{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_cosine-ai","slug":"cosine-ai","name":"Cosine AI","type":"product","url":"https://cosine.sh","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/cosine-ai","categories":["code-editors"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.analysis.semantic.code.understanding","name":"semantic-code-understanding","description":"Analyzes code beyond syntactic patterns to comprehend architectural intent, design patterns, and business logic embedded in the codebase. Uses deep semantic analysis to understand relationships between components and their purpose within the system.","intents":["I want to understand what this code is really doing, not just what it says","I need to know the architectural intent behind existing code before making changes","I want to identify how different parts of my codebase relate to each other semantically"],"best_for":["teams with complex, interconnected codebases","developers working on legacy systems with unclear documentation","engineering teams doing large-scale refactoring"],"limitations":["effectiveness depends on code clarity and documentation quality","may struggle with highly obfuscated or unconventional code patterns","requires sufficient codebase size to establish meaningful semantic relationships"],"requires":["access to full codebase or significant portions of it","codebase in supported programming languages","integration with development environment"],"input_types":["source code files","code repositories","code snippets with context"],"output_types":["semantic understanding summaries","architectural relationship maps","intent descriptions"],"categories":["code-analysis","comprehension"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.analysis.change.impact.assessment","name":"change-impact-assessment","description":"Analyzes the downstream effects and dependencies of proposed code changes across the entire codebase. Identifies which components, functions, and systems would be affected by modifications, helping developers understand the full scope of impact before committing changes.","intents":["I want to know what will break if I make this change","Show me all the places affected by this refactoring before I do it","I need to understand the ripple effects of this modification across my system"],"best_for":["teams performing large-scale refactoring","developers working on shared codebases with many dependencies","organizations trying to reduce regression bugs from changes"],"limitations":["accuracy depends on static analysis capabilities and may miss runtime dependencies","cannot predict behavioral changes in third-party libraries","may produce false positives in complex dependency chains"],"requires":["complete or near-complete codebase access","ability to parse and analyze dependency graphs","understanding of the codebase's module/package structure"],"input_types":["proposed code changes","file modifications","refactoring specifications"],"output_types":["impact reports","affected component lists","dependency chain visualizations","risk assessments"],"categories":["code-analysis","risk-assessment","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_10","uri":"capability://architecture.architectural.consistency.checking","name":"architectural-consistency-checking","description":"Validates that code changes maintain consistency with defined architectural principles and design patterns. Flags violations of architectural rules and suggests corrections.","intents":["Does this change violate our architectural principles?","I want to ensure new code follows our design patterns","Check if this modification maintains architectural consistency"],"best_for":["organizations with well-defined architectures","teams enforcing architectural standards","large systems requiring strict architectural compliance"],"limitations":["requires clear architectural documentation","may produce false positives for edge cases","effectiveness depends on architecture clarity"],"requires":["architectural guidelines or documentation","design pattern definitions","semantic code understanding"],"input_types":["code changes","architectural specifications","design pattern definitions"],"output_types":["consistency reports","violation alerts","correction suggestions","architectural compliance scores"],"categories":["architecture","quality-assurance","code-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_11","uri":"capability://performance.performance.impact.prediction","name":"performance-impact-prediction","description":"Analyzes code changes to predict potential performance impacts, identifying modifications that could affect system performance. Flags performance-critical code changes for review.","intents":["Will this change impact system performance?","Show me if this modification could cause performance issues","I want to know the performance implications before deploying"],"best_for":["performance-critical systems","teams optimizing for efficiency","developers working on bottleneck code"],"limitations":["predictions are based on static analysis and may not reflect actual runtime performance","cannot account for infrastructure or external factors","requires performance baseline data for accuracy"],"requires":["code change analysis","performance metrics or baselines","understanding of performance-critical paths"],"input_types":["code changes","performance baselines","system metrics"],"output_types":["performance impact predictions","bottleneck alerts","optimization suggestions","performance risk reports"],"categories":["performance","optimization","code-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_12","uri":"capability://security.security.vulnerability.detection","name":"security-vulnerability-detection","description":"Scans code changes for potential security vulnerabilities and unsafe patterns. Identifies security risks introduced by modifications and suggests secure alternatives.","intents":["Does this code change introduce security vulnerabilities?","Flag any unsafe patterns in this modification","I want to ensure this change doesn't compromise security"],"best_for":["security-conscious organizations","teams handling sensitive data","systems requiring compliance with security standards"],"limitations":["detection is based on known vulnerability patterns","may miss novel or zero-day vulnerabilities","requires security knowledge to interpret results"],"requires":["code change analysis","security vulnerability database","understanding of secure coding practices"],"input_types":["code changes","security guidelines","vulnerability databases"],"output_types":["vulnerability reports","security risk alerts","secure code suggestions","compliance violation reports"],"categories":["security","quality-assurance","code-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.improvement.contextual.refactoring.suggestions","name":"contextual-refactoring-suggestions","description":"Generates refactoring recommendations that are aware of the codebase's architecture, design patterns, and semantic intent. Suggests improvements that align with existing code style and architectural principles rather than generic patterns.","intents":["I want refactoring suggestions that make sense for my specific codebase","Suggest improvements that fit our architecture and coding standards","Help me improve code quality while maintaining consistency with our design patterns"],"best_for":["teams with established architectural patterns","codebases with consistent coding standards","developers seeking context-aware rather than generic suggestions"],"limitations":["suggestions may not apply to all edge cases or special scenarios","requires clear architectural patterns to be effective","may miss domain-specific refactoring opportunities"],"requires":["semantic understanding of the codebase","access to architectural documentation or patterns","sufficient code context around the target area"],"input_types":["code sections to refactor","architectural guidelines","coding standards documentation"],"output_types":["refactoring suggestions","code transformation examples","justification for changes"],"categories":["code-improvement","refactoring","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://documentation.automated.code.comprehension","name":"automated-code-comprehension","description":"Automatically generates explanations and documentation for existing code by analyzing its structure, logic, and purpose. Reduces the cognitive load on developers by providing instant understanding of unfamiliar code sections.","intents":["I need to quickly understand what this code does without reading it line by line","Generate documentation for code that lacks comments or explanations","Help new team members understand our codebase faster"],"best_for":["teams with large or complex codebases","organizations onboarding new developers","projects with insufficient documentation"],"limitations":["quality of explanations depends on code clarity","may miss domain-specific context or business logic","generated documentation may need human review for accuracy"],"requires":["access to source code","sufficient context around code sections","supported programming languages"],"input_types":["source code files","code functions or classes","code snippets"],"output_types":["natural language explanations","documentation strings","code summaries","function/class descriptions"],"categories":["documentation","comprehension","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.analysis.dependency.graph.analysis","name":"dependency-graph-analysis","description":"Maps and visualizes the relationships and dependencies between different components, modules, and services in the codebase. Helps developers understand system architecture and identify circular dependencies or tightly coupled components.","intents":["Show me how different parts of my system depend on each other","I want to visualize the architecture of my codebase","Help me identify tightly coupled components that should be decoupled"],"best_for":["teams with microservices or modular architectures","developers working on large systems","teams trying to improve system design"],"limitations":["may not capture runtime dependencies or dynamic imports","visualization complexity increases with codebase size","requires clear module/package boundaries to be effective"],"requires":["complete codebase access","ability to parse import/require statements","understanding of module structure"],"input_types":["source code repository","module definitions","import/dependency declarations"],"output_types":["dependency graphs","architecture visualizations","coupling metrics","circular dependency reports"],"categories":["code-analysis","architecture","visualization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_5","uri":"capability://risk.assessment.risk.assessment.for.changes","name":"risk-assessment-for-changes","description":"Evaluates the risk level of proposed code changes by analyzing affected components, test coverage, and potential side effects. Provides risk scores and recommendations to help developers make safer refactoring decisions.","intents":["Is this change risky? What could go wrong?","I want to know the risk level before deploying this change","Help me identify high-risk modifications that need extra testing"],"best_for":["teams with critical systems requiring high reliability","organizations trying to reduce production bugs","developers working on shared codebases"],"limitations":["risk assessment is based on static analysis and may miss runtime issues","cannot account for external factors or infrastructure changes","requires test coverage data to be fully effective"],"requires":["impact analysis of proposed changes","test coverage metrics","historical change data (optional)","understanding of system criticality"],"input_types":["proposed code changes","test coverage reports","change specifications"],"output_types":["risk scores","risk reports","mitigation recommendations","testing suggestions"],"categories":["risk-assessment","quality-assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.codebase.aware.code.generation","name":"codebase-aware-code-generation","description":"Generates new code that is consistent with the existing codebase's style, patterns, and architectural principles. Ensures generated code integrates seamlessly with the project rather than introducing inconsistencies.","intents":["Generate code that matches our codebase's style and patterns","I want AI-generated code that fits naturally into our system","Create new features that follow our architectural guidelines"],"best_for":["teams with established coding standards","projects with consistent architectural patterns","developers wanting to accelerate development while maintaining quality"],"limitations":["quality depends on clarity of existing patterns","may struggle with highly specialized or domain-specific code","generated code still requires review and testing"],"requires":["semantic understanding of the codebase","clear coding standards and patterns","sufficient examples of existing code"],"input_types":["code specifications","architectural guidelines","existing code examples"],"output_types":["generated source code","code templates","implementation suggestions"],"categories":["code-generation","productivity","development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_7","uri":"capability://testing.test.impact.analysis","name":"test-impact-analysis","description":"Identifies which tests are affected by code changes and determines test coverage gaps for modified code. Helps developers understand what testing is needed to validate changes safely.","intents":["Which tests do I need to run to validate this change?","Show me what test coverage gaps exist for this modification","I want to know if my changes are adequately tested"],"best_for":["teams with comprehensive test suites","organizations focused on quality assurance","developers working on critical code paths"],"limitations":["requires existing test suite to be effective","may not identify all edge cases needing tests","accuracy depends on test quality and coverage metrics"],"requires":["access to test files and test coverage data","ability to map code changes to tests","test execution infrastructure"],"input_types":["code changes","test suite definitions","coverage reports"],"output_types":["affected test lists","coverage gap reports","testing recommendations","test execution plans"],"categories":["testing","quality-assurance","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_8","uri":"capability://code.analysis.code.pattern.detection","name":"code-pattern-detection","description":"Identifies recurring patterns, anti-patterns, and code smells across the codebase. Detects inconsistencies in implementation approaches and suggests standardization opportunities.","intents":["Find all instances of this pattern in our codebase","Show me where we're using anti-patterns or code smells","Help me standardize how we implement similar functionality"],"best_for":["teams trying to improve code consistency","organizations refactoring large codebases","developers establishing coding standards"],"limitations":["pattern detection may have false positives","requires clear definition of what constitutes a pattern","may miss subtle variations of patterns"],"requires":["full codebase access","pattern definitions or examples","semantic code understanding"],"input_types":["source code repository","pattern specifications","code examples"],"output_types":["pattern occurrence lists","anti-pattern reports","standardization suggestions","code smell reports"],"categories":["code-analysis","quality-assurance","refactoring"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cosine-ai__cap_9","uri":"capability://refactoring.cross.file.refactoring.coordination","name":"cross-file-refactoring-coordination","description":"Coordinates refactoring changes across multiple files and modules, ensuring consistency and preventing breaking changes. Manages complex refactorings that span multiple components.","intents":["I need to rename this function across all files that use it","Help me refactor this pattern consistently throughout the codebase","Coordinate changes across multiple files to avoid breaking things"],"best_for":["teams performing large-scale refactoring","developers working with tightly integrated systems","organizations trying to reduce refactoring errors"],"limitations":["may miss dynamic references or string-based lookups","requires complete codebase understanding","complex refactorings may still need manual verification"],"requires":["full codebase access","dependency graph analysis","impact assessment capabilities"],"input_types":["refactoring specifications","target code elements","scope definitions"],"output_types":["coordinated change plans","multi-file refactoring suggestions","consistency verification reports"],"categories":["refactoring","productivity","code-improvement"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["access to full codebase or significant portions of it","codebase in supported programming languages","integration with development environment","complete or near-complete codebase access","ability to parse and analyze dependency graphs","understanding of the codebase's module/package structure","architectural guidelines or documentation","design pattern definitions","semantic code understanding","code change analysis"],"failure_modes":["effectiveness depends on code clarity and documentation quality","may struggle with highly obfuscated or unconventional code patterns","requires sufficient codebase size to establish meaningful semantic relationships","accuracy depends on static analysis capabilities and may miss runtime dependencies","cannot predict behavioral changes in third-party libraries","may produce false positives in complex dependency chains","requires clear architectural documentation","may produce false positives for edge cases","effectiveness depends on architecture clarity","predictions are based on static analysis and may not reflect actual runtime performance","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.282Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.549Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=cosine-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=cosine-ai"}},"signature":"1yg4CoLtINwQBY+D7Sb6CBzHrNG5M4Ac6nIrFdfxb3gqYirhHxi8lQon0+Y4ebJ2lGj8HNyarAmtvHYre5FkDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T21:17:41.765Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/cosine-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/cosine-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=cosine-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}