{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","slug":"code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","name":"agentic-signal","type":"agent","url":"https://agentic-signal.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","categories":["automation"],"tags":["ai-agents","ai-automation","fortheloveofcode","gemma","gemma3n","hacktoberfest","llama","local-ai","local-llm","no-code","ollama","open-source","privacy-first","react-flow","typescript","visual-ai","visual-programming","workflow-automation","workflow-builder"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.visual.drag.and.drop.workflow.composition.with.react.flow.graph.editor","name":"visual drag-and-drop workflow composition with react-flow graph editor","description":"Enables users to construct AI agent workflows through a visual node-and-edge graph interface built on react-flow, where nodes represent discrete operations (LLM calls, data transforms, conditionals) and edges define execution flow. The platform serializes the visual graph into an executable workflow definition that can be interpreted by the runtime engine, supporting branching logic, loops, and multi-step orchestration without requiring code authoring.","intents":["I want to build a multi-step AI workflow without writing code","I need to visualize how my agent processes data through different stages","I want to quickly prototype and iterate on agent logic by dragging components around"],"best_for":["non-technical domain experts building automation workflows","teams prototyping agent behaviors before implementation","developers wanting rapid iteration on workflow topology"],"limitations":["Complex conditional logic may become difficult to visualize with many branches","No built-in version control for workflow graphs — requires external Git integration","Performance degrades with >100 nodes in a single workflow due to react-flow rendering overhead"],"requires":["React 16.8+ (hooks support)","Node.js 14+","Modern browser with Canvas/WebGL support"],"input_types":["node configuration objects","edge definitions (source/target node IDs)"],"output_types":["workflow graph JSON","executable workflow definition"],"categories":["automation-workflow","visual-programming"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.local.llm.integration.with.ollama.gemma.llama.runtime.abstraction","name":"local llm integration with ollama/gemma/llama runtime abstraction","description":"Abstracts multiple local LLM providers (Ollama, Gemma, Llama) behind a unified interface, allowing workflows to invoke language models without cloud dependencies. The platform manages model loading, prompt formatting, and response parsing through a provider-agnostic adapter pattern, enabling users to swap between local models or providers by changing configuration without modifying workflow logic.","intents":["I want to run AI workflows entirely on-premises without sending data to cloud APIs","I need to switch between different open-source models (Llama, Gemma) without rewriting my workflows","I want to control model parameters and inference settings locally"],"best_for":["enterprises with data privacy requirements","developers building offline-capable agents","teams avoiding vendor lock-in with proprietary LLM APIs"],"limitations":["Local inference is significantly slower than cloud APIs — expect 5-50x latency increase depending on hardware","Requires substantial local compute resources (GPU recommended for models >7B parameters)","No automatic model optimization or quantization — users must pre-quantize models for acceptable performance","Limited to open-source models; no native support for proprietary APIs like GPT-4 or Claude"],"requires":["Ollama 0.1+ installed and running locally, OR compatible Llama/Gemma runtime","8GB+ RAM minimum (16GB+ recommended for larger models)","GPU with CUDA/Metal support strongly recommended"],"input_types":["text prompts","structured prompt templates with variable substitution"],"output_types":["text completions","structured JSON (with prompt engineering)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_10","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.workflow.composition.with.multi.step.agent.orchestration","name":"workflow composition with multi-step agent orchestration","description":"Enables building multi-step agent workflows where each step can invoke an LLM, process results, and pass outputs to subsequent steps. The platform orchestrates the execution sequence, managing context and state across steps. Supports agent patterns like chain-of-thought, tool use, and iterative refinement through workflow composition without requiring agent framework code.","intents":["I want to build a multi-step reasoning agent that refines answers iteratively","I need to orchestrate tool use where an LLM decides which tools to call","I want to implement a chain-of-thought pattern where each step builds on previous results"],"best_for":["building complex reasoning agents without agent framework code","prototyping multi-step AI workflows visually","teams implementing domain-specific agent patterns"],"limitations":["No built-in agent frameworks (ReAct, etc.) — patterns must be manually composed","Limited context window management — no automatic summarization for long conversations","No native tool calling framework — requires custom nodes for tool integration","Difficult to implement dynamic agent behavior (e.g., variable number of steps)"],"requires":["Understanding of agent patterns and multi-step reasoning"],"input_types":["initial user input","workflow graph with multiple LLM nodes"],"output_types":["final agent output","execution trace showing reasoning steps"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.node.type.system.with.extensible.operation.library","name":"workflow node type system with extensible operation library","description":"Provides a library of pre-built node types (LLM inference, data transformation, conditionals, loops, API calls) that can be composed into workflows. Each node type encapsulates a specific operation with configurable inputs/outputs and execution semantics. The system supports custom node registration, allowing developers to extend the platform with domain-specific operations through a plugin-like mechanism without modifying core runtime.","intents":["I want to add custom operations (e.g., database queries, file I/O) to my workflows","I need standard building blocks like conditionals and loops without writing code","I want to create reusable node templates for common patterns in my domain"],"best_for":["developers extending the platform with custom operations","teams building domain-specific workflow libraries","organizations standardizing on workflow patterns"],"limitations":["Custom node registration requires TypeScript/JavaScript knowledge — not truly no-code for extensions","No built-in node versioning or backward compatibility guarantees for custom nodes","Limited error handling and validation framework for custom node implementations"],"requires":["TypeScript 4.5+ for custom node development","Understanding of node interface contract (inputs, outputs, execution function)"],"input_types":["node configuration objects","input port definitions with type annotations"],"output_types":["execution results","output port values"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.execution.engine.with.local.runtime.and.state.management","name":"workflow execution engine with local runtime and state management","description":"Interprets serialized workflow graphs and executes them sequentially or in parallel depending on graph topology, managing state across node executions. The engine handles control flow (branching, loops), error propagation, and intermediate result caching. Execution occurs entirely locally without cloud orchestration services, with state persisted in-memory or to local storage depending on configuration.","intents":["I want to execute my workflows without relying on external orchestration services","I need to debug workflows by inspecting intermediate state at each node","I want to handle errors gracefully and retry failed operations"],"best_for":["teams building self-contained agent systems","developers requiring full execution visibility and control","systems with strict data residency requirements"],"limitations":["No built-in persistence — workflow state is lost on process termination unless explicitly saved","Lacks distributed execution — cannot scale workflows across multiple machines","No native support for long-running workflows or scheduled execution (requires external scheduler)","Limited observability — no built-in metrics, tracing, or logging infrastructure"],"requires":["Node.js 14+ runtime","Sufficient memory for workflow state (scales with workflow complexity and data size)"],"input_types":["workflow graph JSON","initial input data","node execution context"],"output_types":["workflow execution result","execution trace/logs","intermediate state snapshots"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.privacy.first.data.handling.with.no.cloud.transmission","name":"privacy-first data handling with no cloud transmission","description":"Enforces a strict local-execution model where all workflow data, model inputs, and intermediate results remain on the user's machine. The platform does not transmit data to external APIs or cloud services by design, with no telemetry or analytics collection. This is achieved through exclusive use of local LLM runtimes and avoiding any cloud-dependent integrations in the core platform.","intents":["I need to process sensitive data without any cloud transmission","I want to ensure GDPR/HIPAA compliance by keeping data on-premises","I need to audit exactly what data my workflows process and where it goes"],"best_for":["healthcare/financial organizations with strict data residency requirements","teams handling PII or confidential business data","regulated industries requiring audit trails and data control"],"limitations":["Cannot integrate with cloud-based APIs or services (e.g., Stripe, Slack) without custom workarounds","No cloud backup or disaster recovery — data loss risk if local storage fails","Requires users to manage their own security, encryption, and access control","No built-in compliance reporting or audit logging framework"],"requires":["Secure local storage setup (user responsibility)","Network isolation if maximum security is required"],"input_types":["any data type (text, files, structured data)"],"output_types":["any data type (remains local)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.open.source.codebase.with.community.extensibility","name":"open-source codebase with community extensibility","description":"Published as open-source on GitHub with TypeScript implementation, enabling community contributions, auditing, and self-hosting. The codebase is structured for extensibility with clear separation between core runtime, UI components, and node implementations. Users can fork, modify, and deploy custom versions without licensing restrictions.","intents":["I want to audit the code to verify security and privacy claims","I need to customize the platform for my specific use case","I want to contribute improvements back to the community"],"best_for":["security-conscious organizations requiring code review","developers building custom forks for specialized domains","open-source communities contributing features"],"limitations":["Community-driven development means slower feature velocity compared to commercial platforms","No guaranteed SLA or professional support (community support only)","Requires technical expertise to self-host and maintain","Dependency management burden — users responsible for keeping dependencies patched"],"requires":["Git for cloning repository","Node.js 14+ and npm/yarn for building","TypeScript knowledge for meaningful contributions"],"input_types":["source code","pull requests"],"output_types":["modified codebase","custom builds"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.workflow.serialization.and.import.export.with.json.format","name":"workflow serialization and import/export with json format","description":"Serializes visual workflows to JSON format that captures node definitions, connections, and configurations. This enables workflows to be exported, version-controlled, shared, and imported across instances. The JSON schema is human-readable and can be manually edited or generated programmatically, supporting workflow-as-code patterns.","intents":["I want to version control my workflows in Git","I need to share workflows with team members or across environments","I want to generate workflows programmatically from templates or configurations"],"best_for":["teams using Git-based workflows and CI/CD","organizations sharing workflow templates across departments","developers building workflow generation tools"],"limitations":["No built-in schema validation — invalid JSON can cause silent failures","No migration framework for schema changes — manual updates required when platform evolves","Large workflows (>1000 nodes) produce unwieldy JSON files difficult to diff in Git","No compression or optimization — JSON format is verbose"],"requires":["JSON parser support (built into all modern platforms)"],"input_types":["workflow JSON files","programmatically generated JSON objects"],"output_types":["workflow JSON files","executable workflow definitions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.conditional.branching.and.loop.control.flow.in.workflows","name":"conditional branching and loop control flow in workflows","description":"Provides node types for conditional branching (if/else logic based on runtime values) and loops (iterate over collections or repeat until condition met). These control flow nodes evaluate expressions at runtime and direct execution to different paths based on results. Supports nested conditionals and loops for complex workflow logic without requiring code authoring.","intents":["I want to execute different workflow paths based on LLM output or data conditions","I need to iterate over a list of items and process each one","I want to repeat a workflow step until a condition is satisfied"],"best_for":["building adaptive workflows that respond to runtime data","processing collections or batches of items","implementing retry logic and error recovery"],"limitations":["Expression evaluation is limited to simple comparisons — no complex logic without custom nodes","Deeply nested conditionals become difficult to visualize and debug","No built-in loop optimization — inefficient for large collections (>10k items)","Limited debugging visibility into condition evaluation"],"requires":["Understanding of boolean logic and comparison operators"],"input_types":["runtime values from previous nodes","comparison expressions"],"output_types":["execution path selection","loop iteration results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.debugging.and.execution.tracing.with.node.level.inspection","name":"workflow debugging and execution tracing with node-level inspection","description":"Provides visibility into workflow execution through step-by-step tracing, allowing users to inspect intermediate values at each node, view execution logs, and identify where failures occur. The debugger captures input/output for each node execution and supports pausing/resuming execution for interactive debugging without requiring code-level debugging tools.","intents":["I want to understand why my workflow produced unexpected results","I need to inspect what data each node is processing","I want to pause execution and step through my workflow manually"],"best_for":["non-technical users troubleshooting workflow behavior","developers iterating on workflow logic","teams diagnosing production workflow failures"],"limitations":["Tracing overhead can slow execution significantly for large workflows","No built-in performance profiling — cannot identify bottleneck nodes","Limited log retention — traces may be lost on process restart without persistence","No distributed tracing support for workflows spanning multiple machines"],"requires":["Access to workflow execution environment"],"input_types":["workflow execution context"],"output_types":["execution traces","node input/output snapshots","error logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-code-forge-temple--agentic-signal__cap_9","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.prompt.templating.with.variable.substitution.and.context.injection","name":"prompt templating with variable substitution and context injection","description":"Supports dynamic prompt construction through template variables that are substituted with runtime values from previous workflow nodes. Templates can reference node outputs using placeholder syntax (e.g., {{nodeId.outputField}}), enabling context-aware prompts that adapt to workflow data. Supports filters and transformations on substituted values for formatting.","intents":["I want to build prompts that adapt based on previous workflow results","I need to inject user input or file contents into LLM prompts dynamically","I want to format data (dates, numbers) before including it in prompts"],"best_for":["building context-aware AI agents that respond to user input","processing variable-length inputs (documents, lists) in prompts","creating reusable prompt templates for different data"],"limitations":["No support for complex logic in templates — requires custom nodes for conditional prompt generation","Large context injection can exceed LLM token limits without warning","No built-in prompt optimization or compression","Limited debugging of template variable resolution"],"requires":["Understanding of template syntax and variable references"],"input_types":["prompt template strings","runtime values from workflow nodes"],"output_types":["resolved prompt strings ready for LLM inference"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":40,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["React 16.8+ (hooks support)","Node.js 14+","Modern browser with Canvas/WebGL support","Ollama 0.1+ installed and running locally, OR compatible Llama/Gemma runtime","8GB+ RAM minimum (16GB+ recommended for larger models)","GPU with CUDA/Metal support strongly recommended","Understanding of agent patterns and multi-step reasoning","TypeScript 4.5+ for custom node development","Understanding of node interface contract (inputs, outputs, execution function)","Node.js 14+ runtime"],"failure_modes":["Complex conditional logic may become difficult to visualize with many branches","No built-in version control for workflow graphs — requires external Git integration","Performance degrades with >100 nodes in a single workflow due to react-flow rendering overhead","Local inference is significantly slower than cloud APIs — expect 5-50x latency increase depending on hardware","Requires substantial local compute resources (GPU recommended for models >7B parameters)","No automatic model optimization or quantization — users must pre-quantize models for acceptable performance","Limited to open-source models; no native support for proprietary APIs like GPT-4 or Claude","No built-in agent frameworks (ReAct, etc.) — patterns must be manually composed","Limited context window management — no automatic summarization for long conversations","No native tool calling framework — requires custom nodes for tool integration","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.2353642876541145,"quality":0.47,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:21.549Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:59:57.743Z","last_commit":"2026-04-29T15:40:25Z"},"community":{"stars":151,"forks":19,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=code-forge-temple--agentic-signal"}},"signature":"Usqs5735Ye8/D0Ia4ToqD1OPnyS54+iflFvO+jnntqbLCt7PU6iKjOFrIkkH/kw5DSyUVNH3ef4c4AXNOarYCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:51:08.530Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=code-forge-temple--agentic-signal","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}