{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_composabl","slug":"composabl","name":"Composabl","type":"product","url":"https://www.composabl.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/composabl","categories":["app-builders"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_0","uri":"capability://no.code.visual.ai.agent.builder","name":"visual-ai-agent-builder","description":"Drag-and-drop interface for constructing AI agents that control industrial systems without writing code. Users define agent behaviors, decision logic, and constraints through visual workflows rather than traditional programming.","intents":["I want to build an AI agent to control my manufacturing process without hiring data scientists","I need to create automation logic visually without writing code","I want to quickly prototype different agent behaviors for my industrial system"],"best_for":["Manufacturing engineers","Operations managers","Industrial automation teams without ML expertise"],"limitations":["Requires understanding of reinforcement learning concepts despite no-code interface","Complex multi-step processes may still require significant configuration","Visual interface may have scalability limits for very large agent definitions"],"requires":["Access to industrial system APIs or control interfaces","Basic understanding of agent reward functions","Clear definition of operational constraints and goals"],"input_types":["visual workflow definitions","system parameters","constraint specifications"],"output_types":["executable AI agent","agent configuration files"],"categories":["no-code","automation","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_1","uri":"capability://machine.learning.reinforcement.learning.agent.training","name":"reinforcement-learning-agent-training","description":"Trains AI agents using reinforcement learning from real operational feedback and sensor data rather than pre-labeled datasets. The agent learns optimal control policies by interacting with the industrial system and receiving reward signals.","intents":["I want my AI agent to learn the best way to control my process through trial and feedback","I need an agent that adapts to my unique manufacturing environment without labeled training data","I want to improve agent performance iteratively based on real operational results"],"best_for":["Manufacturers with unique or custom processes","Operations with limited historical labeled data","Teams willing to iterate on agent training over time"],"limitations":["Requires well-defined reward functions which can be non-obvious to specify","Training time varies significantly based on process complexity and feedback quality","May require careful tuning to avoid unsafe or suboptimal learned behaviors","Needs continuous sensor data and operational feedback during training"],"requires":["Real-time sensor data from industrial systems","Ability to safely test agent actions in production or simulation","Clear definition of success metrics and reward signals","Sufficient operational data for meaningful training"],"input_types":["sensor data streams","operational feedback","reward function definitions","system state information"],"output_types":["trained agent model","performance metrics","learning curves"],"categories":["machine-learning","automation","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_10","uri":"capability://deployment.agent.versioning.and.rollback","name":"agent-versioning-and-rollback","description":"Manages multiple versions of AI agents and enables rolling back to previous versions if a new agent version underperforms. Tracks agent evolution and allows safe updates to production agents.","intents":["I want to safely update my agent without risking production performance","I need to compare different agent versions and their performance","I want to quickly revert to a previous agent if a new version fails"],"best_for":["Production deployments requiring stability","Teams iterating on agent improvements","Operations with low tolerance for performance degradation"],"limitations":["Version management adds operational complexity","Rollback may not fully restore previous performance if conditions changed","Storage requirements grow with number of agent versions"],"requires":["Version control infrastructure","Performance baseline tracking","Deployment and rollback procedures","Version comparison tools"],"input_types":["agent configurations","trained agent models","performance metrics"],"output_types":["version history","comparison reports","deployment packages"],"categories":["deployment","operations","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.human.in.the.loop.control","name":"human-in-the-loop-control","description":"Allows human operators to intervene in or override agent decisions when necessary, maintaining human oversight while leveraging AI automation. Enables gradual transition from manual to autonomous control.","intents":["I want operators to be able to override the agent when needed","I need to gradually transition from manual to autonomous control","I want to maintain human oversight while using AI automation"],"best_for":["Operations transitioning to automation","Safety-critical processes requiring human oversight","Teams building operator confidence in AI"],"limitations":["Human intervention can interrupt agent learning","Requires training operators on when and how to intervene","May reduce efficiency gains if operators intervene too frequently","Inconsistent human decisions can confuse agent learning"],"requires":["Operator interface for monitoring and control","Clear procedures for intervention","Operator training and guidelines","Logging of human interventions"],"input_types":["agent recommendations","system state","operator commands"],"output_types":["control commands","intervention logs","override records"],"categories":["automation","human-ai-collaboration","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_12","uri":"capability://analytics.process.optimization.recommendations","name":"process-optimization-recommendations","description":"Analyzes agent behavior and operational data to provide recommendations for process improvements and optimization opportunities. Identifies patterns and suggests changes to improve efficiency or performance.","intents":["I want to understand what changes could improve my process performance","I need insights into optimization opportunities from my agent's learning","I want recommendations for process improvements based on operational data"],"best_for":["Operations seeking continuous improvement","Teams with data-driven decision-making culture","Processes with clear improvement metrics"],"limitations":["Recommendations are based on learned patterns which may not capture all factors","Implementation of recommendations requires domain expertise","Some recommendations may not be feasible due to constraints","Requires sufficient operational data for meaningful analysis"],"requires":["Trained agent with operational history","Performance metrics and KPIs","Process constraints and limitations","Domain knowledge for validation"],"input_types":["agent decision logs","operational data","performance metrics","process parameters"],"output_types":["optimization recommendations","improvement opportunities","impact analysis","implementation guidance"],"categories":["analytics","optimization","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.constraint.definition.and.enforcement","name":"constraint-definition-and-enforcement","description":"Allows users to define operational constraints, safety limits, and business rules that the AI agent must respect during decision-making. Ensures agents operate within acceptable parameters and don't violate critical constraints.","intents":["I need to ensure my AI agent never violates safety limits or equipment constraints","I want to define business rules that the agent must follow","I need to constrain agent actions to stay within regulatory or operational boundaries"],"best_for":["Safety-critical industrial operations","Regulated manufacturing environments","Operations with strict equipment or process limits"],"limitations":["Over-constraining can limit agent effectiveness and learning","Constraint conflicts may require manual resolution","Complex constraint interactions may be difficult to predict"],"requires":["Clear understanding of all critical constraints","Well-defined constraint boundaries and thresholds","Ability to express constraints in the platform's constraint language"],"input_types":["constraint specifications","safety limits","business rules","operational boundaries"],"output_types":["constraint enforcement policies","constraint violation alerts"],"categories":["automation","safety","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.autonomous.process.control","name":"autonomous-process-control","description":"Enables trained AI agents to autonomously make decisions and control industrial processes in real-time without human intervention. The agent continuously monitors system state and executes optimal control actions based on its learned policy.","intents":["I want my manufacturing process to run autonomously with AI making real-time control decisions","I need to reduce manual intervention and human decision-making in my operations","I want to optimize process performance continuously without operator input"],"best_for":["Continuous manufacturing processes","Operations with high decision frequency","Processes where human response time is a bottleneck"],"limitations":["Requires robust sensor infrastructure and real-time data availability","Agent failures or unexpected scenarios may require fallback to manual control","Continuous monitoring and oversight still needed for safety","May not handle novel situations outside training distribution"],"requires":["Trained and validated AI agent","Real-time sensor data feeds","System control interfaces and actuators","Monitoring and alerting infrastructure","Fallback procedures for agent failures"],"input_types":["real-time sensor data","system state information","operational parameters"],"output_types":["control commands","process adjustments","operational logs"],"categories":["automation","industrial","control-systems"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_4","uri":"capability://integration.sensor.data.integration","name":"sensor-data-integration","description":"Integrates with industrial sensor systems and data streams to provide real-time operational data to AI agents. Handles data ingestion, normalization, and streaming from various sensor types and industrial equipment.","intents":["I want to connect my sensors and equipment to the AI agent platform","I need to stream real-time data from my industrial systems to train and run agents","I want to normalize and process sensor data for agent consumption"],"best_for":["Operations with existing sensor infrastructure","Manufacturers with multiple data sources and equipment types","Systems requiring real-time data integration"],"limitations":["Data quality issues can significantly impact agent performance","Integration complexity varies based on equipment and sensor types","May require custom adapters for legacy or proprietary equipment","Data latency can affect real-time agent decision-making"],"requires":["Access to sensor systems and equipment APIs","Network connectivity to industrial systems","Understanding of data formats and protocols used","Data infrastructure for streaming and buffering"],"input_types":["sensor data streams","equipment APIs","industrial protocols","data feeds"],"output_types":["normalized data streams","processed sensor data","system state representations"],"categories":["integration","data","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_5","uri":"capability://monitoring.agent.performance.monitoring","name":"agent-performance-monitoring","description":"Tracks and visualizes AI agent performance metrics including decision quality, constraint violations, and operational outcomes. Provides dashboards and analytics to understand how well the agent is performing.","intents":["I want to see how well my AI agent is performing in production","I need to track whether the agent is meeting its objectives and constraints","I want to identify when the agent is underperforming or needs retraining"],"best_for":["Operations managers overseeing AI agents","Teams iterating on agent training and improvement","Regulated environments requiring performance documentation"],"limitations":["Metrics are only as good as the defined reward functions","May not capture all aspects of operational success","Real-time monitoring can have performance overhead"],"requires":["Trained and deployed agent","Clear performance metrics and KPIs","Historical operational data for comparison","Monitoring infrastructure"],"input_types":["agent decision logs","operational outcomes","system metrics","constraint violation events"],"output_types":["performance dashboards","analytics reports","performance metrics","alerts and notifications"],"categories":["monitoring","analytics","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_6","uri":"capability://machine.learning.reward.function.configuration","name":"reward-function-configuration","description":"Allows users to define and configure reward functions that guide agent learning toward desired behaviors and outcomes. Users specify what actions and results the agent should optimize for without writing code.","intents":["I want to tell the agent what success looks like for my process","I need to define multiple objectives and trade-offs for the agent to optimize","I want to adjust what the agent is optimizing for based on business priorities"],"best_for":["Operations with clear success metrics","Teams willing to iterate on reward definitions","Processes with multiple competing objectives"],"limitations":["Reward function design is non-trivial and requires domain expertise","Poorly designed rewards can lead to unintended agent behaviors","Changing rewards mid-training can destabilize learning","Difficult to capture all nuances of real operational success"],"requires":["Clear understanding of operational objectives","Ability to quantify success metrics","Iterative refinement process","Domain knowledge of the process"],"input_types":["objective specifications","success metrics","business priorities","operational KPIs"],"output_types":["reward function definitions","optimization objectives"],"categories":["machine-learning","configuration","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_7","uri":"capability://testing.simulation.and.testing.environment","name":"simulation-and-testing-environment","description":"Provides a safe simulation environment where agents can be trained and tested without affecting real industrial systems. Allows users to validate agent behavior before deploying to production.","intents":["I want to test my agent safely before deploying it to my real process","I need to train agents without risking my production equipment","I want to simulate different scenarios and edge cases for my agent"],"best_for":["Safety-critical operations","Teams developing and iterating on agents","Operations with high cost of failure"],"limitations":["Simulation may not perfectly match real-world behavior","Agents trained only in simulation may not transfer well to production","Requires accurate process models for meaningful simulation","Simulation-to-reality gap can be significant"],"requires":["Process model or simulator","Accurate representation of system dynamics","Scenario definitions for testing","Validation criteria"],"input_types":["process models","scenario definitions","agent configurations","test parameters"],"output_types":["simulation results","agent behavior logs","performance metrics","validation reports"],"categories":["testing","simulation","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_8","uri":"capability://optimization.multi.objective.optimization","name":"multi-objective-optimization","description":"Enables agents to optimize for multiple competing objectives simultaneously, such as throughput, quality, energy efficiency, and cost. Handles trade-offs between different goals without requiring separate agents.","intents":["I want my agent to optimize for both speed and quality in my process","I need to balance multiple competing objectives like cost and environmental impact","I want to adjust the priority of different objectives without retraining"],"best_for":["Complex manufacturing processes with multiple KPIs","Operations with competing business objectives","Processes where trade-offs between goals are important"],"limitations":["Defining appropriate weights for competing objectives is challenging","Some objectives may be fundamentally incompatible","Pareto frontier exploration can be computationally expensive","User preferences for trade-offs may change over time"],"requires":["Multiple quantifiable objectives","Clear understanding of objective relationships","Ability to weight or prioritize objectives","Metrics for each objective"],"input_types":["multiple objective definitions","objective weights or priorities","constraint specifications"],"output_types":["multi-objective optimized policies","trade-off analysis","pareto frontier information"],"categories":["optimization","machine-learning","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_composabl__cap_9","uri":"capability://explainability.agent.behavior.explainability","name":"agent-behavior-explainability","description":"Provides insights into why an AI agent made specific decisions and what factors influenced its actions. Helps users understand and trust agent behavior through interpretability features.","intents":["I want to understand why my agent made a particular decision","I need to explain agent behavior to operators and stakeholders","I want to debug unexpected or suboptimal agent actions"],"best_for":["Safety-critical operations requiring transparency","Regulated industries with compliance requirements","Teams building trust in AI automation"],"limitations":["Reinforcement learning agents can be inherently difficult to interpret","Explanations may be complex or non-intuitive","Real-time explanation generation may have performance costs","Some agent behaviors may not have clear explanations"],"requires":["Trained agent with decision logs","System state and context information","Explainability infrastructure"],"input_types":["agent decisions","system states","decision context"],"output_types":["decision explanations","feature importance","decision rationale","visualization of decision factors"],"categories":["explainability","transparency","industrial"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Access to industrial system APIs or control interfaces","Basic understanding of agent reward functions","Clear definition of operational constraints and goals","Real-time sensor data from industrial systems","Ability to safely test agent actions in production or simulation","Clear definition of success metrics and reward signals","Sufficient operational data for meaningful training","Version control infrastructure","Performance baseline tracking","Deployment and rollback procedures"],"failure_modes":["Requires understanding of reinforcement learning concepts despite no-code interface","Complex multi-step processes may still require significant configuration","Visual interface may have scalability limits for very large agent definitions","Requires well-defined reward functions which can be non-obvious to specify","Training time varies significantly based on process complexity and feedback quality","May require careful tuning to avoid unsafe or suboptimal learned behaviors","Needs continuous sensor data and operational feedback during training","Version management adds operational complexity","Rollback may not fully restore previous performance if conditions changed","Storage requirements grow with number of agent versions","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.717Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.549Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=composabl","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=composabl"}},"signature":"uaR6c3YsY+y6FzSeFr855+gKNH5fRw1jfc7am+BXAm76UuicIhkeqEUjVR1Mnm7VNOXO6xY/TBLenLWWvnPxAw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T03:08:10.029Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/composabl","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/composabl","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=composabl","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}