{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_conch","slug":"conch","name":"Conch","type":"product","url":"https://www.getconch.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/conch","categories":["text-writing","testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_conch__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.ai.assisted.essay.composition.with.real.time.generation","name":"ai-assisted essay composition with real-time generation","description":"Generates essay drafts and sections using language models with context awareness of user-provided prompts, research materials, and writing style preferences. The system maintains coherence across multi-paragraph outputs by tracking essay structure and previously generated content, enabling iterative refinement of thesis statements, body paragraphs, and conclusions without losing thematic continuity.","intents":["Generate a complete essay draft from a topic and outline in under 5 minutes","Expand a thesis statement into a full introductory paragraph with proper academic tone","Create multiple alternative versions of a section to compare writing approaches","Maintain consistent voice and argumentation across an entire essay"],"best_for":["Academic writers seeking AI assistance while maintaining institutional integrity","Students learning essay structure who want AI-generated examples to study","Non-native English speakers needing help with academic writing conventions"],"limitations":["Generated content may require substantial editing to meet specific assignment rubrics","No guarantee of factual accuracy in claims — requires manual verification against sources","Context window limitations may cause inconsistency in essays exceeding 5,000 words","Cannot generate content for specialized domains (medical, legal) without domain-specific training"],"requires":["Active Conch account with paid subscription tier","Internet connection for real-time LLM inference","Essay prompt or outline as structured input"],"input_types":["text (essay topic, outline, partial drafts)","structured metadata (assignment requirements, word count targets, citation style)"],"output_types":["text (generated essay sections, full drafts)","formatted text (with embedded citation placeholders)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","academic-writing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.integrated.plagiarism.detection.with.originality.scoring","name":"integrated plagiarism detection with originality scoring","description":"Scans generated and user-written content against a database of published academic works, web sources, and previously submitted essays using fingerprinting and semantic similarity matching. Returns an originality score (0-100%) with highlighted sections flagged as potential matches, enabling writers to identify and revise problematic passages before submission to institutions.","intents":["Verify that AI-generated essay sections don't match existing published work","Identify which specific sentences or phrases are flagged as non-original","Get a confidence score on whether an essay will pass institutional plagiarism checks","Understand the source of flagged content to properly attribute or rewrite it"],"best_for":["Students required to submit essays through institutional plagiarism detection systems","Educators wanting to verify student work integrity before grading","Academic institutions implementing AI writing policies that require originality verification"],"limitations":["Detection accuracy depends on database coverage — may miss plagiarism from very recent publications or niche sources","Semantic matching can produce false positives for common academic phrases (e.g., 'In conclusion, this essay has demonstrated')","Does not detect paraphrased plagiarism that restructures sentences while maintaining meaning","Requires periodic database updates to catch newly published sources"],"requires":["Paid Conch subscription with plagiarism detection tier","Complete essay text or section to scan (minimum 100 words recommended)","Access to Conch's plagiarism database (proprietary or licensed third-party)"],"input_types":["text (full essays, essay sections, paragraphs)","formatted documents (with or without citations)"],"output_types":["structured data (originality score, match percentage)","annotated text (with highlighted flagged sections and source links)","report (detailed breakdown of matches by source)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.research.integration.with.citation.extraction.and.source.management","name":"research integration with citation extraction and source management","description":"Ingests research materials (PDFs, web articles, academic papers) and extracts key citations, quotes, and source metadata (author, publication date, DOI) into a structured format. Automatically generates in-text citations and bibliography entries in multiple citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago) and embeds source references directly into generated essay content, reducing manual citation formatting work.","intents":["Import research papers and automatically extract citations for use in essays","Generate properly formatted bibliography entries without manual lookup","Ensure all AI-generated claims are backed by cited sources","Switch between citation styles (APA to MLA) without reformatting entire essay"],"best_for":["Academic researchers managing large literature reviews with dozens of sources","Students unfamiliar with citation formatting conventions","Institutions requiring consistent citation style across student submissions"],"limitations":["OCR accuracy on scanned PDFs may introduce errors in author names or publication dates","Does not extract citations from images or non-text-based content","Requires manual verification of extracted metadata — automated extraction is ~95% accurate","Limited to citation styles supported by Conch (may not support specialized formats like IEEE or ACS)"],"requires":["Research materials in supported formats (PDF, web URL, plain text)","Conch account with research integration feature enabled","Optional: DOI or ISBN for automatic metadata lookup"],"input_types":["file (PDF documents)","text (web URLs, plain text passages)","structured data (DOI, ISBN, publication metadata)"],"output_types":["structured data (extracted citations with metadata)","formatted text (in-text citations in specified style)","bibliography (formatted reference list)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multi.style.essay.generation.with.tone.and.voice.customization","name":"multi-style essay generation with tone and voice customization","description":"Generates essays in multiple academic and professional writing styles (formal academic, persuasive, analytical, narrative) with configurable tone parameters (formal/casual, confident/cautious, technical/accessible). Uses style-specific prompting and post-generation filtering to ensure output matches the requested voice, enabling users to generate multiple versions of the same content for different audiences or assignment requirements.","intents":["Generate an essay in formal academic tone for a university assignment","Create a persuasive version of the same argument for a debate or opinion piece","Adjust tone from overly technical to accessible for a general audience","Generate multiple style variations to compare which best fits assignment requirements"],"best_for":["Students writing for multiple classes with different style expectations","Non-native English speakers learning academic writing conventions","Professional writers adapting content for different publication venues"],"limitations":["Style customization may reduce content quality if parameters conflict with topic requirements","Tone adjustments are applied post-generation and may not affect deep structural choices","Limited to predefined style templates — custom style training not available","Persuasive and narrative styles may introduce bias or unsupported claims if not carefully reviewed"],"requires":["Conch account with style customization feature","Clear specification of desired writing style and tone parameters","Essay topic or outline"],"input_types":["text (essay topic, outline, partial draft)","structured metadata (style preference, tone parameters, target audience)"],"output_types":["text (essay in specified style)","multiple variants (different style versions of same content)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","academic-writing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.iterative.essay.refinement.with.revision.suggestions","name":"iterative essay refinement with revision suggestions","description":"Analyzes generated or user-written essay sections and provides targeted revision suggestions for clarity, argumentation strength, evidence support, and academic tone. Uses rubric-aware evaluation (if user provides assignment rubric) to prioritize suggestions that address specific grading criteria. Enables one-click acceptance of suggestions with automatic content replacement, supporting iterative improvement without manual rewriting.","intents":["Get specific feedback on why a paragraph is weak and how to strengthen it","Ensure essay meets assignment rubric requirements before submission","Improve argumentation by identifying unsupported claims","Refine academic tone and eliminate colloquialisms"],"best_for":["Students revising essays before submission to meet rubric criteria","Writers seeking AI-powered peer review feedback","Educators using Conch to provide automated feedback on student drafts"],"limitations":["Suggestions are heuristic-based and may not align with specific instructor preferences","Cannot evaluate subjective criteria like 'originality of thought' or 'creativity'","One-click acceptance may introduce inconsistencies if suggestions conflict with user intent","Rubric-aware suggestions require manual rubric input — no automatic rubric detection from assignment documents"],"requires":["Conch account with revision feature enabled","Complete essay section or full essay (minimum 200 words)","Optional: assignment rubric in text or structured format"],"input_types":["text (essay sections or full essays)","structured data (assignment rubric with criteria and weights)"],"output_types":["structured data (revision suggestions with priority ranking)","annotated text (suggestions embedded with explanations)","revised text (with one-click suggestion acceptance)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.outline.generation.and.essay.structure.planning","name":"outline generation and essay structure planning","description":"Generates detailed essay outlines from a topic, thesis statement, or assignment prompt, with hierarchical structure (main sections, subsections, key points). Outlines include suggested argument flow, counterargument placement, and evidence allocation. Users can edit the outline before generation, ensuring the essay follows their intended structure rather than AI-determined organization.","intents":["Create a structured outline from a vague essay topic to clarify thinking","Plan argument flow and identify where counterarguments should be addressed","Allocate word count across sections based on outline structure","Ensure essay follows a logical progression before writing"],"best_for":["Students struggling with essay organization and structure","Writers planning complex arguments with multiple counterarguments","Educators teaching essay structure by showing AI-generated outlines as examples"],"limitations":["Generated outlines may not match specific assignment structure requirements (e.g., 5-paragraph vs. longer format)","Counterargument placement is heuristic-based and may not suit all argument types","Outline depth is limited by context window — very long essays may require manual outline expansion","No validation that outline actually supports the thesis statement"],"requires":["Conch account with outline generation feature","Essay topic or thesis statement","Optional: assignment requirements or preferred essay structure"],"input_types":["text (essay topic, thesis statement, assignment prompt)","structured metadata (preferred outline depth, section count)"],"output_types":["structured data (hierarchical outline with main sections and subsections)","annotated outline (with suggested argument points and evidence types)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_6","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.institutional.plagiarism.system.compatibility.and.reporting","name":"institutional plagiarism system compatibility and reporting","description":"Generates plagiarism reports in formats compatible with institutional submission systems (Turnitin, Canvas, Blackboard) and provides transparency about AI-generated vs. human-written content. Reports include metadata about which sections were AI-generated, enabling institutions to apply appropriate policies for AI-assisted work. Supports institutional compliance workflows where educators need to verify both originality and AI usage.","intents":["Submit essays with plagiarism reports that institutions will accept","Disclose AI usage to instructors in a standardized format","Verify that AI-generated content is properly flagged before institutional submission","Ensure essays meet institutional AI usage policies"],"best_for":["Students at institutions with strict plagiarism checking requirements","Educators implementing AI writing policies that require disclosure","Institutions developing AI usage guidelines for student work"],"limitations":["Report format compatibility depends on institution's plagiarism system — not all systems supported","AI-generated content detection is heuristic-based and may have false positives/negatives","Institutions may not have policies for AI-assisted work, making disclosure unclear","Reports do not guarantee institutional acceptance — policies vary by school and instructor"],"requires":["Conch account with institutional reporting feature","Knowledge of institution's plagiarism system (Turnitin, Canvas, etc.)","Complete essay with AI-generated and human-written sections clearly marked"],"input_types":["text (complete essay)","structured metadata (institution type, plagiarism system, AI usage disclosure)"],"output_types":["report (plagiarism report in institutional format)","annotated essay (with AI-generated sections flagged)","metadata (AI usage disclosure document)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_conch__cap_7","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.real.time.writing.quality.feedback.and.grammar.correction","name":"real-time writing quality feedback and grammar correction","description":"Provides real-time feedback on grammar, syntax, clarity, and academic tone as users write or paste content. Uses NLP-based error detection to identify issues (subject-verb agreement, comma splices, passive voice overuse) with explanations and suggested corrections. Integrates with the essay editor to highlight errors inline and offer one-click fixes without disrupting the writing flow.","intents":["Catch grammar and syntax errors while writing rather than after completion","Understand why a sentence is grammatically incorrect and how to fix it","Reduce passive voice and improve clarity in academic writing","Get real-time feedback on tone and formality level"],"best_for":["Non-native English speakers learning academic writing conventions","Students writing under time pressure who need quick error detection","Writers seeking to improve writing quality without manual proofreading"],"limitations":["Real-time feedback may introduce latency in typing experience if processing is slow","Grammar detection is rule-based and may miss context-dependent errors","Suggestions for clarity are heuristic-based and may not match user intent","Cannot detect logical errors or unsupported claims — only surface-level writing quality"],"requires":["Conch account with real-time feedback feature","Active writing session in Conch editor","Minimum 50 words of content for meaningful feedback"],"input_types":["text (typed or pasted content in real-time)"],"output_types":["annotated text (with inline error highlighting)","structured data (error type, severity, suggested correction)","explanations (why the error occurred and how to fix it)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":41,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active Conch account with paid subscription tier","Internet connection for real-time LLM inference","Essay prompt or outline as structured input","Paid Conch subscription with plagiarism detection tier","Complete essay text or section to scan (minimum 100 words recommended)","Access to Conch's plagiarism database (proprietary or licensed third-party)","Research materials in supported formats (PDF, web URL, plain text)","Conch account with research integration feature enabled","Optional: DOI or ISBN for automatic metadata lookup","Conch account with style customization feature"],"failure_modes":["Generated content may require substantial editing to meet specific assignment rubrics","No guarantee of factual accuracy in claims — requires manual verification against sources","Context window limitations may cause inconsistency in essays exceeding 5,000 words","Cannot generate content for specialized domains (medical, legal) without domain-specific training","Detection accuracy depends on database coverage — may miss plagiarism from very recent publications or niche sources","Semantic matching can produce false positives for common academic phrases (e.g., 'In conclusion, this essay has demonstrated')","Does not detect paraphrased plagiarism that restructures sentences while maintaining meaning","Requires periodic database updates to catch newly published sources","OCR accuracy on scanned PDFs may introduce errors in author names or publication dates","Does not extract citations from images or non-text-based content","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.35000000000000003,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:30.281Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.561Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=conch","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=conch"}},"signature":"hQSCylqJBTzjWwve2l+8aqESeTBMcn2CR5VRmIujamQiJV07+pSMr+BxuabSJcn72kLYVrO18QQLN+Y4DzNmDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T22:46:06.402Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/conch","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/conch","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=conch","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}