{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-crewai-ts","slug":"crewai-ts","name":"crewai-ts","type":"framework","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/crewai-ts","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/crewai-ts","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":["crewai","typescript","agents","llm","ai"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.agent.orchestration.with.role.based.task.delegation","name":"multi-agent orchestration with role-based task delegation","description":"Enables creation of specialized AI agents with defined roles, goals, and backstories that collaborate to complete complex tasks through a coordinator pattern. Each agent maintains its own LLM context and can delegate work to other agents or execute tasks independently, with the framework handling message routing, state management, and execution sequencing across the agent network.","intents":["I want to create multiple AI agents with different expertise areas that work together on a single project","I need agents to automatically delegate subtasks to each other based on their specialized roles","I want to orchestrate complex workflows where agents have different responsibilities and can communicate asynchronously"],"best_for":["teams building complex AI workflows with multiple specialized agents","developers creating autonomous agent systems for research, content generation, or business automation","builders prototyping multi-agent collaboration patterns without building orchestration from scratch"],"limitations":["No built-in persistence layer — agent state and conversation history require external storage integration","Synchronous execution model may bottleneck when many agents operate in parallel; no native async/await optimization for concurrent agent operations","Limited to TypeScript/Node.js runtime; cannot directly execute Python-based specialized tools without wrapper layers"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.7+ (or JavaScript with type definitions)","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, or compatible)","Basic understanding of agent design patterns and task decomposition"],"input_types":["task descriptions (text)","agent role definitions (structured JSON/objects)","tool/function definitions (JSON schema)","conversation context (text messages)"],"output_types":["structured task results (JSON)","agent execution logs (text)","conversation transcripts (text)","tool invocation records (structured data)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.use.integration.with.schema.based.function.calling","name":"tool-use integration with schema-based function calling","description":"Provides a declarative system for registering tools/functions that agents can invoke, using JSON schema definitions to enable LLM-native function calling across multiple provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama). The framework handles schema validation, parameter marshalling, and error handling, allowing agents to autonomously decide when and how to use tools based on task context.","intents":["I want agents to call external APIs, databases, or custom functions without manual prompt engineering","I need to ensure tool parameters are validated against a schema before execution","I want to support multiple LLM providers' function-calling APIs with a single tool definition"],"best_for":["developers building agents that need to interact with external systems (APIs, databases, services)","teams standardizing tool definitions across multiple LLM providers","builders creating agent workflows that require deterministic function execution with validation"],"limitations":["Schema validation happens post-LLM generation; malformed tool calls may require retry logic or fallback handlers","No built-in rate limiting or circuit breaker for tool invocations; high-frequency tool use may hit provider rate limits","Tool execution is synchronous; long-running tools block agent execution until completion"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","JSON schema definitions for each tool","LLM provider API keys with function-calling support","TypeScript or JavaScript runtime with async/await support"],"input_types":["tool definitions (JSON schema)","function implementations (JavaScript/TypeScript callables)","agent task descriptions (text)"],"output_types":["tool execution results (any JSON-serializable type)","error messages (text)","execution logs (structured data)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_10","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.typescript.native.type.safety.and.ide.support","name":"typescript-native type safety and ide support","description":"Provides full TypeScript support with type definitions for agents, tasks, tools, and configurations, enabling compile-time type checking and IDE autocompletion. Type safety extends to tool schemas, output validation, and callback signatures, reducing runtime errors and improving developer experience.","intents":["I want compile-time type checking for agent definitions and task configurations","I need IDE autocompletion and type hints for agent APIs","I want to catch schema mismatches and type errors before runtime"],"best_for":["TypeScript-first teams building agent systems with strict type requirements","developers using IDEs with strong TypeScript support (VS Code, WebStorm)","teams prioritizing developer experience and early error detection"],"limitations":["TypeScript compilation adds build-time overhead; no zero-cost abstractions","Type definitions may lag behind framework updates; breaking changes require type definition updates","Dynamic configuration (from JSON files) loses type safety unless explicitly validated"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.7+","Node.js 16+","TypeScript compiler (tsc) or build tool with TypeScript support"],"input_types":["TypeScript source code","type definitions (TypeScript interfaces)"],"output_types":["compiled JavaScript","type checking errors (text)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.provider.abstraction.with.multi.model.support","name":"llm provider abstraction with multi-model support","description":"Abstracts LLM interactions behind a unified interface that supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, and compatible APIs) and models, handling authentication, request formatting, response parsing, and error handling transparently. Agents can switch between models or providers without code changes, enabling cost optimization and model experimentation.","intents":["I want to use different LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local Ollama) interchangeably in my agent system","I need to experiment with different models without rewriting agent code","I want to optimize costs by using cheaper models for simple tasks and premium models for complex reasoning"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multiple LLM providers and wanting to avoid vendor lock-in","developers building cost-sensitive agent systems that need model switching","organizations using local LLMs (Ollama) alongside cloud providers"],"limitations":["Response format variations between providers may require provider-specific parsing logic for edge cases","Token counting and cost estimation differ across providers; no unified cost tracking","Streaming responses are not uniformly abstracted; some providers have different streaming semantics"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or Ollama endpoint)","Knowledge of which models are available on each provider"],"input_types":["provider configuration (JSON/objects)","model identifiers (strings)","prompts/messages (text)"],"output_types":["LLM responses (text)","structured completions (JSON when using tool-calling)","usage metrics (tokens, cost estimates)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.task.based.workflow.execution.with.sequential.and.parallel.patterns","name":"task-based workflow execution with sequential and parallel patterns","description":"Provides a task abstraction that encapsulates work units with descriptions, expected outputs, and assigned agents, supporting both sequential execution (tasks run one after another with output chaining) and parallel execution patterns. The framework manages task state, input/output mapping, and dependency resolution, allowing complex workflows to be defined declaratively.","intents":["I want to define a sequence of tasks where each task's output feeds into the next task's input","I need to run multiple independent tasks in parallel and aggregate their results","I want to track task execution status and handle failures gracefully"],"best_for":["developers building multi-step agent workflows (research → analysis → report generation)","teams automating business processes with clear task dependencies","builders creating content generation pipelines with specialized agents per stage"],"limitations":["No built-in conditional branching; complex workflows with if/else logic require custom orchestration","Task dependencies are implicit through output chaining; no explicit dependency graph visualization","Parallel execution is limited by sequential LLM API calls; no true concurrency optimization for I/O-bound operations"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Task definitions with clear descriptions and expected outputs","Agents assigned to each task"],"input_types":["task descriptions (text)","task context/input (text or structured data)","agent assignments (agent objects)"],"output_types":["task results (text or structured data)","execution logs (text)","task status records (structured data)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.memory.and.context.management.across.agent.conversations","name":"memory and context management across agent conversations","description":"Manages conversation history and context state for agents, maintaining message logs, agent-specific memory, and shared context across task execution. The framework provides hooks for custom memory backends, enabling integration with external storage (databases, vector stores) while maintaining in-memory caches for performance.","intents":["I want agents to remember previous conversations and context across multiple task executions","I need to share context between agents so they can reference each other's work","I want to implement custom memory backends (e.g., vector stores for semantic search over past interactions)"],"best_for":["developers building long-running agent systems that need persistent memory","teams implementing RAG-style agent systems with semantic memory lookup","builders creating multi-turn agent conversations with context awareness"],"limitations":["Default memory is in-process and ephemeral; no built-in persistence without custom backend implementation","No automatic memory pruning or summarization; long conversations can exceed LLM context windows","Memory search is basic string matching by default; semantic search requires external vector store integration"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Optional: external storage backend (database, vector store) for persistent memory","Understanding of memory backend interface for custom implementations"],"input_types":["conversation messages (text)","context metadata (structured data)","memory queries (text)"],"output_types":["retrieved context (text)","conversation history (structured messages)","memory search results (text or structured data)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.output.parsing.and.validation","name":"structured output parsing and validation","description":"Automatically parses and validates LLM outputs against expected schemas, converting raw text responses into structured data (JSON, objects) with type checking and error recovery. Supports multiple output formats and provides fallback strategies when parsing fails, ensuring downstream code receives validated data structures.","intents":["I want agent outputs to be automatically parsed into structured data (JSON, objects) instead of raw text","I need to validate that agent responses match an expected schema before using them","I want to handle parsing failures gracefully with retry or fallback logic"],"best_for":["developers building agent systems that feed outputs into other systems requiring structured data","teams implementing data extraction workflows with validation requirements","builders creating agent pipelines where type safety is critical"],"limitations":["LLM output parsing is probabilistic; complex schemas may require multiple retries or prompt engineering","No automatic schema inference; schemas must be defined explicitly","Fallback strategies (retries, defaults) add latency; no configurable timeout limits"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","JSON schema or TypeScript type definitions for expected outputs","Understanding of schema design for LLM outputs"],"input_types":["LLM response text","output schema definitions (JSON schema or TypeScript types)"],"output_types":["parsed structured data (JSON, objects)","validation errors (text)","fallback values (if parsing fails)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.callback.and.event.hook.system.for.execution.monitoring","name":"callback and event hook system for execution monitoring","description":"Provides a callback/event system that fires at key execution points (agent start, tool call, task completion, error) allowing external monitoring, logging, and custom behavior injection. Callbacks receive structured event data and can modify execution flow or trigger side effects without modifying core agent code.","intents":["I want to log or monitor agent execution in real-time without modifying agent code","I need to trigger external actions (webhooks, notifications) when specific events occur","I want to implement custom metrics collection or observability integration"],"best_for":["teams building production agent systems requiring observability and monitoring","developers integrating agents with external logging/tracing systems (DataDog, New Relic, etc.)","builders implementing custom event-driven workflows triggered by agent execution"],"limitations":["Callbacks are synchronous; long-running callbacks block agent execution","No built-in filtering or sampling; high-frequency callbacks may impact performance","Event schema is framework-defined; custom event types require extension"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Understanding of callback/event patterns","Optional: external logging or monitoring service"],"input_types":["callback function definitions (JavaScript/TypeScript functions)","event filter criteria (optional)"],"output_types":["event data (structured objects)","side effects (logs, webhooks, metrics)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.crew.level.configuration.and.initialization","name":"crew-level configuration and initialization","description":"Provides a declarative configuration system for defining crews (collections of agents and tasks) with settings for execution mode, logging, memory backends, and LLM provider defaults. Configuration can be loaded from code, environment variables, or files, enabling environment-specific behavior without code changes.","intents":["I want to configure multiple agents and tasks in a single crew definition","I need to switch between different execution modes (sequential, hierarchical) without code changes","I want to load crew configuration from environment variables or config files for different deployments"],"best_for":["teams deploying agent systems across multiple environments (dev, staging, prod)","developers building reusable crew templates that can be configured per use case","builders implementing multi-tenant agent systems with per-tenant configuration"],"limitations":["Configuration validation is basic; complex validation logic requires custom code","No built-in configuration versioning or rollback; config changes are immediate","Environment variable loading is manual; no automatic secret management integration"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Understanding of crew structure (agents, tasks, settings)"],"input_types":["crew configuration objects (JavaScript/TypeScript)","environment variables (strings)","configuration files (JSON, YAML)"],"output_types":["initialized crew instances","configuration validation errors (text)"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_8","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.hierarchical.execution.with.manager.agent.pattern","name":"hierarchical execution with manager agent pattern","description":"Implements a manager-agent pattern where a designated manager agent coordinates work among subordinate agents, making decisions about task delegation, prioritization, and result aggregation. The manager uses the same LLM-based reasoning as other agents but operates at a higher level of abstraction, enabling complex multi-agent workflows without explicit orchestration rules.","intents":["I want a manager agent to automatically decide how to delegate tasks among specialized agents","I need hierarchical decision-making where a manager agent evaluates and prioritizes work","I want to implement complex workflows where agents negotiate or collaborate through a manager"],"best_for":["teams building complex multi-agent systems with dynamic task allocation","developers implementing hierarchical organizational structures in agent systems","builders creating adaptive workflows where delegation decisions are LLM-driven"],"limitations":["Manager agent decisions are non-deterministic; same input may produce different delegations across runs","No explicit conflict resolution when multiple agents claim the same task","Manager agent overhead adds latency; every task requires manager evaluation before delegation"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Manager agent definition with clear decision-making goals","Subordinate agents with well-defined capabilities"],"input_types":["task descriptions (text)","agent capability descriptions (text)"],"output_types":["delegation decisions (structured data)","task assignments (agent-task mappings)","aggregated results (text or structured data)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-crewai-ts__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.logic.with.exponential.backoff","name":"error handling and retry logic with exponential backoff","description":"Provides built-in error handling for LLM API failures, tool execution errors, and parsing failures, with configurable retry strategies including exponential backoff, jitter, and maximum retry limits. Errors are categorized (transient vs. permanent) to enable intelligent retry decisions without manual intervention.","intents":["I want agents to automatically retry failed LLM calls without manual intervention","I need to handle rate limiting and transient API failures gracefully","I want to distinguish between retryable errors (rate limits) and permanent errors (invalid input) to avoid wasted retries"],"best_for":["teams building production agent systems requiring resilience to API failures","developers working with rate-limited LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic)","builders implementing long-running agent workflows that must survive transient failures"],"limitations":["Retry logic is synchronous; exponential backoff blocks agent execution","No built-in circuit breaker; repeated failures don't prevent subsequent attempts","Retry configuration is global; per-agent or per-task retry policies require custom code"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Understanding of retry strategies and backoff algorithms"],"input_types":["error objects (JavaScript Error instances)","retry configuration (max attempts, backoff strategy)"],"output_types":["retry results (success or final failure)","error logs (text)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.7+ (or JavaScript with type definitions)","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, or compatible)","Basic understanding of agent design patterns and task decomposition","JSON schema definitions for each tool","LLM provider API keys with function-calling support","TypeScript or JavaScript runtime with async/await support","TypeScript 4.7+","TypeScript compiler (tsc) or build tool with TypeScript support","API keys for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or Ollama endpoint)"],"failure_modes":["No built-in persistence layer — agent state and conversation history require external storage integration","Synchronous execution model may bottleneck when many agents operate in parallel; no native async/await optimization for concurrent agent operations","Limited to TypeScript/Node.js runtime; cannot directly execute Python-based specialized tools without wrapper layers","Schema validation happens post-LLM generation; malformed tool calls may require retry logic or fallback handlers","No built-in rate limiting or circuit breaker for tool invocations; high-frequency tool use may hit provider rate limits","Tool execution is synchronous; long-running tools block agent execution until completion","TypeScript compilation adds build-time overhead; no zero-cost abstractions","Type definitions may lag behind framework updates; breaking changes require type definition updates","Dynamic configuration (from JSON files) loses type safety unless explicitly validated","Response format variations between providers may require provider-specific parsing logic for edge cases","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.03873898263387294,"quality":0.32,"ecosystem":0.45,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:04:47.474Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":122,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=crewai-ts","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=crewai-ts"}},"signature":"0vW9qbVMv4UuD57Wb3ON4qxPShwcsOgv4OZ0b0Uyl703CgOV08FvqktYxV7kY4UcL+f9+IkDaRztAIdKUFlOBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T18:02:28.188Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/crewai-ts","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/crewai-ts","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=crewai-ts","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}