{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hn-46636786","slug":"control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec","name":"Control Claude permissions using a cloud-based decision table UI","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/rulebricks/claude-code-guardrails","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec","categories":["automation"],"tags":["hackernews","show-hn"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_0","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.cloud.based.permission.decision.table.ui","name":"cloud-based permission decision table ui","description":"Provides a visual, no-code interface for defining and managing Claude API permission rules through a cloud-hosted decision table. Rules are stored as structured configurations that can be edited, versioned, and deployed without code changes. The UI abstracts complex permission logic into row-based conditions and actions, enabling non-technical stakeholders to control API access patterns.","intents":["Define granular permission policies for Claude API calls without writing code","Manage and update access control rules in real-time across multiple environments","Audit and version-control permission changes through a centralized UI","Delegate permission management to non-technical team members"],"best_for":["Teams deploying Claude agents in production who need fine-grained access control","Organizations requiring compliance-driven permission auditing and change tracking","Multi-tenant SaaS platforms using Claude where permissions vary by customer"],"limitations":["Cloud dependency — requires internet connectivity and external service availability","Decision table complexity scales poorly beyond ~50-100 rules without optimization","No built-in role-based access control (RBAC) for the UI itself — all users with access see all rules"],"requires":["Claude API key (from Anthropic)","Network access to the cloud-hosted decision table service","Modern web browser with JavaScript support"],"input_types":["structured rule definitions (conditions and actions)","API request metadata (model, tokens, user context)"],"output_types":["permission decision (allow/deny/throttle)","audit logs with rule match details"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.real.time.permission.enforcement.middleware","name":"real-time permission enforcement middleware","description":"Intercepts Claude API calls before they reach the API, evaluates them against the decision table rules, and either allows, denies, or throttles the request based on matching conditions. The middleware integrates with the Claude SDK or HTTP client layer, evaluating rules synchronously with minimal latency overhead. Rule matching uses condition evaluation (e.g., user role, token count, model type) to determine the enforcement action.","intents":["Block unauthorized Claude API calls before they consume quota or incur costs","Enforce token limits or rate limits per user, team, or application","Prevent specific models or features from being used by certain users","Log all permission decisions for compliance and debugging"],"best_for":["Backend services wrapping Claude API calls with custom access control","Multi-tenant platforms where different customers have different permission tiers","Organizations with strict compliance requirements (SOC 2, HIPAA) needing permission audit trails"],"limitations":["Synchronous rule evaluation adds latency (~10-50ms per request depending on rule complexity)","No built-in caching of rule decisions — each request re-evaluates the full decision table","Requires integration at the API call layer — cannot retroactively block already-sent requests"],"requires":["Claude SDK or HTTP client integration point","Access to request metadata (user ID, model, token count, etc.)","Connection to the cloud decision table service for rule fetching"],"input_types":["Claude API request object (model, messages, parameters)","request context (user ID, organization, IP address, timestamp)"],"output_types":["permission decision enum (ALLOW, DENY, THROTTLE)","structured audit log entry with decision rationale"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.rule.condition.evaluation.engine","name":"rule condition evaluation engine","description":"Evaluates complex boolean conditions against request and user context to determine if a rule matches. The engine supports multiple condition types (user role, token count thresholds, model type, time-based rules, custom attributes) and combines them with AND/OR logic. Conditions are defined declaratively in the decision table and compiled into efficient evaluation logic that runs synchronously during request processing.","intents":["Match API requests against multi-attribute conditions (e.g., 'if user is admin AND model is gpt-4 AND tokens > 1000')","Create time-based rules (e.g., 'deny Claude access after 5 PM on weekdays')","Evaluate custom user attributes or metadata against rule conditions","Support complex rule logic without requiring code changes"],"best_for":["Teams with complex permission policies that require multi-factor decision logic","Organizations needing time-based or context-aware access control","Platforms where permission rules vary by customer segment or tier"],"limitations":["Condition evaluation is O(n) where n is the number of rules — no indexing or optimization for large rule sets","Custom attribute matching requires the attribute to be explicitly passed in request context","No support for regex or pattern matching in string conditions — only exact match or simple operators"],"requires":["Request context object with user ID, role, and other relevant attributes","Decision table with defined conditions and operators","Synchronous execution environment (no async condition evaluation)"],"input_types":["condition definition (attribute name, operator, value)","request context (user attributes, request metadata)"],"output_types":["boolean result (condition matched or not)","matched rule ID and condition details for logging"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.permission.rule.versioning.and.audit.logging","name":"permission rule versioning and audit logging","description":"Tracks all changes to permission rules with timestamps, user attribution, and before/after snapshots. Each rule modification creates a new version that can be rolled back or compared. Audit logs record every permission decision (allow/deny/throttle) with the rule that matched, user context, and request details. Logs are persisted in the cloud and queryable for compliance reporting.","intents":["Audit who changed which permission rules and when for compliance purposes","Roll back permission rule changes if a deployment causes issues","Investigate why a specific API call was allowed or denied","Generate compliance reports showing permission policy history"],"best_for":["Regulated industries (finance, healthcare) requiring permission audit trails","Teams with multiple people managing permissions who need change accountability","Organizations conducting security audits or compliance reviews"],"limitations":["Audit logs grow unbounded — no built-in retention policy or archival","Querying large audit logs (millions of entries) may be slow without database indexing","No built-in anonymization or PII redaction in audit logs — sensitive user data may be exposed"],"requires":["Cloud storage for rule versions and audit logs","User authentication to attribute rule changes","Timestamp synchronization across distributed systems"],"input_types":["rule change event (old rule, new rule, user, timestamp)","permission decision event (rule matched, user context, request details)"],"output_types":["version history with diffs","audit log entries with full context","compliance reports (CSV, JSON)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.environment.rule.deployment","name":"multi-environment rule deployment","description":"Supports defining separate permission rule sets for development, staging, and production environments, with the ability to promote rules between environments. Rules are deployed to the cloud service without code changes, and environment-specific overrides can be applied. The system tracks which rule version is active in each environment and supports gradual rollout or A/B testing of new rules.","intents":["Test permission rule changes in staging before deploying to production","Maintain different permission policies for different environments (e.g., stricter in prod)","Promote tested rules from dev → staging → prod with confidence","Quickly roll back to a previous rule version if issues arise in production"],"best_for":["Teams with formal deployment processes and multiple environments","Organizations requiring change management and approval workflows","Platforms where permission policies need to differ by environment"],"limitations":["No built-in approval workflow — any user with access can deploy to any environment","Environment-specific overrides can create confusion if not carefully documented","No support for gradual rollout (canary deployment) of rule changes — all-or-nothing promotion"],"requires":["Cloud service supporting multiple environment configurations","User authentication and authorization to deploy rules","Mechanism to tag or label rules with environment metadata"],"input_types":["rule definition","source environment (dev/staging/prod)","target environment (dev/staging/prod)"],"output_types":["deployment confirmation with timestamp","active rule version per environment","deployment history and rollback options"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.sdk.integration.for.claude.api.interception","name":"sdk integration for claude api interception","description":"Provides language-specific SDKs (JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, etc.) that wrap the official Claude SDK and transparently intercept API calls to evaluate them against permission rules. The SDK is a drop-in replacement that requires minimal code changes — developers import the guarded SDK instead of the official one. Interception happens before the request leaves the client, with rule evaluation happening locally or via a remote decision service.","intents":["Add permission enforcement to existing Claude API integrations with minimal code changes","Intercept API calls at the SDK level without modifying application logic","Support both local rule evaluation and remote decision service calls","Provide clear error messages when a request is denied by a permission rule"],"best_for":["Development teams integrating Claude into existing applications","Teams wanting to add permission enforcement without refactoring their codebase","Organizations supporting multiple programming languages"],"limitations":["SDK must be maintained for each language — incomplete coverage if only JavaScript is supported","Interception at SDK level cannot prevent direct HTTP calls to Claude API that bypass the SDK","Local rule evaluation requires syncing rule definitions to the client, adding complexity"],"requires":["Official Claude SDK (anthropic-sdk for JavaScript, anthropic for Python, etc.)","Language-specific SDK wrapper (provided by this project)","Configuration with decision table service endpoint or local rule definitions"],"input_types":["Claude API call parameters (model, messages, etc.)","user context (user ID, role, etc.)"],"output_types":["permission decision (allow/deny/throttle)","error message if denied","modified request if throttled"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.permission.rule.templates.and.presets","name":"permission rule templates and presets","description":"Provides pre-built rule templates for common permission scenarios (e.g., 'deny all gpt-4 access', 'limit tokens per user per day', 'allow only admins to use extended context'). Templates can be customized and combined to create complex policies without writing rules from scratch. The UI includes a template library with descriptions and recommended use cases.","intents":["Quickly set up common permission policies without designing rules from scratch","Apply industry best practices for permission management","Reduce time to implement permission controls for new applications","Provide guidance on permission rule design for teams unfamiliar with access control"],"best_for":["Teams new to permission management who want best-practice starting points","Organizations needing to quickly implement permission controls","Platforms supporting multiple customer tiers with different permission policies"],"limitations":["Templates may not cover all use cases — custom rules still required for complex scenarios","Template customization can lead to inconsistent policies if not carefully managed","No version control for template modifications — changes are not tracked separately from custom rules"],"requires":["Template library in the cloud service","UI for browsing and selecting templates","Customization interface for modifying template parameters"],"input_types":["template selection","customization parameters (token limits, user roles, etc.)"],"output_types":["generated rule set based on template","documentation explaining the rules"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.real.time.rule.synchronization.and.caching","name":"real-time rule synchronization and caching","description":"Synchronizes permission rules from the cloud service to local clients or edge servers with minimal latency. Rules are cached locally with a configurable TTL (time-to-live), and updates are pushed via webhooks or polling. The system handles network failures gracefully by falling back to cached rules. Rule changes propagate to all clients within seconds, ensuring consistent enforcement across distributed systems.","intents":["Ensure permission rules are up-to-date across all API clients without redeployment","Minimize latency of permission decisions by caching rules locally","Handle network failures gracefully by falling back to cached rules","Support real-time rule updates without requiring client restarts"],"best_for":["Distributed systems with multiple API clients that need consistent permission enforcement","High-throughput applications where permission decision latency matters","Organizations requiring rule changes to take effect immediately across all clients"],"limitations":["Cache invalidation complexity — stale rules may be enforced for up to TTL duration","Webhook-based updates require clients to be reachable — unreliable for mobile or edge clients","Polling-based synchronization adds latency and server load compared to push-based updates"],"requires":["Cloud service supporting rule distribution (webhooks or polling API)","Local caching mechanism (in-memory, Redis, etc.)","Network connectivity for initial rule fetch and periodic updates"],"input_types":["rule update event from cloud service","cache invalidation signal"],"output_types":["cached rule set","cache hit/miss metrics","synchronization status (up-to-date, stale, offline)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.permission.decision.analytics.and.reporting","name":"permission decision analytics and reporting","description":"Aggregates permission decision logs to provide insights into API usage patterns, permission denials, and potential policy issues. Reports include metrics like 'most denied users', 'most common denial reasons', 'token usage by user/team', and 'rule hit frequency'. The analytics dashboard visualizes trends over time and supports filtering by user, rule, environment, and date range. Data can be exported for external analysis.","intents":["Understand which permission rules are being enforced most frequently","Identify users or teams hitting permission limits and adjust policies accordingly","Detect potential security issues (e.g., repeated denial attempts from a user)","Generate usage reports for billing or capacity planning"],"best_for":["Organizations needing visibility into API usage and permission enforcement","Teams optimizing permission policies based on real-world usage patterns","Platforms with multiple customers needing per-customer usage reports"],"limitations":["Analytics are based on decision logs — no visibility into requests that were never made due to client-side filtering","Aggregation queries on large datasets (millions of decisions) may be slow","No real-time analytics — reports are typically updated with a delay (minutes to hours)"],"requires":["Cloud storage for decision logs","Analytics engine (SQL database, data warehouse, etc.)","Dashboard UI for visualizing reports"],"input_types":["permission decision logs (user, rule, decision, timestamp, context)"],"output_types":["aggregated metrics (counts, percentages, trends)","visualizations (charts, graphs, heatmaps)","exportable reports (CSV, JSON, PDF)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46636786__cap_9","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.user.and.team.based.permission.scoping","name":"user and team-based permission scoping","description":"Allows permission rules to reference user identity and team membership to enforce different policies for different users or teams. Rules can specify conditions like 'allow only if user is in admin team' or 'limit tokens per user per day'. User and team information is passed in request context and matched against rule conditions. The system supports dynamic team membership (e.g., from LDAP or SAML) without requiring rule updates.","intents":["Enforce different permission policies for different users or teams","Limit API usage on a per-user or per-team basis","Restrict access to specific models or features to certain teams","Support multi-tenant scenarios where each customer has different permissions"],"best_for":["Multi-tenant platforms where different customers have different permission tiers","Organizations with role-based access control (RBAC) requirements","Teams needing to enforce different policies for different departments or projects"],"limitations":["User and team information must be passed in request context — requires integration with identity system","Dynamic team membership requires real-time lookups, adding latency","No built-in support for hierarchical teams or complex organizational structures"],"requires":["User identity in request context (user ID, email, etc.)","Team membership information (passed in context or fetched from identity provider)","Rule conditions that reference user/team attributes"],"input_types":["user ID or email","team membership list","user attributes (role, department, etc.)"],"output_types":["permission decision scoped to user/team","user-specific limits (token quota, rate limit, etc.)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":34,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Claude API key (from Anthropic)","Network access to the cloud-hosted decision table service","Modern web browser with JavaScript support","Claude SDK or HTTP client integration point","Access to request metadata (user ID, model, token count, etc.)","Connection to the cloud decision table service for rule fetching","Request context object with user ID, role, and other relevant attributes","Decision table with defined conditions and operators","Synchronous execution environment (no async condition evaluation)","Cloud storage for rule versions and audit logs"],"failure_modes":["Cloud dependency — requires internet connectivity and external service availability","Decision table complexity scales poorly beyond ~50-100 rules without optimization","No built-in role-based access control (RBAC) for the UI itself — all users with access see all rules","Synchronous rule evaluation adds latency (~10-50ms per request depending on rule complexity)","No built-in caching of rule decisions — each request re-evaluates the full decision table","Requires integration at the API call layer — cannot retroactively block already-sent requests","Condition evaluation is O(n) where n is the number of rules — no indexing or optimization for large rule sets","Custom attribute matching requires the attribute to be explicitly passed in request context","No support for regex or pattern matching in string conditions — only exact match or simple operators","Audit logs grow unbounded — no built-in retention policy or archival","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.36,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.46,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.691Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-04T08:10:06.239Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec"}},"signature":"z9KT0fkUff5k60OuZCcNg+GJBU52nrlF/1MkjCkjfsjDOH4+nw4Y29GX1g62KudcpiXLdVtqm07ZK1vJ/YHcDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T08:59:56.795Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=control-claude-permissions-using-a-cloud-based-dec","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}