning","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.contextual.risk.scoring.with.asset.criticality","name":"contextual risk scoring with asset criticality","description":"Calculates risk scores for vulnerabilities by considering multiple contextual factors including asset criticality, exploit availability, business impact, and environmental context. Moves beyond simple severity ratings to provide business-aligned risk assessment.","intents":["I need to know which vulnerabilities pose the biggest business risk, not just technical severity","I want to understand how critical assets are affected by vulnerabilities","I need to justify remediation priorities to business stakeholders based on actual impact"],"best_for":["enterprises with complex asset inventories and criticality classifications","security teams needing to communicate risk to business leadership","organizations with limited remediation capacity needing to prioritize strategically"],"limitations":["requires accurate asset inventory and criticality data to be effective","scoring accuracy depends on quality of contextual metadata","may not account for all organizational-specific risk factors without customization"],"requires":["asset inventory with criticality classifications","exploit availability data and threat intelligence feeds","business impact assessment data","environmental context about asset relationships and dependencies"],"input_types":["vulnerability data","asset inventory","criticality ratings","exploit intelligence","business context metadata"],"output_types":["contextual risk scores","business-impact ratings","prioritized remediation recommendations"],"categories":["security","risk-management","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.cross.platform.vulnerability.deduplication","name":"cross-platform vulnerability deduplication","description":"Identifies and merges duplicate vulnerability records that appear across multiple security tools, eliminating redundant alerts for the same underlying issue. Consolidates related vulnerabilities into single actionable items.","intents":["I'm seeing the same vulnerability reported by multiple tools and need to deduplicate","I want to count unique vulnerabilities, not inflated numbers from tool overlap","I need to track remediation efforts without duplicate work items"],"best_for":["organizations using multiple overlapping security scanning tools","security teams with limited resources to handle duplicate work","enterprises needing accurate vulnerability counts for reporting"],"limitations":["deduplication accuracy depends on consistent vulnerability identification across tools","may miss subtle variations of the same underlying issue","requires ongoing tuning as new tools are added to the stack"],"requires":["aggregated vulnerability data from multiple sources","consistent vulnerability identifiers (CVE, CWE) across tools","metadata about vulnerability characteristics for matching"],"input_types":["vulnerability records from multiple tools","CVE/CWE identifiers","asset and location data"],"output_types":["deduplicated vulnerability records","consolidated vulnerability list","mapping of source tool records to deduplicated items"],"categories":["security","data-deduplication","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_4","uri":"capability://security.unified.security.operations.dashboard","name":"unified security operations dashboard","description":"Provides a centralized operational view displaying aggregated security data, prioritized alerts, risk metrics, and remediation status across all connected security tools. Enables security teams to monitor and manage security posture from a single interface.","intents":["I need a single dashboard to see the overall security status of my organization","I want to track remediation progress across all vulnerabilities and alerts","I need to quickly identify emerging threats or spikes in security incidents"],"best_for":["security operations centers (SOCs) and security teams","security leadership needing visibility into organizational risk","enterprises with distributed security responsibilities"],"limitations":["dashboard effectiveness depends on quality of underlying data aggregation","real-time updates may have latency depending on source tool integration","customization options may be limited for specific organizational needs"],"requires":["aggregated security data from multiple sources","prioritized alert and vulnerability data","real-time or near-real-time data feeds from connected tools"],"input_types":["aggregated alerts","prioritized vulnerabilities","risk scores","remediation status data"],"output_types":["visual dashboard","metrics and KPIs","alert summaries","trend analysis"],"categories":["security","visualization","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_5","uri":"capability://security.automated.alert.noise.filtering","name":"automated alert noise filtering","description":"Uses ML and contextual analysis to automatically suppress, group, or deprioritize low-value alerts and false positives that don't represent genuine security risks. Reduces alert volume to focus security team attention on meaningful threats.","intents":["I want to eliminate noisy alerts that don't represent real security risks","I need to reduce alert fatigue so my team can focus on actual threats","I want to suppress known benign alerts and false positives automatically"],"best_for":["organizations with high false positive rates in their security tools","security teams experiencing alert fatigue","enterprises with mature security tooling generating excessive noise"],"limitations":["filtering rules may need customization for specific organizational environment","risk of suppressing legitimate alerts if filtering is too aggressive","requires ongoing tuning and feedback to maintain accuracy"],"requires":["historical alert data to identify patterns of false positives","contextual information about legitimate system behavior","feedback mechanism to refine filtering rules"],"input_types":["raw security alerts","alert metadata and context","historical alert patterns"],"output_types":["filtered alert stream","suppressed alert logs","noise reduction metrics"],"categories":["security","machine-learning","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.vulnerability.remediation.workflow.orchestration","name":"vulnerability remediation workflow orchestration","description":"Manages and tracks the remediation process for prioritized vulnerabilities, including assignment, status updates, and closure tracking. Integrates with ticketing systems and enables teams to coordinate remediation efforts across the organization.","intents":["I need to assign vulnerabilities to teams and track remediation progress","I want to ensure critical vulnerabilities are remediated before less important ones","I need to report on remediation metrics and SLA compliance"],"best_for":["security teams managing large remediation backlogs","enterprises with formal remediation SLAs","organizations needing to coordinate across multiple teams"],"limitations":["effectiveness depends on team adoption and consistent status updates","may require integration with existing ticketing or ITSM systems","doesn't automate actual remediation, only workflow management"],"requires":["prioritized vulnerability list","team and resource information","integration with ticketing or ITSM systems","remediation SLA definitions"],"input_types":["prioritized vulnerabilities","team assignments","remediation status updates","SLA definitions"],"output_types":["remediation tickets","progress tracking","SLA compliance reports","remediation metrics"],"categories":["security","workflow-management","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_7","uri":"capability://security.threat.intelligence.enrichment","name":"threat intelligence enrichment","description":"Augments vulnerability and alert data with external threat intelligence including exploit availability, active exploitation status, and threat actor information. Provides context about whether vulnerabilities are actively being exploited in the wild.","intents":["I need to know if vulnerabilities are actively being exploited","I want to understand the threat landscape for vulnerabilities affecting my organization","I need to prioritize based on whether exploits are publicly available"],"best_for":["security teams needing to understand exploit availability","organizations prioritizing based on active threat status","enterprises managing zero-day and emerging threat risks"],"limitations":["threat intelligence quality depends on data sources used","may have latency in detecting newly active exploits","requires integration with threat intelligence feeds"],"requires":["access to threat intelligence feeds and data sources","vulnerability identifiers (CVE) for enrichment lookup","integration with external threat intelligence platforms"],"input_types":["vulnerability records","CVE identifiers","threat intelligence feeds"],"output_types":["enriched vulnerability records","exploit availability status","threat actor information","active exploitation indicators"],"categories":["security","threat-intelligence","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cyclops-security__cap_8","uri":"capability://security.security.posture.reporting.and.compliance","name":"security posture reporting and compliance","description":"Generates comprehensive reports on organizational security posture, vulnerability metrics, remediation progress, and compliance status. Provides executive-level summaries and detailed technical reports for different stakeholder audiences.","intents":["I need to report security metrics to executive leadership and the board","I want to demonstrate compliance with security standards and regulations","I need to show progress on vulnerability remediation over time"],"best_for":["security leadership and CISOs reporting to executives","organizations with compliance requirements","enterprises needing to demonstrate security maturity"],"limitations":["report accuracy depends on quality of underlying data","may require customization for specific compliance frameworks","reporting templates may not cover all organizational needs"],"requires":["aggregated security data and metrics","historical trend data for comparison","compliance framework definitions","remediation and closure data"],"input_types":["vulnerability metrics","remediation data","risk scores","compliance requirements"],"output_types":["executive summary reports","detailed technical reports","compliance attestation reports","trend analysis and metrics"],"categories":["security","reporting","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["API credentials for SIEM, vulnerability scanners, and cloud platforms","network connectivity to all source security tools","security team technical expertise for integration configuration","sufficient historical alert and vulnerability data for ML training","normalized and aggregated alert data from multiple sources","ongoing data feed to continuously improve model accuracy","asset inventory with criticality classifications","exploit availability data and threat intelligence feeds","business impact assessment data","environmental context about asset relationships and dependencies"],"failure_modes":["requires API access and authentication credentials for each connected tool","integration setup is technically demanding and requires security team involvement","effectiveness depends on depth of integration with existing toolstack","prioritization accuracy depends on quality and completeness of input data","ML model effectiveness improves over time with more data","may require tuning and customization for specific organizational context","requires accurate asset inventory and criticality data to be effective","scoring accuracy depends on quality of contextual metadata","may not account for all organizational-specific risk factors without customization","deduplication accuracy depends on consistent vulnerability identification across tools","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.41666666666666663,"quality":0.79,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.282Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.538Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=cyclops-security","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=cyclops-security"}},"signature":"gj4oUOK/5xOq2jtvQVPik3jNuZ4ZayZdlGzu2A+rqwwj6FvCZfYWVyp3yNaYXPwnRTr/SMNjEXdub61AFH5QAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T14:36:30.337Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/cyclops-security","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/cyclops-security","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=cyclops-security","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}