{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt","slug":"codegpt","name":"CodeGPT","type":"extension","url":"https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=CSDN.csdn-codegpt","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/codegpt","categories":["code-editors"],"tags":["ai","c#","c++","chat","chatai","chatbot","chatsearch","code explanation","code generation","CodeGPT","codegt","copilot","go","gpt","java","javascript","llm","php","python","typescript"],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.context.aware.code.generation.from.natural.language.prompts","name":"context-aware code generation from natural language prompts","description":"Generates code snippets and functions by accepting natural language descriptions, leveraging the active editor's language context (detected file type, selected code region, and surrounding code structure) to produce syntactically correct output. The extension integrates with VS Code's language detection to infer the target language and applies language-specific formatting rules before inserting generated code into the editor.","intents":["I want to generate a function that does X without writing boilerplate from scratch","I need to quickly scaffold a code pattern for the language I'm currently working in","I want to generate code that matches the style and context of my existing codebase"],"best_for":["solo developers building prototypes and MVPs","teams seeking faster code scaffolding without context-switching to documentation","developers working across multiple languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, C#, PHP, Go) who want consistent generation workflows"],"limitations":["Generated code may require manual review for correctness; no static analysis validation before insertion","Limited to single-file context; cannot generate code that spans multiple files or requires cross-file refactoring","Accuracy depends on LLM backend quality; no fine-tuning for domain-specific code patterns"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Active internet connection for LLM API calls","API key or authentication token for underlying LLM service (OpenAI, Anthropic, or proprietary CSDN service)"],"input_types":["natural language text (English or Chinese)","selected code region (optional context)","file extension/language identifier"],"output_types":["code snippet (single function, class, or block)","formatted code matching target language syntax"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","developer-tools"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.explanation.and.documentation.generation","name":"code explanation and documentation generation","description":"Analyzes selected code blocks and generates natural language explanations of their functionality, including logic flow, variable usage, and algorithmic intent. The extension sends the selected code to the LLM backend with language-specific parsing hints, then formats the explanation as inline comments or standalone documentation that can be inserted back into the editor.","intents":["I need to understand what this legacy code block does without reading line-by-line","I want to generate documentation comments for code I just wrote","I need to explain code logic to a team member or in a code review"],"best_for":["developers maintaining legacy codebases with sparse documentation","teams conducting code reviews who need quick explanations of complex logic","junior developers learning new codebases or unfamiliar languages"],"limitations":["Explanations are generated without semantic analysis of the full codebase; may miss context-dependent behavior or side effects","Cannot generate accurate explanations for obfuscated or highly optimized code","Explanation quality varies by code complexity; simple code gets verbose explanations, complex logic may be oversimplified"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Selected code block (minimum 1 line, practical limit ~500 lines)","Active internet connection and valid LLM API credentials"],"input_types":["code snippet (selected text from editor)","language context (inferred from file extension)"],"output_types":["natural language explanation (English or Chinese)","formatted documentation comment (JSDoc, Python docstring, etc.)","inline comment blocks"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.chat.based.code.assistance.with.codebase.context","name":"chat-based code assistance with codebase context","description":"Provides a conversational interface within VS Code where developers can ask questions about code, request modifications, or seek debugging help. The chat maintains conversation history and can reference the currently selected code or open file as context, sending this context along with each message to the LLM backend to enable multi-turn conversations about specific code sections.","intents":["I want to ask follow-up questions about generated code without losing context","I need to debug an issue by describing the problem and getting suggestions iteratively","I want to refactor a function but need guidance on the best approach before committing changes"],"best_for":["developers who prefer conversational interaction over command-based code generation","teams using pair-programming workflows where chat provides a virtual pair-programmer","developers debugging complex issues who need iterative suggestions and explanations"],"limitations":["Conversation history is session-scoped; no persistence across VS Code restarts without manual export","Context window is limited by the underlying LLM's token limit; long conversations may lose early context","No integration with version control; cannot automatically apply suggested changes or track which suggestions were accepted"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Active internet connection","Valid LLM API credentials","Webview support in VS Code (standard in all modern versions)"],"input_types":["natural language text (English or Chinese)","selected code block (optional, auto-included in context)","conversation history (maintained in memory)"],"output_types":["natural language responses","code suggestions (inline or as separate blocks)","explanations and debugging guidance"],"categories":["text-generation-language","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_3","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.code.search.and.retrieval.via.semantic.understanding","name":"code search and retrieval via semantic understanding","description":"Enables searching for code patterns, functions, or logic by natural language description rather than keyword matching. The extension converts natural language queries into semantic embeddings and searches the current file or workspace for code that matches the intent, returning ranked results based on semantic similarity. This differs from regex or keyword search by understanding the meaning of code rather than literal text patterns.","intents":["I need to find the function that handles user authentication but I don't remember its exact name","I want to locate all error-handling patterns in my codebase that match a specific approach","I need to find similar code patterns to understand how a particular problem is solved elsewhere in the project"],"best_for":["developers navigating large or unfamiliar codebases","teams refactoring code who need to find all instances of a pattern across files","developers learning from existing code patterns without knowing exact function names or keywords"],"limitations":["Semantic search is slower than keyword search; results may take 1-5 seconds depending on codebase size","Accuracy depends on code clarity and naming conventions; poorly named functions may not match semantic queries","Limited to files in the current workspace; cannot search across multiple projects or external libraries","No ranking by relevance score; results are presented in file order rather than by semantic match strength"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Active internet connection for embedding generation","Valid LLM API credentials","Workspace with at least one code file"],"input_types":["natural language query (English or Chinese)","optional file type filter (e.g., 'Python files only')"],"output_types":["ranked list of code snippets","file paths and line numbers","preview of matching code blocks"],"categories":["search-retrieval","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.code.refactoring.with.syntax.preservation","name":"multi-language code refactoring with syntax preservation","description":"Accepts refactoring requests in natural language (e.g., 'extract this logic into a separate function', 'rename all instances of X to Y', 'convert this callback to async/await') and applies transformations while preserving language-specific syntax, indentation, and formatting. The extension parses the selected code using language-specific rules, applies the transformation via the LLM, and validates the output against the target language's syntax before insertion.","intents":["I want to extract a complex code block into a reusable function without manually managing parameters and return types","I need to refactor callback-based code to async/await but don't want to manually rewrite the entire block","I want to rename a variable across multiple lines while respecting scope and language-specific naming conventions"],"best_for":["developers performing large-scale refactoring who want to automate repetitive transformations","teams modernizing legacy code (e.g., converting callbacks to promises) across multiple files","solo developers who want to improve code structure without manual line-by-line editing"],"limitations":["Refactoring is limited to single-file scope; cannot automatically update function signatures across multiple files","Complex refactorings (e.g., extracting methods with complex dependencies) may produce incorrect code requiring manual fixes","No integration with version control; changes are not automatically committed or tracked","Refactoring quality depends on code clarity; obfuscated or highly optimized code may be incorrectly transformed"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Selected code block","Active internet connection and valid LLM API credentials","Target language support (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, C#, PHP, Go)"],"input_types":["natural language refactoring request","selected code block (minimum 1 line, practical limit ~500 lines)","language context (inferred from file extension)"],"output_types":["refactored code block","formatted code matching original indentation and style","optional explanation of changes made"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_5","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.test.case.generation.from.code.logic","name":"test case generation from code logic","description":"Analyzes a selected function or code block and automatically generates unit test cases covering common scenarios (happy path, edge cases, error conditions). The extension infers the function's input/output types and expected behavior, then generates tests in the appropriate framework for the detected language (Jest for JavaScript, pytest for Python, JUnit for Java, etc.), formatted and ready to insert into a test file.","intents":["I want to generate test cases for a function without manually writing boilerplate test code","I need to ensure my code has edge case coverage but don't want to manually enumerate all scenarios","I want to generate tests in the correct framework for my language without looking up syntax"],"best_for":["developers practicing test-driven development who want to accelerate test writing","teams improving code coverage without manual test authoring overhead","developers new to a language's testing frameworks who need syntax guidance"],"limitations":["Generated tests may not cover domain-specific edge cases; require manual review and augmentation","Test quality depends on function clarity; complex functions with implicit dependencies may generate incomplete tests","Cannot automatically mock external dependencies; tests may fail if functions call external APIs or databases","No integration with CI/CD pipelines; generated tests must be manually added to test suites and run"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Selected function or code block","Active internet connection and valid LLM API credentials","Target language support with test framework (Jest, pytest, JUnit, etc.)"],"input_types":["function or code block (selected text)","language context (inferred from file extension)","optional test framework preference"],"output_types":["test code in language-specific framework","multiple test cases covering happy path and edge cases","formatted and ready to insert into test file"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"vscode-csdn-csdn-codegpt__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.bug.detection.and.debugging.suggestions","name":"bug detection and debugging suggestions","description":"Analyzes selected code for common bugs, anti-patterns, and potential runtime errors (null pointer dereferences, type mismatches, off-by-one errors, etc.) and provides specific debugging suggestions. The extension sends code to the LLM with language-specific bug pattern hints, receives a list of potential issues with explanations, and displays them as inline diagnostics or in a dedicated panel with suggested fixes.","intents":["I have a bug but don't know where to start debugging; I want AI to identify potential issues","I want to catch common mistakes before running my code","I need suggestions on how to fix identified bugs without manually researching solutions"],"best_for":["developers debugging complex code who want a second opinion on potential issues","teams conducting code reviews who want to identify bugs before merging","junior developers learning to recognize common bug patterns"],"limitations":["Bug detection is heuristic-based; may produce false positives or miss subtle bugs that require runtime context","Cannot detect bugs that depend on external state or API responses","Suggestions are generic; may not account for framework-specific behavior or library quirks","No integration with debugger; cannot provide runtime values or execution traces"],"requires":["VS Code 1.50+","Selected code block or open file","Active internet connection and valid LLM API credentials"],"input_types":["code block or entire file","language context (inferred from file extension)"],"output_types":["list of potential bugs with descriptions","suggested fixes or debugging approaches","inline diagnostics in editor"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":38,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["VS Code 1.50+","Active internet connection for LLM API calls","API key or authentication token for underlying LLM service (OpenAI, Anthropic, or proprietary CSDN service)","Selected code block (minimum 1 line, practical limit ~500 lines)","Active internet connection and valid LLM API credentials","Active internet connection","Valid LLM API credentials","Webview support in VS Code (standard in all modern versions)","Active internet connection for embedding generation","Workspace with at least one code file"],"failure_modes":["Generated code may require manual review for correctness; no static analysis validation before insertion","Limited to single-file context; cannot generate code that spans multiple files or requires cross-file refactoring","Accuracy depends on LLM backend quality; no fine-tuning for domain-specific code patterns","Explanations are generated without semantic analysis of the full codebase; may miss context-dependent behavior or side effects","Cannot generate accurate explanations for obfuscated or highly optimized code","Explanation quality varies by code complexity; simple code gets verbose explanations, complex logic may be oversimplified","Conversation history is session-scoped; no persistence across VS Code restarts without manual export","Context window is limited by the underlying LLM's token limit; long conversations may lose early context","No integration with version control; cannot automatically apply suggested changes or track which suggestions were accepted","Semantic search is slower than keyword search; results may take 1-5 seconds depending on codebase size","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.48,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.35000000000000003,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:34.118Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:33.198Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=codegpt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=codegpt"}},"signature":"mtbmw1RtYCTiuOCvP2WoFdLXs2MOD9RCv0+5pcUyddMnyqvO8QDiynURurqU51IAyfeO3VQtSzBL3wddL5BMCQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T16:09:23.473Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/codegpt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/codegpt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=codegpt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}