{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_collectif","slug":"collectif","name":"Collectif","type":"product","url":"https://collectif.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/collectif","categories":["research-search"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_0","uri":"capability://research.automated.interview.transcription","name":"automated-interview-transcription","description":"Automatically transcribes audio or video recordings of user interviews into searchable text format. Converts spoken dialogue into written transcripts with minimal manual effort, enabling faster access to interview content.","intents":["I want to transcribe my user interviews without manually typing them out","I need searchable text versions of my recorded interviews quickly","I want to avoid the time cost of manual transcription services"],"best_for":["Product teams conducting regular user interviews","Research teams with limited transcription budgets","Distributed teams needing async access to interview content"],"limitations":["Accuracy depends on audio quality and speaker clarity","Poor audio, heavy accents, or background noise reduces transcription quality","May struggle with technical jargon specific to certain industries"],"requires":["Audio or video recording of interviews","Reasonable audio quality (clear speech, minimal background noise)"],"input_types":["audio files","video files"],"output_types":["text transcripts","searchable transcript documents"],"categories":["research","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_1","uri":"capability://research.ai.powered.interview.coding","name":"ai-powered-interview-coding","description":"Automatically analyzes interview transcripts and applies thematic codes or tags to relevant segments. Uses AI to identify patterns, themes, and key insights without manual line-by-line coding, dramatically reducing analysis time.","intents":["I want to code my interview transcripts without spending weeks on manual analysis","I need to identify recurring themes across multiple interviews quickly","I want to tag interview segments by topic or sentiment automatically"],"best_for":["Product teams analyzing 10+ interviews","Research teams without dedicated qualitative analysts","Companies seeking faster research turnaround times"],"limitations":["AI coding accuracy depends heavily on interview quality and clarity","May miss nuanced or implicit insights that human coders would catch","Requires clear, well-articulated interview responses to work effectively","May need manual review and refinement of AI-generated codes"],"requires":["Interview transcripts (text)","Clear, coherent interview content","Defined coding framework or taxonomy (optional but improves results)"],"input_types":["text transcripts"],"output_types":["coded segments","thematic tags","coded transcript documents"],"categories":["research","analysis","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_10","uri":"capability://research.research.template.library","name":"research-template-library","description":"Provides pre-built interview guides, research templates, and coding frameworks for common research scenarios. Enables teams to quickly start new research projects without building from scratch.","intents":["I want to run a user interview but don't know where to start","I need a template for a specific type of user research","I want to follow best practices for interview design"],"best_for":["Teams new to user research","Organizations seeking faster research project setup","Teams without dedicated research methodology expertise"],"limitations":["Templates may not fit all specific use cases","Requires customization for specific research questions","Template quality varies by research scenario"],"requires":["Defined research goals or questions"],"input_types":["research scenario selection"],"output_types":["interview guides","research templates","coding frameworks","methodology guides"],"categories":["research","templates"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_2","uri":"capability://research.automated.theme.extraction","name":"automated-theme-extraction","description":"Automatically identifies and extracts recurring themes, patterns, and key insights from coded interview data. Synthesizes findings across multiple interviews to surface the most important takeaways without manual synthesis work.","intents":["I want to extract key themes from my interviews without manually reading all transcripts","I need to identify the most important patterns across my user research","I want to generate research insights and findings automatically"],"best_for":["Product teams conducting 5+ interviews","Research teams needing rapid insight synthesis","Companies with limited research analysis capacity"],"limitations":["Themes are only as good as the underlying interview data quality","May miss subtle or context-dependent insights","Requires sufficient interview volume to identify meaningful patterns","May over-weight frequently mentioned but less important topics"],"requires":["Multiple coded interview transcripts","Sufficient interview volume (typically 5+ interviews)","Reasonably clear and coherent interview content"],"input_types":["coded transcripts","interview data"],"output_types":["theme summaries","insight reports","pattern analysis"],"categories":["research","analysis","automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_3","uri":"capability://collaboration.real.time.collaborative.review","name":"real-time-collaborative-review","description":"Enables multiple team members to simultaneously review, comment on, and discuss interview findings and coded segments in real-time. Allows distributed teams to collaborate on research analysis without scheduling synchronous meetings.","intents":["I want my distributed team to review research findings together without scheduling meetings","I need to gather feedback on interview insights from multiple stakeholders asynchronously","I want to enable team discussion and debate on research findings in one place"],"best_for":["Distributed or remote product teams","Teams with stakeholders across multiple time zones","Organizations seeking faster research feedback cycles"],"limitations":["Asynchronous collaboration may slow decision-making compared to real-time meetings","Requires team discipline to actively engage with shared content","May create information overload if too many concurrent discussions"],"requires":["Multiple team members with platform access","Internet connectivity","Coded interviews or research findings to review"],"input_types":["interview transcripts","coded segments","research findings"],"output_types":["comments","annotations","discussion threads","collaborative notes"],"categories":["collaboration","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_4","uri":"capability://research.interview.project.organization","name":"interview-project-organization","description":"Provides a centralized workspace to organize, store, and manage multiple interview projects, transcripts, and research artifacts. Allows teams to structure research work by project, participant, or research question.","intents":["I want to organize all my interview data in one searchable place","I need to keep track of multiple concurrent research projects","I want to structure my research data by project, cohort, or research question"],"best_for":["Teams conducting ongoing user research","Organizations managing multiple research initiatives","Companies needing centralized research data management"],"limitations":["Limited integration with external analytics or product data platforms","Manual data stitching required to connect research with other product metrics"],"requires":["Interview recordings or transcripts","Defined project structure or taxonomy"],"input_types":["audio files","video files","text transcripts","metadata"],"output_types":["organized project workspace","searchable research repository","project dashboards"],"categories":["research","productivity","organization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_5","uri":"capability://research.interview.search.and.retrieval","name":"interview-search-and-retrieval","description":"Enables full-text search across all interview transcripts and coded segments to quickly find relevant quotes, themes, or participant responses. Allows researchers to locate specific insights without manually reviewing entire transcripts.","intents":["I want to find all mentions of a specific feature or pain point across my interviews","I need to locate relevant quotes to support my research findings","I want to search for interviews by participant characteristics or responses"],"best_for":["Teams with large volumes of interview data","Researchers needing to validate findings with specific quotes","Product teams building evidence for feature decisions"],"limitations":["Search effectiveness depends on transcript quality and clarity","May miss implicit or indirect references to topics","Requires well-structured coding to enable semantic search"],"requires":["Transcribed interview data","Indexed transcript database"],"input_types":["search queries","text transcripts"],"output_types":["matching transcript segments","relevant quotes","search results with context"],"categories":["research","search"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_6","uri":"capability://research.research.insight.export","name":"research-insight-export","description":"Exports research findings, coded segments, themes, and insights in multiple formats for sharing with stakeholders or integration into reports. Enables researchers to package and present findings to non-technical audiences.","intents":["I want to export my research findings in a format I can share with executives","I need to create a research report with quotes and themes from my interviews","I want to present my findings in a specific format for my team or clients"],"best_for":["Research teams presenting findings to stakeholders","Product managers creating research reports","Agencies sharing research with clients"],"limitations":["Export format options may be limited","Complex visualizations may not export cleanly","Manual formatting may still be required for polished reports"],"requires":["Completed research analysis","Coded interviews and extracted themes"],"input_types":["coded transcripts","themes","insights"],"output_types":["PDF reports","Word documents","CSV exports","presentation-ready formats"],"categories":["research","reporting"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_7","uri":"capability://research.participant.metadata.tracking","name":"participant-metadata-tracking","description":"Captures and organizes metadata about interview participants including demographics, cohort information, and participant characteristics. Enables filtering and segmentation of insights by participant attributes.","intents":["I want to track who I interviewed and their key characteristics","I need to segment my research findings by participant type or demographic","I want to ensure I'm interviewing a diverse set of users"],"best_for":["Teams conducting segmented user research","Research teams needing to track participant diversity","Organizations analyzing insights by user cohort"],"limitations":["Metadata quality depends on consistent data entry","Limited ability to connect with external user databases","Manual participant information entry required"],"requires":["Participant information","Defined metadata schema or taxonomy"],"input_types":["participant demographics","user characteristics","cohort information"],"output_types":["participant profiles","segmented research views","cohort analysis"],"categories":["research","data-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_8","uri":"capability://research.custom.coding.framework.definition","name":"custom-coding-framework-definition","description":"Allows teams to define custom coding frameworks, taxonomies, or tag systems tailored to their specific research questions. Enables AI coding to work within a defined analytical structure rather than generating arbitrary codes.","intents":["I want to define my own coding scheme for my research","I need the AI to code interviews using my specific framework","I want to ensure consistent coding across my research team"],"best_for":["Teams with specific research frameworks or methodologies","Organizations needing consistent coding across multiple researchers","Research teams with domain-specific coding needs"],"limitations":["Requires upfront investment in defining coding framework","AI coding accuracy depends on framework clarity","Changes to framework may require re-coding existing interviews"],"requires":["Defined research questions or analytical framework","Clear code definitions and examples"],"input_types":["code definitions","taxonomy structure","coding guidelines"],"output_types":["custom coding framework","coded transcripts using custom codes"],"categories":["research","customization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_collectif__cap_9","uri":"capability://research.interview.comparison.and.contrast","name":"interview-comparison-and-contrast","description":"Enables side-by-side comparison of interview responses, themes, and insights across different participants or participant segments. Highlights similarities and differences in user perspectives and experiences.","intents":["I want to compare how different user segments answered the same question","I need to identify where user perspectives diverge or align","I want to understand differences in experience between user cohorts"],"best_for":["Teams conducting segmented research","Researchers analyzing user diversity","Product teams understanding different user needs"],"limitations":["Comparison effectiveness depends on interview consistency","May require manual interpretation of differences","Works best with structured interview questions"],"requires":["Multiple interviews with comparable structure","Participant segmentation or cohort information","Coded interview data"],"input_types":["coded transcripts","participant metadata","interview responses"],"output_types":["comparison matrices","side-by-side analysis","difference summaries"],"categories":["research","analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Audio or video recording of interviews","Reasonable audio quality (clear speech, minimal background noise)","Interview transcripts (text)","Clear, coherent interview content","Defined coding framework or taxonomy (optional but improves results)","Defined research goals or questions","Multiple coded interview transcripts","Sufficient interview volume (typically 5+ interviews)","Reasonably clear and coherent interview content","Multiple team members with platform access"],"failure_modes":["Accuracy depends on audio quality and speaker clarity","Poor audio, heavy accents, or background noise reduces transcription quality","May struggle with technical jargon specific to certain industries","AI coding accuracy depends heavily on interview quality and clarity","May miss nuanced or implicit insights that human coders would catch","Requires clear, well-articulated interview responses to work effectively","May need manual review and refinement of AI-generated codes","Templates may not fit all specific use cases","Requires customization for specific research questions","Template quality varies by research scenario","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.717Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.549Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=collectif","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=collectif"}},"signature":"YCWAXhUKgidqkKz5hXPUX6+Y8vEEBZDKPucEBkujzHiOkFTnwgWZiEVGa8J4biSEktb9Tl4bCj4bpPeqspyLCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T02:40:47.123Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/collectif","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/collectif","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=collectif","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}