{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_cocounsel","slug":"cocounsel","name":"CoCounsel","type":"model","url":"https://casetext.com/cocounsel","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/cocounsel","categories":["research-search","documentation"],"tags":["legal-research","document-review","thomson-reuters","enterprise"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_0","uri":"capability://legal.contract.clause.analysis","name":"contract-clause-analysis","description":"Analyzes contract documents to identify, extract, and interpret specific clauses, obligations, and risk factors. Provides structured summaries of key terms, conditions, and potential legal implications within contracts.","intents":["I need to quickly understand what obligations my company is taking on in this vendor agreement","Find all liability limitation clauses across these 50 contracts and flag unusual terms","What are the renewal and termination conditions in this lease?"],"best_for":["Corporate legal departments","In-house counsel reviewing vendor/supplier agreements","M&A teams conducting due diligence"],"limitations":["May misinterpret ambiguous or non-standard clause language","Cannot reliably identify implications of multi-jurisdictional contract interactions","Requires human review for high-stakes or novel contract structures"],"requires":["Contract document in text or PDF format","CoCounsel platform access","Legal domain knowledge to validate outputs"],"input_types":["PDF documents","Word documents","Plain text contracts"],"output_types":["Structured clause summaries","Risk flagging reports","Obligation matrices"],"categories":["legal","document-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_1","uri":"capability://legal.batch.document.review","name":"batch-document-review","description":"Processes large volumes of documents (discovery sets, regulatory filings, internal communications) to identify relevant documents, extract key information, and categorize by legal relevance or privilege status. Enables rapid triage of document collections.","intents":["We have 100,000 emails to review for litigation discovery—help us identify the 5% that are actually relevant","Flag all documents that might contain attorney-client privilege before we produce them","Categorize these regulatory filings by compliance risk level"],"best_for":["Large law firms handling complex litigation","Corporate legal teams managing regulatory investigations","In-house counsel conducting internal investigations"],"limitations":["May miss nuanced relevance judgments that require deep case context","Privilege determination requires human verification to avoid waiver","Performance degrades on highly technical or domain-specific documents"],"requires":["Document collection in digital format (PDF, email, text)","Clear search parameters or relevance criteria","CoCounsel platform with sufficient processing capacity"],"input_types":["Email archives","PDF document sets","Word documents","Text files"],"output_types":["Relevance-scored document lists","Privilege flags","Category assignments","Summary reports"],"categories":["legal","document-review"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_10","uri":"capability://legal.litigation.risk.assessment","name":"litigation-risk-assessment","description":"Analyzes case facts, documents, and legal precedent to assess litigation risk, predict likely outcomes, and identify key vulnerabilities or strengths in a legal position. Helps attorneys evaluate settlement value and litigation strategy.","intents":["What's our realistic chance of winning this case based on the facts and law?","What are the biggest risks in our legal position?","How do similar cases typically resolve?"],"best_for":["Litigation attorneys evaluating case strategy","In-house counsel assessing litigation costs vs. settlement","Trial teams preparing for trial"],"limitations":["Cannot predict actual judge or jury behavior","Risk assessments are probabilistic and require attorney judgment","Effectiveness depends on completeness of case information","May miss jurisdiction-specific factors or judicial preferences","Should not be sole basis for litigation decisions"],"requires":["Complete case facts and documents","Applicable legal precedent","CoCounsel platform access","Attorney expertise to interpret results"],"input_types":["Case pleadings","Discovery materials","Legal precedent","Factual narratives"],"output_types":["Risk assessments","Outcome predictions","Vulnerability analyses","Strength/weakness summaries"],"categories":["legal","litigation-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_11","uri":"capability://legal.contract.generation.assistance","name":"contract-generation-assistance","description":"Assists in drafting new contracts by suggesting language, identifying missing clauses, and ensuring consistency with company templates and legal requirements. Provides clause libraries and precedent language for common contract types.","intents":["Draft a vendor agreement using our standard template and this scope of work","What clauses are missing from this employment agreement?","Suggest indemnification language for this service agreement"],"best_for":["In-house counsel drafting routine contracts","Legal teams seeking to standardize contract language","Business teams creating contract first drafts"],"limitations":["Generated language requires attorney review and customization","May not account for industry-specific or jurisdiction-specific requirements","Cannot replace experienced contract counsel for complex deals","Suggested language may not reflect company risk preferences"],"requires":["Contract template or precedent","Deal terms and parameters","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Contract templates","Deal terms","Existing contract drafts"],"output_types":["Contract language suggestions","Clause libraries","Missing clause identification","Redline suggestions"],"categories":["legal","document-generation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_2","uri":"capability://legal.legal.research.synthesis","name":"legal-research-synthesis","description":"Searches Thomson Reuters' legal database and case law to answer legal research questions, synthesizing relevant cases, statutes, and regulations into coherent research summaries. Integrates with Casetext's platform for seamless citation and source verification.","intents":["What's the current state of law on non-compete enforceability in California?","Find cases where courts have interpreted this specific statute provision","Summarize the legal precedent on damages calculations for breach of contract claims"],"best_for":["Associates conducting legal research","Solo practitioners and small firms seeking research efficiency","In-house counsel researching novel legal questions"],"limitations":["Tendency to hallucinate or misattribute case citations","May miss recent case law or jurisdiction-specific nuances","Cannot reliably handle multi-jurisdictional comparative analysis","Requires verification of all citations before use in legal documents"],"requires":["CoCounsel platform access","Access to Thomson Reuters legal database","Clear research question or legal topic"],"input_types":["Natural language legal questions","Case citations","Statute references"],"output_types":["Research summaries","Case citations with summaries","Statute interpretations","Precedent analysis"],"categories":["legal","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_3","uri":"capability://legal.deposition.preparation.assistant","name":"deposition-preparation-assistant","description":"Analyzes case documents, prior testimony, and discovery materials to prepare deposition outlines, identify key topics, and suggest questioning strategies. Helps attorneys anticipate witness responses and develop line-of-questioning frameworks.","intents":["Create a deposition outline for this witness based on their emails and prior statements","What are the key inconsistencies in the defendant's testimony across these three depositions?","Suggest follow-up questions to lock down testimony on the timeline of events"],"best_for":["Litigation attorneys preparing for depositions","Trial teams developing witness examination strategies","Corporate counsel preparing for regulatory depositions"],"limitations":["Cannot predict actual witness behavior or credibility assessments","May miss subtle inconsistencies requiring deep case knowledge","Suggested questions require attorney judgment and ethical review","Effectiveness depends on quality and completeness of source documents"],"requires":["Case documents and discovery materials","Prior testimony or witness statements","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Deposition transcripts","Email and document discovery","Prior witness statements","Case pleadings"],"output_types":["Deposition outlines","Question suggestions","Inconsistency reports","Witness profile summaries"],"categories":["legal","litigation-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_4","uri":"capability://legal.case.timeline.generation","name":"case-timeline-generation","description":"Extracts temporal information from case documents, discovery materials, and witness statements to automatically construct chronological timelines of events. Identifies gaps, inconsistencies, and key dates relevant to legal claims.","intents":["Build a timeline of all communications between the parties from these 500 emails","When did the defendant know about the defect? Show me the evidence in chronological order","Identify all dates mentioned in the contract and related correspondence"],"best_for":["Litigation teams managing complex multi-party disputes","Trial preparation teams creating visual evidence presentations","Attorneys analyzing causation and knowledge elements"],"limitations":["May miss implicit dates or temporal references requiring inference","Cannot resolve conflicting date information without human judgment","Effectiveness depends on document completeness and clarity","Requires verification against source documents"],"requires":["Case documents with temporal references","Email archives or correspondence","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Email collections","Document discovery sets","Witness statements","Deposition transcripts"],"output_types":["Chronological timelines","Date-indexed document references","Gap analysis reports","Inconsistency flags"],"categories":["legal","litigation-support"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_5","uri":"capability://legal.privilege.and.confidentiality.detection","name":"privilege-and-confidentiality-detection","description":"Scans documents to identify attorney-client privileged communications, work product, and confidential information before production or disclosure. Flags documents requiring redaction or withholding.","intents":["Before we produce these documents in discovery, flag anything that might be privileged","Identify all attorney-client communications in this email archive","Which documents contain confidential business information that needs redaction?"],"best_for":["Litigation teams managing discovery obligations","Corporate counsel overseeing document production","Law firms handling regulatory investigations"],"limitations":["Privilege determinations are fact-specific and require attorney review","May miss nuanced privilege claims or waiver issues","Cannot reliably identify all confidential information without context","Over-flagging can create unnecessary review burden"],"requires":["Document collection in digital format","Clear privilege and confidentiality policies","Attorney review and final determination authority"],"input_types":["Email archives","Document collections","Internal communications"],"output_types":["Privilege flags","Confidentiality markers","Redaction recommendations","Privilege log entries"],"categories":["legal","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_6","uri":"capability://legal.regulatory.compliance.analysis","name":"regulatory-compliance-analysis","description":"Analyzes documents and business practices against applicable regulatory requirements and compliance frameworks. Identifies potential violations, gaps in compliance documentation, and risk areas requiring remediation.","intents":["Are our data handling practices compliant with GDPR requirements?","Review these employment policies against current labor law requirements","Identify gaps in our anti-corruption compliance program"],"best_for":["In-house counsel managing regulatory compliance","Corporate legal teams conducting compliance audits","Compliance officers seeking legal analysis"],"limitations":["Regulatory landscape changes frequently; requires current training data","May miss jurisdiction-specific requirements or recent regulatory updates","Cannot provide definitive compliance opinions without expert review","Effectiveness varies by regulatory domain and complexity"],"requires":["Applicable regulatory framework or statute references","Company policies and practices documentation","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Company policies","Regulatory requirements","Compliance documentation","Business process descriptions"],"output_types":["Compliance gap reports","Risk assessments","Remediation recommendations","Regulatory requirement summaries"],"categories":["legal","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_7","uri":"capability://legal.due.diligence.document.analysis","name":"due-diligence-document-analysis","description":"Processes acquisition or investment target documents to extract key financial, legal, and operational information. Identifies material contracts, liabilities, regulatory issues, and other factors relevant to deal valuation and risk assessment.","intents":["We're acquiring this company—summarize all material contracts and their key terms","What litigation or regulatory issues does this target have?","Identify all debt obligations and contingent liabilities from these documents"],"best_for":["M&A teams conducting acquisition due diligence","Investment firms evaluating portfolio companies","Corporate development teams assessing deal risks"],"limitations":["May miss subtle financial or legal risks requiring expert judgment","Effectiveness depends on completeness of due diligence materials","Cannot replace professional valuation or financial analysis","Requires verification by experienced deal counsel"],"requires":["Target company documents (contracts, financials, filings)","Deal parameters and risk criteria","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Contracts and agreements","Financial statements","Regulatory filings","Corporate records"],"output_types":["Material contract summaries","Liability inventories","Risk assessment reports","Deal issue lists"],"categories":["legal","due-diligence"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_8","uri":"capability://legal.legal.document.summarization","name":"legal-document-summarization","description":"Generates concise summaries of lengthy legal documents including contracts, court filings, regulations, and case opinions. Extracts key points, obligations, and implications while preserving critical details.","intents":["Summarize this 50-page contract in plain language for the business team","What are the key holdings and reasoning in this court decision?","Give me a one-page summary of this regulatory guidance document"],"best_for":["Attorneys communicating with non-legal stakeholders","Business teams needing legal document context","Attorneys managing high-volume document review"],"limitations":["May oversimplify complex legal nuances or edge cases","Summaries require verification against source documents","Cannot capture all context-dependent implications","Quality varies based on document clarity and structure"],"requires":["Legal document in text or PDF format","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Contracts","Court opinions","Regulatory documents","Legal memoranda"],"output_types":["Executive summaries","Plain-language summaries","Key point extractions","Obligation summaries"],"categories":["legal","document-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_cocounsel__cap_9","uri":"capability://legal.legal.question.answering","name":"legal-question-answering","description":"Answers specific legal questions based on case documents, contracts, and legal research. Provides citations to source materials and explains reasoning, enabling attorneys to quickly find answers without manual document review.","intents":["What are the payment terms specified in Section 4 of this agreement?","Did the defendant admit liability in any of these discovery responses?","What damages are recoverable under this statute?"],"best_for":["Attorneys seeking quick answers from case documents","Paralegals supporting legal research","In-house counsel answering business questions"],"limitations":["Answers require verification against source documents","May miss nuanced context or conflicting information","Cannot reliably answer questions requiring legal judgment","Effectiveness depends on document clarity and completeness"],"requires":["Relevant source documents uploaded to CoCounsel","Clear, specific legal questions","CoCounsel platform access"],"input_types":["Natural language questions","Case documents","Contracts","Discovery materials"],"output_types":["Direct answers with citations","Source document references","Explanation of reasoning"],"categories":["legal","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":35,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Contract document in text or PDF format","CoCounsel platform access","Legal domain knowledge to validate outputs","Document collection in digital format (PDF, email, text)","Clear search parameters or relevance criteria","CoCounsel platform with sufficient processing capacity","Complete case facts and documents","Applicable legal precedent","Attorney expertise to interpret results","Contract template or precedent"],"failure_modes":["May misinterpret ambiguous or non-standard clause language","Cannot reliably identify implications of multi-jurisdictional contract interactions","Requires human review for high-stakes or novel contract structures","May miss nuanced relevance judgments that require deep case context","Privilege determination requires human verification to avoid waiver","Performance degrades on highly technical or domain-specific documents","Cannot predict actual judge or jury behavior","Risk assessments are probabilistic and require attorney judgment","Effectiveness depends on completeness of case information","May miss jurisdiction-specific factors or judicial preferences","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.21666666666666667,"quality":0.6,"ecosystem":0.37,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:29.717Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.563Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=cocounsel","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=cocounsel"}},"signature":"jfANbv/bHL8u7fOzSLP4+isQ7t+VlRjAOia7Wz2S/cCoHGRixOtPXiidPWhrLkXnFGh7YJWINsaMKBOzcGN/Bw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:39:10.771Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/cocounsel","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/cocounsel","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=cocounsel","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}